HLA typing is not predictive of proliferative diabetic retinopathy in patients with younger onset type 2 diabetes mellitus

[Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system in ophthalmology]

Various inflammatory and non-inflammatory eye diseases are associated with specific HLA isotypes. Therefore, HLA isotyping can be a useful diagnostic tool for these diseases and has already been shown to reduce the rejection rate of corneal allografts. Unfortunately, the volume of published data and the varying quality of these publications complicate obtaining good overview in this field. This review briefly summarizes the genetic structure of the HLA system and elucidates differences between HLA classes I and II in the context of antigen presentation. Possible mechanisms of HLA associations in the field of ophthalmology are discussed, and finally different tools (e.g. genome wide association studies) for assessing associations of HLA isotypes with different ocular diseases are examined.

HLA genes, islet autoantibodies and residual C-peptide at the clinical onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus and the risk of retinopathy 15 years later

Aims/Hypothesis

HLA genes, islet autoantibodies and residual C-peptide were studied to determine the independent association of each exposure with diabetic retinopathy (DR), 15 years after the clinical onset of type 1 diabetes in 15–34 year old individuals.

Methods

The cohort was identified in 1992 and 1993 by the Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden (DISS), which investigates incident cases of diabetes for patients between 15 and 34 years of age. Blood samples at diagnosis were analyzed to determine HLA genotype, islet autoantibodies and serum C-peptide. In 2009, fundus photographs were obtained from patient records. Study measures were supplemented with data from the Swedish National Diabetes Registry.

Results

The prevalence of DR was 60.2% (148/246). Autoantibodies against the 65 kD isoform of glutamate decarboxylase (GADA) at the onset of clinical diabetes increased the risk of DR 15 years later, relative risk 1.12 for each 100 WHO units/ml, [95% CI 1.02 to 1.23]. This equates to risk estimates of 1.27, [95% CI 1.04 to 1.62] and 1.43, [95% CI 1.06 to 1.94] for participants in the highest 25^th (GADA>233 WHO units/ml) and 5^th percentile (GADA>319 WHO units/ml) of GADA, respectively. These were adjusted for duration of diabetes, HbA_1c, treated hypertension, sex, age at diagnosis, HLA and C-peptide. Islet cell autoantibodies, insulinoma-antigen 2 autoantibodies, residual C-peptide and the type 1 diabetes associated haplotypes DQ2, DQ8 and DQ6 were not associated with DR.

Conclusions

Increased levels of GADA at the onset of type 1 diabetes were associated with DR 15 years later. These results, if confirmed, could provide additional insights into the pathogenesis of the most common microvascular complication of diabetes and lead to better risk stratification for both patient screenings and DR treatment trials.

Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Autoantibody Prevalence and Association with HLA Genotype in Patients with Younger-Onset Type 1 Diabetes and Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship of HLA status and autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) to assess the role of autoimmunity and genetic markers in retinopathy.

DESIGN

Retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients who had suffered from type 1 diabetes for >10 years and who had been first diagnosed as diabetic under 30 years of age were studied. They were classified into 3 groups: 20 patients with diabetes and PDR (PDR group), 22 patients who had diabetes and severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (SNPDR group), and 25 patients who had diabetes with no diabetic retinopathy (non-DR group).

METHODS

Blood was collected, and the relationship between HLA status and GAD autoantibody positivity in diabetic retinopathy was investigated in a cross-sectional study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Human leukocyte antigen status and GAD autoantibody positivity.

RESULTS

The highest positive rate of GAD autoantibody was 56.0% in the non-DR group, followed by the SNPDR group (40.1%) and the PDR group (15.0%). The frequencies of the HLA-DQ4 and -DR4/-DQ4 haplotypes were significantly higher in the PDR group (75.0% and 65%, respectively) than in the SNPDR group (40.9% and 31.8%) or the non-DR group (40.0% and 28.0%) (P = 0.035 and P = 0.026, respectively). The prevalence of GAD antibodies was lower in patients with the HLA-DR4 and HLA-DQ4 alleles and -DR4/-DQ4 haplotype frequencies in the PDR group (P = 0.018, P = 0.0088, and P = 0.0031, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the existence of GAD antibodies is inversely related and HLA status is directly related to the stage or severity of retinopathy.

Development and progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with Type 1 diabetes who are positive for GAD autoantibody

AIMS

To investigate the relationship between autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) to assess the role of autoimmunity in retinopathy.

METHODS

Patients with Type 1 diabetes for more than 10 years who had been diagnosed under age 30 (13-28 years) were studied. They were classified into three groups. The PDR group consisted of 22 patients, the pre-PDR group was 26 patients, while the non-DR group was 32 patients who had Type 1 diabetes without retinopathy. Blood was collected to measure autoantibodies to GAD, and the relationship between PDR and GAD positivity was investigated in a cross-sectional study.

RESULTS

The highest positivity rate of GAD autoantibodies was 50.0% in the non-DR group, followed by the pre-PDR group (30.8%) and the PDR group (18.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Production or existence of GAD autoantibodies may contribute to the prevention of retinopathy.