Domańska B, VanLunen B, Peterson L, Mountian I, Schiff M. Comparative usability study for a certolizumab pegol autoinjection device in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2016;
14:15-22. [PMID:
27801596 DOI:
10.1080/17425247.2016.1256283]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To compare the usability of a new certolizumab pegol (CZP) autoinjector with the adalimumab, etanercept, and golimumab devices in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS
Two identical studies were performed in 2013 and 2016; patients performed a simulated self-injection with the CZP autoinjector and the most up-to-date device versions at the time in a randomized, consecutive sequence. The primary end point was the ranking of the four autoinjectors in order of preference. Device usability and intuitiveness were assessed across a range of secondary and exploratory end points.
RESULTS
The 2013 and 2016 study populations included 76 patients each; a significant majority (2013: 67%; 2016: 59%) ranked the CZP autoinjector as their most preferred device (p < 0.001). Most patients agreed that the CZP autoinjector was easier to use, start, and manipulate, and were more willing to use it than the comparator devices (p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons with CZP). Likert score differences also favored the CZP autoinjector regarding how easy it was to determine injection completion. The CZP autoinjector was associated with a low rate of use error.
CONCLUSIONS
In both studies, the CZP autoinjector was the preferred choice compared to the alternative devices and was associated with a high level of patient satisfaction.
Collapse