Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in patients with immune-related myositis

Clinical and pathological aspects of toxic myopathies

As the most frequent cause of acquired myopathy, toxic myopathies are characterised by clinicopathological features that vary depending on the mode of action of the drugs or toxins involved. Although a large number of substances can induce myotoxicity, the main culprits are statins, alcohol, and corticosteroids. A rigorous, well-organised diagnostic approach is necessary to obtain a rapid diagnosis. For early diagnosis and management, it is important for clinicians to be aware that most toxic myopathies are potentially reversible, and the goal of treatment should be to avoid serious muscle damage.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-induced Myositis

Myositis induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an infrequent, potentially fatal, immune-related adverse event. It has higher incidence in patients who receive combination ICI therapy compared to monotherapy. Patients can present with clinical manifestation symptoms of myositis alone or in combination with myocarditis and/or myasthenia gravis, which significantly worsens the course and prognosis. Diagnosis can generally be made on the basis of clinical presentation, elevation of muscle enzymes, and electromyographic changes, but some patients may require a muscle biopsy. The first line of therapy is high-dose corticosteroids, followed by immunosuppression, plasmapheresis, or intravenous immunoglobulin in patients with severe disease.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Myositis: A Distinct Form of Inflammatory Myopathy

ABSTRACT

Research on the relationship between inflammatory myopathy and malignancy has grown considerably within the last century. Now, the burgeoning field of inflammatory myopathy has yet another player in the mix: immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis (ICI myositis). Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis is indicated by clinical diagnosis of inflammatory myopathy after initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor for cancer management. Current literature reflects low prevalence but high mortality associated with ICI myositis, especially when involving myasthenia gravis and myocarditis. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myositis tends to have muscle pain along with weakness, infrequent presentation with dermatitis, or interstitial lung disease and is typically seronegative with scattered, endomysial inflammatory infiltrates on biopsy. The differential diagnosis of ICI myositis includes myasthenia gravis and other neurological immune-related adverse events. Therapeutic approach involves high doses of corticosteroids with a choice of steroid-sparing immunomodulating agent(s) that is primarily driven by expert opinion due to lack of robust research to support one agent over another. There is wide variation in the inclusion criteria for ICI myositis used in previous studies. We review previously used inclusion criteria and suggest an expertise-based classification criterion to provide a standardized definition and allow comparability between studies. There is a critical need for prospective translational and clinical studies that elucidate the pathophysiology of ICI myositis in order to improve evaluation and management of these patients.

: A case report of re-challenge of immune checkpoint inhibitors after immune-related neurological adverse events: Review of literature

INTRODUCTION

The indications for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are expanding for various cancers because of their durable responses and tolerable safety profiles. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including neurological adverse events (nAEs), are associated with ICIs therapy. However, there have been few studies on whether re-challenge with ICIs can be clinically acceptable after neurological AE has improved.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 69-year-old woman with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing palliative chemotherapy was admitted to our hospital with sudden development of diplopia, dizziness, and gait instability. The patient was administered ICI therapy with anti-angiogenic agents for 9 weeks for 3 cycles.

DIAGNOSIS

We performed neurological examination, brain imaging, nerve conduction studies, and serology tests. The patient was diagnosed with Guillain-Barré syndrome variant, an immune-mediated polyneuropathy characterized by a triad of ataxia, areflexia, and ophthalmoplegia.

INTERVENTION

After prompt discontinuation of pembrolizumab, the patient was taken intravenous methylprednisolone (2 mg/kg) was administered for 5 days, and her symptoms were partially resolved. With the addition of immunoglobulin 0.4 g/kg for 5 days, her symptoms gradually improved.

OUTCOMES

The patient's neurological symptoms improved after immunosuppressive therapy, without sequelae. The NCV showed normal nerve conduction. Unfortunately, because there was little evidence for pembrolizumab rechallenge, pembrolizumab therapy was permanently discontinued, and the tumors eventually progressed.

Toxische Myopathie

Viele Medikamente können Myopathien auslösen. Statine sind dabei die häufigste Ursache, aber auch Amiodaron, Chlorochin, antiretrovirale Medikamente, Kortikosteroide und Checkpoint-Inhibitoren sind potentiell myotoxisch. Häufigster nicht-medikamentöser Auslöser ist Alkoholismus. Pathogenetisch spielen unterschiedliche, meist nicht völlig verstandene Mechanismen eine Rolle. Symptome reichen von milden Myalgien und Krampi bis hin zu hochgradigen Paresen, Myoglobinurien und lebensbedrohlicher Rhabdomyolyse. Diagnostisch sind die Anamnese einer Exposition gegenüber Noxen sowie von Risikofaktoren, die klinische Untersuchung, die CK-Wert-Bestimmung und Elektromyographie wegweisend. Eine Muskelbiopsie ist oft für die Diagnosesicherung nötig. Das frühzeitige Erkennen von toxischen Myopathien ist relevant, da eine Beendigung des Auslösers meist zur prompten Symptombesserung führt. Selten wird eine immunvermittelte Muskelschädigung angestoßen, die eine spezifische Immuntherapie erfordert.

Characterization and management of neurological adverse events during immune-checkpoint inhibitors treatment: an Italian multicentric experience

BACKGROUND

Neurological immune-related adverse events (nirAEs) are rare toxicities of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). With the increase of ICI oncological indications, their incidence is growing. Their recognition and management remain nevertheless challenging.

METHODS

A national, web-based database was built to collect cases of neurological symptoms in patients receiving ICI and not attributable to other causes after an adequate workup.

RESULTS

We identified 27 patients who developed nirAEs (20 males, median age 69 years). Patients received anti-PD1/PDL1 (78%), anti-CTLA4 (4%), or both (19%). Most common cancers were melanoma (30%) and non-small cell lung cancer (26%). Peripheral nervous system was mostly affected (78%). Median time to onset was 43.5 days and was shorter for peripheral versus central nervous system toxicities (36 versus 144.5 days, p = 0.045). Common manifestations were myositis (33%), inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies (33%), and myasthenia gravis (19%), alone or in combination, but the spectrum of diagnoses was broad. Most patients received first-line glucocorticoids (85%) or IVIg (15%). Seven patients (26%) needed second-line treatments. At last follow-up, four (15%) patients were deceased (encephalitis, 1; myositis/myasthenia with concomitant myocarditis, 2; acute polyradiculoneuropathy, 1), while seven (26%) had a complete remission, eight (30%) partial improvement, and six (22%) stable/progressing symptoms. ICI treatment was discontinued in most patients (78%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurological irAEs are rare but potentially fatal. They primarily affect neuromuscular structures but encompass a broad range of presentations. A prompt recognition is mandatory to timely withheld immunotherapy and administrate glucocorticoids. In corticoresistant or severely affected patients, second-line treatments with IVIg or plasmapheresis may result in additional benefit.

Autoimmunity in 2019

Based on the PubMed data, we have been performing a yearly evaluation of the publications related to autoimmune diseases and immunology to ascertain the relative weight of the former in the scientific literature. It is particularly intriguing to observe that despite the numerous new avenues of immune-related mechanisms, such as cancer immunotherapy, the proportion of immunology manuscripts related to autoimmunity continues to increase and has been approaching 20% in 2019. As in the previous 13 years, we performed an arbitrary selection of the peer-reviewed articles published by the major dedicated Journals and discussed the common themes which continue to outnumber peculiarites in autoimmune diseases. The investigated areas included systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), autoantibodies (autoAbs), and common therapeutic avenues and novel pathogenic mechanisms for autoimmune conditions. Some examples include new pathogenetic evidence which is well represented by IL21 or P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) in SLE or the application of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), mass cytometry, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and flow cytometry for the analysis of different cellular populations in RA. Cumulatively and of interest to the clinicians, a large number of findings continue to underline the importance of a strict relationship between basic and clinical science to define new pathogenetic and therapeutic developments. The therapeutic pipeline in autoimmunity continues to grow and maintain a constant flow of new molecules, as well illustrated in RA and PsA, and this is most certainly derived from the new basic evidence and the high-throughput tools applied to autoimmune diseases.

Treatment strategies and safety of rechallenge in the setting of immune checkpoint inhibitors-related myositis: A national multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

The occurrence of immune-related myositis (irM) is increasing, yet there are no therapeutic guidelines. We sought to analyze the current therapeutic strategies of irM and evaluate the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) rechallenge.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide retrospective study between April 2018 and March 2020 including irM without myocardial involvement. Depending on the presence of cutaneous signs or unusual histopathological features, patients were classified into two groups: typical or atypical irM. Therapeutic strategies were analyzed in both groups. The modalities and outcomes of ICI rechallenge were reviewed.

RESULTS

Among the 20 patients, 16 presented typical irM. Regardless of severity, most typical irM were treated with steroid monotherapy (n = 14/16) and all had a complete response within ≤ 3 weeks. The efficacy of oral steroids for non-severe typical irM (n = 10) was the same with low-dose (≤ 0.5 mg/kg/day) or high-dose (1 mg/kg/day). Severe typical irM were successfully treated with intravenous methylprednisolone. Atypical irM (n = 4) had a less favorable evolution, including one irM-related death, and required heavy immunosuppression. ICI were safely reintroduced in 9 patients presenting a moderate (n = 6) or a severe (n = 3) irM.

CONCLUSION

Our data highlight that steroid monotherapy is an effective treatment for typical irM, either with prednisone or with intravenous methylprednisone pulses depending on the severity. The identification of unusual features is important in determining the initial therapeutic strategy. The outcomes of rechallenged patients are in favor of a safe reintroduction of ICI following symptom resolution and CK normalization in moderate and severe forms of irM.

Neurological complications of chimeric antigen receptor T cells and immune-checkpoint inhibitors: ongoing challenges in daily practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to summarize the most recent advances in the management of neurological toxicities associated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of cancer immunotherapies has dramatically improved the prognosis of several refractory and advanced neoplasms. Owing to their mechanism of action, cancer immunotherapies have been associated with a variety of immune-related adverse events (irAE). Neurological irAE are uncommon compared with other irAE, but they are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite the efforts to draft common protocols and guidelines, the management of neurological irAE remains challenging. Our ability to predict the development of neurotoxicity is still limited, hampering to elaborate prevention strategies. Treatment heavily relies on the administration of high-dose corticosteroids that, however, have the potential to impair oncological efficacy. The experimentation of novel strategies to avoid resorting to corticosteroids is hindered by the lack of an adequate understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms driving the development of irAE.

SUMMARY

In this review, we will discuss the most recent advances on the diagnosis and management of neurological irAE associated with ICIs and CAR-T cells, focusing on the issues that remain most challenging in clinical practice.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy: a clinicoseropathologically distinct myopathy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the landscape of cancer treatment. Alongside their many advantages, they elicit immune-related adverse events, including myopathy, which potentially result in substantial morbidity if not recognized and treated promptly. Current knowledge of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy is limited. We conducted a 5-year retrospective study of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy. Clinical features, survival and ancillary test findings were analysed and compared with those of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy patients without immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure seen during the same time period. We identified 24 patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy (median age 69 years; range 28-86) and 38 patients with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy. Ocular involvement occurred in 9/24 patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure, without electrodiagnostic evidence of neuromuscular transmission defect, and in none of the immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy patients (P < 0.001). Myocarditis occurred in eight immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy patients and in none of the immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy patients (P < 0.001). Median creatine kinase was 686 IU/l in the immune checkpoint inhibitor cohort (seven with normal creatine kinase) compared to 6456 IU/l in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy cohort (P < 0.001). Lymphopenia was observed in 18 and 7 patients with and without immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure, respectively (P < 0.001). Myopathological findings were similar between patients with and without immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure, consisting of necrotic fibres with no or subtle inflammation. Necrotic fibres however arranged in clusters in 10/11 immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy patients but in none of the immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients (P < 0.001). Despite the lower creatine kinase levels in immune checkpoint inhibitor-exposed patients, the number of necrotic fibres was similar in both groups. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy patients had a higher frequency of mitochondrial abnormalities and less number of regenerating fibres than immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy patients (P < 0.001). Anti-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase or signal recognition particle antibodies were absent in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure but positive in two-thirds of immune checkpoint inhibitor-naïve patients. Most patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy responded favourably to immunomodulatory treatments, but four died from myopathy-related complications and one from myocarditis. Intubated patients had significantly shorter survival compared to non-intubated patients (median survival of 22 days; P = 0.004). In summary, immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myopathy is a distinct, treatable immune-mediated myopathy with common ocular involvement, frequent lymphopenia and necrotizing histopathology, which contrary to immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, is featured by clusters of necrotic fibres and not accompanied by anti-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase or signal recognition particle antibodies. Normal or mildly elevated creatine kinase level does not exclude the diagnosis.

Secondary Causes of Myositis

Purpose of review

The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively evaluate secondary causes of inflammatory myopathies (myositis) and to review treatment options.

Recent findings

This review highlights recent advancements in our understanding of known causes of myositis, including newer drugs that may cause myositis such as checkpoint inhibitors and viruses such as influenza, HIV, and SARS-CoV2. We also discuss treatment for malignancy-associated myositis and overlap myositis, thought to be a separate entity from other rheumatologic diseases.

Summary

Infections, drugs, rheumatologic diseases, and malignancies are important causes of myositis and are important to diagnose as they may have specific therapies beyond immunomodulatory therapy.

Nebenwirkungen immunonkologischer Therapien

Immunonkologische Therapien und insbesondere die Immuncheckpoint-Inhibitoren (ICPi) als Hauptvertreter dieser neuen Substanzklasse kommen bei zunehmender Anzahl von soliden und teils auch hämatologischen Tumorentitäten und Indikationen zum Einsatz. Die relativ hohen (Langzeit-)Tumoransprechraten auch in fortgeschrittenen und therapierefraktären Stadien haben die therapeutischen Möglichkeiten der Onkologie geradezu revolutioniert. Gleichzeitig bringt der zunehmende Einsatz von ICPi auch neue Herausforderungen: Immunonkologische Therapien verursachen ein breites Spektrum an autoimmunen Nebenwirkungen, sogenannten „immune-related adverse events“ (irAEs), die teilweise klassischen Autoimmunopathien ähneln und jedes Organsystem betreffen können. Die große Mehrheit der ICPi-behandelten Patienten erlebt ein irAE an mindestens einem Organsystem und davon weisen ca. 5–20% ein rheumatisches irAEs auf. Diese sind interessanterweise mit einem besseren Tumoransprechraten bei ICPi-Therapie assoziiert und können entweder die Erstmanifestation einer klassischen entzündlich-rheumatischen Erkrankung oder auch nur eine transiente Nebenwirkung mit spezifischen Charakteristika sein. Zweifelsohne wird das interdisziplinäre Management immunvermittelter Nebenwirkungen auch den Rheumatologen in den nächsten Jahren zunehmend beschäftigen. Der vorliegende Artikel fasst die Erkenntnisse zum klinischen Management von irAEs für den praktizierenden Rheumatologen zusammen.

Pembrolizumab on pre-existing inclusion body myositis: a case report

Background

Cases of exacerbation of pre-existing neuromuscular diseases induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have rarely been reported because patients with autoimmune diseases have generally been excluded from ICI therapy due to the increased risk of exacerbation. We describe the first case of an elderly patient who experienced exacerbation of a previously undiagnosed sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM), the most common myopathy in the geriatric population, which was triggered by anti-programmed cell death-1 therapy.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old man who was receiving pembrolizumab presented with limb weakness. Three years prior, he had noticed slowly progressive limb weakness, but he received no diagnosis. After the first infusion of pembrolizumab, his creatine kinase (CK) levels had increased. The neurological examination and muscle biopsy findings confirmed the diagnosis of sIBM and suggested exacerbation of sIBM induced by pembrolizumab. After the patient’s CK levels decreased, pembrolizumab was restarted. The tumor progressed after its treatment with pembrolizumab. The patient died after 15 months of follow-up.

Conclusions

In patients with slowly progressive limb weakness, sIBM should be explored before ICI therapy. In addition, if patients show high CK levels after ICI introduction, it is necessary to confirm whether they have sIBM in order to avoid unnecessary immunosuppressive therapies and assess whether they can tolerate ICI reintroduction.

Toxin-Induced Channelopathies, Neuromuscular Junction Disorders, and Myopathy

Channelopathies, neuromuscular junction disorders, and myopathies represent multiple mechanisms by which toxins can affect the peripheral nervous system. These toxins include ciguatoxin, tetrodotoxin, botulinum toxin, metabolic poisons, venomous snake bites, and several medications. These toxins are important to be aware of because they can lead to serious symptoms, disability, or even death, and many can be treated if recognized ear.

[Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors-induced Myasthenia Gravis: From Diagnosis to Treatment]

已经证实免疫检查点抑制剂（immune checkpoint inhibitor, ICI）使多种肿瘤的治疗有了翻天覆地的变化。尽管治疗的有效性让人欣慰，但是这些治疗也造成了多样化的免疫治疗相关的不良反应（immune-related adverse events, irAEs）。重症肌无力（myasthenia gravis, MG）就是一种罕见且危及生命的irAE，通常在ICI治疗后急性发病并迅速进展。早期诊断和积极的治疗非常重要。在此，我们对近几年的相关文献进行了复习和整理，针对ICI-MG诊断和治疗相关的常见问题提供参考意见。

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition-Does It Cause Rheumatic Diseases? Mechanisms of Cancer-Associated Loss of Tolerance and Pathogenesis of Autoimmunity

Mechanisms of immune checkpoints and their role in autoimmunity are discussed in the context of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for cancer. The updated clinical spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with an in-depth discussion of rheumatic irAEs, is presented. The relationship between ICI-induced loss of self-tolerance in cancer and the implications for understanding of irAEs, rheumatic irAEs in particular, is overviewed.

Rheumatic Manifestations in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are monoclonal antibodies that activate the immune system, aiming at enhancing antitumor immunity. Their clinical efficacy is well-documented, but the side effects associated with their use are still under investigation. These drugs cause several immune-related adverse events (ir-AEs), some of which stand within the field of rheumatology. Herein, we present a literature review performed in an effort to evaluate all publicly available clinical data regarding rheumatic manifestations associated with ICIs. The most common musculoskeletal ir-AEs are inflammatory arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica and myositis. Non-musculoskeletal rheumatic manifestations are less frequent, with the most prominent being sicca, vasculitides and sarcoidosis. Cases of systemic lupus erythematosus or scleroderma are extremely rare. The majority of musculoskeletal ir-AEs are of mild/moderate severity and can be managed with steroids with no need for ICI discontinuation. In severe cases, more intense immunosuppressive therapy and permanent ICI discontinuation may be employed. Oncologists should periodically screen patients receiving ICIs for new-onset inflammatory musculoskeletal complaints and seek a rheumatology consultation in cases of persisting symptoms.

Acute Interstitial Nephritis and Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Background

The objective of this case cohort study was to describe our experience in the care of patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor–related acute interstitial nephritis (ICI-AIN) including rechallenge.

Methods

A descriptive case series of patients that received an ICI and had an AKI (defined as a ≥1.5-fold increase in serum creatinine) as an immune-related adverse event (irAE), with biopsy-proven or clinically suspected ICI-AIN from January 1, 2014 to December 1, 2018 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. We studied details regarding diagnosis, clinical course, management, and outcomes of rechallenge of immunotherapy. Complete response (CR) was defined as return of kidney function back to baseline or <0.3 mg/dl above baseline creatinine; partial response (PR) was defined as creatinine >0.3 mg/dl from baseline, but less than twofold above the baseline by the end of steroid course.

Results

A total of 14 cases of biopsy-proven (35%) or clinically suspected (65%) ICI-AIN was identified. All patients had their ICI withheld and 12 patients received steroids. Steroid regimens were highly variable. The starting equivalent dose of prednisone was higher in those that had a CR versus a PR (median 0.77 mg/kg versus 0.66 mg/kg). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were used in 11 patients and were stopped in eight (73%) patients at the time of the AKI event. A CR was seen in five (63%) of the eight patients who discontinued PPIs. Rechallenge was attempted in four of the 14 patients: three were successful with no recurrence of AKI, but one patient had recurrent AKI and fatal pneumonitis.

Conclusions

Careful review, withholding ICI and concomitant known AIN-inducing medications, along with prompt initial steroid management were the key in complete renal kidney recovery. A kidney biopsy should be strongly considered. Rechallenge of immunotherapy after a kidney irAE, although challenging, is possible and would need careful evaluation on an individual basis.

Podcast

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/K360/2020_01_30_KID0000152019.mp3

Frequency and distribution of various rheumatic disorders associated with checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have advanced the treatment paradigm of various cancers, achieving remarkable survival benefits. However, a myriad of immune-related adverse events (irAE) has been recognized in almost every organ system, presumably because of persistent immune system activation. Rheumatic symptoms such as arthralgia or myalgia are very common. More specific irAE are increasingly being reported. The most frequent ones are inflammatory arthritis, polymyalgia-like syndromes, myositis and sicca manifestations. These rheumatic irAE can develop in ∼5-10% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, although true incidence rates cannot be estimated given the lack of prospective cohort studies, and likely underreporting of rheumatic irAE in oncology trials. In this review, we will provide a summary of the epidemiologic data reported for these rheumatic irAE, until more robust prospective longitudinal studies become available to further define the true incidence rate of rheumatic irAE in patients receiving these novel cancer therapies.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of thymic epithelial tumors: how to maximize benefit and optimize risk?

A greater understanding of anti-tumor immunity has resulted in rapid development of immunotherapy for a wide variety of cancers. Antibodies targeting the immune checkpoints, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death-1 (PD-1), or its ligand (PD-L1) have demonstrated clinical activity and are approved for treatment of melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, head and neck cancers, esophageal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma, among others. Treatment is generally well tolerated with relatively few adverse events compared with standard treatments such as chemotherapy. However, immune activation can potentially affect any organ system and a small fraction of patients are at risk for developing severe immune-related adverse events. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and other immunotherapeutic modalities such as cancer vaccines are in nascent stages of development for treatment of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). Since the thymus plays a key role in the development of immune tolerance, thymic tumors have a unique biology which can influence the risk-benefit balance of immunotherapy. Indeed, early results from clinical trials have demonstrated clinical activity, albeit at a cost of a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events, which seem to particularly affect skeletal and cardiac muscle and the neuromuscular junction. In this paper we describe the effects of thymic physiology on the immune system and review the results of clinical trials that have evaluated immunotherapy for treatment of relapsed thymoma and thymic carcinoma. We review ongoing efforts to mitigate the risk of immune-related complications in patients with TETs receiving immunotherapy and offer our thoughts for making immunotherapy a feasible alternative for treatment of thymic tumors.

Immune-related Adverse Events Associated with Cancer Immunotherapy: A Review for the Practicing Rheumatologist

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer therapy by blocking inhibitory pathways of the immune system to fight cancer cells. Their use is often limited by the development of autoimmune toxicities, which can affect multiple organ systems and are referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAE). Among these are rheumatologic irAE, including inflammatory arthritis, myositis, vasculitis, and others. Rheumatologic irAE seem to be different from irAE in other organs and from traditional autoimmune diseases in that they can occur early or have delayed onset, and can persist chronically, even after cancer therapy is terminated. Because immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly used for many types of cancer, it is important for oncologists and rheumatologists to recognize and manage toxicities early. In this review, we discuss currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors and their mechanisms of action and systemic toxicities, with a focus on the management and effect on further cancer therapy of rheumatic irAE.

[What's new in internal medicine?]

What's new in internal medicine will be dedicated to three topics: i) inflammatory myopathies constituting a heterogenous group of diseases whose clinical manifestations, immunological abnormalities, treatment response and outcomes vary widely; ii) alterations of gut microbiota contributing to the occurrence or development of a range of conditions, including autoimmune diseases for which further work is necessary to understand the correlation of dysbiosis with these diseases; iii) the reciprocal relationship between obesity, metabolic syndrome, atherosclerosis and autoimmune diseases. New data concerning systemic sclerosis, cutaneous vasculitis, adult Still's disease, autoantibodies anti DFS70, Epstein Barr virus and autoimmune diseases were also highlighted.