Classification criteria: time for a rethink?

Improving the design of RCTs in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

Concerns have been raised that randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) might be failing to identify patients that best show differences in clinical response rates between those receiving active drug and those receiving placebo therapies; in addition, some studies might even be showing spurious differences in responses to TNF and IL-17 inhibitor therapies. In particular, the most recent phase III RCTs in nr-axSpA have reported variable and generally lower response rates than observed in phase III trials of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and in trials conducted a decade ago in patients with early axSpA who were selected on the basis of axial inflammation evident on MRI scans. We argue that these observations at least partly reflect an RCT design that does not take full advantage of MRI to select patients who are responsive to therapy because the current MRI-based inclusion criteria cannot identify patients with axSpA with sufficient specificity. We propose that future studies should be designed using revised patient inclusion criteria based on expanded MRI evaluation and the application of data-driven definitions of a positive MRI for inflammatory and structural lesions typical of axSpA reported in an international multicentre analysis of MRI scans from the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification cohort.

[Spondyloarthritis in childhood and adulthood]

Axial spondylarthritis in adulthood (SpAA) is frequently initially manifested as a sacroiliitis, whereas this not true for enthesitis-related arthritis (EAA), which begins in childhood and adolescence. Classically, EAA begins with peripheral arthritis and only a part transitions into a juvenile SpA (jSpA) or SpAA. The criteria used for classification of SpAA and EAA are currently being validated and revised. For the first time imaging is included for EAA. For both diseases nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are initially used therapeutically, followed by biologicals or synthetic targeted disease-modifying drugs in refractory courses. Steroids should be avoided in long-term treatment. For optimal transition and further care in adulthood, a close cooperation between internistic and pediatric rheumatologists is necessary.

Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What is Relevant for Diagnosis in Daily Practice?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore how imaging may assist diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis in rheumatology practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

A diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis is based on pattern recognition by synthesizing clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings. In health care settings providing low threshold access to advanced imaging, sacroiliac joint MRI is the preferred imaging modality in clinically suspected axial spondyloarthritis. In daily routine, the optimum protocol to assess suspected inflammatory back pain combines sacroiliac joint and spine MRI fitting a 30-min slot. Contextual assessment of concomitant structural and active MRI lesions is key to enhance diagnostic utility. In women with postpartum back pain suggestive of axial spondyloarthritis, recent reports advocate waiting 6-12 months after delivery before acquiring sacroiliac joint MRI. Major unmet needs are consistent MRI protocols, standardized training modules on how to evaluate axial MRI, and timely dissemination of imaging advances into mainstream practice both in rheumatology and in radiology. In rheumatology practice, MRI has become indispensable to help diagnose early axial spondyloarthritis. However, major gaps in training and knowledge transfer to daily care need to be closed.

Utility of the "2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria" for the management of patients with IgG4-related disease

BACKGROUND

The 2019 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) represent a fundamental tool for patient enrollment in research studies and in clinical trials but their usefulness in daily clinical practice remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the 2019 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for IgG4-RD in a real-life setting and to anticipate their utility for orienting disease diagnosis and patient management.

METHODS

Four experts were asked to classify 200 patients diagnosed with IgG4-RD according to the 2019 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for IgG4-RD. Agreement between experts was calculated and the Classification score of each patient was correlated with the following variables and outcomes: serum IgG4 and IgE; inflammatory markers; eosinophils; plasmablasts; IgG4-RD responder index; diabetes, osteoporosis, relapses; and use of rituximab.

RESULTS

Among the 157/200 cases equally rated by at least three experts, 94 (59.9%) achieved IgG4-RD classification and 63 (40.1%) did not. Strong agreement among IgG4-RD experts was observed in classifying patients (k = 0.711, p<0.0001). Clinical presentations not included in the classification algorithm and lack of informative histology were the most common reasons for not achieving classification. In patients achieving classification, the Classification score did not correlate with variables of disease activity and was not associated with specific outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria represent a replicable instrument for classifying patients and a useful framework for orienting diagnosis but are of limited utility for assessing IgG4-RD activity, for predicting disease outcomes, and for defining personalized therapeutic approaches.

Quality Evaluation of the Underlying Evidence in the Updated Treatment Recommendations for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disorder known for its broad clinical spectrum. Recently, the European, British and Latin American rheumatology professional societies (EULAR, BSR and PANLAR) published updated recommendations for SLE management. The objective of this study was to characterize the data supporting the updated recommendations, with the goal of highlighting areas which could benefit from additional high-quality research.

METHODS

References were compiled from the recently published EULAR, BSR and PANLAR SLE treatment recommendations. Data collected from each study included publication year, treatment regimen, study design, sample size, inclusion and exclusion criteria and relevant SLE diagnostic criteria. Studies with less than 10 patients and those which did not specify the SLE diagnostic criteria used were excluded.

RESULTS

Altogether 250 studies were included in this study. The majority were prospective and retrospective cohorts (72%), with only a small percentage of randomized controlled trials (28%). The median number of patients included was 37 (IQR 19-86). The revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1982 criteria were the most commonly used criteria for SLE diagnosis (52%), followed by the revised ACR criteria from 1997 (27%). Only a small proportion of studies included the use of disease activity scores when defining study population (15%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has indicated a scarcity of sufficiently powered high-quality research referenced in the recently published SLE treatment guidelines. Well-designed large-scale studies utilizing the updated 2019 SLE diagnostic criteria are needed to better inform healthcare professionals caring for patients with SLE.

m6A RNA Methylation in Systemic Autoimmune Diseases-A New Target for Epigenetic-Based Therapy?

The general background of autoimmune diseases is a combination of genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors, that lead to defective immune reactions. This erroneous immune cell activation results in an excessive production of autoantibodies and prolonged inflammation. During recent years epigenetic mechanisms have been extensively studied as potential culprits of autoreactivity. Alike DNA and proteins, also RNA molecules are subjected to an extensive repertoire of chemical modifications. N6-methyladenosine is the most prevalent form of internal mRNA modification in eukaryotic cells and attracts increasing attention due to its contribution to human health and disease. Even though m6A is confirmed as an essential player in immune response, little is known about its role in autoimmunity. Only few data have been published up to date in the field of RNA methylome. Moreover, only selected autoimmune diseases have been studied in respect of m6A role in their pathogenesis. In this review, I attempt to present all available research data regarding m6A alterations in autoimmune disorders and appraise its role as a potential target for epigenetic-based therapies.