Three-month tapering and discontinuation of long- term, low-dose glucocorticoids in senior patients with rheumatoid arthritis is feasible and safe: placebo-controlled double blind tapering after the GLORIA trial

Management of Late-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis with Treat-to-Target Strategy

The incidence of patients with late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (LORA) is increasing. The clinical diagnosis of LORA is essentially the same as that of young-onset rheumatoid arthritis (YORA), but special attention should be paid to the differences in clinical features between LORA and YORA. Undertreatment of LORA can lead to reduced physical function and increased societal burden. The treat-to-target strategy has been successfully applied in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but evidence supporting this strategy is still insufficient for LORA. A wide range of factors should be considered and evaluated in addition to age and RA-related factors, including comorbidity/organ damage, psycho-neurological factors, socio-economic factors and frailty. Considering the proportion of patients with LORA achieving clinical remission or low disease activity in observational studies, the treat-to-target strategy could be stratified by age. Patients with LORA aged < 75 years are treated according to the treat-to-target algorithm used for all patients with RA, with clinical remission as the main target and low disease activity as the alternative target. In patients with LORA aged ≥ 75 years, the initial main target is set at low disease activity, which can be escalated to clinical remission with appropriate adaptation of treatment if a favourable balance of effectiveness and safety is struck at the time of achieving low disease activity by 6 months of treatment. Evidence of the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of methotrexate, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, Janus kinase inhibitors and glucocorticoids in patients with LORA is accumulating, but further research is warranted.

Treatment with methotrexate plus oral prednisolone versus triple therapy (methotrexate/sulfasalazine/hydroxychloroquine) plus intra-articular glucocorticoids in early rheumatoid arthritis: a prespecified nonrandomised subgroup analysis of clinical and radiographic data at 48 weeks from the NORD-STAR trial's conventional treatment arm

OBJECTIVES

In the NOrdic Rheumatic Diseases Strategy Trials And Registries (NORD-STAR) trial, the active conventional arm had 2 nonrandomised regimens: arm 1A (oral group; Sweden, Norway, Netherlands, and Iceland) and arm 1B (injection group; Denmark and Finland). We report clinical, patient-reported, safety, and radiographic outcomes after 48 weeks.

METHODS

Oral group received methotrexate plus oral prednisolone (20.0 mg/d, tapered rapidly, discontinued week 36); Injection group received triple therapy (methotrexate, sulphasalazine, hydroxychloroquine) and mandatory intra-articular glucocorticoid injections. The primary end point was analysed by logistic regression with several approaches for handling missing outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 137 and 80 patients were included in the oral group and injection group; 78% vs. 89% completed, respectively. At 48 weeks, adjusted clinical disease activity index remission ≤2.8 rates (95% CI) were 36% (28-44) and 55% (42-68), respectively; the risk difference (primary outcome) was 19% (2-35). Similarly, key secondary clinical, patient-reported and safety outcomes showed numerically better results in the injection group vs oral group, for example, infections occurred in 53% vs 30%, respectively. Radiographic progression (Δtotal van der Heijde-modified Sharp Score) was low: oral group: adjusted mean, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.08-0.43); injection group: adjustedd mean, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.55-1.05). Cumulative dose of oral/intra-articular glucocorticoids (median) was 1905 mg prednisolone for the oral group and 165 mg for the injection group.

CONCLUSIONS

In treatment-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, triple therapy and mandatory glucocorticoid joint injections had numerically better clinical outcomes, fewer withdrawals, fewer adverse events, and lower cumulative dose of glucocorticoids, but slightly worse radiographic outcomes than treatment with methotrexate and oral prednisolone. These findings, although nonrandomised, suggest a potential for optimising treatment strategy with conventional therapies in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Comparison of two strategies of glucocorticoid withdrawal in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in low disease activity (STAR): a randomised, placebo- controlled, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare two strategies-a hydrocortisone replacement strategy and a prednisone tapering strategy-for their success in glucocorticoid discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with low disease activity (LDA).

METHODS

The Strategies for glucocorticoid TApering in Rheumatoid arthritis (STAR) study was a double- blind, double-placebo randomised controlled trial including patients with RA receiving a stable dose of glucocorticoid 5 mg/day for ≥3 months and were in LDA for ≥3 months. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either replace prednisone with 20 mg/day of hydrocortisone for 3 months, then reduce to 10 mg/day for 3 months before discontinuation or to taper prednisone by 1 mg/day every month until complete discontinuation, contingent on maintaining LDA. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients achieving glucocorticoid discontinuation at 12 months. Other secondary outcomes were proportion of flares, need for additional glucocorticoid use, disease activity, patient-reported outcomes and the results of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation tests.

RESULTS

Of the 102 patients randomised in the trial (mean age 62.4 years, 70.6% females), 53 had hydrocortisone replacement and 49 tapered prednisone. At 12 months, 29 patients (55%) in the hydrocortisone replacement group and 23 patients (47%) in the prednisone tapering group achieved glucocorticoid discontinuation (p=0.4). No difference was observed between groups in the secondary outcomes. No cases of acute adrenal insufficiency were observed; however, 17 patients still had an abnormal ACTH stimulation test at 12 months, with no differences between arms.

CONCLUSION

A hydrocortisone replacement strategy was not superior to a prednisone tapering strategy for achieving glucocorticoid discontinuation success in patients with RA in LDA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02997605.

Current practice, trends and attitudes of rheumatologists towards glucocorticoids use for rheumatoid arthritis (GURANTEE): a national cross-sectional survey across China

INTRODUCTION

To investigate current practices, changes, and perceptions of rheumatologists regarding GC use in RA patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire between April and August 2023. Rheumatologists from 31 province-level regions of Mainland China were invited to participate. Chi-squared tests were adopted to investigate the differences by sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

1,717 rheumatologists from 598 hospitals completed the survey with a response rate of 92%. Up to 60% of participants expressed currently infrequent initiation of GC co-therapy with csDMARDs (hardly ever 7.0%; occasionally 24.6%; sometimes 29.1%), accompanied by a decline of frequency over time reported in 64.2%. Regarding attitudes towards bridging therapy with GC, 604 (35.2%) participants supported this approach, 468 (27.3%) opposed it, and 645 (37.6%) remained inconclusive. Time to GC discontinuation in context of csDMARDs was commonly reported within 6 months in current practice which has been narrowed over time. Reasons for chronic GC use were mostly reported due to suboptimal disease control, followed by the need of RA complications, and pre-existing comorbidities. After failure of GC cessation, majority of respondents (84.4%) would escalate RA therapy (commonly by addition of JAK inhibitors, TNF inhibitors), which usually or often facilitated the GC cessation. The most frequently reported advantages and weaknesses of GC were rapid and strong efficacy, adverse events, respectively. Regarding long-term low-dose GC use for RA, the percentage of respondents who supported, opposed, or depended on the situation were 15.9%, 17.2%, and 66.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The current data demonstrate that GC initiation for RA treatment is not as frequent as before and the awareness of GC discontinuation is growing in current practice. Attitudes towards GC co-therapy with csDMARDs vary considerably and long-term low-dose GC use remain situation dependent.

Low-Dose Glucocorticoids in Older Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: What Does the Evidence Say?

The short-term use of glucocorticoids (GCs) in combination with methotrexate was recommended for the initial treatment of rheumatoid arthritis by the European League Against Rheumatism. A randomized controlled trial (GLORIA) showed that treatment of older patients with low-dose GCs in combination with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs was more efficacious than disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs plus placebo in terms of disease activity control and prevention of joint destruction. Glucocorticoid-related adverse events were likely to increase relative to placebo, with no increase in serious adverse events and fractures over 2 years. Observational studies showed an increased risk of serious infections, cardiovascular events, and fractures associated with long-term continuation of GCs in older patients, but the adverse events may be associated not only with GC toxicity but also with poor disease control of rheumatoid arthritis. In the GLORIA study, low-dose GCs during 2 years could be tapered off safely, but many patients had a flare of disease activity after discontinuation of GCs. In the two representative large Japanese registries (IORRA and NinJa), the proportion of patients using GCs and non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors increased with increasing age at disease onset, with a decreasing trend in methotrexate use. The proportion of patients in remission with GC treatment also increased with increasing age at onset. These suggested that it is not easy to discontinue GCs in older patients. If GCs cannot be terminated in the short term, it may be acceptable to use GCs to control disease activity for up to 2 years.

Autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis: still a challenge for the rheumatologist

Increased research over the past 30 years has greatly improved the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical aspects of autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis, resulting in improved management and outcomes. In contrast, the subset of rheumatoid arthritis that does not have autoantibodies (such as rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies) remains less well defined in its pathogenic mechanisms. Autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis continues to pose diagnostic challenges, might respond differently to therapies, and appears to be burdened with different comorbidities and outcomes. The clear separation of rheumatoid arthritis according to serotypes is still a subject of uncertainty and controversy, and studies specifically focused on comparing rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis-like arthritides that do not have autoantibodies remain scarce. The purpose of this Review is to summarise the peculiarities that make autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis different from its autoantibody-positive counterpart, with the aim of generating debate and stimulating further research on this challenging condition.

Viewpoint: Glucocorticoids in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: points to (re)consider

Glucocorticoids (prednisone) are essential in the treatment of RA and other autoimmune diseases. They are widely used, but treatment guidelines advise against. This viewpoint article explains why and suggests a way forward.