Two related regulatory sequences are required for maximal induction of Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 transcription

Activation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae HIS3 results in Gcn4p-dependent, SWI/SNF-dependent mobilization of nucleosomes over the entire gene

The effects of transcriptional activation on the chromatin structure of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HIS3 gene were addressed by mapping the precise positions of nucleosomes in uninduced and induced chromatin. In the absence of the Gcn4p activator, the HIS3 gene is organized into a predominant nucleosomal array. In wild-type chromatin, this array is disrupted, and several alternative overlapping nucleosomal arrays are formed. The disruption of the predominant array also requires the SWI/SNF remodeling machine, indicating that the SWI/SNF complex plays an important role in nucleosome mobilization over the entire HIS3 gene. The Isw1 remodeling complex plays a more subtle role in determining nucleosome positions on HIS3, favoring positions different from those preferred by the SWI/SNF complex. Both the SWI/SNF and Isw1 complexes are constitutively present in HIS3 chromatin, although Isw1 tends to be excluded from the HIS3 promoter. Despite the apparent disorder of HIS3 chromatin generated by the formation of multiple nucleosomal arrays, nucleosome density profiles indicate that some long-range order is always present. We propose that Gcn4p stimulates nucleosome mobilization over the entire HIS3 gene by the SWI/SNF complex. We suggest that the net effect of interplay among remodeling machines at HIS3 is to create a highly dynamic chromatin structure.

SWI/SNF-dependent long-range remodeling of yeast HIS3 chromatin

Current models for the role of the SWISNF chromatin remodeling complex in gene regulation are focused on promoters, where the most obvious changes in chromatin structure occur. Here we present evidence that the SWISNF complex is involved in the remodeling of the chromatin structure of an entire gene in vivo. We compared the native chromatin structures of a small yeast plasmid containing the HIS3 gene purified from uninduced and induced cells. Relative to uninduced chromatin, induced chromatin displayed a large reduction in negative supercoiling, a large reduction in sedimentation rate, and increased accessibility to restriction enzymes with sites located both near and far from the HIS3 promoter. These observations indicate that the entire plasmid was remodeled as a result of induction. Loss of supercoiling required the presence of the SWISNF remodeling complex and the activator Gcn4p in vivo. The TATA boxes were not required, suggesting that remodeling was not the result of transcription. The induction-dependent loss of negative supercoiling was not apparent in cells, indicating that the supercoils were lost preferentially from induced chromatin during purification. Thus, induced HIS3 chromatin has a highly labile structure that is revealed as a result of purification. It is concluded that induction of HIS3 creates a domain of labile chromatin structure that extends far beyond the promoter to include the entire gene. We propose that the SWISNF complex is recruited to the HIS3 promoter by Gcn4p and then directs remodeling of a chromatin domain, with important implications for transcription.

Preferential accessibility of the yeast his3 promoter is determined by a general property of the DNA sequence, not by specific elements

Yeast promoter regions are often more accessible to nuclear proteins than are nonpromoter regions. As assayed by HinfI endonuclease cleavage in living yeast cells, HinfI sites located in the promoters of all seven genes tested were 5- to 20-fold more accessible than sites in adjacent nonpromoter regions. HinfI hypersensitivity within the his3 promoter region is locally determined, since it was observed when this region was translocated to the middle of the ade2 structural gene. Detailed analysis of the his3 promoter indicated that preferential accessibility is not determined by specific elements such as the Gcn4 binding site, poly(dA-dT) sequences, TATA elements, or initiator elements or by transcriptional activity. However, progressive deletion of the promoter region in either direction resulted in a progressive loss of HinfI accessibility. Preferential accessibility is independent of the Swi-Snf chromatin remodeling complex, Gcn5 histone acetylase complexes Ada and SAGA, and Rad6, which ubiquitinates histone H2B. These results suggest that preferential accessibility of the his3 (and presumably other) promoter regions is determined by a general property of the DNA sequence (e.g., base composition or a related feature) rather than by defined sequence elements. The organization of the compact yeast genome into inherently distinct promoter and nonpromoter regions may ensure that transcription factors bind preferentially to appropriate sites in promoters rather than to the excess of irrelevant but equally high-affinity sites in nonpromoter regions.

Inactivation of the UAS1 of STA1 by glucose and STA10 and identification of two loci, SNS1 and MSS1, involved in STA10-dependent repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

It has been reported that two upstream activation sites, UAS1 and UAS2, exist in the 5' non-coding region of the STA1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. diastaticus. Based on studies using a UAS1STA1-CYC1-lacZ fusion, we divided UAS1 into two subsites, UAS1-1 and UAS1-2. The activation of the CYC1 promoter by UAS1STA1 was repressed by glucose in the culture medium and by the STA10 gene. The MATa/MAT alpha mating type configuration did not, however, affect UAS1STA1 activation. The UAS1STA1-CYC1-lacZ expression system was used to study STA10 repression further. A mutant insensitive to STA10-dependent repression was isolated. This sns1 mutation was not linked to STA10 and partially overcame the repressive effect of STA10 at the transcriptional level. From a genomic library constructed in the UAS1STA1-CYC1-lacZ expression vector, the MSS1 locus (multicopy suppressor of sns1) was isolated. This suppression of the sns1 mutation by multiple copies of the MSS1 locus occurred at the transcriptional level. When a gene disruption experiment was performed to examine the effect of a mss1 mutation, the sns1 mss1 double mutants produced 4 times higher levels of STA1 transcripts in the presence of STA10 than did the sns1 strain. Data presented in this paper suggest that both SNS1 and MSS1 loci are involved in STA10-dependent repression.

Protein kinase A mediates growth-regulated expression of yeast ribosomal protein genes by modulating RAP1 transcriptional activity

Yeast ribosomal protein genes are coordinately regulated as a function of cell growth; RNA levels decrease during amino acid starvation but increase following a carbon source upshift. Binding sites for RAP1, a multifunctional transcription factor, are present in nearly all ribosomal protein genes and are associated with growth rate regulation. We show that ribosomal protein mRNA levels are increased twofold in strains that have constitutively high levels of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase A [PKA]) activity. The PKA-dependent induction requires RAP1 binding sites, and it reflects increased transcriptional activation by RAP1. Growth-regulated transcription of ribosomal protein genes strongly depends on the ability to regulate PKA activity. Cells with constitutively high PKA levels do not show the transcriptional decrease in response to amino acid starvation. Conversely, in cells with constitutively low PKA activity, ribosomal protein mRNAs levels are lower and largely uninducible upon carbon source upshift. We suggest that modulation of RAP1 transcriptional activity by PKA accounts for growth-regulated expression of ribosomal protein genes.

Protein kinase A mediates growth-regulated expression of yeast ribosomal protein genes by modulating RAP1 transcriptional activity

Yeast ribosomal protein genes are coordinately regulated as a function of cell growth; RNA levels decrease during amino acid starvation but increase following a carbon source upshift. Binding sites for RAP1, a multifunctional transcription factor, are present in nearly all ribosomal protein genes and are associated with growth rate regulation. We show that ribosomal protein mRNA levels are increased twofold in strains that have constitutively high levels of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase A [PKA]) activity. The PKA-dependent induction requires RAP1 binding sites, and it reflects increased transcriptional activation by RAP1. Growth-regulated transcription of ribosomal protein genes strongly depends on the ability to regulate PKA activity. Cells with constitutively high PKA levels do not show the transcriptional decrease in response to amino acid starvation. Conversely, in cells with constitutively low PKA activity, ribosomal protein mRNAs levels are lower and largely uninducible upon carbon source upshift. We suggest that modulation of RAP1 transcriptional activity by PKA accounts for growth-regulated expression of ribosomal protein genes.

Mutations in the three largest subunits of yeast RNA polymerase II that affect enzyme assembly

Mutations in the three largest subunits of yeast RNA polymerase II (RPB1, RPB2, and RPB3) were investigated for their effects on RNA polymerase II structure and assembly. Among 23 temperature-sensitive mutations, 6 mutations affected enzyme assembly, as assayed by immunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged subunits. In all six assembly mutants, RNA polymerase II subunits synthesized at the permissive temperature were incorporated into stably assembled, immunoprecipitable enzyme and remained stably associated when cells were shifted to the nonpermissive temperature, whereas subunits synthesized at the nonpermissive temperature were not incorporated into a completely assembled enzyme. The observation that subunit subcomplexes accumulated in assembly-mutant cells at the nonpermissive temperature led us to investigate whether these subcomplexes were assembly intermediates or merely byproducts of mutant enzyme instability. The time course of assembly of RPB1, RPB2, and RPB3 was investigated in wild-type cells and subsequently in mutant cells. Glycerol gradient fractionation of extracts of cells pulse-labeled for various times revealed that a subcomplex of RPB2 and RPB3 appears soon after subunit synthesis and can be chased into fully assembled enzyme. The RPB2-plus-RPB3 subcomplexes accumulated in all RPB1 assembly mutants at the nonpermissive temperature but not in an RPB2 or RPB3 assembly mutant. These data indicate that RPB2 and RPB3 form a complex that subsequently interacts with RPB1 during the assembly of RNA polymerase II.

Mutations in the three largest subunits of yeast RNA polymerase II that affect enzyme assembly

Mutations in the three largest subunits of yeast RNA polymerase II (RPB1, RPB2, and RPB3) were investigated for their effects on RNA polymerase II structure and assembly. Among 23 temperature-sensitive mutations, 6 mutations affected enzyme assembly, as assayed by immunoprecipitation of epitope-tagged subunits. In all six assembly mutants, RNA polymerase II subunits synthesized at the permissive temperature were incorporated into stably assembled, immunoprecipitable enzyme and remained stably associated when cells were shifted to the nonpermissive temperature, whereas subunits synthesized at the nonpermissive temperature were not incorporated into a completely assembled enzyme. The observation that subunit subcomplexes accumulated in assembly-mutant cells at the nonpermissive temperature led us to investigate whether these subcomplexes were assembly intermediates or merely byproducts of mutant enzyme instability. The time course of assembly of RPB1, RPB2, and RPB3 was investigated in wild-type cells and subsequently in mutant cells. Glycerol gradient fractionation of extracts of cells pulse-labeled for various times revealed that a subcomplex of RPB2 and RPB3 appears soon after subunit synthesis and can be chased into fully assembled enzyme. The RPB2-plus-RPB3 subcomplexes accumulated in all RPB1 assembly mutants at the nonpermissive temperature but not in an RPB2 or RPB3 assembly mutant. These data indicate that RPB2 and RPB3 form a complex that subsequently interacts with RPB1 during the assembly of RNA polymerase II.

Synergistic transcriptional enhancement does not depend on the number of acidic activation domains bound to the promoter

Many eukaryotic transcriptional activator proteins contain a DNA-binding domain that interacts with specific promoter sequences and an acidic activation region that is required to stimulate transcription. Transcriptional enhancement by such activator proteins is often synergistic and promiscuous; promoters containing multiple binding sites for an individual protein or even for unrelated proteins can be 10-100 times more active than promoters with single sites. It has been suggested that such synergy reflects a nonlinear response of the basic transcription machinery to the number and/or quality of acidic activation regions. Here, we determine the transcriptional activity of Jun-Fos heterodimers containing one or two GCN4 acidic activation regions on promoters containing one or two Ap-1 target sites. Surprisingly, heterodimers with one or two acidic regions activate transcription with similar efficiency and are equally synergistic (10- to 15-fold) on promoters containing two target sites. Thus, transcriptional synergy does not depend on the number of acidic activation regions but rather on the number of proteins bound to the promoter. This suggests that synergy is mediated either by cooperative DNA binding or by alternative mechanisms in which the DNA-binding domain plays a more direct role in transcription (e.g., changes in DNA structure, nucleosome displacement, or direct interactions with the transcriptional machinery).

Mutations that define the optimal half-site for binding yeast GCN4 activator protein and identify an ATF/CREB-like repressor that recognizes similar DNA sites

The yeast GCN4 transcriptional activator protein binds as a dimer to a dyad-symmetric sequence, indicative of a protein-DNA complex in which two protein monomers interact with adjacent half-sites. However, the optimal GCN4 recognition site, ATGA(C/G)TCAT, is inherently asymmetric because it contains an odd number of base pairs and because mutation of the central C.G base pair strongly reduces specific DNA binding. From this asymmetry, we suggested previously that GCN4 interacts with nonequivalent and possibly overlapping half-sites (ATGAC and ATGAG) that have different affinities. Here, we examine the nature of GCN4 half-sites by creating symmetrical derivatives of the optimal GCN4 binding sequence that delete or insert a single base pair at the center of the site. In vitro, GCN4 bound efficiently to the sequence ATGACGTCAT, whereas it failed to bind to ATGAGCTCAT or ATGATCAT. These observations strongly suggest that (i) GCN4 specifically recognizes the central base pair, (ii) the optimal half-site for GCN4 binding is ATGAC, not ATGAG, and (iii) GCN4 is a surprisingly flexible protein that can accommodate the insertion of a single base pair in the center of its compact binding site. The ATGACGTCAT sequence strongly resembles sites bound by the yeast and mammalian ATF/CREB family of proteins, suggesting that GCN4 and the ATF/CREB proteins recognize similar half-sites but have different spacing requirements. Unexpectedly, in the context of the his3 promoter, the ATGACGTCAT derivative reduced transcription below the basal level in a GCN4-independent manner, presumably reflecting DNA binding by a distinct ATF/CREB-like repressor protein. In other promoter contexts, however, the same site acted as a weak upstream activating sequence.

Mutations that define the optimal half-site for binding yeast GCN4 activator protein and identify an ATF/CREB-like repressor that recognizes similar DNA sites

The yeast GCN4 transcriptional activator protein binds as a dimer to a dyad-symmetric sequence, indicative of a protein-DNA complex in which two protein monomers interact with adjacent half-sites. However, the optimal GCN4 recognition site, ATGA(C/G)TCAT, is inherently asymmetric because it contains an odd number of base pairs and because mutation of the central C.G base pair strongly reduces specific DNA binding. From this asymmetry, we suggested previously that GCN4 interacts with nonequivalent and possibly overlapping half-sites (ATGAC and ATGAG) that have different affinities. Here, we examine the nature of GCN4 half-sites by creating symmetrical derivatives of the optimal GCN4 binding sequence that delete or insert a single base pair at the center of the site. In vitro, GCN4 bound efficiently to the sequence ATGACGTCAT, whereas it failed to bind to ATGAGCTCAT or ATGATCAT. These observations strongly suggest that (i) GCN4 specifically recognizes the central base pair, (ii) the optimal half-site for GCN4 binding is ATGAC, not ATGAG, and (iii) GCN4 is a surprisingly flexible protein that can accommodate the insertion of a single base pair in the center of its compact binding site. The ATGACGTCAT sequence strongly resembles sites bound by the yeast and mammalian ATF/CREB family of proteins, suggesting that GCN4 and the ATF/CREB proteins recognize similar half-sites but have different spacing requirements. Unexpectedly, in the context of the his3 promoter, the ATGACGTCAT derivative reduced transcription below the basal level in a GCN4-independent manner, presumably reflecting DNA binding by a distinct ATF/CREB-like repressor protein. In other promoter contexts, however, the same site acted as a weak upstream activating sequence.

RNA polymerase II mutants defective in transcription of a subset of genes

Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II conditional mutants that selectively disrupt the synthesis of specific mRNAs were isolated. At the permissive temperature, several of the mutants were inositol auxotrophs as a result of inadequate induction of INO1 transcription. The transcriptional defects exhibited by one of these Ino- mutants (rpb2-2) were further investigated. The induction of GAL10 and HIS4 transcription in rpb2-2 strains was similar to that of wild-type strains, in contrast to the lack of induction of INO1 transcription. When shifted to the nonpermissive temperature, cells containing rpb2-2 continued to accumulate some mRNAs but not others. Together, these results indicate that transcription of specific genes can be disrupted by RNA polymerase II mutations. The rpb2-2 allele alters an amino acid residue that occurs in a highly conserved segment of the RPB2 protein and that is shared by homologous subunits in other species.

RNA polymerase II mutants defective in transcription of a subset of genes

Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA polymerase II conditional mutants that selectively disrupt the synthesis of specific mRNAs were isolated. At the permissive temperature, several of the mutants were inositol auxotrophs as a result of inadequate induction of INO1 transcription. The transcriptional defects exhibited by one of these Ino- mutants (rpb2-2) were further investigated. The induction of GAL10 and HIS4 transcription in rpb2-2 strains was similar to that of wild-type strains, in contrast to the lack of induction of INO1 transcription. When shifted to the nonpermissive temperature, cells containing rpb2-2 continued to accumulate some mRNAs but not others. Together, these results indicate that transcription of specific genes can be disrupted by RNA polymerase II mutations. The rpb2-2 allele alters an amino acid residue that occurs in a highly conserved segment of the RPB2 protein and that is shared by homologous subunits in other species.

RNA polymerase II subunit RPB3 is an essential component of the mRNA transcription apparatus

To improve our understanding of RNA polymerase II, the gene that encodes its third-largest subunit, RPB3, was isolated from a lambda gt11 DNA library by using antibody probes. The RPB3 DNA sequence predicts a 318-amino-acid protein whose sequence was confirmed, in part, by microsequence analysis of the gel-purified RNA polymerase II subunit. RPB3 was found to be an essential single-copy gene that is tightly linked to HIS6 on chromosome IX. An RPB3 temperature-sensitive mutant that arrested growth after three to four generations at the restrictive temperature was isolated. When the mutant was shifted to the restrictive temperature, RNA polymerase II could no longer assemble, previously assembled functional enzyme was depleted, and mRNA levels were consequently reduced. These results demonstrate that RPB3 is an essential component of the mRNA transcription apparatus. Finally, the RPB3 protein is similar in sequence and length to RPC5, a subunit common to RNA polymerases I and III, suggesting that these subunits may play similar roles in RNA polymerases I, II, and III.

RNA polymerase II subunit RPB3 is an essential component of the mRNA transcription apparatus

To improve our understanding of RNA polymerase II, the gene that encodes its third-largest subunit, RPB3, was isolated from a lambda gt11 DNA library by using antibody probes. The RPB3 DNA sequence predicts a 318-amino-acid protein whose sequence was confirmed, in part, by microsequence analysis of the gel-purified RNA polymerase II subunit. RPB3 was found to be an essential single-copy gene that is tightly linked to HIS6 on chromosome IX. An RPB3 temperature-sensitive mutant that arrested growth after three to four generations at the restrictive temperature was isolated. When the mutant was shifted to the restrictive temperature, RNA polymerase II could no longer assemble, previously assembled functional enzyme was depleted, and mRNA levels were consequently reduced. These results demonstrate that RPB3 is an essential component of the mRNA transcription apparatus. Finally, the RPB3 protein is similar in sequence and length to RPC5, a subunit common to RNA polymerases I and III, suggesting that these subunits may play similar roles in RNA polymerases I, II, and III.

A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

A series of yeast shuttle vectors and host strains has been created to allow more efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Transplacement vectors were constructed and used to derive yeast strains containing nonreverting his3, trp1, leu2 and ura3 mutations. A set of YCp and YIp vectors (pRS series) was then made based on the backbone of the multipurpose plasmid pBLUESCRIPT. These pRS vectors are all uniform in structure and differ only in the yeast selectable marker gene used (HIS3, TRP1, LEU2 and URA3). They possess all of the attributes of pBLUESCRIPT and several yeast-specific features as well. Using a pRS vector, one can perform most standard DNA manipulations in the same plasmid that is introduced into yeast.

Functional relationship among TATA sequences, gene induction and transcription initiation in the beta-galactosidase, LAC4, gene from Kluyveromyces lactis

In the 5' non-coding region of the beta-galactosidase, LAC4, gene of Kluyveromyces lactis, three TATA-like sequences are present at -230, -170 and -142 from the ATG translation start site. By means of deletion mutations in the TATA region, at least two of these TATA sequences, those at -230 and -142, were shown to be required for normal gene expression. Evidence is presented for a functional hierarchy and cooperation between these TATA sequences. The deletion or a change in the position of the TATA sequences affects both beta-galactosidase induction and the location of RNA initiation sites. The TATA sequence at -230 alone is sufficient for correct gene induction when it is moved to a position 41 bp from the major RNA initiation sites located around -110; the -142 TATA alone contributes only partly to gene induction. We suggest a functional distinction between these two related regulatory sequences. This functional distinction might be established by sequence differences and/or targets of unlike specific DNA binding protein(s). A conformational analysis of the LAC4 promoter showed that under torsional stress the functional elements UAS, TATA boxes RNA initiation sites and ATG can be detected as P1-sensitive sites. Possible functions of DNA structural alterations on gene expression are discussed.

A regulatory region responsible for proline-specific induction of the yeast PUT2 gene is adjacent to its TATA box

Deletion analysis of the promoter of the PUT2 gene that functions in the proline utilization pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified a PUT2 upstream activation site (UAS). It is contained within a single 40-base-pair (bp) region located immediately upstream of the TATA box and is both necessary and sufficient for proline induction. When placed upstream of a CYC7-lacZ gene fusion, the 40-bp sequence conferred proline regulation on CYC7-lacZ. A 35-bp deletion within the PUT2 UAS in an otherwise intact PUT2 promoter resulted in noninducible expression of a PUT2-lacZ gene fusion. When a plasmid bearing this UAS-deleted promoter was placed in a strain carrying a constitutive mutation in the positive regulatory gene PUT3, expression of PUT2-lacZ was not constitutive but occurred at levels below those found under noninducing conditions. In heterologous as well as homologous gene fusions, the PUT2 UAS appeared to be responsible for uninduced as well as proline-induced levels of expression. Although located immediately adjacent to the PUT2 UAS, the TATA box did not appear to play a regulatory role, as indicated by the results of experiments in which it was replaced by the CYC7 TATA box. A 26-bp sequence containing this TATA box was critical to the expression of PUT2, since a deletion of this region completely abolished transcriptional activity of the gene under both inducing and noninducing conditions. Our results indicate that the PUT2 promoter has a comparatively simple structure, requiring UAS and TATA sequences as well as the PUT3 gene product (directly or indirectly) for its expression.

A regulatory region responsible for proline-specific induction of the yeast PUT2 gene is adjacent to its TATA box

Deletion analysis of the promoter of the PUT2 gene that functions in the proline utilization pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae identified a PUT2 upstream activation site (UAS). It is contained within a single 40-base-pair (bp) region located immediately upstream of the TATA box and is both necessary and sufficient for proline induction. When placed upstream of a CYC7-lacZ gene fusion, the 40-bp sequence conferred proline regulation on CYC7-lacZ. A 35-bp deletion within the PUT2 UAS in an otherwise intact PUT2 promoter resulted in noninducible expression of a PUT2-lacZ gene fusion. When a plasmid bearing this UAS-deleted promoter was placed in a strain carrying a constitutive mutation in the positive regulatory gene PUT3, expression of PUT2-lacZ was not constitutive but occurred at levels below those found under noninducing conditions. In heterologous as well as homologous gene fusions, the PUT2 UAS appeared to be responsible for uninduced as well as proline-induced levels of expression. Although located immediately adjacent to the PUT2 UAS, the TATA box did not appear to play a regulatory role, as indicated by the results of experiments in which it was replaced by the CYC7 TATA box. A 26-bp sequence containing this TATA box was critical to the expression of PUT2, since a deletion of this region completely abolished transcriptional activity of the gene under both inducing and noninducing conditions. Our results indicate that the PUT2 promoter has a comparatively simple structure, requiring UAS and TATA sequences as well as the PUT3 gene product (directly or indirectly) for its expression.

ATR1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene encoding a transmembrane protein required for aminotriazole resistance

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (aminotriazole) competitively inhibits the activity of imidazoleglycerolphosphate dehydratase, the product of the HIS3 gene. Wild-type strains are able to grow in the presence of 10 mM aminotriazole because they induce the level of imidazoleglycerolphosphate dehydratase. However, strains containing gcn4 mutations are unable to grow in medium containing aminotriazole because they lack the GCN4 transcriptional activator protein necessary for the coordinate induction of HIS3 and other amino acid biosynthetic genes. Here, we isolated a new gene, designated ATR1, which when present in multiple copies per cell allowed gcn4 mutant strains to grow in the presence of aminotriazole. In wild-type strains, multiple copies of ATR1 permitted growth at extremely high concentrations of aminotriazole (80 mM), whereas a chromosomal deletion of ATR1 caused growth inhibition at very low concentrations (5 mM). When radioactive aminotriazole was added exogenously, cells with multiple copies of ATR1 accumulated less aminotriazole than wild-type cells, whereas cells with the atr1 deletion mutation retained more aminotriazole. Unlike the mammalian mdr or yeast PDR genes that confer resistance to many drugs, ATR1 appears to confer resistance only to aminotriazole. Genetic analysis, mRNA mapping, and DNA sequencing revealed that (i) the primary translation product of ATR1 contains 547 amino acids, (ii) ATR1 transcription is induced by aminotriazole, and (iii) the ATR1 promoter region contains a binding site for the GCN4 activator protein. The deduced amino acid sequence suggests that ATR1 protein is very hydrophobic with many membrane-spanning regions, has several potential glycosylation sites, and may contain an ATP-binding site. We suggest that ATR1 encodes a membrane-associated component of the machinery responsible for pumping aminotriazole (and possibly other toxic compounds) out of the cell.

ATR1, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene encoding a transmembrane protein required for aminotriazole resistance

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (aminotriazole) competitively inhibits the activity of imidazoleglycerolphosphate dehydratase, the product of the HIS3 gene. Wild-type strains are able to grow in the presence of 10 mM aminotriazole because they induce the level of imidazoleglycerolphosphate dehydratase. However, strains containing gcn4 mutations are unable to grow in medium containing aminotriazole because they lack the GCN4 transcriptional activator protein necessary for the coordinate induction of HIS3 and other amino acid biosynthetic genes. Here, we isolated a new gene, designated ATR1, which when present in multiple copies per cell allowed gcn4 mutant strains to grow in the presence of aminotriazole. In wild-type strains, multiple copies of ATR1 permitted growth at extremely high concentrations of aminotriazole (80 mM), whereas a chromosomal deletion of ATR1 caused growth inhibition at very low concentrations (5 mM). When radioactive aminotriazole was added exogenously, cells with multiple copies of ATR1 accumulated less aminotriazole than wild-type cells, whereas cells with the atr1 deletion mutation retained more aminotriazole. Unlike the mammalian mdr or yeast PDR genes that confer resistance to many drugs, ATR1 appears to confer resistance only to aminotriazole. Genetic analysis, mRNA mapping, and DNA sequencing revealed that (i) the primary translation product of ATR1 contains 547 amino acids, (ii) ATR1 transcription is induced by aminotriazole, and (iii) the ATR1 promoter region contains a binding site for the GCN4 activator protein. The deduced amino acid sequence suggests that ATR1 protein is very hydrophobic with many membrane-spanning regions, has several potential glycosylation sites, and may contain an ATP-binding site. We suggest that ATR1 encodes a membrane-associated component of the machinery responsible for pumping aminotriazole (and possibly other toxic compounds) out of the cell.

Regulation of the TRP4 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the transcriptional level and functional analysis of its promotor

The TRP4 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which encodes anthranilate phosphoribosyl transferase (E.C. 2.4.2.18), is subject to the general control of amino acid biosynthesis. The regulation takes place at the transcriptional level by increasing the amount of initiation and not by changing the stability of mRNA. We have observed a change in the utilization of TRP4 mRNA start sites, depending on whether cells were grown under repressing or derepressing conditions. The function of promoter elements has been tested by deletion analysis with a plasmid-encoded TRP4 gene. A routinely practicable method was used for copy-number calibration of plasmids based on 2 micron DNA. Promoter structures and spacing problems in the TRP4 promoter region are discussed.