Odevixibat and partial external biliary diversion showed equal improvement of cholestasis in a patient with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Exploring bile acid transporters as key players in cancer development and treatment: Evidence from preclinical and clinical studies

Bile acid transporters (BATs) are integral membrane proteins belonging to various families, such as solute carriers, organic anion transporters, and ATP-binding cassette families. These transporters play a crucial role in bile acid transportation within the portal and systemic circulations, with expression observed in tissues, including the liver, kidney, and small intestine. Bile acids serve as signaling molecules facilitating the absorption and reabsorption of fats and lipids. Dysregulation of bile acid concentration has been implicated in tumorigenesis, yet the role of BATs in this process remains underexplored. Emerging evidence suggests that BATs may modulate various stages of cancer progression, including initiation, development, proliferation, metastasis, and tumor microenvironment regulation. Targeting BATs using siRNAs, miRNAs, and small compound inhibitors in preclinical models and their polymorphisms are well-studied for transporters like BSEP, MDR1, MRP2, OATP1A2, etc., and have shed light on their involvement in tumorigenesis, particularly in cancers such as those affecting the liver and gastrointestinal tract. While BATs' role in diseases like Alagille syndrome, biliary atresia, and cirrhosis have been extensively studied, their implications in cancer warrant further investigation. This review highlights the expression and function of BATs in cancer development and emphasizes the potential of targeting these transporters as a novel therapeutic strategy for various malignancies.

Practical Considerations for Odevixibat Treatment in Patients with Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis: A Single-Center Case Series

Background: Patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) experience cholestasis-associated symptoms, including severe pruritus. Odevixibat is an ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor indicated for treatment of PFIC in the European Union and for the treatment of pruritus in PFIC in the United States. The aim of the current study was to characterize the real-world effectiveness and safety of odevixibat in patients with PFIC. Methods: This retrospective study included 9 patients with PFIC treated with odevixibat in a single center in Tübingen, Germany. Data were recorded using case report forms. Results: Of the 9 patients (PFIC1, n = 2; PFIC2, n = 7), 5 had improved serum bile acid levels, pruritus, liver function tests, and sleep with odevixibat treatment. Two siblings with periodic relapses of PFIC symptoms also had improved pruritus and sleep within 4 months of treatment. Two siblings with complete loss of bile salt export pump (BSEP) protein did not respond to treatment; both underwent liver transplantation (indications: hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] manifestation [n = 1] and severe failure to thrive and refractory pruritus [n = 1]). Four patients reported abdominal complaints that were transient or responded to dose reduction; no other safety issues were reported. Conclusions: In this case series, clinical benefits were observed in most patients with PFIC1 and PFIC2 treated with odevixibat. In patients with periodic relapse of PFIC symptoms, ≥3 months of treatment with odevixibat may be required for symptom control. Patients with complete loss of BSEP did not have consistent symptom relief and require careful monitoring. Effectiveness and feasibility results from our cohort demonstrate potential for long-term benefits with odevixibat in real-world treatment of patients with PFIC.

Sodium/bile acid co-transporter inhibitors currently in preclinical or early clinical development for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis

INTRODUCTION

Pruritus is common and often undertreated in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Existing treatments largely have an aging and low-quality evidence base, and studies included only small numbers of patients. More recent data that has added to our understanding of pruritus treatments has often come from clinical trials where itching was a secondary outcome measure in a trial designed primarily to assess disease-modifying agents. This area represents an unmet clinical need in the management of PBC.

AREAS COVERED

In this manuscript, we first summarize the proposed mechanisms for PBC-related pruritus and the current treatment paradigm. We then present an appraisal of the existing pre-clinical and clinical evidence for the use of ileal bile acid transporter inhibitors (IBATis) for this indication in PBC patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence for the efficacy of IBATis is promising but limited by the currently available volume of data. Furthermore, larger clinical trials with long-term data on efficacy, safety and tolerability are needed to confirm the role of using IBATis in clinical practice and their place on the itch treatment ladder. Additional focus should also be given to exploring the disease-modifying potential of IBATis in PBC.

Opinion paper on the diagnosis and treatment of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis

Background & Aims

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) relates to a group of rare, debilitating, liver disorders which typically present in early childhood, but have also been reported in adults. Without early detection and effective treatment, PFIC can result in end-stage liver disease. The aim of the paper was to put forward recommendations that promote standardisation of the management of PFIC in clinical practice.

Methods

A committee of six specialists came together to discuss the challenges faced by physicians in the management of PFIC. The committee agreed on two key areas where expert guidance is required to optimise care: (1) how to diagnose and treat patients with a clinical presentation of PFIC in the absence of clear genetic test results/whilst awaiting results, and (2) how to monitor disease progression and response to treatment. A systematic literature review was undertaken to contextualise and inform the recommendations.

Results

An algorithm was developed for the diagnosis and treatment of children with suspected PFIC. The algorithm recommends the use of licensed inhibitors of ileal bile acid transporters as the first-line treatment for patients with PFIC and suggests that genetic testing be used to confirm genotype whilst treatment is initiated in patients in whom PFIC is suspected. The authors recommend referring patients to an experienced centre, and ensuring that monitoring includes measurements of pruritus, serum bile acid levels, growth, and quality of life following diagnosis and during treatment.

Conclusions

The algorithm presented within this paper offers guidance to optimise the management of paediatric PFIC. The authors hope that these recommendations will help to standardise the management of PFIC in the absence of clear clinical guidelines.

Impact and implications

This opinion paper outlines a consistent approach to the contemporaneous diagnosis, monitoring, referral and management of children with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis. This should assist physicians given the recent developments in genetic diagnosis and the availability of effective drug therapy. This manuscript will also help to raise awareness of current developments and educate health planners on the place for new drug therapies in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis.

Optimal liver transplant procedure in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 treated with biliary diversion or intestinal transplantation: Lessons learned from three cases treated with different approaches

BACKGROUND

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1 (PFIC1) is an autosomal recessive cholestatic liver disorder caused by ATP8B1 gene mutations. Although liver transplantation (LT) is indicated for progressive liver disease, postoperative complications, including severe diarrhea and graft steatohepatitis leading to graft loss, have been reported.

CASES

The first patient had jaundice, pruritus, diarrhea, and growth retardation (weight z-score: -2.5; height z-score: -3.7). She underwent LT with total internal biliary diversion (TIBD) to the colon at 2 years of age. Graft biopsy at the 7-year follow-up examination revealed microvesicular steatosis (60%). Her diarrhea improved, and her growth failure was recovering (weight z-score: -1.0; height z-score: -1.7). The second patient underwent sequential intestine-liver transplantation at 8 years of age due to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and short bowel syndrome caused by massive bowel resection for internal hernia after partial external biliary diversion (PEBD) at 21 months of age. She developed severe pancreatitis induced by steroid-bolus therapy for rejection after transplantation. She died 1.7 years after intestinal transplantation due to an uncontrollable pancreatic abscess and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The third patient underwent PEBD at 15 months of age and received LT with TEBD at 15 years of age due to ESLD with hepatic encephalopathy. Throughout the perioperative period, she showed no abdominal symptoms, including diarrhea and pancreatitis. Graft biopsy at the 2-year follow-up examination revealed macrovesicular steatosis (60%) with inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients showed different outcomes. Effective therapeutic options to mitigate post-LT complications in patients with PFIC1 must be considered individually.

Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis: A Descriptive Study in a Tertiary Care Center

Background

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a rare genetic disorder that results from defective mechanisms of bile secretion. We aim to describe different types of PFIC and their clinical features, treatment modalities, and outcomes in Saudi Arabia. Patients and Methods. This is a retrospective study of all patients diagnosed with PFIC at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center in Riyadh from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2021. All relevant information was collected from patient charts and transferred into the REDcap® database for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 79 patients were identified with PFIC, and PFIC type 3 was the most common (59.5%), followed by PFIC type 2 (34.2%), PFIC type 1 (5.1%), and PFIC type 4 (1.3%). Males and females were affected in 54.4% and 45.6%, respectively. Mutations in ATP8B1, ABCB11, and ABCB4 genes were observed in PFIC type 1, PFIC type 2, and PFIC type 3, and loss of function in a variant of TJP2 was detected in PFIC type 4, respectively. A total of 51 (64.6%) patients underwent liver transplantation: three patients (3/4) with PFIC type 1 (75%), twenty patients (20/27) with PFIC type 2 (74.1%), twenty-seven patients (27/47) with PFIC type 3 (57.4%), and one patient with PFIC type 4 (100%). The mean duration of disease before transplantation was 53.9 ± 67 months with a median of 30 months. Following liver transplantation, symptomatic control was achieved in 47 patients (92.2%). Recurrence after transplantation occurred in 4 patients (7.8%) within an average of 22.5 months and a median of 17 months.

Conclusion

PFIC is considered a rare disorder in Saudi Arabia; however, early recognition of the disease is important for appropriate management and early referral for liver transplantation evaluation. The overall rate of liver transplantation in our cohort was 64.6% with an excellent five-year survival rate.

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis-outcome and time to transplant after biliary diversion according to genetic subtypes

Background

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a heterogeneous disease characterized by progressive cholestasis in early childhood. Surgical therapy aims at preventing bile absorption either by external or internal biliary diversion (BD). Several different genetic subtypes encode for defects in bile transport proteins, and new subtypes are being discovered ongoingly. Overall, the literature is scarce, however, accumulating evidence points to PFIC 2 having a more aggressive course and to respond less favorable to BD. With this knowledge, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the long-term outcome of PFIC 2 compared to PFIC 1 following BD in children at our center.

Methods

Clinical data and laboratory findings of all children with PFIC, who were treated and managed in our hospital between 1993 and 2022, were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Overall, we treated 40 children with PFIC 1 (n = 10), PFIC 2 (n = 20) and PFIC 3 (n = 10). Biliary diversion was performed in 13 children (PFIC 1, n = 6 and 2, n = 7). Following BD, bile acids (BA) (p = 0.0002), cholesterol (p < 0.0001) and triglyceride (p < 0.0001) levels significantly decreased only in children with PFIC 1 but not in PFIC 2. Three out of 6 children (50%) with PFIC 1 and 4 out of 7 children (57%) with PFIC 2 required liver transplantation despite undergoing BD. On an individual case basis, BA reduction following BD predicted this outcome. Of the 10 children who had PFIC 3, none had biliary diversion and 7 (70%) required liver transplantation.

Conclusion

In our cohort, biliary diversion was effective in decreasing bile acids, cholesterol levels as well as triglycerides in the serum only in children with PFIC 1 but not PFIC 2. On an individual case level, a decrease in BA following BD predicted the need for liver transplantation.

Surgical versus Medical Management of Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis-Case Compilation and Review of the Literature

(1) Background: Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a rare cause of liver failure. Surgical biliary diversion (SBD) and ileal bile salt inhibitors (IBAT) can delay or prevent liver transplantation (LTX). A comparison of the two methodologies in the literature is lacking. The combination has not been investigated. (2) Methods: We performed a literature survey on medical and surgical treatments for PFIC and reviewed the charts of our patients with PFIC of a tertiary hospital. The end points of our analysis were a decrease in serum bile acid (sBA) levels, reduction of pruritus and delay or avoidance of (LTX). (3) Results: We included 17 case series on SBD with more than 5 patients and a total of 536 patients. External or internal SBD, either conventional or minimally invasive, can reduce pruritus and sBA, but not all PFIC types are suitable for SBD. Six publications described the use of two types of IBAT in PFIC with a total of 118 patients. Treatment response was dependent on genetic type and subtype. Patients with PFIC 2 (nt-BSEP) showed the best response to treatment. Four out of eleven PFIC patients underwent SBD at our centre, with two currently receiving IBAT. (4) Conclusions: Limited data on IBAT in selected patients with PFIC show safety and effectiveness, although surgical methods should still be considered as a successful bridging procedure. Further studies to evaluate a possible combination of IBAT and SBD in PFIC are warranted and treatment decision should be discussed in an interdisciplinary board.

Odevixibat: A Review of a Bioactive Compound for the Treatment of Pruritus Approved by the FDA

Odevixibat is synthesized through chemical modification of Benzothiazepine's structure. It is a tiny chemical that inhibits the ileal bile acid transporter and is used to treat a variety of cholestatic illnesses, including progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC). For cholestatic pruritus and liver disease development, bile acid transporter inhibition is a unique treatment strategy. Odevixibat reduces enteric bile acid reuptake. Oral odevixibat was also studied in children with cholestatic liver disease. Odevixibat received its first approval in the European Union (EU) in July 2021 for the treatment of PFIC in patients aged 6 months, followed by approval in the USA in August 2021 for the treatment of pruritus in PFIC patients aged 3 months. Bile acids in the distal ileum can be reabsorbed by the ileal sodium/bile acid cotransporter, a transport glycoprotein. Odevixibat is a sodium/bile acid co-transporter reversible inhibitor. An average 3 mg once-daily dose of odevixibat for a week resulted in a 56% reduction in the area under the curve of bile acid. A daily dose of 1.5 mg resulted in a 43% decrease in the area under the curve for bile acid. Odevixibat is also being evaluated in many countries for the treatment of other cholestatic illnesses, including Alagille syndrome and biliary atresia. This article reviews the updated information on odevixibat with respect to its clinical pharmacology, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, metabolism, drug-drug interactions, pre-clinical studies, and clinical trials.

Case Report: Add-on treatment with odevixibat in a new subtype of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis broadens the therapeutic horizon of genetic cholestasis

Odevixibat, an ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitor, is effective for the treatment of pruritus in children diagnosed with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) type 1 and 2. There are no studies showing the efficacy of Odevixibat in children with different subtypes of PFIC. We describe the case of a 6-year-old girl with chronic cholestatic jaundice. In the last 12 months laboratory data showed high serum levels of bilirubin (total bilirubin x 2.5 ULN; direct bilirubin x 1.7 ULN) and bile acids (sBA x 70 ULN), elevated transaminases (x 3-4 ULN), and preserved synthetic liver function. Genetic testing showed homozygous mutation in ZFYVE19 gene, which is not included among the classic causative genes of PFIC and determined a new non-syndromic phenotype recently classified as PFIC9 (OMIM # 619849). Due to the persistent intensity of itching [score of 5 (very severe) at the Caregiver Global Impression of Severity (CaGIS)] and sleep disturbances not responsive to rifampicin and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), Odevixibat treatment was started. After treatment with odevixibat we observed: (i) reduction in sBA from 458 to 71 μmol/L (absolute change from baseline: -387 μmol/L), (ii) reduction in CaGIS from 5 to 1, and (iii) resolution of sleep disturbances. The BMI z-score progressively increased from -0.98 to +0.56 after 3 months of treatment. No adverse drug events were recorded. Treatment with IBAT inhibitor was effective and safe in our patient suggesting that Odevixibat may be potentially considered for the treatment of cholestatic pruritus also in children with rare subtypes of PFIC. Further studies on a larger scale could lead to the increasing of patients eligible for this treatment.

Gene Therapy for Acquired and Genetic Cholestasis

Cholestatic diseases can be caused by the dysfunction of transporters involved in hepatobiliary circulation. Although pharmacological treatments constitute the current standard of care for these diseases, none are curative, with liver transplantation being the only long-term solution for severe cholestasis, albeit with many disadvantages. Liver-directed gene therapy has shown promising results in clinical trials for genetic diseases, and it could constitute a potential new therapeutic approach for cholestatic diseases. Many preclinical gene therapy studies have shown positive results in animal models of both acquired and genetic cholestasis. The delivery of genes that reduce apoptosis or fibrosis or improve bile flow has shown therapeutic effects in rodents in which cholestasis was induced by drugs or bile duct ligation. Most studies targeting inherited cholestasis, such as progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC), have focused on supplementing a correct version of a mutated gene to the liver using viral or non-viral vectors in order to achieve expression of the therapeutic protein. These strategies have generated promising results in treating PFIC3 in mouse models of the disease. However, important challenges remain in translating this therapy to the clinic, as well as in developing gene therapy strategies for other types of acquired and genetic cholestasis.

Ileal Bile Acid Transporter Inhibition Reduces Post-Transplant Diarrhea and Growth Failure in FIC1 Disease—A Case Report

Familial intrahepatic cholestasis 1 (FIC1) disease is a genetic disorder characterized by hepatic and gastrointestinal disease due to ATP8B1 deficiency, often requiring liver transplantation (LT). Extrahepatic symptoms, such as diarrhea, malabsorption, and failure to thrive, do not improve and instead may be aggravated after LT. We describe a patient with FIC1 disease who underwent LT at 2 years, 8 months of age. After LT, the child developed severe refractory diarrhea and failed to thrive. The response to bile acid resins was unsatisfactory, and the parents declined our recommendation for partial external biliary diversion (PEBD). Quality of life was extremely impaired, especially due to severe diarrhea, making school attendance impossible. Attempting to reduce the total bile acids, we initiated off-label use of the ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibitor Elobixibat (Goofice^™), later converted to Odevixibat (Bylvay^™). After six months of treatment, the patient showed less stool output, increased weight and height, and improved physical energy levels. The child could now pursue higher undergraduate education. In our patient with FIC1 disease, the use of IBAT inhibitors was effective in treating chronic diarrhea and failure to thrive. This approach is novel; further investigations are needed to clarify the exact mode of action in this condition.

Bile acid metabolism and FXR-mediated effects in human cholestatic liver disorders

Intrahepatic cholestasis is the main feature of a group of liver diseases that are characterized by hepatic and systemic accumulation of bile acids due to impaired excretion of bile, based on inflammation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts or dysfunction of hepatobiliary transport proteins. The nuclear bile acid sensor farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is central for the regulation of bile acid turnover, including synthesis, hepatic excretion and intestinal and hepatic uptake. Several drugs targeting FXR have been developed for the treatment of cholestatic liver diseases, and so far one of them has been granted conditional approval. In this review, we will discuss the current knowledge and the clinical and experimental data available on agents affecting FXR and bile acid turnover.

Recent updates on progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis types 1, 2 and 3: Outcome and therapeutic strategies

Recent evidence points towards the role of genotype to understand the phenotype, predict the natural course and long term outcome of patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC). Expanded role of the heterozygous transporter defects presenting late needs to be suspected and identified. Treatment of pruritus, nutritional rehabilitation, prevention of fibrosis progression and liver transplantation (LT) in those with end stage liver disease form the crux of the treatment. LT in PFIC has its own unique issues like high rates of intractable diarrhoea, growth failure; steatohepatitis and graft failure in PFIC1 and antibody-mediated bile salt export pump deficiency in PFIC2. Drugs inhibiting apical sodium-dependent bile transporter and adenovirus-associated vector mediated gene therapy hold promise for future.

MRGPRX4 in Cholestatic Pruritus

Pruritus (itch) is a debilitating symptom in liver diseases with cholestasis, which severely affects patients' quality of life. Limited treatment options are available for cholestatic itch, largely due to the incomplete understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms. Several factors have been proposed as pruritogens for cholestatic itch, such as bile acids, bilirubin, lysophosphatidic acid, and endogenous opioids. Recently, two research groups independently identified Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X4 (MRGPRX4) as a receptor for bile acids and bilirubin and demonstrated its likely role in cholestatic itch. This discovery not only opens new avenues for understanding the molecular mechanisms in cholestatic itch but provides a promising target for developing novel anti-itch treatments. In this review, we summarize the current theories and knowledge of cholestatic itch, emphasizing MRGPRX4 as a bile acid and bilirubin receptor mediating cholestatic itch in humans. We also discuss some future perspectives in cholestatic itch research.