Bean Extract-Based Gargle for Efficient Diagnosis of Active COVID-19 Infection Using Rapid Antigen Tests

Clinical evaluation of a new COVID-19 antigen rapid test kit for detection of SARS-CoV-2

The antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) is an assay kit for detecting the SARS-COV-2 nucleocapsid proteins, based on the colloidal gold method.Accurate diagnosis has an important role in limiting the transmission of SARS-COV-2, and also helps patients to receive earlier treatment .The object of this study was to perform the clinical evaluation of a novel Ag-RDTs with samples collected from two different swabs.DEEPBLUE®COVID-19 antigen detection kit used for the examination of the subjects in the experiment.For antigen testing on samples collected with nasal swabs, sensitivity was 91.7 % (95 % CI 83.6-96.6 %) and specificity was 100 %(95 %CI 98.1-100 %).For nasopharyngeal swabs, the sensitivity was 96.8 % (95 % CI 93.6-98.7 %) and the specificity was 100 % (95 % CI 98.2-100 %).Fisher Precision test showed a significant correlation between nasopharyngeal swab Ag-RDTs and nasal swab Ag-RDTs and RT-qPCR test (p-value <0.001).The results showed that the patients use the kit for testing were comparable to the RT-qPCR.

Performance of saline and water gargling for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The performance of gargling for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR testing has not been previously reviewed. This review systematically assessed the performance of saline and water gargling for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing in the settings of diagnosing and monitoring viral shedding.We included original studies comparing the performance of gargling and (oropharyngeal-)nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing. Studies conducted in either suspected individuals or confirmed cases were included and analysed separately. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were examined using random-effects models.Gargles achieved a high overall sensitivity (91%), specificity (97%), PPV (95%) and NPV (91%) for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing. Studies using saline gargle and water gargle have an overall sensitivity of 97% and 86%, respectively. The sensitivity values were largely maintained for saline and water gargling on stratified analysis, for both diagnosis (96% and 92%) and viral shedding monitoring (98% and 78%). A higher sensitivity was also reported by studies using sterile saline (100%), a smaller amount of gargling solution (92% versus 87%) and a longer gargling duration (95% versus 86%).Our results supported the use of gargling as a sampling approach for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, which achieved a high sensitivity for both diagnosis and viral shedding monitoring purposes. Further investigation on the comparative performance of different gargling mediums is needed to draw a definitive conclusion.