Plasma prednisolone studies in rheumatic patients

Differential Glucocorticoid Responsiveness of Dialysis Patients’ Lymphocytes

Objectives

To evaluate in vitro glucocorticoid responsiveness of phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated lymphocytes from peritoneal dialysis (PO) patients compared to hemodialysis (HO) patients.

Design

Cross-sectional study of prevalent PO and HO patients and concurrent control subjects.

Setting

Urban outpatient dialysis unit.

Patients

20 HO, 14 PO, and 20 control subjects.

Measurements

Using standard lymphocyte culture techniques, the concentration of prednisolone (P) and methylprednisolone (MP) required to cause 50% inhibition (ICso) of the proliferative response to phytohemagglutinin (PHA) was determined from dose-response curves.

Results

There was considerable heterogeneity in the sensitivities of individual patients’ PBMC to glucocorticoid inhibition, especially those of HO patients’ cells to P. The mean: i: SO ICso for MP was significantly (p ≤ 0.001) lower than that for P in each cohort: PO 11 ± 5 vs. 34 ± 18 ng/mL; HO 22 ± 14 vs. 89 ± 43 ng/mL; control subjects 14 ± 11 vs. 55 ± 56 ng/mL. Interestingly, the ICSO for both P and MP was significantly higher in HO than in either PO or controls (ANOVA, P: F = 6.56, p = 0.003; MP: F = 3.77, p = 0.03), indicating decreased sensitivity of HO lymphocytes to both drugs. There were no significant differences in mean ICSO values for either P or MP between PO and controls. No correlations were found between ICSO for either P or MP and patient age, gender, duration of dialysis, serum creatinine, serum albumin, or parathyroid hormone level.

Conclusions

In vitro glucocorticoid responsiveness of dialysis patients’ lymphocytes appears to be influenced by dialysis modality, butthefactor(s) involved remains to be determined. Thegreater sensitivity of PO lymphocytes to both P and MP might result in better immunosuppression and less severe rejection after renal transplantation. MP may be particularly advantageous following renal transplantation for any patient manifesting relative or absolute in vitro resistance to P.

Optimizing glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis

Glucocorticoids have a profound effect on the immune system and also on the HPA axis. Present insights into these mechanisms are discussed. Glucocorticoid resistance and clinical efficacy in the treatment of RA are reviewed. There is growing evidence for a positive effect of low-dose glucocorticoids on the retardation of erosive joint damage. Side effects of glucocorticoids on bone are now better controlled. Some guidelines to optimize glucocorticoid therapy in RA are given regarding dosage, timing, managing of side effects, and (new) types of glucocorticoids.

Suppression of lymphocyte interleukin-2 receptor expression by glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, or both

Although glucocorticoids and cyclosporine are frequently used to treat patients with various types of glomerulopathy, clinical responses to treatment vary considerably. Considerable interindividual heterogeneity in the suppressive effects of glucocorticoids on lymphocyte proliferation in vitro has been previously reported, suggesting that differences in the pharmacodynamic responsiveness of the immune system to these agents might be an important determinant of how well an individual patient responds to treatment. It also has been shown that methylprednisolone is significantly more suppressive than prednisolone. To identify cellular mechanisms by which these drugs act, a study of the suppressive effects of prednisolone, methylprednisolone, and cyclosporine on lymphocyte proliferation and the expression of the cell surface receptor for interleukin-2 (IL-2R) was conducted using phytohemagglutin-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from 13 patients with glomerulopathy and 12 control subjects. Heterogeneity among individuals in both parameters of lymphocyte responsiveness to these drugs was again found, and the significantly greater suppressive effect of methylprednisolone was confirmed for both proliferation and IL-2R expression in patients and control subjects. Cyclosporine alone was moderately suppressive. For most individuals, the greatest degree of suppression occurred when cells were exposed to both cyclosporine and glucocorticoid. Further studies are being conducted to determine whether pretreatment assessment of in vitro lymphocyte responsiveness has any predictive value regarding therapeutic efficacy of each drug in individual patients and to identify of those patients likely to require a more intensive or multidrug immunosuppressive regimen.

Lymphocyte responsiveness to glucocorticoids, cyclosporine, or both

The reason why some patients with glomerular diseases respond to steroid treatment and others do not remains obscure, and it is not possible to prospectively evaluate the probability of response in individual patients. One factor that might contribute to the clinical response to treatment could be the relative sensitivity of a patient's immune system to the suppressive effects of steroids or other immunosuppressive agents. To evaluate this possibility, phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 16 patients with various biopsy-proven glomerulopathies were cultured with prednisolone or methylprednisolone in final concentrations of 10(-5) to 10(-8) mol/L. From the dose-response curves, the concentration of steroid required to cause 50% inhibition (IC50) of the PHA-induced proliferative response was determined. The PBMC from 10 patients also were cultured with 400 ng/mL cyclosporine both alone and with 10(-7) mol/L steroid, and the inhibitory effects were calculated. There was considerable heterogeneity in the sensitivities of individual patients to steroid inhibition, and the mean +/- SEM IC50 was significantly lower for methylprednisolone than for prednisolone. Cyclosporine caused 50% or greater inhibition in 6 of the 10 patients but had < 10% inhibitory effect in 2 patients. In most patients studied, cyclosporine plus steroid was significantly more inhibitory than cyclosporine alone, but the combination was usually no more effective than 10(-7) mol/L methylprednisolone alone. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that differences in the sensitivity of individual patient's immune systems to the immunosuppressive effects of steroids and cyclosporine might contribute to differences in their clinical responsiveness to treatment.

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of plain and enteric-coated prednisolone tablets

1. Eight healthy volunteers and eight patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) received 30 mg prednisolone as plain (P) and enteric-coated tablets (EP) in a randomised, cross-over manner. Plasma prednisolone and cortisol and blood glucose were measured over 24 h. 2. Although absorption of prednisolone was considerably slower when administered as the enteric-coated form, peak plasma drug concentrations and total AUC (0,24 h) were equivalent for the two formulations. Malabsorption of prednisolone was not observed. 3. The administration of EP was associated with significantly less adrenal suppression in volunteers than P as judged by measurement of AUC (0,24 h) values for endogenous cortisol. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance in the patient group. 4. Plasma cortisol concentrations declined more slowly following administration of the enteric-coated form to both groups. The difference in time taken (median and range) to maximum suppression of cortisol was statistically significant (P less than 0.05) between P (2.5 h; 2-4 h) and EP (4 h; 3-12 h) preparations administered to volunteers. There was a similar significant difference (P less than 0.05) between P (2.5 h; 1-4 h) and EP (7 h; 2-12 h) in the patients. 5. Plasma cortisol concentrations were significantly lower at 24 h in patients receiving the enteric-coated product in association with higher terminal prednisolone concentrations. 6. Blood glucose concentrations increased over an 8 h period in both groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)