Coexistent rheumatoid arthritis and tophaceous gout: a case report

Concomitant atypical knee gout and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Gout and seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (SNRA) are two distinct inflammatory joint diseases whose co-occurrence is relatively infrequently reported. Limited information is available regarding the clinical management and prognosis of these combined diseases.

CASE SUMMARY

A 57-year-old woman with a 20-year history of joint swelling, tenderness, and morning stiffness who was negative for rheumatoid factor and had a normal uric acid level was diagnosed with SNRA. The initial regimen of methotrexate, leflunomide, and celecoxib alleviated her symptoms, except for those associated with the knee. After symptom recurrence after medication cessation, her regimen was updated to include iguratimod, methotrexate, methylprednisolone, and folic acid, but her knee issues persisted. Minimally invasive needle-knife scope therapy revealed proliferating pannus and needle-shaped crystals in the knee, indicating coexistent SNRA and atypical knee gout. After postarthroscopic surgery to remove the synovium and urate crystals, and following a tailored regimen of methotrexate, leflunomide, celecoxib, benzbromarone, and allopurinol, her knee symptoms were significantly alleviated with no recurrence observed over a period of more than one year, indicating successful management of both conditions.

CONCLUSION

This study reports the case of a patient concurrently afflicted with atypical gout of the knee and SNRA and underscores the significance of minimally invasive joint techniques as effective diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the field of rheumatology and immunology.

Interventions for tophi in gout

BACKGROUND

Tophi develop in untreated or uncontrolled gout. Their presence can lead to severe and potentially fatal complications. To date there have been no systematic reviews focused on the management of tophi in gout.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of non-surgical and surgical treatments for the management of tophi in gout.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched three databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE. We handsearched American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) abstracts from 2010 to 2011, references from included studies and trial registries. We completed the most recent search on 20 May 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials with quasi-randomised methods of allocating participants to treatment examining interventions for tophi in gout in adults. Possible interventions included urate-lowering pharmacological treatment (e.g. benzbromarone, probenecid, allopurinol, febuxostat, pegloticase), surgical removal or other interventions such as haemodialysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data from titles, abstracts and selected studies for detailed review, and extracted data and risk of bias independently. Major outcomes were number of participants with complete resolution of tophi, number of study participant withdrawals due to adverse events, joint pain reduction, function, quality of life, serum urate normalisation and total adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one study, at low risk of all biases, met the inclusion criteria. This was the pooled results from two RCTs (225 participants, 145 with tophi at baseline) randomised to one of three arms; pegloticase infusion every two weeks (biweekly), monthly pegloticase infusion (pegloticase infusion alternating with placebo infusion every two weeks) and placebo. Moderate-quality evidence from one study indicated that biweekly pegloticase 8 mg infusion reduced tophi in the subset of participants with tophi, but increased withdrawals due to adverse events in all participants, and monthly infusion appeared to result in less benefit.Biweekly pegloticase treatment resulted in resolution of tophi in 21/52 participants compared with 2/27 who received placebo (risk ratio (RR) 5.45, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.38 to 21.54; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 3 (95% CI 2 to 6).Eleven of 52 participants with monthly pegloticase treatment had complete resolution of one or more tophi compared with 2/27 who received placebo (RR 2.86, 95% CI 0.68 to 11.97).Participant-reported pain relief of 30% or greater, function, quality of life, serum urate normalisation, were reported for all participants but not separately for those with tophi; therefore, we did not include the results.Pegloticase administered biweekly resulted in more withdrawals due to adverse events compared with placebo (15/85 participants with pegloticase versus 1/43 participants with placebo; RR 7.59, 95% CI 1.04 to 55.55; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 7, 95% CI 4 to 17). Pegloticase administered monthly also resulted in more withdrawals due to adverse events than placebo (16/84 participants with pegloticase versus 1/43 participants with placebo; RR 8.19, 95% CI 1.12 to 59.71; NNTH 6, 95% CI 4 to 14). Most withdrawals were due to infusion reactions.Total adverse events were high in all treatment groups: 80/85 participants administered pegloticase biweekly reported an adverse event compared with 41/43 from the placebo group (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07); 84/84 participants administered pegloticase monthly reported an adverse event versus 41/43 in the placebo group (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14). As 80% of adverse events were due to flares of gout, probably unrelated to the drug treatment per se, this may explain the high rate of adverse events in the placebo group - who were essentially untreated.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This study showed pegloticase is probably beneficial in the management of tophi in gout, in terms of resolution of tophi, but with a high risk of adverse infusion reactions. However, there is a need for more RCT data considering other interventions, including surgical removal of tophi.

The broad spectrum of urate crystal deposition: unusual presentations of gouty tophi

OBJECTIVES

Gout is typically described as an inflammatory arthropathy that affects the peripheral joints. Our aim was to describe atypical and rare clinical presentations of gouty tophi to help increase physician awareness and aid in patient care.

METHODS

The relevant English literature of unusual gout manifestations was searched using the keywords gout, toph*, monosodium urate, uric acid, unusual, and rare. Well-described case reports, case series, and review articles were evaluated and included, if relevant, in the literature review.

RESULTS

Review of the literature revealed many unusual manifestations of gouty tophi involving the head and neck, skin, viscera, bones, tendons, ligaments, nerves, and axial skeleton. Transplant recipients, women, and elderly people are particularly susceptible to developing tophi. Furthermore, gout can cause diagnostic dilemmas, as it can be a great mimicker of and can coexist with infection, malignancy, and other connective tissue diseases. Imaging modalities can help detect tophi in atypical locations.

CONCLUSIONS

Tophi can present in unexpected locations, even as the first sign of gout, and vigilance is required when unusual symptoms or signs occur in a patient with gout.

Rare copresent rheumatoid arthritis and gout: comparison with pure rheumatoid arthritis and a literature review

Copresent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and gout is seldom reported. This study summarizes the findings of eight cases of copresent RA and gout and compares them with 31 pure RA cases. Additional reported cases were retrieved from the current literature by Medline search. Patients with copresent RA and gout were older (p = 0.014) and predominantly male (p < 0.01). Synovial fluid, positive for urate crystals, was aspirated most frequently from the knee (five out of eight), followed by the first metatarsophalangeal joint (three out of eight). Serum creatinine and urate levels in the copresent group were significantly higher (p < 0.01, both), and serum hemoglobin was lower (p = 0.04) than those with pure RA. Copresent subjects had much lower percentage of positive rheumatoid factor (RF) tests than patients with pure RA (37.5 vs 80.6%). Only one copresent subject had both RF and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody. Of copresent subjects, 75% had gouty arthritis before diagnosis of RA, which is consistent with earlier reports. Seven copresent subjects had gout attacks under disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use. This study revealed that polyarthritis negative for RF in a previously gouty patient may be RA and vice versa. This combination occurs more frequently in males. Moreover, anti-CCP antibody examination is not helpful for this diagnosis. Therefore, physicians must obtain synovial fluid for analysis in joints with intense swelling, especially in old RA subjects with renal insufficiency or involvement of lower extremities. Conversely, RA must be considered in gouty patients with polyarticular involvement.

Gouty involvement of flexor tendons

This article presents three patients suffering from complications related to tophi deposited within the hand and wrist synovium and flexor tendons. One patient had no previous history of gout or acute arthritis, with uricemia within normal values upon admission. The pathophysiology and treatment of gout in these special circumstances are discussed.

Rheumatoid arthritis preceding the onset of polyarticular tophaceous gout

Images

Gout nodulosis: widespread subcutaneous deposits without gout

Subcutaneous tophaceous deposits of monosodium urate, in the absence of arthritis, may occasionally occur as the initial manifestation of gout. In this report, we describe a 35-year-old man who presented with a 6-year history of multiple subcutaneous nodules and no history of previous articular complaints. Needle aspirations of the nodules proved them to be deposits of monosodium urate. A literature search revealed 28 other cases with a similar presentation. We propose the term "gout nodulosis" as a clinical entity at one end of the spectrum of gout to describe this group of patients.

Does hyperuricemia protect from rheumatoid inflammation? A clinical study

The negative association between gout and rheumatoid arthritis is well accepted. The reason for this mutual exclusion is not clear; a protective immunosuppressive effect of hyperuricemia has been included among possible explanations. To test this hypothesis, we reviewed the charts of 160 rheumatoid arthritis patients on whom clinical information and followup for at least a year were available. We selected those patients with persistent hyperuricemia as defined by serum urate levels averaging above 7.5 mg% for at least 6 months. We found 12 patients fulfilling such criteria, and 11 of these were judged to have quiescent, minimally active, or inactive disease during hyperuricemic periods. In 2 patients, flares of the rheumatoid process coincided with normalization of serum urate levels. We propose that persistent hyperuricemia may protect against or decrease the expression of rheumatoid inflammation.

Uric acid effects on in vitro models of rheumatoid inflammatory and autoimmune processes

A neutrophil monolayer system was used to study the effects of uric acid on neutrophil-aggregate interactions important in rheumatoid inflammation. No effect on immunoglobulin G aggregate phagocytosis was seen, but hyperuricaemic levels of uric acid were associated with an enhancement of phagocytosis-induced release of the azurophilic granular enzyme beta-glucuronidase. A trinitrophenyl-coupled mononuclear leucocyte rheumatoid factor plaque-forming assay was utilised to study uric acid effects on polyclonal activation of immunocompetent cells. Low levels of uric acid enhanced and high levels suppressed this system. Hyperuricaemia may enhance some aspects of rheumatoid inflammation, while uric acid may modulate an important component of rheumatoid autoimmunity.