Testing different thresholds for patient global assessment in defining remission for rheumatoid arthritis: are the current ACR/EULAR Boolean criteria optimal?

PASSing to the patient side: early achieving of an acceptable symptom state in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with Janus kinase inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

Patients Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is a single dichotomized question assessing health satisfaction. We aimed to investigate PASS achievement within 4 weeks of treatment with Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (Jakinibs) and its association with treatment response after 4 and 12 weeks in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS

We recruited consecutive RA patients starting baricitinib or tofacitinib. At baseline, 4 and 12 weeks, we calculated disease activity [Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28), Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index], disease status [remission and low-disease activity (LDA)], percentage of patients achieving PASS, and the time to attain PASS. We assessed the impact of clinically relevant variables on PASS achievement by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

We enrolled 113 patients [98 (86.7%) females; median age 59.6 (interquartile range 16.9), median disease duration 144 (132) months]. 90 (79.6%) patients achieved PASS after 10 (8) days. A similar percentage of PASS achievers and non-achievers was in remission/LDA at weeks 4 and 12, but the reduction of disease activity was significantly greater in PASS achievers. All patients achieving Boolean remission at weeks 4 and 12 had achieved PASS within 4 weeks. The impact of Patients Global Assessment (PGA) on DAS28 was significantly greater in PASS non-achievers compared to PASS achievers; inversely, the impact of C-reactive protein was more relevant in PASS achievers. At multivariate analysis, pain and PGA were significantly associated with PASS.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, Jakinibs allowed an early achievement of PASS in a great percentage of RA patients. PASS is strictly dependent on PGA and pain and could suggest, early in the management of RA patients, therapeutic success.

Persistently different patterns of patient's global assessment of health in rheumatoid arthritis are associated with pain and impaired function more than with inflammation: an inception cohort study over 15 years

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient's self-reported global assessment of health (PGA) in relation to inflammation, pain and disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Data were obtained from the Better Anti-Rheumatic PharmacOTherapy early RA cohort, in which patients were scheduled for follow-up of 15 years. Longitudinal PGA trajectories were identified using hierarchical agglomerative clustering procedure with Wards methods, based on PGA assessments during the first 2 years. Multivariate linear regression and mixed models were used to evaluate associations between PGA, inflammation, pain and disability.

RESULTS

Totally 2238 patients were included in 1991-2006. Three PGA trajectories were identified, low, medium and high, including 34%, 48% and 18% of the patients, respectively. The similar PGA patterns were shown for the inclusion periods before and after 1999. The patients in the low PGA group were less often women, had lower body mass index, lower levels of inflammatory variables, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores at baseline than patients in the higher PGA groups. After adjustments, smoking and antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide status differentiated between being in low and high PGA groups. During the first year, all PGA groups showed improved outcomes, most pronounced in low PGA group. Fewer patients in high PGA group achieved remission, independent of remission criteria used. The outcomes were consistently different between the PGA groups from 6 months and onwards. The PGA levels from baseline over 15 years were best explained by VAS pain, followed by HAQ score, Disease Activity Score on 28 joints-3 and tender joint count, adjusted R2 up to 77%, 41%, 27% and 26%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Persistently higher PGA levels in RA were mostly related to pain and disability.

Management strategies in rheumatoid arthritis

Management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved from simply the direct translation of drug efficacy results from clinical trials to patient care, to a more complex longitudinal process that considers not only drug efficacy but also the safety gestalt of a treatment and patient profiles and preferences, as well as health-economic factors. With numerous DMARDs available to treat RA, knowledge about trial efficacy becomes less important than data that inform an appropriate clinical strategy for their optimal selection and use. Overly ambitious approaches targeting the 'maximum' level of success could, for example, be prone to failure and create frustration, and lead to a large number of patients then being considered as 'difficult to treat'. Safety profiles might be more informative than efficacy profiles for precision medicine approaches. Contemporary RA management strategies might therefore take a more holistic approach, beyond merely efficacy, to the setting of targets that lead to improved compliance rather than aspirational successes, with consideration of each patient's multimorbidity profile and preferences, as well as the safety profile of each treatment. Ultimately, the goal remains unchanged: maximizing health-related quality of life; however, with a focus on optimal balance rather than superlatives.

Remission versus low disease activity as treatment targets in rheumatoid arthritis: how to strike the right balance between too strict and too lenient targets? A meta-epidemiological study of individual patient data

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of using Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)-LDA (low disease activity) versus different definitions of remission as a treatment target in established rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A meta-epidemiological study of individual patient data from eight randomised controlled trials was performed. Four definitions of the target were considered at 6 months: (1) SDAI-LDA: SDAI≤11; (2) SDAI-Remission: SDAI≤3.3; (3) 4V-Remission: Tender and swollen 28-joint counts and C reactive protein (mg/dL) all ≤1 and patient global assessment (PGA)≤2 and (4) 3-variable (3V)-Remission: as 4V, excluding PGA. The mean radiographic change in the modified total Sharp-van der Heijde score (mTSS) and the Good Radiographic Outcome rates (defined as a change of ≤0.5 units mTSS) over 2 years were compared among target definitions. Radiographic progression and the distribution of the individual criteria of the Boolean definition in the only LDA subgroup (3.3

RESULTS

In total, 4374 patients (mean disease duration of 5.9 years (95% CI 4.6; 7.1)) were included. The pooled rate of SDAI-LDA at 6 months was 49%, with 13% in SDAI-remission. The 4V-Remission and 3V-Remission were achieved by 16% and 23%, respectively. Mean radiographic progression was 0.55 (0.14; 0.96) units for SDAI-LDA and 0.22 (-0.09; 0.54), 0.28 (-0.07; 0.62), 0.28 (-0.10; 0.65) for SDAI-Remission, 4V-Remission and 3V-Remission states, respectively. Patients with SDAI Pure-LDA presented significantly more radiographic progression than patients in SDAI-Remission (mean 0.72 vs 0.22 units, p<0.05). Over 53% of all patients achieving SDAI-LDA were not in 3V-Remission and had more mean radiographic progression over 2 years than those who met both targets (0.70 vs 0.25 units, p=0.014). Among patients with SDAI-LDA but not in SDAI-Remission, 40% scored PGA>2, reflecting relevant disease impact.

CONCLUSION

SDAI-LDA is associated with more structural damage over 2 years than any of the definitions of remission. It also allows substantial disease impact to go unchecked and uncontrolled. Physicians should strive for remission whenever possible and safe while also taking into account the different individual disease activity parameters included in the adopted definition.

Collapse

Key Words

• Outcome Assessment, Health Care
• Patient Reported Outcome Measures
• Rheumatoid Arthritis

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy
• Remission Induction
• Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use
• Treatment Outcome
• Severity of Illness Index
• Disease Progression
• Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
• Female
• Male
• Middle Aged

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Catia Duarte Rheumatology, ULS de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Johannes W G Jacobs Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC, Utrecht, Netherlands
Ricardo J O Ferreira Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Higher School of Nursing of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal Higher School of Nursing of Coimbra Health Sciences Research Unit Nursing, Coimbra, Portugal
Paco M J Welsing Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, UMC, Utrecht, Netherlands
Laure Gossec INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, INSERM, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France APHP, Rheumatology Department, Hopital Universitaire Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
Pedro M Machado Department of Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, UK Centre for Rheumatology, University College London, London, UK
Désirée van der Heijde Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
Jose Antonio Pereira da Silva Rheumatology, ULS de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

Collapse

Comparison of Remission Criteria in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results from a Smart System of Disease Management Group

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the rates of disease remission evaluated using various remission criteria, including Boolean2.0, Boolean1.0, clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and disease activity score using 28 joints based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Patients and Methods

A cross-sectional observational analysis was performed using data from patients with RA enrolled in a smart system of disease management group (SSDM). The clinical remission rates of RA patients estimated using the DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SDAI, Boolean1.0 and Boolean2.0 criteria were investigated. Variables were compared using the t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, or chi-squared test. The agreement between Boolean remission and the DAS28-CRP, CDAI, or SDAI definitions of remission was assessed using McNemar's test with k coefficient of agreement.

Results

A total of 5619 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of the patients was 56.33 (±13.01) years, with the majority being female (4491, 79.9%). The rates of remission, as assessed by Boolean2.0, Boolean1.0, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, and SDAI, were 16.6%, 9.7%, 35.2%, 9.1%, and 9.4%, respectively. Comparison with Boolean1.0 criteria revealed higher concordance between Boolean2.0 and DAS28-CRP remission and lower concordance with CDAI and SDAI, regardless of whether the analysis was conducted on the entire population or subgroups based on gender, age or disease duration. Additionally, the administration of different medications may have influenced the rate of Boolean2.0 remission.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated a higher concordance between Boolean2.0 criteria and DAS28-CRP remission and a lower concordance with CDAI and SDAI when compared with Boolean1.0 remission criteria.

Application of disease activity index in rheumatoid arthritis management in Korea

Effective management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) necessitates the accurate measurement of disease activity using a treat-to-target strategy established as a cornerstone approach. Disease activity assessment tools such as the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), Simplified Disease Activity Index, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 have been internationally validated and recognised. In Korea, the government initiated a quality assessment program mandating routine measurement of DAS28 to ensure high-quality RA management. However, whether the DAS28 is the most suitable disease activity measurement tool in the Korean clinical environment is a topic worth considering. In this review, we comprehensively examined disease activity measurement tools and their performance in the Korean context. We also propose a new strategy for measuring RA disease activity, tailored to the different situations encountered by physicians in routine clinical practice. This review may contribute to the improvement of the quality of care for patients with RA in Korea.

American College of Rheumatology and Food and Drug Administration Summit: Summary of the Meeting, May 17-18, 2022

The American College of Rheumatology and the US Food and Drug Administration co-sponsored a public meeting in May 2022 about challenges in the clinical development of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), focusing on innovative clinical trial designs, outcome measures, and data collection methods. Recommendations include early dose-ranging studies and use of active comparators. Challenges and opportunities in assessing long-term safety by leveraging real-world data from electronic health records (EHRs) and claims data are discussed, along with insights from European registries and the evolving role of real-world evidence and artificial intelligence in regulatory evaluations. Endpoints for assessing disease activity and outcome measures used in RA and PsA trials are explored, emphasizing challenges in defining remission, assessing clinical response, and evaluating structural progression. The need for outcome measures that better reflect treatment targets and the potential of advanced imaging in future trials are highlighted. Challenges with placebo-controlled trials in RA are discussed and use of non-inferiority clinical trial design, in which new drugs are evaluated with active comparators, is proposed. Pragmatic trials in RA and PsA, employing decentralized approaches, are highlighted for their real-world relevance and administrative efficiencies. Strategies for identifying at-risk populations for RA and the challenges of using EHRs and insurance claims data in drug development are discussed. Registry data and digital health technologies show promise in bridging the gap between clinical trials and real-world effectiveness.

Remission definitions guiding immunosuppressive therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: which is best fitted for the purpose?

OBJECTIVE

To assess which definition of remission best predicts good radiographic outcome (GRO) and good functional outcome (GFO) in rheumatoid arthritis, focusing the updated American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Meta-analyses of individual patient data (IPD) from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Six definitions of remission were considered: (1) Boolean with Patient Global Assessment (PGA)≤1 (Boolean); (2) Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)≤3.3; (3) Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)≤2.8; (4) Boolean with PGA≤2 (Updated-Boolean); (5) Boolean with Physician Global Assessment (PhGA≤1) replacing PGA (Boolean-PhGA) and (6) Boolean excluding PGA (3VBoolean). GRO was defined as a worsening ≤0.5 units in radiographic score and GFO as a no worsening in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), that is, ∆HAQ-DI≤0.0 units. Relationships between each remission definition at 6 and/or 12 months and GRO and GFO during the second year were analysed. Pooled probabilities for each outcome for each definition and their predictive accuracy were estimated.

RESULTS

IPD from eight RCTs (n=4423) were analysed. Boolean, SDAI, CDAI, Updated-Boolean, Boolean-PhGA and 3VBoolean were achieved by 24%, 27%, 28%, 32%, 33% and 43% of all patients, respectively. GRO among patients achieving remission ranged from 82.4% (3VBoolean) to 83.9% (SDAI). 3VBoolean showed the highest predictive accuracy for GRO: 51.1% versus 38.8% (Boolean) and 44.1% (Updated-Boolean). The relative risk of GFO ranged from 1.16 (Boolean) to 1.05 (3VBoolean). However, the proportion of GFO correctly predicted was highest for the 3VBoolean (50.3%) and lowest for the Boolean (43.8%).

CONCLUSION

3VBoolean definition provided the most accurate prediction of GRO and GFO, avoiding the risk of overtreatment in a substantial proportion of patients without increment in radiographic damage progression, supporting the proposal that 3VBoolean remission is preferable to guide immunosuppressive treatment. The patient's perspective, which must remain central, is best served by an additional patient-oriented target: a dual-target approach.

RheuMetric Quantitative 0 to 10 Physician Estimates of Inflammation, Damage, and Distress in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Validation Against Reference Measures

OBJECTIVE

To analyze a RheuMetric checklist, which includes four feasible physician 0 to 10 scores for DOCGL, inflammation (DOCINF), damage (DOCDAM), and distress (DOCSTR) for criterion and discriminant validity against standard reference measures.

METHODS

A prospective, cross-sectional assessment was performed at one routine care visit at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Rheumatologists recorded DOCGL, DOCINF, DOCDAM, DOCSTR, and 28 joint counts for swelling (SJC), tenderness (TJC), and limited motion/deformity (DJC). Patients completed a multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ), which includes routine assessment of patient index data (RAPID3), fibromyalgia assessment screening tool (FAST4), and MDHAQ depression screen (MDS2). Laboratory tests and radiographic scores were recorded. RheuMetric estimates of inflammation, damage, and distress were compared with reference and other measures using correlations and linear regressions.

RESULTS

In 173 patients with RA, variation in RheuMetric DOCINF was explained significantly by SJC and inversely by disease duration; variation in DOCDAM was explained significantly by DJC, radiographic scores, and physical function; and variation in DOCSTR was explained significantly by fibromyalgia and depression.

CONCLUSION

RheuMetric DOCINF, DOCDAM, and DOCSTR estimates were correlated significantly and specifically with reference measures of inflammation, damage, and distress, documenting criterion and discriminant validity.

Disease activity and disease-related factors are drivers of patient global assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-life cross-sectional study

Despite that the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) is widely used for measuring Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) disease activity to define the remission state of the disease, the primary contributors influencing patients' ratings are still debated. This study aims to determine which clinical, sociodemographic and lifestyle-related contextual factors might be key drivers of PGA in RA. This single-center cross-sectional study recruited 393 consecutive adult RA patients. Median age 60 years, females 306 (77.9%). Data related to disease activity were assessed by using Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), severity by Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and impact by RA Impact of Disease (RAID). Sociodemographic/lifestyle features were collected. Disease remission was calculated using Boolean-based criteria 1.0 and 2.0. Quantile regression models were used for univariate and multivariate analysis. The remission rate progressively increased from 15% by using SDAI with a Boolean 1.0-based definition to 43.5% using a Boolean 2.0-based remission. Among factors related to disease activity, the use of low-dose corticosteroids, the RAID items pain and sleep difficulties were predictive for worse PGA scores (p = 0.01). Among factors related to disease severity HAQ score and RAID total were independent factors associated with higher median PGA (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001). RAID's physical well-being was related to PGA scores (p = 0.01). An increasing trend in PGA was observed in longstanding diseases (> 15 years). Our results confirmed that there is no unambiguous interpretation of the PGA score. It is a measure related to some disease activity parameters, but it is also influenced by contextual factors related to disease severity and impact. These data highlighted that PGA should have a broad interpretation, thus supporting the proposal of a dual targets (biological and impact) approach to obtain a more accurate estimate of disease activity.

The impact of time length to Boolean remission for tight disease activity control after acquisition in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Clinical importance of time length from initiation under treat-to-target (T2T) strategy to acquisition of clinical remission (TL) in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on disease activity control, daily activities, and quality of life maintenance was investigated. In patients who achieved Boolean remission once or more, relationship between TL and patients' background data at initiation, and relationship between TL and mean simplified disease activity score (SDAI), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score, pain score with visual analog scale (PS-VAS), Sharp/van der Heijde Score (SHS) and quality of life score (QOLS) at the first remission and thereafter were evaluated statistically. Patients were divided into two groups whether TL was within 6 months or longer (G ≤ 6 and G > 6). Change of the parameters and Boolean remission rate (BRR) after the first remission between the two groups were compared statistically. In 465 patients, TL correlated significantly with the SDAI score, the HAQ score, PS-VAS, SHS, and the QOLS after the remission. The SDAI score and the BRR after the remission were significantly better in the G ≤ 6 than in the G > 6. TL is an important key to guarantee good and stable clinical course in treating under T2T.

Comprehensive evaluation of the influence of sex differences on composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: results from a nationwide observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The effects and their magnitudes of sex on disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis are not clear. We aimed to comprehensively evaluate the influence of sex on disease activity indices in the real-world setting using a large observational database.

METHODS

We analyzed 14,958 patients registered in the National Database of Rheumatic Diseases in Japan (NinJa) in 2017. We evaluated the sex differences in the 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), DAS28 using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and Clinical Disease Activity Index by disease activity category using Cliff's delta and regression analysis. Differences in the share of components of indices were evaluated using permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Correction equations were constructed to estimate the number of misclassification in male patients who achieve DAS28-ESR remission.

RESULTS

DAS28-ESR showed higher values in female patients than male patients in remission despite no obvious difference in other indices or disease activity categories. Among the components of DAS28-ESR, only ESR was higher in female patients than male patients in remission. In DAS28-CRP and SDAI, 28-tender joint count was higher and CRP was lower in female patients than male patients. In addition, the profiles in the components were different between female and male patients, especially among those with high disease activity. Using correction equations, almost 12% of male patients with DAS28-ESR remission were estimated to be misclassified, mainly due to differences in ESR.

CONCLUSION

Among the disease activity indices, significant sex difference was observed only in DAS28-ESR remission. The degree of misclassification in DAS28-ESR remission would be unignorable.

American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Remission Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis: 2022 Revision

OBJECTIVE

In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean- and index-based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the 2 sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index-based criteria.

METHODS

We used data from 4 randomized trials comparing biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0-10 cm) compared to the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analyzed agreement between the Boolean- and index-based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index [SDAI] and Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI]) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score ≤0.5) and radiographic nonprogression.

RESULTS

Data from 2,048 trial participants, 1,101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared to Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8-4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Using the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index-based remission criteria without jeopardizing predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index-based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.

American College of Rheumatology/EULAR remission criteria for rheumatoid arthritis: 2022 revision

OBJECTIVE

In 2011, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and EULAR endorsed provisional criteria for remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), both Boolean-based and index-based. Based on recent studies indicating that a higher threshold for the patient global assessment (PtGA) may improve agreement between the two sets of criteria, our goals were to externally validate a revision of the Boolean remission criteria using a higher PtGA threshold and to validate the provisionally endorsed index-based criteria.

METHODS

We used data from four randomised trials comparing biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs to methotrexate or placebo. We tested the higher proposed PtGA threshold of 2 cm (Boolean2.0) (range 0-10 cm) compared with the original threshold of 1 cm (Boolean1.0). We analysed agreement between the Boolean-based and index-based criteria (Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)) for remission and examined how well each remission definition predicted later good physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score≤0.5) and radiographic non-progression.

RESULTS

Data from 2048 trial participants, 1101 with early RA and 947 with established RA, were included. The proportion of patients with disease in remission at 6 months after treatment initiation increased when using Boolean2.0 compared with Boolean1.0, from 14.8% to 20.6% in early RA and 4.2% to 6.0% in established RA. Agreement between Boolean2.0 and the SDAI or CDAI remission criteria was better than for Boolean1.0, particularly in early disease. Boolean2.0, SDAI, and CDAI remission criteria had similar positive likelihood ratios (LRs) to predict radiographic nonprogression and a HAQ score of ≤0.5 (positive LR 3.8-4.3). The omission of PtGA (BooleanX) worsened the prediction of good functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Using the Boolean 2.0 criteria classifies, more patients as achieving remission and increases the agreement with index-based remission criteria without jeopardising predictive value for radiographic or functional outcomes. This revised Boolean definition and the previously provisionally endorsed index-based criteria were endorsed by ACR and EULAR.

EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update

OBJECTIVES

To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field.

METHODS

An international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item.

RESULTS

The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3-6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost.

Clinical Advantage of Attaining Index-Based Remission Prior to Composite Remission in Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The clinical advantage of targeting index-based remission prior to Boolean remission was evaluated retrospectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 578 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who were treated for more than three years, were recruited. Patients who were treated to targeted index-based remission and composite measure remission criteria such as Boolean remission from the first consultation were divided according to the turn of attaining Boolean remission and index-based remission: G-IBR, a group that matched index-based remission at the same time Boolean remission is attained or earlier; G-BR_IF, a group that attained Boolean remission followed by index-based remission or failed; G-IR_BF, a group that could not attain Boolean remission despite attaining index-based remission; G-BothF, a group that failed to attain either Boolean remission or index-based remission. Background factors were statistically compared among groups. The Boolean remission rate in patients who attained index-based remission (BRR) and the rate of failure to attain index-based remission in patients who failed to attain Boolean remission (BFR) were statistically evaluated.

RESULTS

Groups comprising 225, 231, and 482 in G-IBR; 160, 154, and 8 in G-BR_IF; 18, 18, and 75 in G-IR_BF; and 175, 175, and 13 in G-BothF when indexing the clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), and 28-joints disease activity score with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP), respectively. Disease activity indices' scores after Boolean remission were demonstrated to be significantly higher in the G-BR_IF group than in the G-IBR group. BRR was 92.6%, 92.8%, and 86.5%, while BFR was 71.3%, 71.3%, and 13.8% when indexing CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28-CRP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Targeting CDAI and SDAI remission prior to Boolean remission contributes to a stable clinical course.

Remission or Not Remission, That's the Question: Shedding Light on Remission and the Impact of Objective and Subjective Measures Reflecting Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Introduction

The inclusion of certain variables in remission formulas for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may give rise to discrepancies. An increase in patient global assessment (PGA), a variable showing the patient's self-evaluation of their disease activity, may alone tilt a patient out of remission when using certain remission-assessing methods. This study aimed to explore differences in remission rates among various formulas and the impact of PGA and other clinical variables on the calculation of remission.

Methods

Data were collected from RA patients monitored during the years 2015–2019 at an outpatient clinic in southern Norway. Linear and logistic regression assessed associations between PGA, other RA-related variables, and remission-assessing methods.

Results

Remission rates were 23%, 65%, and 73% in 2019 when assessing the same 502 RA patients using Boolean remission, Boolean remission without PGA, and the disease activity score (DAS) with C-reactive peptide [DAS28(3)-CRP] method, respectively. Among the same population that year, 27% reported PGA ≤ 10, 74% had a tender joint count of ≤ 1, 85% had a swollen joint count of ≤ 1, and 86% had CRP ≤ 10. Pain (standardized coefficient β = 0.7, p < 0.001) was most strongly associated with PGA. Pain, fatigue, and morning stiffness were substantially associated with the remission-assessing methods that incorporated PGA.

Conclusions

Since PGA is strongly associated with the patient’s perception of pain and may not reflect the inflammatory process, our study challenges the application of remission-assessing methods containing PGA when monitoring RA patients in the outpatient clinic. We recommend using measures that are less likely to be associated with noninflammatory pain and psychosocial factors.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00490-5.

Inflammatory correlates of the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity vary in relation to disease duration and autoantibody status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the associations between the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) and measures of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in relation to disease duration and autoantibody status.

METHODS

1412 patients from three independent cohorts were studied: a prospective cohort of 810 patients with early RA followed up for 24 months; a cross-sectional cohort of 210 patients with established RA in low disease activity; a cross-sectional cohort of 401 patients with established RA in moderate-to-high disease activity. Correlations of the PGA were analysed by Pearson's coefficients and multivariable linear regression at baseline and at months 6, 12 and 24 in the overall populations and after stratification for autoantibody subgroup and remission status (Boolean remission, PGA near remission and non-remission).

RESULTS

In patients with early RA in non-remission, swollen joints correlated independently with the PGA; the correlation became progressively weaker but persisted at all time points in autoantibody-positive patients (adjusted r=0.30-0.12) but lost significance after month 12 in autoantibody-negative patients. Swollen joints independently correlated with the PGA also in near remission until month 12 (adjusted r=0.18-0.16) in autoantibody-positive patients. No independent correlations of inflammatory variables were instead found in patients with established RA irrespective of disease activity and autoantibody status.

CONCLUSIONS

In the early phases of RA, particularly in autoantibody-positive patients, inflammatory variables directly correlate with the PGA across different disease activity states. The optimal cut-off values of the PGA capable of identifying absence of disease should be better explored in relation to disease duration and autoantibody status.

Validity and risk of adopting PGA ≤ 2 as a remission criteria of Boolean in clinical practice in patient with rheumatoid arthritis

Validity and risk of setting patient's global assessment (PGA) ≤ 2 as a Boolean remission criteria substituting PGA ≤ 1 in treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was investigated. Patients were recruited from an area cohort, of whom attained Boolean remission (Boolean-1) or near remission with PGA ≤ 2 and the rest components were ≤ 1 (Boolean-2). Simplified disease activity index (SDAI) score was compared according to the criteria variations. A total of 517 patients were studied. Mean SDAI score of patients with Boolean-1 was significantly lower than that of patients with Boolean-2 at acquisition. The trend was evident in the patients who attained Boolean-1 remission. Mean SDAI score at acquisition, 6 months after, and 1 year after of patients who attained Boolean-2 first and then Boolean-1, was significantly inferior to that of patients who attained the remissions at the same time. The mean SDAI score at month 6 in the Boolean-2 was not SDAI remission at all. We concluded that setting PGA ≤ 2 as a remission criteria may not have statistical difference in disease activity from PGA ≤ 1, however, there was an determinant risk to misread that includes patient who losses clinical remission after acquisition.

Inflammation and biologic therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis achieving versus not achieving ACR/EULAR Boolean remission in a treat-to-target study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate limiting factors of American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR Boolean remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and compare patients who fulfil the criteria to patients who only partly fulfil the criteria, with respect to imaging inflammation and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) usage.

METHODS

Patients with DMARD-naïve RA were treated according to current recommendations in the the ARCTIC trial (Aiming for Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial examining the benefit of ultrasound in a Clinical TIght Control regimen). Limiting factors of reaching ACR/EULAR Boolean remission at 2 years were assessed. Imaging inflammation (ultrasound and MRI) in patients in remission was compared with patients failing to fulfil different components of the criteria. The OR of biologic therapy was calculated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 203 patients, 112 (55%) reached ACR/EULAR Boolean remission; 49 (24%) fulfilled three of four criteria. The main limiting factors were patient global assessment (PGA) (59%) and tender joints (22%). Imaging inflammation was not significantly different for patients in remission and patients not fulfilling the criteria due to elevated PGA and/or tender joints, but higher odds of using biologics (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.73 to 7.61) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

PGA and tender joints were the factors most often limiting achievement of ACR/EULAR Boolean remission. The level of imaging inflammation was not elevated in these patients compared with patients in remission, but the odds of using biologic DMARDs were higher.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Can Lupus Patients Take the Driver's Seat in Their Disease Monitoring?

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder that has detrimental effects on patient’s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Owing to its immense heterogeneity of symptoms and its complexity regarding comorbidity burden, management of SLE necessitates interdisciplinary care, with the goal being the best possible HRQoL and long-term outcomes. Current definitions of remission, low disease activity, and response to treatment do not incorporate self-reported patient evaluation, while it has been argued that the physician’s global assessment should capture the patient’s perspective. However, even the judgment of a very well-trained physician might not replace a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM), not only owing to the multidimensionality of self-perceived health experience but also since this notion would constitute a direct contradiction to the definition of PROMs. The proper use of PROMs is not only an important conceptual issue but also an opportunity to build bridges in the partnership between patients and physicians. These points of consideration adhere to the overall framework that there will seldom be one single best marker that helps interpret the activity, severity, and impact of SLE at the same time. For optimal outcomes, we not only stress the importance of the use of PROMs but also emphasize the urgency of adoption of the conception of forming alliances with patients and facilitating patient participation in surveillance and management processes. Nevertheless, this should not be misinterpreted as a transfer of responsibility from healthcare professionals to patients but rather a step towards shared decision-making.

Re-examining remission definitions in rheumatoid arthritis: considering the 28-Joint Disease Activity Score, C-reactive protein level and patient global assessment

The Editors of the 5 journals of the American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology have been reminded by this editorial that ACR and EULAR have jointly agreed on various classification criteria, definitions, recommendations, or points to consider, which do not always find reflection in manuscripts submitted to the journals. Consequently, in the future, the Editors will enforce the use of the products obtained in the course of joint ACR/EULAR or EULAR/ACR activities in all respective papers. For rheumatoid arthritis this would mean use of the ACR/EULAR or EULAR/ACR classification criteria, remission definitions, recommendations on what to report in clinical trials, and others, as pertinent. The same applies to other diseases. There are valid and important reasons that these activities have been undertaken by ACR and EULAR, and therefore, the conclusions of the various task forces, which have been endorsed by ACR and EULAR, should be respected by investigators and study administrators. This does not mean other methods could not be used in a study, but at the least, the reports should address the methods agreed on by the two organisations. Maintaining uniformity across major publications regarding rheumatoid arthritis remission or other definitions not only allows for more appropriate comparison across analyses, but also enhances readers’ ability to interpret results. Author instructions across the five journals will more strongly reflect this requirement.

Treating-to-target in rheumatology: Theory and practice

Despite its inclusion in current treatment recommendations, adherence to the treat-to-target strategy (T2T) is still poor. Among the issues are the definition(s) of target, especially the caveats of the patient global assessment (PGA), included in all recommended definitions of remission. The PGA is poorly related to inflammation, especially at low levels of disease activity, rather being a measure of the disease impact. Up to 60% of all patients otherwise in remission still score PGA at >1 and as high as 10. These patients (PGA-near-remission) are exposed to overtreatment if current recommendations are strictly followed and will continue to endure significant impact, unless adjuvant measures are implemented. A proposed method to overcome both these risks is to systematically pursue two targets: one focused on the disease process (the biological target) and another focused on the symptoms and impact (the impact target), the dual-target strategy. Candidate instruments to define each of these targets are discussed.

Considerations and priorities for incorporating the patient perspective on remission in rheumatoid arthritis: An OMERACT 2020 special interest group report

OBJECTIVE

To determine how best to incorporate the patient perspective into rheumatoid arthritis remission criteria.

METHODS

At OMERACT 2020, several studies, including a longitudinal multi-centre study testing the validity of adding patient-valued domains to the ACR/EULAR criteria, were presented and discussed by the virtual Special Interest Group.

RESULTS

Overall consensus was that there is insufficient evidence to change the remission criteria at this point. Future work should focus on measurement of the new domain of independence, clarifying the value of the patient global assessment, and optimizing the input of domains that patients value in the criteria.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating the patient perspective into remission criteria should be further explored.

Limiting factors to Boolean remission differ between autoantibody-positive and -negative patients in early rheumatoid arthritis

Background:

The patient global assessment of disease activity (PGA) is the major limiting factor to Boolean remission in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we investigated the limiting variables to disease remission in patients with early RA treated with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, also in relation to autoantibody status.

Methods:

Data were retrieved from 535 early RA patients (<12 months of symptoms) with an observation period of 6–12 months upon initiation of therapy with methotrexate aimed at the achievement of low disease activity based on the 28-joints disease activity score. Near-remission was defined as any of the four core items of Boolean remission >1 with the remaining three all ⩽1. Reasons for missing Boolean remission and predictors of near-remission subcategories were analyzed in relation to baseline disease variables.

Results:

After 6 and 12 months, near-remission was two-times more frequent than Boolean remission (25.6% and 26.9% at the two time-points). A 28-swollen joint count (SJC28) >1 was responsible for the majority of near-remission (56.2% and 57.6% at 6 and 12 months, respectively), and PGA > 1 accounted for approximatively 35% of the cases. Autoantibody-positivity independently predicted the risk of missing remission because of SJC28 > 1 [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.81 (1.59–4.9) at 6 months and 1.73 (1.01–3.01) at 12 months], whilst autoantibody-negativity was an independent predictor of PGA near-remission [adjusted OR (95% CI) 2.45 (1.25–4.80) at 6 months and 5.71 (2.47–13.2) at 12 months].

Conclusion:

In early RA, Boolean remission is more frequently missed because of persistent swollen joints. However, barriers to full-remission vary in relation to the autoantibody status. Autoantibody-positive patients more commonly experience residual swollen joints, whilst PGA more frequently impairs remission in autoantibody-negative patients. Efforts to target full-remission in early RA may thus require different strategies according to autoantibody profile.

Revisiting the use of remission criteria for rheumatoid arthritis by excluding patient global assessment: an individual meta-analysis of 5792 patients

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of excluding patient global assessment (PGA) from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Boolean remission criteria, on prediction of radiographic and functional outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Meta-analyses using individual patient data from randomised controlled trials testing the efficacy of biological agents on radiographic and functional outcomes at ≥2 years. Remission states were defined by 4 variants of the ACR/EULAR Boolean definition: (i) tender and swollen 28-joint counts (TJC28/SJC28), C reactive protein (CRP, mg/dL) and PGA (0-10=worst) all ≤1 (4V-remission); (ii) the same, except PGA >1 (4V-near-remission); (iii) 3V-remission (i and ii combined; similar to 4V, but without PGA); (iv) non-remission (TJC28 >1 and/or SJC28 >1 and/or CRP >1). The most stringent class achieved at 6 or 12 months was considered. Good radiographic (GRO) and functional outcome (GFO) were defined as no worsening (ie, change in modified total Sharp score (ΔmTSS) ≤0.5 units and ≤0.0 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index points, respectively, during the second year). The pooled probabilities of GRO and GFO for the different definitions of remission were estimated and compared.

RESULTS

Individual patient data (n=5792) from 11 trials were analysed. 4V-remission was achieved by 23% of patients and 4V-near-remission by 19%. The probability of GRO in the 4V-near-remission group was numerically, but non-significantly, lower than that in the 4V-remission (78 vs 81%) and significantly higher than that for non-remission (72%; difference=6%, 95% CI 2% to 10%). Applying 3V-remission could have prevented therapy escalation in 19% of all participants, at the cost of an additional 6.1%, 4.0% and 0.7% of patients having ΔmTSS >0.0, >0.5 and >5 units over 2 years, respectively. The probability of GFO (assessed in 8 trials) in 4V-near-remission (67%, 95% CI 63% to 71%) was significantly lower than in 4V-remission (78%, 74% to 81%) and similar to non-remission (69%, 66% to 72%).

CONCLUSION

4V-near-remission and 3V-remission have similar validity as the original 4V-remission definition in predicting GRO, despite expected worse prediction of GFO, while potentially reducing the risk of overtreatment. This supports further exploration of 3V-remission as the target for immunosuppressive therapy complemented by patient-oriented targets.

How to Define Boolean Low Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Experience from a Large Real-world Cohort

Introduction

The aim of this work is to propose Boolean-defined low disease activity (LDA) and to test its utility in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Methods

We used data from a longitudinal academic clinical database of RA in Peking University First Hospital over a decade. The initial proposal of Boolean-defined LDA was proposed with ascending thresholds from 2 to 5 in steps of 1 (referred to as Boolean-LDA2/3/4/5). Agreement and residual swollen joint count (SJC) pattern with the index-based [Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)] LDA was analyzed. To confirm discovery, we randomly classified RA patients in a 3:2 ratio into either analysis cohort or validation cohort.

Results

In total, 4881 visits of 672 patients were included in the analysis cohort. Of these visits, the frequencies of achieving LDA were 71.9% (SDAI), 73.6% (CDAI), 52.8% (Boolean-LDA2), 65.2% (Boolean-LDA3), 73.5% (Boolean-LDA4), and 80.7% (Boolean-LDA5). High consistency and similar SJC pattern with SDAI-LDA or CDAI-LDA were observed in Boolean-LDA3 (kappa = 0.796, 0.771). Further analysis found meeting SDAI-LDA but not Boolean-LDA3 was largely attributable to higher patient’s global assessment (PGA) scores (62.9%). In further modification of Boolean-LDA3, better agreement with SDAI-LDA or CDAI-LDA was reached when exclusively increasing PGA cutoffs to 4.0, 4.5 or replacing PGA by evaluator’s global assessment (EGA) with cutoff to 3.0. These findings were further replicated in randomly generated validation cohort of 449 patients with 3306 clinic visits.

Conclusions

Using cutoff of 3 to Boolean-LDA provides great clinical utility with index-based LDA, especially when exclusively increasing PGA cutoffs to 4.0, 4.5 or replacing PGA by EGA with cutoffs to 3.0. This may deserve being considered in clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-020-00270-z.

Transforming clinical trials in rheumatology: towards patient-centric precision medicine

Despite the success of targeted therapies in the treatment of inflammatory arthritides, the lack of predictive biomarkers drives a 'trial and error' approach to treatment allocation, leading to variable and/or unsatisfactory responses. In-depth characterization of the synovial tissue in rheumatoid arthritis, as well as psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis, is bringing new insights into the diverse cellular and molecular features of these diseases and their potential links with different clinical and treatment-response phenotypes. Such progress raises the tantalizing prospect of improving response rates by matching the use of specific agents to the cognate target pathways that might drive particular disease subtypes in specific patient groups. Innovative patient-centric, molecular pathology-driven clinical trial approaches are needed to achieve this goal. Whilst progress is clearly being made, it is important to emphasize that this field is still in its infancy and there are a number of potential barriers to realizing the premise of patient-centric clinical trials.

Insights into the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: A paradigm in medicine

Insights into rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have slowly evolved over the last century, but with breathtaking speed over the last 2 decades. While only aspirin and parenteral gold were available in early 20th century, the efficacy of sulfasalazine, glucocorticoids and methotrexate was established around its middle. Identification of pathogenetic pathways was slow, and until today the role of T-cells is enigmatic, while it is clear that genetics via the shared epitope and other genes as well as environmental factors including the metagenome play major roles. More clarity evolved on importance of proinflammatory cytokines, especially TNF and IL-6. The activation of osteoclasts, the culprits of bony joint damage, is amplified by the proinflammatory cytokines. The realization of TNF's central role led to the successful introduction of TNF-inhibitors and subsequently also inhibitors of other cytokines and cells as well as signal transduction. In parallel, the evolution of outcomes research has contributed importantly to RA management. At the turn to the 21st century, improvement criteria and continuous indices were created, allowing reliable therapeutic response determination, including definition of endpoints like remission. Also our understanding of the role of disease activity relative to disease pathology has increased, ultimately fostering the treat-to-target concept and recommendations and, thus, optimal outcomes for RA patients as never been seen before. Similar developments are now ultimately being introduced in the field of psoriatic arthritis. Here many of these aspects are reviewed from a very personal perspective of the author in the hopes of further helping parients with chronic forms of arthritis.