Receptor-binding domain of ephrin-A1: production in bacterial expression system and activity

Analysis of GPI-Anchored Receptor Distribution and Dynamics in Live Cells by Tag-mediated Enzymatic Labeling and FRET

The analysis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored receptor distribution and dynamics in live cells is challenging, because their clusters exhibit subdiffraction-limited sizes and are highly dynamic. However, the cellular response depends on the GPI-anchored receptor clusters' distribution and dynamics. Here, we compare three approaches to GPI-anchored receptor labeling (with antibodies, fluorescent proteins, and enzymatically modified small peptide tags) and use several variants of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) detection by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry in order to obtain insight into the distribution and the ligand-induced dynamics of GPI-anchored receptors. We found that the enzyme-mediated site-specific fluorescence labeling of T-cadherin modified with a short peptide tag (12 residues in length) have several advantages over labeling by fluorescent proteins or antibodies, including (i) the minimized distortion of the protein's properties, (ii) the possibility to use a cell-impermeable fluorescent substrate that allows for selective labeling of surface-exposed proteins in live cells, and (iii) superior control of the donor to acceptor molar ratio. We successfully detected the FRET of GPI-anchored receptors, T-cadherin, and ephrin-A1, without ligands, and showed in real time that adiponectin induces stable T-cadherin cluster formation. In this paper (which is complementary to our recent research (Balatskaya et al., 2019)), we present the practical aspects of labeling and the heteroFRET measurements of GPI-anchored receptors to study their dynamics on a plasma membrane in live cells.

Point mutations in dimerization motifs of the transmembrane domain stabilize active or inactive state of the EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase

The EphA2 receptor tyrosine kinase plays a central role in the regulation of cell adhesion and guidance in many human tissues. The activation of EphA2 occurs after proper dimerization/oligomerization in the plasma membrane, which occurs with the participation of extracellular and cytoplasmic domains. Our study revealed that the isolated transmembrane domain (TMD) of EphA2 embedded into the lipid bicelle dimerized via the heptad repeat motif L(535)X3G(539)X2A(542)X3V(546)X2L(549) rather than through the alternative glycine zipper motif A(536)X3G(540)X3G(544) (typical for TMD dimerization in many proteins). To evaluate the significance of TMD interactions for full-length EphA2, we substituted key residues in the heptad repeat motif (HR variant: G539I, A542I, G553I) or in the glycine zipper motif (GZ variant: G540I, G544I) and expressed YFP-tagged EphA2 (WT, HR, and GZ variants) in HEK293T cells. Confocal microscopy revealed a similar distribution of all EphA2-YFP variants in cells. The expression of EphA2-YFP variants and their kinase activity (phosphorylation of Tyr(588) and/or Tyr(594)) and ephrin-A3 binding were analyzed with flow cytometry on a single cell basis. Activation of any EphA2 variant is found to occur even without ephrin stimulation when the EphA2 content in cells is sufficiently high. Ephrin-A3 binding is not affected in mutant variants. Mutations in the TMD have a significant effect on EphA2 activity. Both ligand-dependent and ligand-independent activities are enhanced for the HR variant and reduced for the GZ variant compared with the WT. These findings allow us to suggest TMD dimerization switching between the heptad repeat and glycine zipper motifs, corresponding to inactive and active receptor states, respectively, as a mechanism underlying EphA2 signal transduction.