Methotrexate in patients with moderate systemic lupus erythematosus (exclusion of renal and central nervous system disease)

Synthetic Pharmacotherapy for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Potential Mechanisms of Action, Efficacy, and Safety

The pharmacological treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) aims to decrease disease activity, progression, systemic compromise, and mortality. Among the pharmacological alternatives, there are chemically synthesized drugs whose efficacy has been evaluated, but which have the potential to generate adverse events that may compromise adherence and response to treatment. Therapy selection and monitoring will depend on patient characteristics and the safety profile of each drug. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the most important synthetic drugs used in the treatment of SLE, including the current treatment options (mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and cyclophosphamide), review their mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and, most importantly, provide monitoring parameters that should be considered while the patient is receiving the pharmacotherapy.

On which evidence can we rely when prescribing off-label methotrexate in dermatological practice? - a systematic review with GRADE approach

If an authorized drug is prescribed for a use that is not described in the Summary of Product Characteristics, this is defined as 'off-label use.' Methotrexate is often used off-label for dermatological indications. Off-label use is permitted if physicians can justify the treatment based on scientific evidence available to them. Our objective here was therefore to summarize the evidence for the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the dermatological off-label use of methotrexate in a systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for studies for evidence on the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the off-label use of methotrexate in dermatological indications up to November 2019. We used the GRADE system to rate the quality of the evidence. The search retrieved 34,583 hits of which 3566 were selected after the title and abstract screening. After the full-text screening, 143 studies were included, which involved 3688 patients in total. We found low-quality evidence for the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the off-label use of methotrexate in 31 dermatological diseases. To optimize the quality of evidence to support off-label use, we need high-quality studies in which well-characterized patients are treated with standardized treatments regimens using well-validated outcomes relevant to patients and physicians.

Differential DNA methylation correlates with response to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVES

Identifying blood-based biomarkers that predict treatment response in RA is a clinical priority. We investigated differential DNA methylation as a candidate biomarker of response for the first-line drug used in RA, MTX.

METHODS

DNA methylation was measured in DNA samples from individuals recruited to the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study. Differentially methylated positions were compared between whole blood samples collected at baseline and at 4 weeks from patients who, by 6 months, had a good (n = 34) or poor response (n = 34) to MTX using linear modelling, adjusting for gender, age, cell composition, baseline 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) and smoking status. Analyses also compared methylation with changes in DAS28 and changes in swollen joint count and tender joint count, and changes in CRP over the initial 6 months after MTX commencement. Differentially methylated positions showing significant differences with any response parameter were tested using pyrosequencing in an independent group of 100 patients from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study.

RESULTS

In the discovery group, two CpG sites showed methylation changes at 4 weeks associated with clinical EULAR response by 6 months. Significant changes in methylation for three differentially methylated positions associated with change in tender joint counts, three with change in swollen joint count and a further four with change in CRP. Of the 12 CpGs, four showed replicated association in an independent dataset of samples from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Medication Study.

CONCLUSION

These data represent an advance on current practice by contributing to a personalized medicine strategy allowing an escalation or change in therapy as early as 4 weeks.

Drug repurposing to improve treatment of rheumatic autoimmune inflammatory diseases

The past century has been characterized by intensive efforts, within both academia and the pharmaceutical industry, to introduce new treatments to individuals with rheumatic autoimmune inflammatory diseases (RAIDs), often by 'borrowing' treatments already employed in one RAID or previously used in an entirely different disease, a concept known as drug repurposing. However, despite sharing some clinical manifestations and immune dysregulation, disease pathogenesis and phenotype vary greatly among RAIDs, and limited understanding of their aetiology has made repurposing drugs for RAIDs challenging. Nevertheless, the past century has been characterized by different 'waves' of repurposing. Early drug repurposing occurred in academia and was based on serendipitous observations or perceived disease similarity, often driven by the availability and popularity of drug classes. Since the 1990s, most biologic therapies have been developed for one or several RAIDs and then tested among the others, with varying levels of success. The past two decades have seen data-driven repurposing characterized by signature-based approaches that rely on molecular biology and genomics. Additionally, many data-driven strategies employ computational modelling and machine learning to integrate multiple sources of data. Together, these repurposing periods have led to advances in the treatment for many RAIDs.

Management strategies and future directions for systemic lupus erythematosus in adults

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterised by the loss of self-tolerance and formation of nuclear autoantigens and immune complexes resulting in inflammation of multiple organs. The clinical presentation of SLE is heterogeneous, can involve one or more organs, including the skin, kidneys, joints, and nervous system, and take a chronic or relapsing and remitting disease course. SLE is most common in women and in those of non-white ethnicity. Because of the multitude of presentations, manifestations, and serological abnormalities in patients with SLE, diagnosis can be challenging. Therapeutic approaches predominantly involve immunomodulation and immunosuppression and are targeted to the specific organ manifestation, with the aim of achieving low disease activity. Despite many treatment advances and improved diagnostics, SLE continues to cause substantial morbidity and premature mortality. Current management strategies, although helpful, are limited by high failure rates and toxicity. An overreliance on corticosteroid therapy contributes to much of the long-term organ damage. In this Seminar, we outline the classification criteria for SLE, current treatment strategies and medications, the evidence supporting their use, and explore potential future therapies.

Mechanisms of action and historical facts on the use of intravenous immunoglobulins in systemic lupus erythematosus

The current existing therapies for severe cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients are still limited. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIGs), which are purified from the plasma of thousands of healthy human donors, have been profiled as efficacious and life-saving options for SLE patients refractory to conventional therapy. The specific mechanism of action by which IVIGs generate immunomodulation in SLE is not currently understood. In this manuscript, we reviewed some of the hypothesis that have been postulated to explain the IVIG effects, including those on T and B cell intracellular signalling and activation, as well as the interferon signalling pathways involved in the detection of nucleic acids and the defective removal of immune complexes and debris.

Psoriasis: Which therapy for which patient: Psoriasis comorbidities and preferred systemic agents

Psoriasis is a systemic inflammatory disease associated with increased risk of comorbidities, such as psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, malignancy, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases. These factors have a significant impact on the decision to use one therapy over another. The past decade has seen a paradigm shift in our understanding of the pathogenesis of psoriasis that has led to identification of new therapeutic targets. Several new drugs have gained approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, expanding the psoriasis armamentarium, but still a large number of patients continue to be untreated or undertreated. Treatment regimens for psoriasis patients should be tailored to meet the specific needs based on disease severity, the impact on quality of life, the response to previous therapies, and the presence of comorbidities. The first article in this continuing medical education series focuses on specific comorbidities and provides insights to choose appropriate systemic treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Disease severity and prophylactic measures in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus: results of a worldwide questionnaire-based study

Introduction

Due to a wide array of dermatologic manifestations, assessment of disease severity in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) remains challenging. Given a need for some standardization in this field, we conducted a worldwide questionnaire-based study among physicians experienced in CLE management.

Aim

We asked about CLE assessment, their prophylactic measures advised to patients, and treatment recommendations.

Material and methods

A total of 83 completed questionnaires were received. Participating physicians recommended assessing disease severity at each patient’s visit (39.1%), monthly (4.9%) or at least every third month (17.3%). Almost half of the responding physicians (47.0%) waited 2–3 months before identifying a specific treatment option as not effective.

Results

The vast part of the participants informed their patients about of the risks of sun exposure and advised adequate preventive measures. Smoking was less frequently a matter of discussion between physicians and their patients. Recommendations for the timing of CLE severity assessment likely depends on disease severity and the type of therapeutic intervention.

Conclusions

Proper patient education about effective prophylactic measures should be included during routine CLE patient consultations.

Systemic lupus erythematosus: review of synthetic drugs

INTRODUCTION

Synthetic drugs are prescribed for nearly all patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), a multisystem autoimmune disease, to ameliorate symptoms and positively influence outcome. While only 2 biologic agents have been approved for the treatment of SLE, synthetic drugs are still the mainstay of therapy in SLE. The highly variable and unpredictable course of SLE poses a challenge for physicians as to what drug(s) should be prescribed for which patient.

AREAS COVERED

Previous and recent studies have evaluated several synthetic drugs in the treatment of SLE. This article reviews currently available evidence for the efficacy and safety of synthetic drugs in SLE and discusses future treatment perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Hydroxychloroquine should be considered an anchor drug in SLE because of the multiple beneficial effects of this agent. When patients present with persistent disease activity despite hydroxychloroquine therapy or need higher dosages and/or prolonged use of glucocorticoids (GCs), additional immunosuppressants should be promptly prescribed. Based on available evidence, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil are the drugs of first choice. Determination of a 'safe' GC dose for chronic daily use is of major importance and should be subject of further studies in large patient populations.

The efficacy of add-on tacrolimus for minor flare in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a retrospective study

Objective

We have assessed the effectiveness of tacrolimus for minor flares in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients.

Methods

The medical records of 313 patients were retrospectively reviewed over a period of seven years, from 2006 to 2013. We enrolled patients with minor flare treated with add-on tacrolimus, without glucocorticoid (GC) intensification (tacrolimus group). Minor flare was defined as a ≥1-point increase in a total score between 3 and 11 in the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). We enrolled as controls patients who were administered increased doses of GC for minor flare (GC group). All patients were followed for one year. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of responders.

Results

There were 14 eligible patients in the tacrolimus group and 20 eligible patients in the GC group. The mean SLEDAI at flare tended to be higher in the tacrolimus group than in the GC group (7.5 vs. 6.2, p = 0.085). A mean dose of 1.6 mg tacrolimus/day was administered for flare, while the mean GC dose was 13.7 mg/day in the GC group. The proportion of responders was 86% (12/14) in the tacrolimus group and 75% (15/20) in the GC group ( p = 0.67). The mean dose of GC at 12 months was higher in the GC group than in the tacrolimus group (9.7 mg/day vs. 7.1 mg/day, p < 0.05). Only one patient discontinued tacrolimus because of fatigue after three months.

Conclusion

Adding tacrolimus without increasing the GC dose may provide an effective treatment option for minor flares in patients with SLE.

Methotrexate: an old new drug in autoimmune disease

Methotrexate (MTX) is currently considered, among disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), the 'anchor-drug' in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. In the last 25 years, there has been a marked expansion in the use of MTX in different inflammatory diseases. Its low cost, associated to a good long-term efficacy and safety profile, justifies the use of MTX as a first-line disease-modifying drug or alternatively, a steroid-sparing medication in this field of medicine. Although new emerging options, including biological treatments, are being established in the therapeutic scenario, the good cost/benefit ratio of MTX supports the choice of this drug in combination with these newer therapies, enhancing the efficacy of these combination therapies and decreasing the risk of potential side effects.

Efficacy and safety of nonbiologic immunosuppressants in the treatment of nonrenal systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the efficacy and safety of nonbiologic immunosuppressants in the treatment of nonrenal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

We conducted a sensitive literature search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to October 2011. The selection criteria were studies including adult patients with SLE, a treatment intervention with nonbiologic immunosuppressants, a placebo or active comparator group, and outcome measures assessing efficacy and/or safety. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, clinical trials, and cohort studies were included. The quality of each study was evaluated using Jadad’s scale and the Oxford Levels of Evidence.

RESULTS

In total, 158 of the 2,827 initially found articles were selected for detailed review; 65 studies fulfilled the predetermined criteria. Overall, the studies were low quality, with only 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Cyclophosphamide demonstrated efficacy for neuropsychiatric SLE, preventing relapses with an additional steroid sparing effect, although its use was associated with cumulative damage, development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia,and ovarian failure. Other immunosuppressants (azathioprine, methotrexate, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil,and cyclosporin A) demonstrated efficacy in reducing nonrenal activity and flares with a steroid-sparing effect, although only on occasion in non–placebo-controlled RCTs of small numbers of patients.

CONCLUSION

Several immunosuppressants demonstrated their safety and efficacy in nonrenal SLE. A specific drug for each particular manifestation cannot be recommended, although cyclophosphamide may be used in more severe cases, and methotrexate may be the first option in most cases of moderately active SLE. High-quality RCTs of larger numbers of patients are needed.

Methotrexate in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review of its efficacy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to evaluate the evidence for efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

A comprehensive, computerized search was performed in MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials registry to screen for studies that examined the efficacy of MTX in adult SLE patients. The Jadad scoring system was used to assess study quality, and data were pooled using the random effects model.

RESULTS

Of the 53 articles that were identified, 44 were excluded. Nine studies (including three randomized controlled and six observational) were eligible for inclusion. All of the included studies predominantly involved patients with arthritis or mucocutaneous features. There was significant reduction of the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) among MTX-treated patients when compared with controls (p = 0.001, odds ratio (OR) 0.444, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.279 to 0.707). There was also significant reduction in the average dose of corticosteroids among MTX-treated patients when compared with controls (p = 0.001, OR 0.335, 95% CI 0.202 to 0.558). The effect of MTX on laboratory and serological markers, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anti-dsDNA and complement levels (C3 and C4), could not be determined because of the limited numbers of controlled trials.

CONCLUSION

The use of MTX is associated with significant reductions in SLEDAI and the average dose of corticosteroids in adult patients with SLE.

The effect of methotrexate on improving serological abnormalities of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

This was an open-labeled, prospective, control study to determine the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) for improving serological abnormalities in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Thirty patients with a low serum complement and/or high anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody levels during a prednisolone taper received MTX orally at a dose of 7.5 mg/week over 12-18 months (MTX group). Eighteen SLE patients were selected as controls (control group). At the time of entrance into the study, all patients were receiving <15 mg/day of prednisolone. The C3, C4, and immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA, and IgM levels were measured using a turbidimetric immunoassay. The anti-dsDNA antibody level was measured using the Farr assay.

RESULTS

Significant increases in C3 and C4 levels and significant decreases in anti-dsDNA antibody, IgG, IgA, and IgM levels from baseline were observed for 3-18 months after the trial in the MTX group but not in the control group. At the end of the study, C3 and/or C4 levels in 96.7% of the MTX patients and 33.3% of the control patients were normalized or elevated (p = 0.0001), and anti-dsDNA antibody levels were normalized or lowered in 24 of the 26 MTX patients (92.3%) and in 50.0% of the control patients (p = 0.0022). In addition, a significant reduction in SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score and a prednisolone-sparing effect were observed for the MTX group but not the control group. A significant increase in mean corpuscular volume of red blood cells, which is indicative of an anti-folic-acid metabolic disorder induced by MTX, was observed only for patients in the MTX group. Five patients (16.7%) discontinued MTX treatment because of disease flare, and another three (10.0%) discontinued due to treatment side effects.

CONCLUSION

MTX appears to be effective for improving serological abnormalities frequently observed before disease flares in SLE patients on a prednisolone taper.

Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in articular and cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus

AIM

A prospective open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) and chloroquine (CQ) in articular and cutaneous manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Consecutive SLE patients were randomly assigned to either 10 mg MTX weekly or 150 mg CQ daily during 24 weeks. Outcome measures were: numbers of swollen and tender joints, duration of morning stiffness, visual analog scale (VAS) for articular pain, physician global assessment index, patient global assessment index, SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), disappearance of skin rash and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).

RESULTS

Forty-one patients consented to participate, 15 were allocated in the MTX group and 26 in the CQ group. Two patients on MTX dropped out due to side-effects and two in the CQ group, one due to side-effects and one due to inefficacy. Baseline demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters of the two groups were nearly identical. In both groups the clinical and laboratory parameters improved significantly over 24 weeks, except the ESR in the MTX group. The results of the outcome measures at the end of the trial did not differ significantly between the two groups, except morning stiffness (P < 0.05 in favor of the MTX group) and ESR (P < 0.01 in favor of the CQ group). Rise of serum alanine aminotransferase was observed in two cases in the MTX group and in none in the CQ group.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose MTX appears to be as effective as CQ in patients with articular and cutaneous manifestations of SLE, having an acceptable toxicity profile. Results of this prospective study need to be confirmed in a larger study.

Drug monitoring in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To conduct an evidence-based review of the common medication toxicities and strategies and utility of drug toxicity monitoring among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

PubMed and other databases were searched for articles published between the years 1960 and 2010 for keywords referring to medication toxicity or monitoring strategies for 7 drugs commonly used in SLE. All relevant English-language articles were reviewed. Most of the evidence we reviewed comprised studies that addressed the incidence of toxicity-randomized trials that compare different monitoring strategies for these drugs do not exist.

RESULTS

Data to describe the frequency of adverse events and appropriate strategies for screening for these events are scarce. Toxicities do not appear to be substantially more common among patients with SLE compared to other conditions for which these drugs are used.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review demonstrates that the scientific basis for many aspects of drug toxicity monitoring is weak and that most current recommendations are based largely on expert consensus. We present a future research agenda to address these gaps.

Pharmacotherapy of systemic lupus erythematosus

The pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is challenging owing to its unpredictable clinical course, the variable organ system involvement and the lack of clear understanding of disease pathogenesis. The widely used corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs, which can control disease activity, have serious, potentially fatal, side effects. In the last decade, a better understanding of lupus pathogenesis has led to the development of biological agents that are directed at biomarkers. However, these biologicals also exert side effects due to infections resulting from completely eliminating immune cells (e.g., B cells) or cytokine signals (e.g., interferon-alpha) or affecting molecular targets outside the immune system (CD40L on platelets). New biomarker-driven clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate the safety and efficacy of B-cell depletion, blocking of interferon signaling, inhibition of the mTOR pathway, and restoration of glutathione deficiency in lupus T cells.

Lupus arthritis

Arthritis in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is one of the most common disease manifestations. Nearly all joints can be affected by SLE, but hand and knee involvement are the most typical. Periarticular structures can be inflamed leading to tendonitis, tenosynovitis and tendon rupture. Avascular necrosis (AVN) also occurs causing joint pain and disability, typically in larger joints such as the hip and knee. This article addresses the clinical features of arthritis in lupus and an approach to the differential diagnosis. Treatment strategies include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories, corticosteroids, anti-malarials and a variety of immunosuppressive medications.

Steroid-sparing effects of methotrexate in systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the potential benefits of methotrexate in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

A 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of methotrexate with folic acid was conducted. Intent-to-treat analyses were performed with mixed linear models and alpha = 0.04 (96% confidence interval [96% CI]) to account for interim analysis of longitudinal data to assess the treatment effects on lupus disease activity and daily steroid dose across monthly measurements, and to test if the treatment effects depended on selected participant characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 215 participants screened, 94 were excluded, 35 declined, and 86 were randomized (methotrexate = 41, placebo = 45). The groups were balanced for demographic and disease characteristics. Antimalarial use was more frequent in the placebo group, which was adjusted for in multivariable analyses. Sixty participants (27 methotrexate, 33 placebo) completed the study and 26 terminated early. Among participants who had the same baseline prednisone dose, those taking methotrexate received, on average, 1.33 mg/day less prednisone during the trial period (96% CI 0.06, 2.72 mg/day; a 22% reduction of their average-during-trial daily dose) compared with those in the placebo group. For the primary measure of disease activity (revised Systemic Lupus Activity Measure), methotrexate use was also associated with a marginally significant reduction in the mean during-trial score of 0.86 units (96% CI 0.01, 1.71; P = 0.039). A significant interaction between treatment and baseline damage was found (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Methotrexate conferred a significant advantage in participants with moderately active lupus by lowering daily prednisone dose and slightly decreasing lupus disease activity. As a therapeutic option in moderate SLE, methotrexate can be considered to be steroid sparing.

Cutaneous vasculitis: diagnosis and management

Vasculitis is histologically defined as inflammatory cell infiltration and destruction of blood vessels. Vasculitis is classified as primary (idiopathic, eg, cutaneous leukocytoclastic angiitis, Wegener's granulomatosis) or secondary, a manifestation of connective tissue diseases, infections, adverse drug eruptions, or a paraneoplastic phenomenon. Cutaneous vasculitis, manifested as urticaria, purpura, hemorrhagic vesicles, ulcers, nodules, livedo, infarcts, or digital gangrene, is a frequent and often significant component of many systemic vasculitic syndromes such as lupus or rheumatoid vasculitis and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated primary vasculitic syndromes such as Churg-Strauss syndrome. In most instances, cutaneous vasculitis represents a self-limited, single-episode phenomenon, the treatment of which consists of general measures such as leg elevation, warming, avoidance of standing, cold temperatures and tight fitting clothing, and therapy with antihistamines, aspirin, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. More extensive therapy is indicated for symptomatic, recurrent, extensive, and persistent skin disease or coexistence of systemic disease. For mild recurrent or persistent disease, colchicine and dapsone are first-choice agents. Severe cutaneous and systemic disease requires more potent immunosuppression (prednisone plus azathioprine, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, or mycophenolate mofetil). In cases of refractory vasculitis, plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin are viable considerations. The new biologic therapies that work via cytokine blockade or lymphocyte depletion such as tumor alpha inhibitor infliximab and the anti-B-cell antibody rituximab, respectively, are showing benefit in certain settings such as Wegener's granulomatosis, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, Behçet's disease, and cryoglobulinemic vasculitis.

Methotrexate in systemic lupus erythematosus

The most appropriate treatment of moderate, nonorgan threatening disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remains poorly defined, although methotrexate (MTX) is commonly used. The results of 20 uncontrolled case series and a single retrospective cohort study tend to support its use to treat active skin and joint disease. Unfortunately, three prospective randomized trials have reported conflicting results. Two reported improvement in overall disease activity and decreased corticosteroid requirement with MTX. The third trial showed no benefit from MTX for disease activity, but did report a reduction in corticosteroid requirements. Difficulties in conducting trials in moderately active SLE are discussed.

Bullous SLE: response to methotrexate and relationship with disease activity

We report on a case of 40-year-old female with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who developed a severe bullous eruption on sun-exposed areas. The bullous manifestation was associated with a flare of lupus serologies, whereas the previous manifestations of the disease were quiescent. Due to prior intolerance to many drugs, she was given oral methotrexate (10 mg/week). The drug administration was followed by a rapid and full resolution of cutaneous lesions. Five months later she developed a class III lupus nephritis. Our case is the first report of efficacy of methotrexate in bullous SLE and rises the question of the relationship between bullous eruption and SLE activity.

Specific modulation of the anti-DNA autoantibody-nucleic acids interaction by the high affinity RNA aptamer

Anti-DNA autoantibodies are one of the frequently found autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus patient sera. RNA aptamers for the monoclonal G6-9 anti-DNA autoantibody were selected from a random pool of RNA library. Binding affinity of the best aptamer is around 2nM, which is at least 100-fold higher than that of cognate DNA antigen to the autoantibody. Aptamer binds specifically to the G6-9 autoantibody but not to other similar autoantibodies. Minimal binding motif of the aptamer was mapped, providing a hint for a natural epitope of the autoantibody. DNA binding to the G6-9 autoantibody is shown to be efficiently inhibited by the aptamer. Such binding property of the RNA aptamer could be used not only as a modulator for the pathogenic anti-DNA autoantibody, but also as a useful biochemical reagent for elucidating a fine specificity of the autoantibody-nucleic acid interaction.

Methotrexate therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus

There are 12 non-controlled and only two controlled studies using methotrexate (MTX) in a total of 207 SLE patients in the literature. The majority of these studies evaluated mainly cutaneous and/or articular involvement and attained good results. Two studies evaluated a small number of patients with lupus nephritis, achieving discordant results. Two other studies in pediatric onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) also presented conflicting results, it being relevant that the one with poor response had the majority of patients with nephritis. One of the controlled trials was retrospective and concluded that MTX was effective in the treatment of antimalarial-resistant lupus arthritis and that toxicity leading to discontinuation of MTX was infrequent. The other controlled study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that evaluated SLE patients with mild activity. The authors concluded that MTX was effective in controlling cutaneous and articular activity and permitted prednisone dose reduction. The side effects were frequent but only 10% of patients needed to discontinue the medication. The accumulative evidence suggests that MTX in a low weekly dose may be effective in SLE patients with articular and/or cutaneous involvement with no response to antimalarials and low-dose prednisone and in patients in whom we can not reduce prednisone dose due to articular or cutaneous activity. Caution is required concerning the side effects.

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

The treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is mainly based on a number of "traditional" drugs such as corticosteroids, antimalarials, azathioprine and cyclophosphamide. However, this scenario is rapidly changing due to the introduction of new compounds. Some of these new agents have been successfully used in other diseases, while others are being specifically designed to interfere with the immune abnormalities seen in SLE. As our knowledge on the mechanisms of immune response increases, new drugs that can interfere with T and B cell interaction and activation, production of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies, immune-complexes deposition and cytokine activation have been developed and some of these are now under investigation in SLE. Although initial data regarding their safety and efficacy are encouraging, caution must be taken before these drugs are considered as the treatment of choice for specific SLE manifestations. Specifically, controlled clinical trials with sufficient number of patients are necessary. If the promising results already available are confirmed, the use of these drugs might represent the keystone in the future management of SLE and other autoimmune diseases.

Systemic lupus erythematosus

This review covers major advances in clinical issues related to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) published between 1995 and 2000. The classification criteria for both SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) have been updated, and up to 19 different subsets of neuropsychiatric lupus have been defined. New epidemiological data show that the incidence of new cases and the survival of patients with SLE are both increasing. Several randomised controlled trials have defined the role of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, antimalarials, and hormonal treatment in the management of SLE. New data are available for drugs such as ciclosporin and thalidomide. Finally, several new treatments for severe refractory cases, such as mycophenolate mofetil and stem-cell transplantation, are being increasingly used. New data also refer to management of thrombosis in APS and high-risk pregnancies in women with SLE or APS.

Therapy of systemic lupus erythematosus: new agents and new evidence

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a disease of relatively low prevalence with a wide range of clinical manifestations. Due in part to these two facts, there is little new evidence on the treatment of lupus. In fact, randomised controlled studies and prospective series are few and usually involve a small number of patients. Despite this, some therapies have shown to be beneficial within the last five years, while others emerge as possibilities in the near future. Among the former, antimalarials appear to be the treatment of choice for maintaining mild to moderate disease in remission. Methotrexate may be an alternative to other corticosteroid-sparing drugs, especially in patients with active arthritis and skin disease. Cyclosporin can be of use in proteinuric nephritis, although the incidence of hypertension with this drug is high. Thalidomide is useful for refractory skin lesions, but the efficacy of lower, less toxic doses is still to be studied. Immunoglobulins should probably be limited to selected patients with manifestations such as thrombocytopoenia. Experience is more limited with cladribine, fludarabine, tacrolimus, danazol and pentoxifylline. New therapies for severe SLE include mycophenolate mofetil, a potent immunosuppressive drug with a reasonable safety profile and immunoablative therapy with or without stem cell transplantation, in highly resistant cases or those with a poor prognosis. Other recently developed molecules, including anti-CD40L monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), are still under investigation.

Novel approaches to therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus

Current therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are targeted at immunosuppression and at reducing inflammation. The current therapies are broad-spectrum and include steroids and cytotoxic agents that are counterbalanced by toxicity and side effects of the medications. Methotrexate can be utilized to reduce steroid requirements in mild to moderate SLE. Manipulation of the hormonal axis includes DHEA and bromocriptine. Mycophenolate mofetil is an immunosuppressive agent that is being investigated for SLE renal disease. Autologous stem cell transplantation or high-dose cyclophosphamide may be an option for severe refractory SLE. The aim of the future is to target therapies by altering specific known mechanisms of inflammation and autoimmunity. Although the inciting antigen is still unknown in SLE, it may be possible to alter the regulation of the immune response by targeted molecular therapy. Methods to do so would include manipulation of idiotypes, manipulation of second signal stimulation of the immune response, manipulation of cytokines, and the induction of tolerance by administration of blocking peptides. IVIg is an immunomodulator that has been successful in the treatment of SLE. Targeted molecular therapy is undergoing phase I trials with monoclonal anti-CD40L, a signaling inhibitor. Anti-CTLA4Ig, another signaling blocker, is presently being investigated for psoriasis, but may be a potential therapy for SLE. Finally, therapies may include the administration of peptides to induce tolerance.

Mycophenolate mofetil for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: an open pilot trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who were inadequately controlled with corticosteroids, antimalarials, and other immunosuppressive agents.

METHODS

Ten patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were treated with 1500-2000 mg mycophenolae mofetil (MMF) daily for a median observation time of 11. 2+/-2.4 (8-16) months in an open clinical trial. The effectiveness and safety of treatment were analyzed using an established disease activity score, clinical status, and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

All patients improved under treatment with no or only minor side effects. The disease activity score (SLAM) decreased statistically significantly from a median of 15.6+/-5.5 to 9.9+/-4.1 after three months (P<0.01) and to 8.0+/-3.3 after six months (P<0.01). Hematologic parameters did not change significantly whereas a reduction of inflammatory markers was observed. Four patients with SLE-nephritis already treated with cyclophosphamide pulse therapy continuously showed a slight improvement of renal function. Prednisolone dosages could be reduced significantly from a median level of 10.0+/-5.1 mg/d before treatment to 4.6+/-3.5 mg/d after six months (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Mycophenolate mofetil is a promising option in immunosuppressive treatment of patients with moderate and severe systemic lupus erythematosus who did not show a satisfactory response to other immunosuppressives.

Recruitment strategies in superiority trials in SLE: lessons from the study of methotrexate in lupus erythematosus (SMILE)

The task of recruiting patients for a research project can prove to be the most difficult aspect of the entire research process. A large portion of the work of research is devoted to the identification of strategies which ensure a successful recruitment of patients. Every researcher has learned from experience the many methods needed to enhance patient enrollment into trials. Superiority trials in SLE have not been frequent in previous years. This paper describes the challenges encountered with the multicentre SMILE trial in progress across Canada. We identify areas where patient recruitment is a problem, potential reasons for the problem, and the results of tactics used to increase enrollment.

[Methotrexate in dermatology: pharmacology, indications, applications and prudent use]

High dosage methotrexate is currently used in the treatment of malignancies. When used at low- or moderate doses, methotrexate has antiproliferative and antiinflammatory effects and is a useful drug in skin diseases. The aim of this review is to describe pharmacology, indications, adverse effects and practical use in Dermatology. Pharmacodynamics of methotrexate is especially related to antifolic activity. Methotrexate is officially approved in the treatment of severe psoriasis, but many other proliferative or inflammatory diseases with cutaneous manifestations may benefit from this drug, usually in association with corticosteroids. The use of methotrexate needs some precautions and a precise follow-up to minimise the risk of severe adverse effects. However, efficacy of methotrexate was reported in open and retrospective small size studies. Prospective and comparative trials are required to confirm the indications, advantages and tolerance of methotrexate in dermatology.

Methotrexate-resistant form of dihydrofolate reductase protects transgenic murine embryos from teratogenic effects of methotrexate

Methotrexate, a potent inhibitor of the ubiquitously expressed enzyme dihydrofolate reductase, induces limb and facial anomalies that resemble vascular disruptions in their evolution and final outcome. Previous studies suggest that inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase is responsible for methotrexate-induced embryopathy, although specific sites of methotrexate activity have not been well defined. In this report, we show that constitutive expression of a methotrexate-resistant form of dihydrofolate reductase in transgenic embryos and their placentas ameliorates methotrexate teratogenicity. However, expression of the transgene in maternal tissues had no significant protective effect. The results confirm the role of dihydrofolate reductase inhibition in the pathogenesis of methotrexate-induced birth defects and provide a foundation for future studies of targeted transgene expression in select embryonic or placental cell populations.

Indications for, and use of, cytotoxic agents in SLE

Over the past decade, cytotoxic drugs have come to assume an increasingly important role in the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Intravenous cyclophosphamide has become the standard treatment for lupus affecting major organs, in particular lupus nephritis. Cytotoxics with less potential for adverse side effects such as azathioprine and methotrexate are widely used in the management of non-major organ lupus and as an adjunct to reduce corticosteroid requirements. Recent clinical experience in lupus with newer cytotoxic drugs such as cyclosporin A, adenosine analogues, and mycophenolate mofetil appear promising and may offer improvements in lupus management in the future.