A controlled trial of antihypertensive therapy in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)

Prediction and primary prevention of major vascular complications in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

In Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), vasculopathy is the background of major vascular complications (MVCs), like digital ulcers (DUs), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). We aimed to identify the predictors and to test the primary preventive effect of vasoactive/vasodilating drugs (VVD) for the development of MVCs in SSc MVCs-naïve patients.

METHODS

patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2013 classification criteria for SSc without history of MVCs were eligible. Data about clinical manifestations, laboratory and instrumental assessments and treatments were retrospectively collected at baseline and latest available follow-up.

RESULTS

134 SSc patients were enrolled (mean age 56.5 years ± 14.2, females 88.1%, limited subset 61.9%, ACA positivity 60.4%). In a mean of 43 ± 19 months of follow-up 12 (9.0%) patients developed at least 1 MVC (10 DU, 2 PAH and 1 SRC). Dyspnoea and arthritis at baseline were independent predictors for MVCs development (p = 0.012, and p = 0.002 respectively). No primary preventive effect of VVD on MVCs development was found. However, sildenafil reduced the renal resistive index increase (p = 0.042) and alprostadil slowed the DLco decline (p = 0.029). Both iloprost and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) delayed MVCs development, while angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) determined an earlier onset of such MCVs.

CONCLUSIONS

in SSc patients, our data confirm the role of arthritis and dyspnea as independent predictors of major vascular complications, in particular in MVCs-naïve patients. Prostanoids, sildenafil and ARBs, even in absence of a primary preventive action, might help in slowing disease progression and postponing the onset of MVCs.

Scleroderma renal crisis

Abrupt onset of severe uncontrolled hypertension and rapidly progressive oliguric renal failure characterizes scleroderma renal crisis. The etiology is unclear, but very high renin levels are present. While scleroderma is more common in women and whites, there is no difference in the prevalence of scleroderma renal crisis by gender. However, there appears to be a higher prevalence of scleroderma renal crisis among African Americans than whites. Survival was dismal prior to the introduction of the vigorous treatment of hypertension and use of converting-enzyme inhibitors. However, most data on the benefit of these medications are derived from uncontrolled and unblinded studies. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the role of angiotensin receptor blockers. Prevention trials could define the role of various drugs in decreasing the rate of scleroderma renal crisis.

Design and quality considerations for randomized controlled trials in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To appraise systematically randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on systemic sclerosis (SSc) in order to determine whether the parameter of study design and its quality may influence the reporting of efficacy for tested interventions.

METHODS

Seventy RCTs were analyzed (1965-2000) in terms of design, patient characteristics, outcomes, and reported results.

RESULTS

Median sample size was 28 patients. Fifty-nine trials were double blind, but only 16 mentioned the randomization mode and only 7 described allocation concealment. There was sufficient information on withdrawals in 37 trials. Larger trials with longer followup scored higher on quality characteristics, but had higher withdrawal rates. Only 8 trials had a followup of more than 1 year. Significant efficacy was less likely to be reported in double-blind studies (P = 0.029) and in studies with larger rates of withdrawal (P = 0.032). Specification of the following parameters improved over time: power calculations (P = 0.0003), outcomes (P = 0.001), and sample size per arm (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

Several aspects of the quality of design and conduct of SSc RCTs can be improved. Adequately powered trials with longer followup and clear outcomes are needed.

Effects of the American College of Rheumatology systemic sclerosis trial guidelines on the nature of systemic sclerosis patients entering a clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients entered into the d-penicillamine trial with SSc patients entered into previous controlled SSc trials. It was hypothesized that the d-penicillamine trial patients, who conformed to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines for clinical trials in SSc were different from patients entered into previous trials.

METHODS

Patients entering a double-blind, randomized trial of low- vs high-dose d-penicillamine were described carefully and completely. Their characteristics were then compared with previously published data on SSc and its treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-four patients had early [mean duration 9.5 (s.d. 4.2) months], diffuse [skin score 21 (8)] disease. Organ involvement in the patients was as follows: pulmonary 54%, cardiac 20%, joints 38%, muscular 20%. Thirty-three per cent had mild proteinuria and 13% were hypertensive when first seen. Compared with patients in most previous studies, these SSc patients had earlier disease and uniformly had diffuse disease. They had less muscular involvement, less dyspnoea, less abnormal pulmonary function and less cardiac and less renal involvement than patients in earlier studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the new ACR guidelines for SSc trials may change the nature of patient populations entering future studies.

Scleroderma renal crisis

Renal crisis occurs in systemic sclerosis patients with rapidly progressive diffuse cutaneous thickening early in their disease. SRC is characterized by malignant hypertension, hyperreninemia, azotemia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and renal failure. This complication, which in the past has been almost uniformly fatal, is now successfully treated in most cases with ACE inhibitors. This therapy has improved survival, reduced requirement for dialysis, and in those on dialysis has often allowed discontinuation of this procedure 6 to 18 months later. Prompt diagnosis and early, aggressive initiation of therapy with ACE inhibitors will result in the most optimal outcome. Chronic nonrenal crisis renal insufficiency is unusual and rarely progresses to significant renal dysfunction.

Treatment of systemic sclerosis

Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials in progressive systemic sclerosis have been recommended to determine drug efficacy better. To date, the results of disease-modifying drugs in scleroderma have been disappointing. The treatment of esophagitis has been revolutionized by omeprazole. Raynaud's phenomenon can be treated with calcium channel blockers and iloprost. Scleroderma renal crisis can be treated with aggressive blood pressure control using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. The best treatment for rapidly progressive scleroderma lung is still unknown. Future treatments in scleroderma should be tested with the use of recommended guidelines.

Outcome measurement in scleroderma clinical trials

Clinical trials in scleroderma were reviewed to assess the clinimetric properties of frequently used outcome measures. Twenty-seven controlled intervention studies were found in the English literature; nine demonstrated effective therapy. The outcome measures used included skin involvement, functional status, physical performance (grip strength, oral aperture), and internal organ involvement (pulmonary, gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiac). Very few outcome measures detected between- or within-group differences even when an active drug was compared with a placebo. Skin measures were found to yield statistical differences in seven studies, patient global assessment in three, and physician global assessments in four. Internal organ measures detected differences between groups only rarely; the pulmonary diffusing capacity was statistically different twice. Physical performance measures (eg, grip strength and oral aperture) never yielded statistical differences, and in only one of five trials did a functional assessment detect statistical differences. To show drug efficacy in future trials in scleroderma, better outcome measures need to be developed and a consensus obtained on which outcomes to use so that potentially effective therapies can be tested in a standardized fashion against a placebo or current therapy. Currently, because of a lack of clinimetric data on outcome measures, therapeutic inefficacy cannot be differentiated from a lack of sensitivity in the outcome measures used. In the future, outcome measures should be chosen on the basis of the adequacy of their reliability, construct, and content validity and be sensitive to change. Ideally, outcome measures also should have criterion validity, ie, show a strong association between the measure (such as a skin score) and an irrefutable gold standard (such as skin pathology).

Treatment of systemic sclerosis

Proper classification of patients into diffuse cutaneous and limited cutaneous subsets and the anticipation of complications are the keys to the management of subjects with systemic sclerosis (scleroderma). Patients with early diffuse disease and rapidly progressive skin thickening are at highest risk of developing serious disease of the internal organs (intestine, lung, heart, kidney) and should be considered for disease modifying treatment. The targets of the disease and sites of possible intervention are vascular endothelium (vasoprotective agents), mononuclear cell subsets (immunosuppressive agents), and fibroblasts (colchicine, D-penicillamine). A number of new agents with sound scientific rationale are currently undergoing therapeutic trials. Much can be done to improve the lifestyle of those with scleroderma. The most dramatic recent development is the ability to reverse kidney disease by the prompt use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and modern methods of renal dialysis and transplantation. Scleroderma is not a hopeless disease.

ACE inhibitors. A safe option for hypertension and congestive heart failure

The Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure has recently recommended angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta blockers, and diuretics as potential first-step agents for the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension. ACE inhibitors should be considered an important option in most patients because of their safety profile, absence of adverse metabolic effects, and positive cardiac and renal effects. If the response to an ACE inhibitor is inadequate, a diuretic or another agent can be added, and this combination should be effective and well tolerated in 85% to 90% of patients. ACE inhibitors can be used to treat congestive heart failure and to prevent the renal complications of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, significantly expanding their use in patients with these high-risk conditions. They also can be used concurrently with other antihypertensive agents, digitalis, cardiac glycosides, and lithium and are not contraindicated in most of the diseases commonly seen in hypertensive patients.

ARAMIS (the American Rheumatism Association Medical Information System). A prototypical national chronic-disease data bank

ARAMIS is a prototype of a national chronic-disease data-bank system consisting of parallel, longitudinal, clinical data sets from 17 diverse locations; the data describe the courses of thousands of patients with rheumatic disease followed over many years. Chronic-disease data-bank systems include the data themselves, protocols to ensure their quality, computer systems for their manipulation, statistical procedures for analysis and an appropriately skilled staff. Such a data resource facilitates analyzing long-term health outcomes and the factors associated with particular outcomes. Such systems are mandated by the overwhelming prevalence of chronic illness; the variability, complexity and uniqueness of a patient's course; the difficulties of traditional randomized approaches in these areas, and the time span required for studying these problems.