Analysis of Yeast Killer Toxin K1 Precursor Processing via Site-Directed Mutagenesis: Implications for Toxicity and Immunity

The Killer Saccharomyces cerevisiae Toxin: From Origin to Biomedical Research

The killer systems of S. cerevisiae are defined by the co-infection of two viral agents, an M virus and a helper virus. Each killer toxin is determined by the type of M virus (ScV-M1, ScV-M2, ScV-M28, and ScV-Mlus), which encodes a specific toxin (K1, K2, K28, and Klus). Since their discovery, interest in their potential use as antimicrobial agents has driven research into the mechanisms of action of these toxins on susceptible cells. This review provides an overview of the key aspects of killer toxins, including their origin and the evolutionary implications surrounding the viruses involved in the killer system, as well as their potential applications in the biomedical field and as a biological control strategy. Special attention is given to the mechanisms of action described to date for the various S. cerevisiae killer toxins.

Killer yeasts: expanding frontiers in the age of synthetic biology

Killer yeasts secrete protein toxins that are selectively lethal to other yeast and filamentous fungi. These exhibit exceptional genetic and functional diversity, and have several biotechnological applications. However, despite decades of research, several limitations hinder their widespread adoption. In this perspective we contend that technical advances in synthetic biology present an unprecedented opportunity to unlock the full potential of yeast killer systems across a spectrum of applications. By leveraging these new technologies, engineered killer toxins may emerge as a pivotal new tool to address antifungal resistance and food security. Finally, we speculate on the biotechnological potential of re-engineering host double-stranded (ds) RNA mycoviruses, from which many toxins derive, as a safe and noninfectious system to produce designer RNA.

The signal peptide of yeast killer toxin K2 confers producer self-protection and allows conversion into a modular toxin-immunity system

Some microbial toxins also target the producer species itself, necessitating a means of self-protection. The M2 double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) killer virus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains a single open reading frame (ORF) encoding both the secreted pore-forming toxin K2 as well as a cognate immunity factor. Here, we show that expression of a 49-amino acid N-terminal peptide from the K2 precursor is both necessary and sufficient for immunity. This immunity peptide simultaneously functions as a signal peptide for toxin secretion and protects the cell against the cytotoxic K2 α subunit. The K2 toxin and immunity factor can be functionally separated into two ORFs, yielding a modular toxin-immunity system. This case further shows how a (signal) peptide can carry the potential for providing cellular protection against an antimicrobial toxin.

Expression of the K74 Killer Toxin from Saccharomyces paradoxus Is Modulated by the Toxin-Encoding M74 Double-Stranded RNA 5' Untranslated Terminal Region

Yeast killer toxins are widely distributed in nature, conferring a competitive advantage to the producer yeasts over nonkiller ones when nutrients are scarce. Most of these toxins are encoded on double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) generically called M. L-A members of the viral family Totiviridae act as helper viruses to maintain M, providing the virion proteins that separately encapsidate and replicate L-A and M genomes. M genomes are organized in three regions, a 5' region coding the preprotoxin, followed by an internal poly(A) stretch and a 3' noncoding region. In this work, we report the characterization of K74 toxin encoded on M74 dsRNA from Saccharomyces paradoxus Q74.4. In M74, there is a 5' upstream sequence of 141 nucleotides (nt), which contains regulatory signals for internal translation of the preprotoxin open reading frame (ORF) at the second AUG codon. The first AUG close to the 5' end is not functional. For K74 analysis, M74 viruses were first introduced into laboratory strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show here that the mature toxin is an α/β heterodimer linked by disulfide bonds. Though the toxin (or preprotoxin) confers immunity to the carrier, cells with increased K74 loads have a sick phenotype that may lead to cell death. Thus, a fine-tuning of K74 production by the upstream regulatory sequence is essential for the host cell to benefit from the toxin it produces and, at the same time, to safely avoid damage by an excess of toxin. IMPORTANCE Killer yeasts produce toxins to which they are immune by mechanisms not well understood. This self-immunity, however, is compromised in certain strains, which secrete an excess of toxin, leading to sick cells or suicidal phenotypes. Thus, a fine-tuning of toxin production has to be achieved to reach a balance between the beneficial effect of toxin production and the stress imposed on the host metabolism. K74 toxin from S. paradoxus is very active against Saccharomyces uvarum, among other yeasts, but an excess of toxin production is deleterious for the host. Here, we report that the presence of a 5' 141-nt upstream sequence downregulates K74 toxin precursor translation, decreasing toxin levels 3- to 5-fold. Thus, this is a special case of translation regulation performed by sequences on the M74 genome itself, which have been presumably incorporated into the viral RNA during evolution for that purpose.

Occurrence of Yeasts in White-Brined Cheeses: Methodologies for Identification, Spoilage Potential and Good Manufacturing Practices

Yeasts are generally recognized as contaminants in the production of white-brined cheeses, such as Feta and Feta-type cheeses. The most predominant yeasts species are Debaryomyces hansenii, Geotrichum candidum, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Kluyveromyces lactis, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, and Trichosporon spp. Although their spoilage potential varies at both species and strain levels, yeasts will, in case of excessive growth, present a microbiological hazard, effecting cheese quality. To evaluate the hazard and trace routes of contamination, the exact taxonomic classification of yeasts is required. Today, identification of dairy yeasts is mainly based on DNA sequencing, various genotyping techniques, and, to some extent, advanced phenotypic identification technologies. Even though these technologies are state of the art at the scientific level, they are only hardly implemented at the industrial level. Quality defects, caused by yeasts in white-brined cheese, are mainly linked to enzymatic activities and metabolism of fermentable carbohydrates, leading to production of metabolites (CO2, fatty acids, volatile compounds, amino acids, sulfur compounds, etc.) and resulting in off-flavors, texture softening, discoloration, and swelling of cheese packages. The proliferation of spoilage yeast depends on maturation and storage conditions at each specific dairy, product characteristics, nutrients availability, and interactions with the co-existing microorganisms. To prevent and control yeast contamination, different strategies based on the principles of HACCP and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) have been introduced in white-brined cheese production. These strategies include milk pasteurization, refrigeration, hygienic sanitation, air filtration, as well as aseptic and modified atmosphere packaging. Though a lot of research has been dedicated to yeasts in dairy products, the role of yeast contaminants, specifically in white-brined cheeses, is still insufficiently understood. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on the identification of contaminant yeasts in white-brined cheeses, their occurrence and spoilage potential related to different varieties of white-brined cheeses, their interactions with other microorganisms, as well as guidelines used by dairies to prevent cheese contamination.