1
|
Roberts GA, Chen K, Bower EKM, Madrzak J, Woods A, Barker AM, Cooper LP, White JH, Blakely GW, Manfield I, Dryden DTF. Mutations of the domain forming the dimeric interface of the ArdA protein affect dimerization and antimodification activity but not antirestriction activity. FEBS J 2013; 280:4903-14. [PMID: 23910724 PMCID: PMC3906837 DOI: 10.1111/febs.12467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Revised: 07/26/2013] [Accepted: 07/29/2013] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
ArdA antirestriction proteins are encoded by genes present in many conjugative plasmids and transposons within bacterial genomes. Antirestriction is the ability to prevent cleavage of foreign incoming DNA by restriction-modification (RM) systems. Antimodification, the ability to inhibit modification by the RM system, can also be observed with some antirestriction proteins. As these mobile genetic elements can transfer antibiotic resistance genes, the ArdA proteins assist their spread. The consequence of antirestriction is therefore the enhanced dissemination of mobile genetic elements. ArdA proteins cause antirestriction by mimicking the DNA structure bound by Type I RM enzymes. The crystal structure of ArdA showed it to be a dimeric protein with a highly elongated curved cylindrical shape [McMahon SA et al. (2009) Nucleic Acids Res37, 4887–4897]. Each monomer has three domains covered with negatively charged side chains and a very small interface with the other monomer. We investigated the role of the domain forming the dimer interface for ArdA activity via site-directed mutagenesis. The antirestriction activity of ArdA was maintained when up to seven mutations per monomer were made or the interface was disrupted such that the protein could only exist as a monomer. The antimodification activity of ArdA was lost upon mutation of this domain. The ability of the monomeric form of ArdA to function in antirestriction suggests, first, that it can bind independently to the restriction subunit or the modification subunits of the RM enzyme, and second, that the many ArdA homologues with long amino acid extensions, present in sequence databases, may be active in antirestriction.
Collapse
|
2
|
McMahon SA, Roberts GA, Johnson KA, Cooper LP, Liu H, White JH, Carter LG, Sanghvi B, Oke M, Walkinshaw MD, Blakely GW, Naismith JH, Dryden DTF. Extensive DNA mimicry by the ArdA anti-restriction protein and its role in the spread of antibiotic resistance. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:4887-97. [PMID: 19506028 PMCID: PMC2731889 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2009] [Revised: 05/13/2009] [Accepted: 05/18/2009] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The ardA gene, found in many prokaryotes including important pathogenic species, allows associated mobile genetic elements to evade the ubiquitous Type I DNA restriction systems and thereby assist the spread of resistance genes in bacterial populations. As such, ardA contributes to a major healthcare problem. We have solved the structure of the ArdA protein from the conjugative transposon Tn916 and find that it has a novel extremely elongated curved cylindrical structure with defined helical grooves. The high density of aspartate and glutamate residues on the surface follow a helical pattern and the whole protein mimics a 42-base pair stretch of B-form DNA making ArdA by far the largest DNA mimic known. Each monomer of this dimeric structure comprises three alpha-beta domains, each with a different fold. These domains have the same fold as previously determined proteins possessing entirely different functions. This DNA mimicry explains how ArdA can bind and inhibit the Type I restriction enzymes and we demonstrate that 6 different ardA from pathogenic bacteria can function in Escherichia coli hosting a range of different Type I restriction systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen A. McMahon
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - Gareth A. Roberts
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - Kenneth A. Johnson
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - Laurie P. Cooper
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - Huanting Liu
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - John H. White
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - Lester G. Carter
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - Bansi Sanghvi
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - Muse Oke
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - Malcolm D. Walkinshaw
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - Garry W. Blakely
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - James H. Naismith
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| | - David T. F. Dryden
- Centre for Biomolecular Science, The University, St Andrews, KY16 9ST, School of Chemistry and School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, The King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|