Surfactant therapy in late preterm and term neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Use of surfactant beyond respiratory distress syndrome, what is the evidence?

Surfactant replacement therapy is currently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) caused by surfactant deficiency due to immaturity. There is strong evidence that surfactant decreases mortality and air leak syndromes in premature infants with RDS. However, surfactant is also used "off-label" for respiratory failure beyond classic RDS. This review discusses current evidence for the use of off-label surfactant therapy for (1) term infants with lung disease such as meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), pneumonia/sepsis, and congenital diaphragmatic hernia (2) premature infants after 72 h for acute respiratory failure, and (3) the use of surfactant lavage. At last, we briefly describe the use of surfactants for drug delivery and the current evidence on evaluating infants for surfactant deficiency.

Neonatal point-of-care lung ultrasound: what should be known and done out of the NICU?

Lung ultrasound is rapidly becoming a useful tool in the care of neonates: its ease of use, reproducibility, low cost, and negligible side effects make it a very suitable tool for the respiratory care of all neonates. This technique has been extensively studied by different approaches in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), both for diagnostic and prognostic aims and to guide respiratory treatments. However, many neonates are being born in level I/II hospitals without NICU facilities so all pediatricians, not just neonatal intensivists, should be aware of its potential. This is made possible by the increasing access to ultrasound machines in a modern hospital setting. In this review, we describe the ultrasonographic characteristics of the normal neonatal lung. We also discuss the ultrasound features of main neonatal respiratory diseases: transient tachypnea of the neonate (TTN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), pneumothorax (PNX), pleural effusion (PE), or pneumonia. Finally, we mention two functional approaches to lung ultrasound: 1. The use of lung ultrasound in level I delivery centers as a mean to assess the severity of neonatal respiratory distress and request a transport to a higher degree structure in a timely fashion. 2. The prognostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for early and targeted surfactant replacement.

CONCLUSION

 LU is still a useful tool in level I/II neonatal units, both for diagnostic and functional issues.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Neonatal lung ultrasound has been recently introduced in the usual care in many Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

WHAT IS NEW

• It also has many advantages in level I/II neonatal units, both for neonatologist or even pediatricians that treat neonates in those sites.

Airway management in neonates and infants: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia joint guidelines

Airway management is required during general anaesthesia and is essential for life-threatening conditions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Evidence from recent trials indicates a high incidence of critical events during airway management, especially in neonates or infants. It is important to define the optimal techniques and strategies for airway management in these groups. In this joint European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) guideline on airway management in neonates and infants, we present aggregated and evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians in providing safe and effective medical care. We identified seven main areas of interest for airway management: i) preoperative assessment and preparation; ii) medications; iii) techniques and algorithms; iv) identification and treatment of difficult airways; v) confirmation of tracheal intubation; vi) tracheal extubation, and vii) human factors. Based on these areas, Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) questions were derived that guided a structured literature search. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to formulate the recommendations based on those studies included with consideration of their methodological quality (strong '1' or weak '2' recommendation with high 'A', medium 'B' or low 'C' quality of evidence). In summary, we recommend: 1. Use medical history and physical examination to predict difficult airway management (1C). 2. Ensure adequate level of sedation or general anaesthesia during airway management (1B). 3. Administer neuromuscular blocker before tracheal intubation when spontaneous breathing is not necessary (1C). 4. Use a videolaryngoscope with an age-adapted standard blade as first choice for tracheal intubation (1B). 5. Apply apnoeic oxygenation during tracheal intubation in neonates (1B). 6. Consider a supraglottic airway for rescue oxygenation and ventilation when tracheal intubation fails (1B). 7. Limit the number of tracheal intubation attempts (1C). 8. Use a stylet to reinforce and preshape tracheal tubes when hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades are used and when the larynx is anatomically anterior (1C). 9. Verify intubation is successful with clinical assessment and end-tidal CO2 waveform (1C). 10. Apply high-flow nasal oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for postextubation respiratory support, when appropriate (1B).

Airway management in neonates and infants: European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and British Journal of Anaesthesia joint guidelines

Airway management is required during general anaesthesia and is essential for life-threatening conditions such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Evidence from recent trials indicates a high incidence of critical events during airway management, especially in neonates or infants. It is important to define the optimal techniques and strategies for airway management in these groups. In this joint European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) and British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) guideline on airway management in neonates and infants, we present aggregated and evidence-based recommendations to assist clinicians in providing safe and effective medical care. We identified seven main areas of interest for airway management: i) preoperative assessment and preparation; ii) medications; iii) techniques and algorithms; iv) identification and treatment of difficult airways; v) confirmation of tracheal intubation; vi) tracheal extubation, and vii) human factors. Based on these areas, Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) questions were derived that guided a structured literature search. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to formulate the recommendations based on those studies included with consideration of their methodological quality (strong '1' or weak '2' recommendation with high 'A', medium 'B' or low 'C' quality of evidence). In summary, we recommend: 1. Use medical history and physical examination to predict difficult airway management (1С). 2. Ensure adequate level of sedation or general anaesthesia during airway management (1B). 3. Administer neuromuscular blocker before tracheal intubation when spontaneous breathing is not necessary (1С). 4. Use a videolaryngoscope with an age-adapted standard blade as first choice for tracheal intubation (1B). 5. Apply apnoeic oxygenation during tracheal intubation in neonates (1B). 6. Consider a supraglottic airway for rescue oxygenation and ventilation when tracheal intubation fails (1B). 7. Limit the number of tracheal intubation attempts (1C). 8. Use a stylet to reinforce and preshape tracheal tubes when hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blades are used and when the larynx is anatomically anterior (1C). 9. Verify intubation is successful with clinical assessment and end-tidal CO 2 waveform (1C). 10. Apply high-flow nasal oxygenation, continuous positive airway pressure or nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for postextubation respiratory support, when appropriate (1B).

Management of respiratory distress in moderate and late preterm infants: clinical trajectories in the Neobs study

Management of respiratory distress (RD) in the extremely preterm newborn meets recommendations. Few data are available concerning the management and the clinical course of moderate and late preterms with RD. Clinical course and management among moderate (30-33 weeks (wks) of gestation) and late preterms (34-36 wks) were assessed in the Neobs study, a French neonatal observational cohort study (2018) of preterms with RD in the first 24 h of life. Clinical course was defined as stable (use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) only), initially severe (initial use of invasive ventilation (IV)), and worsening (switch off IV after NIV support). Surfactant therapy instillation and withdrawal of all ventilator support at 72 h were recorded. Among moderate (n = 279) and late (n = 281) preterms, the clinical course was similar (p < 0.27): stable (82.1 and 86.8%), worsening (11.8% and 9.3%), and initially severe RD (6.1% and 3.9%), respectively. Surfactant was administered more frequently in the moderate versus late preterm groups (28.3% vs 16.7%; p < 0.001). The recommended surfactant dose (200 mg/kg) was administered in 53.3-83.3% of moderate and 42.1-63.2% of late preterms according to the clinical course. Withdrawal of ventilatory support at 72 h was observed in 40.0% and 70.0% of moderate and late preterms, respectively (p < 0.05), and was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with clinical course (the minus proportion among the worsening group).

CONCLUSION

While the proportion of clinical course pattern is similar in moderate and late preterm infants, the management of RD varies with gestational age, with late preterm infants being managed later in life and moderate premature infants weaned from ventilation at a later stage.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• There is a lack of clear guidance on the management of respiratory distress (RD) in moderate-to-late preterm infants. • Neobs was a multicentre, observational study designed to characterise the real-world management of moderate-to-late preterm infants with RD in France.

WHAT IS NEW

• Secondary analyses of Neobs study data found that ventilatory support strategies were dependent on gestational age despite a similar clinical course. • At 30-33 weeks of gestation (wks), infants were more likely to receive non-invasive ventilation at delivery, while 34-36 wks infants were more likely to be managed using a wait-and-see approach.

Clinical decision thresholds for surfactant administration in preterm infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

The ideal threshold at which surfactant administration in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is most beneficial is contentious. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the optimal clinical criteria to guide surfactant administration in preterm neonates with RDS.

Methods

The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022309433). Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL were searched from inception till 16th May 2023. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. A Bayesian random effects network meta-analysis (NMA) evaluating 33 interventions was performed. The primary outcome was requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within 7 days of life.

Findings

58 RCTs were included. In preterm neonates ≤30 weeks after adjusting for the confounding factor of modality of surfactant administration, an arterial alveolar oxygen tension ratio (aAO2) <0.36 (FiO2: 37-55%) was ranked the best threshold for decreasing the risk of IMV, very low certainty. Further, surfactant administration at an FiO2 40-45% possibly decreased mortality compared to rescue treatment when respiratory failure was diagnosed, certainty very low. The reasonable inference that could be drawn from these findings is that surfactant administration may be considered in preterm neonates of ≤30 weeks' with RDS requiring an FiO2 ≥ 40%. There was insufficient evidence for the comparison of FiO2 thresholds: 30% vs. 40%. The evidence was sparse for surfactant administration guided by lung ultrasound. For the sub-group >30 weeks, nebulized surfactant administration at an FiO2 < 30% possibly increased the risk of IMV compared to Intubate-Surfactant-Extubate at FiO2 < 30% and 40%, and less invasive surfactant administration at FiO2 40%, certainty very low.

Interpretation

Surfactant administration may be considered in preterm neonates of ≤30 weeks' with RDS if the FiO2 requirement is ≥40%. Future trials are required comparing lower FiO2 thresholds of 30% vs. 40% and that guided by lung ultrasound.

Funding

None.

Predictors of adverse short-term outcomes in late preterm infants

BACKGROUND

Infants born between 34 weeks and 36 weeks and 6 days of gestation are defined as late preterm infants (LPIs), and they account for approximately 74% of all premature births. Preterm birth (PB) remains the leading cause of infant mortality and morbidity worldwide.

AIM

To analyse short-term morbidity and mortality and identify predictors of adverse outcomes in late preterm infants.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we evaluated adverse short-term outcomes of LPIs admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Clinic for Children's Diseases, University Clinical Center Tuzla, between 01.01.2020 and 31.12.2022. The analysed data included sex, gestational age, parity, birth weight, Apgar score (i.e., assessment of vitality at birth in the first and fifth minutes after birth), and length of hospitalization in NICU, as well as short-term outcome data. Maternal risk factors we observed were: age of mother, parity, maternal morbidity during pregnancy, complications and treatment during pregnancy. LPIs with major anatomic malformations were excluded from the study. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for neonatal morbidity among LPIs.

RESULTS

We analysed data from 154 late preterm newborns, most of whom were male (60%), delivered by caesarean Sect. (68.2%) and from nulliparous mothers (63.6%). Respiratory complications were the most common outcome among all subgroups, followed by CNS morbidity, infections and jaundice requiring phototherapy. The rate of almost all of the complications in the late-preterm group decreased as gestational age increased from 34 to 36 weeks. Birth weight (OR: 1,2; 95% CI: 0,9 - 2,3; p = 0,0313) and male sex (OR: 2,5; 95% CI: 1,1-5,4; p = 0,0204) were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk for respiratory morbidity, and gestational weeks and male sex were associated with infectious morbidity. None of the risk factors analysed herein were predictors of CNS morbidity in LPIs.

CONCLUSION

A younger gestational age at birth is associated with a greater risk of short-term complications among LPIs, thus highlighting the need for increased knowledge about the epidemiology of these late preterm births. Understanding the risks of late preterm birth is critical to optimizing clinical decision-making, enhancing the cost-effectiveness of endeavours to delay delivery during the late preterm period, and reducing neonatal morbidity.

European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) care pathways evolve slowly as new evidence emerges. We report the sixth version of "European Guidelines for the Management of RDS" by a panel of experienced European neonatologists and an expert perinatal obstetrician based on available literature up to end of 2022. Optimising outcome for babies with RDS includes prediction of risk of preterm delivery, appropriate maternal transfer to a perinatal centre, and appropriate and timely use of antenatal steroids. Evidence-based lung-protective management includes initiation of non-invasive respiratory support from birth, judicious use of oxygen, early surfactant administration, caffeine therapy, and avoidance of intubation and mechanical ventilation where possible. Methods of ongoing non-invasive respiratory support have been further refined and may help reduce chronic lung disease. As technology for delivering mechanical ventilation improves, the risk of causing lung injury should decrease, although minimising time spent on mechanical ventilation by targeted use of postnatal corticosteroids remains essential. The general care of infants with RDS is also reviewed, including emphasis on appropriate cardiovascular support and judicious use of antibiotics as being important determinants of best outcome. We would like to dedicate this guideline to the memory of Professor Henry Halliday who died on November 12, 2022.These updated guidelines contain evidence from recent Cochrane reviews and medical literature since 2019. Strength of evidence supporting recommendations has been evaluated using the GRADE system. There are changes to some of the previous recommendations as well as some changes to the strength of evidence supporting recommendations that have not changed. This guideline has been endorsed by the European Society for Paediatric Research (ESPR) and the Union of European Neonatal and Perinatal Societies (UENPS).

Trends in the use of non-invasive respiratory support for term infants in tertiary neonatal units in Australia and New Zealand

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the use of non-invasive respiratory support, such as continuous positive airway pressure and nasal high flow, to treat term infants in Australian and New Zealand tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) has changed over time, and if so, whether there are parallel changes in short-term respiratory morbidities.

DESIGN

Retrospective database review of patient-level data from the Australian and New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN) from 2010 to 2018. Denominator data on the number of term inborn livebirths in each facility was only available as annual totals.

PATIENTS AND SETTING

Term, inborn infants cared for in NICUs within the ANZNN.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was the annual change in hospital-specific rates of non-invasive respiratory support per 1000 inborn livebirths, expressed as a percentage change. Secondary outcomes were the change in rates of mechanical ventilation, pneumothorax requiring drainage, exogenous surfactant treatment and death before hospital discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 14 656 term infants from 21 NICUs were included from 2010 to 2018, of whom 12 719 received non-invasive respiratory support. Non-invasive respiratory support use increased on average by 8.7% per year (95% CI: 7.9% to 9.4% per year); the number of term infants receiving non-invasive respiratory support almost doubled from 980 in 2010 (10.8/1000 livebirths) to 1913 in 2018 (20.8/1000). There was no change over time in rate of mechanical ventilation or death. The rate of pneumothorax requiring drainage increased over time, as did surfactant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-invasive respiratory support use to treat term infants cared for in NICUs within the ANZNN is increasing over time. Clinicians should be diligent in selecting infants most likely to benefit from treatment with non-invasive respiratory support in this relatively low-risk population of term newborn infants. Analysis of patient-level data by individual NICUs is recommended to control for potential confounding due to changes in population over time.

Surfactant therapy in late preterm and term neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There are no evidence-based recommendations for surfactant use in late preterm (LPT) and term infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of surfactant in LPT and term infants with RDS.

METHODS

Systematic review, meta-analysis and evidence grading.

INTERVENTIONS

Surfactant therapy versus standard of care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality and requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

RESULTS

Of the 7970 titles and abstracts screened, 17 studies (16 observational studies and 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT)) were included. Of the LPT and term neonates with RDS, 46% (95% CI 40% to 51%) were treated with surfactant. We found moderate certainty of evidence (CoE) from observational studies evaluating infants supported with non-invasive respiratory support (NRS) or IMV that surfactant use may be associated with a decreased risk of mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.64). Very low CoE from observational trials in which surfactant was administered at FiO₂ >0.30-0.40 to infants on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) indicated that surfactant did not decrease the risk of IMV (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.56). Very low to low CoE from the RCT and observational trials showed that surfactant use was associated with a significant decrease in risk of air leak, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN), duration of IMV, NRS and hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence base on surfactant therapy in LPT and term infants with RDS indicates a potentially decreased risk of mortality, air leak, PPHN and duration of respiratory support. In view of the low to very low CoE and widely varying thresholds for deciding on surfactant replacement in the included studies, further trials are needed.