Identification and treatment of paediatric sepsis: getting the balance right

Effect of a Sepsis Screening Algorithm on Care of Children with False-Positive Sepsis Alerts

OBJECTIVES

To determine if implementation of an automated sepsis screening algorithm with low positive predictive value led to inappropriate resource utilization in emergency department (ED) patients as evidenced by an increased proportion of children with false-positive sepsis screens receiving intravenous (IV) antibiotics.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study comparing children <18 years of age presenting to an ED who triggered a false-positive sepsis alert during 2 different 5-month time periods: a silent alert period when alerts were generated but not visible to clinicians and an active alert period when alerts were visible. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received IV antibiotics. Secondary outcomes included proportion receiving IV fluid boluses, proportion admitted to the hospital, and ED length of stay (LOS).

RESULTS

Of 1457 patients, 1277 triggered a false-positive sepsis alert in the silent and active alert periods, respectively. In multivariable models, there were no changes in the proportion administered IV antibiotics (27.0% vs 27.6%, aOR 1.1 [0.9,1.3]) or IV fluid boluses (29.7% vs 29.1%, aOR 1.0 [0.8,1.2]). Differences in ED LOS and proportion admitted to the hospital were not significant when controlling for similar changes seen across all ED encounters.

CONCLUSIONS

An automated sepsis screening algorithm did not lead to changes in the proportion receiving IV antibiotics or IV fluid boluses, department LOS, or the proportion admitted to the hospital for patients with false-positive sepsis alerts.

Management of Children With Fever at Risk for Pediatric Sepsis: A Prospective Study in Pediatric Emergency Care

Objective: To study warning signs of serious infections in febrile children presenting to PED, ascertain their risk of having sepsis, and evaluate their management. Design: Prospective observational study. Setting: A single pediatric emergency department (PED). Participants: Febrile children, aged 1 month-16 years, with >= 1 warning signs of sepsis. Interventions and Main outcome measures: Clinical characteristics, including different thresholds for tachycardia and tachypnoea, and their association with (1) delivery of pediatric sepsis 6 (PS6) interventions, (2) final diagnosis of invasive bacterial infection (IBI), (3) the risk for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission, and (4) death. Results: Forty-one percent of 5,156 febrile children had warning signs of sepsis. 1,606 (34%) children had tachypnoea and 1,907 (39%) children had tachycardia when using APLS threshold values. Using the NICE sepsis guidelines thresholds resulted in 1,512 (32%) children having tachypnoea (kappa 0.56) and 2,769 (57%) children having tachycardia (kappa 0.66). Of 1,628 PED visits spanning 1,551 disease episodes, six children (0.4%) had IBI, with one death (0.06%), corresponding with 256 children requiring escalation of care according to sepsis guideline recommendations for each child with IBI. There were five additional PICU admissions (0.4%). 121 (7%) had intravenous antibiotics in PED; 39 children (2%) had an intravenous fluid bolus, inotrope drugs were started in one child. 440 children (27%) were reviewed by a senior clinician. In 4/11 children with IBI or PICU admission or death, PS6 interventions were delivered within 60 min after arriving. 1,062 (65%) visits had no PS6 interventions. Diagnostic performance of vital signs or sepsis criteria for predicting serious illness yielded a large proportion of false positives. Lactataemia was not associated with giving iv fluid boluses (p = 0.19) or presence of serious bacterial infections (p = 0.128). Conclusion: Many febrile children (41%) present with warning signs for sepsis, with only few of them undergoing investigations or treatment for true sepsis. Children with positive isolates in blood or CSF culture presented in a heterogeneous manner, with varying levels of urgency and severity of illness. Delivery of sepsis care can be improved in only a minority of children with IBI or admitted to PICU.