Time to address the challenge of difficult to treat psoriatic arthritis: results from an international survey

Continental perspectives on managing axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: approaches and insights from Latin America

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review provides a critical analysis of the management of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Latin America, emphasizing regional challenges, genetic diversity, healthcare disparities, and efforts to optimize patient care in resource-limited settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent literature highlights significant differences in treatment accessibility, healthcare infrastructure, and disease burden across Latin America considering the management of axSpA and PsA. Pan American league of associations for rheumatology (PANLAR) has established region-specific treatment recommendations adapted to the region that address these disparities while complementing international guidelines from assessment of spondyloarthritis international society - European alliance of associations for rheumatology (ASAS-EULAR) and group for research and assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (GRAPPA). Limited access to biologics, high rates of diagnostic delay, and unique genetic and environmental factors shape disease management in this region. From the clinical perspective, the higher frequency of peripheral manifestations and the low frequency of HLA-B27 are remarkable.

SUMMARY

Latin America faces distinct obstacles in axSpA and PsA management, requiring tailored strategies that integrate regional epidemiological characteristics, healthcare system disparities, and economic constraints. Supporting collaborative research networks across all countries and increasing access to advanced therapies are critical to enhance patient outcomes in SpA and PsA. Implementation of management strategies in the continent are required.

Chasing the target: reports from the Advances in Targeted Therapies meeting, 2024

OBJECTIVES

The Advances in Targeted Therapies annual meeting brings together experts within the field of rheumatology and immunology to highlight and discuss the latest scientific developments and needs in the field. The objective is to highlight unmet scientific needs in the field of rheumatology.

METHODS

The 24th annual Advances in Targeted Therapies meeting convened with more than 100 international clinicians and scientific researchers in rheumatology, immunology, and other specialities relating to all aspects of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. During the meeting, we held 5 rheumatologic disease-specific discussion sections consisting of experts in each field. These groups included rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), osteoarthritis (OA), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In each group, experts were asked to identify the top 2 to 3 most important overarching and disease-specific scientific unmet needs to be addressed in the next 5 years.

RESULTS

The overarching themes across disciplines included the need for precision medicine, improved classification of disease states, and the further identification of targets and associated therapies, including the potential role of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. Within RA, the group highlighted the lack of precision medicine and the need for better biomarkers. Further, the lack of targeted therapies against fibroblasts in RA was discussed, with the potential impact of targeting fibroblasts early in the disease as an unmet need. For PsA, there is a continued need for a better definition of disease endotypes and for the categorisation of those with complex and difficult-to-treat (D2T) diseases. The development of bispecific molecules and combination therapeutic approaches remain a high priority. For axSpA, the disease-modifying characteristics of nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drugs need further evaluation, as does the treatment of residual pain and fatigue frequently in the disease. In OA, new therapeutic targets remain an unmet need, and the discussion group prioritised potential experimental strategies that could lead to innovative therapeutic targets. Elucidating the specific signalling and target cells responsible for, or inhibiting, repair will be essential for developing targeted therapies. SLE experts emphasised the need to identify the most predictive biological contributions to disease progression in patients with early clinical precursors of SLE. The role of CAR T cell therapy must be further investigated, along with ancillary biologic studies (eg, immune system profiling) that provide critical insights into disease pathogenesis. Further, there is a need to determine the relationship of patient-relevant symptoms to the pathophysiology of SLE and identify new therapeutic targets for these symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

There remain many unmet needs on the road to precision medicine with regard to identifying disease endotypes and biomarkers for disease progression or therapeutic response. For most diseases discussed, a strong unmet need remains with regard to identifying new targets and therapies for those with refractory or D2T disease. The ability to prevent or cure rheumatic disease remains the ultimate unmet need in rheumatology.

The concept of difficult-to-treat disease in rheumatology: where next?

New pathogenesis-based therapeutics and evidence-based consensus treatment recommendations, often with predefined treatment goals, have remarkably improved outcomes across many chronic diseases. However, a clinically significant subgroup of patients responds poorly to interventions and show a progressive decline in the disease trajectory, which poses an increasing health-care challenge. Difficult-to-treat approaches exist in several areas of medicine and the need for similar definitions has recently also emerged in rheumatology. The term difficult-to-treat refers not only to patients with pathology-driven, treatment-refractory disease, but also implicates multiple other factors that can contribute to patients being in this state, including having few treatment options, misdiagnosis, and coincident psychosocial factors. Therefore, the difficult-to-treat state requires a comprehensive, holistic, multidisciplinary approach that considers the specific characteristics of each disease and the personalised needs of the patient. In this Personal View, we provide an overview of the different aspects of the concept of difficult-to-treat disease, highlight its advantages, and propose the importance of incorporating this concept more widely in the design of rheumatological treatment strategies.

Delineating inflammatory from non-inflammatory mechanisms for therapy optimization in psoriatic arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is anatomically much more heterogeneous than rheumatoid arthritis, as, beyond synovitis, it often also involves enthesitis, peritendinitis, tenosynovitis, osteitis and periostitis. This heterogeneity currently precludes a gold standard for objectively defining resolution of inflammation following treatment, with enthesitis posing a particular challenge. Despite these difficulties, we apply lessons learned from rheumatoid arthritis to describe how patients with PsA and an inadequate response to therapy can be designated within two patient subgroups, characterized by persistent inflammatory PsA (PIPsA) and non-inflammatory PsA (NIPsA), respectively. The NIPsA phenotype is defined by the lack of ongoing joint inflammation, as confirmed through clinical assessment and imaging, along with normalized inflammatory marker levels. NIPsA might be associated with obesity, biomechanical-related pain, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, secondary post-inflammatory damage and central pain mechanisms. In this article, we frame PsA composite outcomes measures in relationship to the PIPsA and NIPsA phenotypes and propose that this approach might help to minimize unnecessary or ineffective cycling of PsA therapy in patients who acquire dominant non-inflammatory mechanisms and might also inform future trial design.

The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) Consensus-Based Expert Definition of Difficult-to-Manage, including Treatment-Refractory, Axial Spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVES

To develop a consensus-based expert definition of difficult-to-manage (D2M) axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), incorporating treatment-refractory (TR) disease.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted in 2022 to identify potential definitions for D2M/TR axSpA from prior studies, followed by a 2-round Delphi consensus process conducted in 2022 and 2023 to identify components of D2M axSpA. Based on the results of the Delphi process, a draft of the D2M axSpA definition was developed and presented to the expert task force, including patient representation, and, subsequently, to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) membership for endorsement in January 2024.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on a D2M definition encapsulating treatment failure (treatment according to the ASAS-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology recommendations and failure of ≥2 biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs with different mechanisms of action unless contraindicated), suboptimal disease control, and physician or patient acknowledgement of problematic signs/symptoms in patients diagnosed with axSpA by the rheumatologist. This definition represents a broad concept that includes various reasons that lead to an unsatisfactory treatment outcome. TR axSpA is covered by the D2M definition but requires a history of treatment failure, the presence of objective signs of inflammatory activity, and the exclusion of noninflammatory reasons for nonresponse. The proposed D2M definition incorporating TR disease was endorsed by ASAS at the annual meeting in January 2024, with 89% votes (109/123) in favour of it.

CONCLUSIONS

The ASAS D2M axSpA definition, including TR disease, allows for identifying patients with unmet needs, paving the way for further research in this condition and its clinical care improvement.

Refractory psoriatic arthritis: emerging concepts in whole process management

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic and progressive inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis, mainly affecting the axial and peripheral joints, characterized by a wide range of complex phenotypes, significant heterogeneity, and a multifactorial etiology. To effectively address the distinct challenges in managing PsA, a pivotal emphasis is placed on clarifying the concept of refractory PsA. Here, we propose a distinction between refractory PsA, differentiating between difficult-to-treat PsA (D2T PsA) and Pseudo-D2T PsA. The former centers on the lack of efficacy of multiple disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and signs suggestive of active/progressive disease, while also considering the challenges posed by comorbidities. The latter focuses on misdiagnosis and mismanagement, detailing the difficulties caused by artificial factors, whether by clinicians or patients. Hoping the clarification of these distinctions will enable clinicians to manage patients with refractory PsA more effectively.

Identification and characteristics of patients with potential difficult-to-treat psoriatic arthritis: exploratory analyses of the Greek PsA registry

OBJECTIVE

To present the characteristics of patients with potential difficult-to-treat (D2T) PsA.

METHODS

We used data from the Greek multicentre registry of PsA patients. D2T PsA was defined as follows: patients with at least 6 months' disease duration, who have failed to at least one conventional synthetic DMARD and at least two biologic DMARDs/targeted synthetic DMARDs with a different mechanism of action and have either at least moderate disease activity (MODA) defined as DAPSA (Disease Activity index in PSoriatic Arthritis) >14, and/or are not at minimal disease activity (MDA). Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between D2T and non-D2T PsA patients. In two sensitivity analyses, patients classified as D2T solely according to the MODA or MDA criterion were examined separately.

RESULTS

Among 467 patients included, 77 (16.5%) were considered D2T and 390 non-D2T PsA. Compared with non-D2T, patients with D2T PsA presented more commonly with extensive psoriasis (P < 0.0001) and were more likely to have higher BMI (P = 0.023) and a history of IBD (P = 0.026). In the MODA and MDA sensitivity analyses, 7.5% and 12.5% of patients were considered D2T, respectively. In both sensitivity analyses, extensive psoriasis was again identified as an independent variable for D2T PsA (P = 0.001 and P = 0.008, respectively). Moreover, female gender (P = 0.034) in the MODA analysis and axial disease (P = 0.040) in the MDA analysis were independent variables for D2T PsA.

CONCLUSION

Despite the availability of therapies, D2T PsA is common in real-life cohorts of patients with PsA and extensive psoriasis. High BMI, female gender, axial disease and history of IBD were also associated with D2T PsA.

Deciphering difficult-to-treat psoriatic arthritis (D2T-PsA): a GRAPPA perspective from an international survey of healthcare professionals

Objectives

This study contributes to the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)'s effort to define 'difficult-to-treat' PsA (D2T-PsA), leveraging insights of healthcare professionals who are GRAPPA members. The primary objective is to inform GRAPPA's D2T PsA project, ensuring the consensus definition reflects clinical experience and expertise.

Methods

An online survey was conducted among GRAPPA's healthcare professionals managing PsA patients. The survey covered demographic details, structured questions, and open-ended queries to gather comprehensive insights into the experts' viewpoints.

Results

About 223 physicians completed the survey, comprising 179 (80.2%) rheumatologists and 40 (17.9%) dermatologists. The majority, 184 (82.5%), favoured establishing distinct definitions for D2T-PsA and complex-to-manage PsA (C2M-PsA). Furthermore, 202 (90.5%) supported a definition that includes objective inflammation signs (clinical, laboratory, imaging, among others). However, opinions varied on the criteria for prior treatment failures, with most (93, 41.7%) favouring a definition that includes at least one conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug and two or more biological- or targeted-synthetic-DMARDs with different mechanisms of action.

Conclusion

The survey reveals a majority opinion among GRAPPA experts favouring the differentiation between D2T-PsA and C2M-PsA, and the inclusion of objective inflammatory markers in these definitions. However, there is less than 50% agreement on the specific treatment failure criteria, particularly regarding the number of therapies needed to classify PsA as D2T. These findings suggest a need for continued discussion to reach a more unified approach in defining D2T-PsA, reflecting the complexity of the condition.

Unmet needs in psoriatic arthritis, a narrative review

Psoriatic arthritis is a chronic rheumatic disease that poses challenges in its diagnosis, evaluation, and management. The heterogeneity in the manifestations and the absence of definitive diagnosis biomarkers often complicates the process of accurate diagnosis. Furthermore, the involvement of multiple disease domains poses difficulties in assessing disease activity and defining the concept of remission. Despite therapeutic advancements, a subset of patients remains refractory to treatment, leading to the emergence of the concept of "difficult-to-treat" patients and the necessity for novel therapeutic approaches (e.g., drugs with novel mechanisms of action; combinations of treatments). This review addresses key unmet needs in psoriatic arthritis, in terms of diagnosis, classification, evaluation, comorbidities and treatment.