The effect of glasses on visual function following cataract surgery in a cataract camp

Humanitarian missions and visual outcomes in cataract surgery: A literature review

The limited accessibility to ophthalmological services in remote regions of developing countries poses a significant challenge in visual healthcare. Cataracts and refractive errors are prominent causes of visual impairment, and surgery, despite being an efficient option, faces barriers in developing countries due to financial and geographical constraints. Humanitarian missions play a vital role in addressing this issue. The improvement in the accuracy of calculating IOL power through techniques such as keratometry and biometry is a fundamental step towards optimizing surgical outcomes and the quality of life for patients in these underserved regions. In this context, the consideration of keratometry and immersion ultrasound biometry as preoperative assessment standards in cataract surgeries in developing countries is presented as a pertinent and advisable strategy.

Which visual measures affect change in driving difficulty after first eye cataract surgery?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate self-reported driving difficulty before and after first eye cataract surgery and determine which visual measures are associated with changes in self-reported driving difficulty after surgery.

METHODS

A cohort of 99 older drivers with bilateral cataract were assessed the week before and 12 weeks after first eye cataract surgery. Visual measures including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereopsis and useful field of view were assessed. Self-reported driving difficulty was measured via the Driving Habits Questionnaire. Cognitive status was assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination. Regression analysis was undertaken to determine the association between changes in visual measures and self-reported driving difficulty after first eye cataract surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, self-reported driving difficulty improved after first eye cataract surgery. However, 16% of participants did not improve and driving difficulty worsened in 11% following surgery. Improvement in driving difficulty score after first eye cataract surgery was associated with improved contrast sensitivity in the operated eye (p<0.001), new glasses after surgery (p<0.001), and fewer chronic health conditions (p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

Contrast sensitivity rather than visual acuity was a significant factor affecting change in self-reported driving difficulty after first eye cataract surgery for bilateral patients. This has implications for driver licensing authorities worldwide that rely heavily on visual acuity as a measure of visual fitness to drive.

The challenges in improving outcome of cataract surgery in low and middle income countries

Cataract is the leading cause of blindness globally and surgery is the only known measure to deal with it effectively. Providing high quality cataract surgical services is critical if patients with cataract are to have their sight restored. A key focus of surgery is the outcome of the procedure. In cataract surgery this is measured predominantly, using visual acuity. Population- and hospital-based studies have revealed that the visual outcome of cataract surgery in many low and middle income settings is frequently sub-optimal, often failing to reach the recommended standards set by the World Health Organization (WHO). Another way of measuring outcome of cataract surgery is to ask patients for their views on whether surgery has changed the functioning of their eyes and their quality of life. There are different tools available to capture patient views and now, these patient-reported outcomes are becoming more widely used. This paper discusses the visual outcome of cataract surgery and frames the outcome of surgery within the context of the surgical service, suggesting that the process and outcome of care cannot be separated. It also discusses the components of patient-reported outcome tools and describes some available tools in more detail. Finally, it describes a hierarchy of challenges that need to be addressed before a high quality cataract surgical service can be achieved.

Effectiveness of a short message reminder in increasing compliance with pediatric cataract treatment: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVE

Regular follow-up is essential to successful management of childhood cataract. We sought to assess whether a mobile phone short message service (SMS) for parents of children with cataract could improve follow-up adherence and the proportion of procedures performed in timely fashion.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled trial. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01417819.

PARTICIPANTS

We included 258 parent-child pairs involved in the Childhood Cataract Program of the Chinese Ministry of Health.

METHODS

Participants were randomized (1:1) to a mobile phone SMS intervention or standard follow-up appointments. All participants were scheduled to attend ≥ 4 follow-up appointments according to the protocol. Parents in the intervention group received SMS automated reminders before scheduled appointments. The control group parents did not receive SMSs or any alternative reminder of scheduled appointments. Regular ocular examinations and analyses were performed by investigators masked to group allocation; however, study participants and the manager in charge of randomization and sending SMSs were not masked.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of follow-up appointments attended, additional surgeries, laser treatments, changes in eyeglasses prescription, and occurrence of secondary ocular hypertension.

RESULTS

Among parent-child participants, 135 were randomly assigned to the SMS intervention and 123 to standard appointments. Attendance rates for the SMS group (first visit, 97.8%; second, 91.9%; third, 92.6%; fourth, 83%) were significantly higher than those for the control group (first visit, 87.8%; second, 69.9%; third, 56.9%; fourth, 33.3%). The increase in attendance rate for total number of follow-up visits with SMS reminders was 47.2% (relative risk [RR] for attendance, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-1.78; P = 0.003). The number needed to remind (NNR) to gain 1 additional visit by 1 child was 3 (95% CI, 1.8-4.2). A total of 247 clinical interventions were carried out in the SMS group and 134 in the control group (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.37-1.99; P = 0.007). The NNR to result in 1 additional clinical intervention was 5 (95% CI, 3.5-6.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The SMS reminders significantly improved follow-up adherence in pediatric cataract treatment. Using readily available mobile phone resources may be an effective and economic strategy to improve management of childhood cataract in China.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any of the materials discussed in this article.

The impact of eyeglasses on vision-related quality of life in American Indian/Alaska Natives

PURPOSE

To determine the change in vision-related quality-of-life scores after providing eyeglasses to American Indian/Alaska Natives with undercorrected refractive error.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, comparative (nonrandomized) interventional study.

METHODS

We compared a group with undercorrected refractive error to a control group who did not need a change in eyeglasses. Undercorrected refractive error was defined as distance visual acuity 20/40 or worse in the better-seeing eye that could be improved by at least 2 lines in Snellen visual acuity. Intervention was the provision of new glasses to the undercorrected refractive error group members, based on results of manifest refraction. The main outcome measures were the differences in the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) scores from baseline (Time 1) to the time after providing eyeglasses (Time 2).

RESULTS

The NEI VFQ-25 median Composite score at Time 1 was significantly lower in those with undercorrected refractive error when compared to the control group (75 vs 92, P = .001). The median Composite score for the undercorrected refractive error group improved to 96 (P < .001) at Time 2 when compared to Time 1, while the control group remained stable at 93 (P = .417). The undercorrected refractive error group showed significantly greater improvement than the control group in 8 of 12 subscale scores and in the overall Composite score (all P values ≤ .05). A multivariate linear regression analysis, which controlled for differences in age, percent self-identified American Indian/Alaskan Native, and best-corrected visual acuity between the undercorrected refractive error and control group, showed eyeglasses to be significantly associated with improvement in NEI VFQ-25 composite score.

CONCLUSION

Visual impairment from undercorrected refractive error is common in American Indian/Alaskan Natives. Providing eyeglasses results in a large, significant increase in vision-related quality of life.

The impact of reduced distance and near vision on the quality of life of adults in Timor-Leste

PURPOSE

To determine the independent, relative, and combined impact of reduced distance and near vision on the vision-specific quality of life (VS QOL) of adults in Timor-Leste.

DESIGN

A population-based cross-sectional eye health survey was conducted in urban and rural areas in Timor-Leste.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were 40 years or older. Those with better eye presenting distance vision worse than 6/18, and every third participant with 6/18 or better vision, completed the VS QOL questionnaire: in total 704 of the 1414 participants.

METHODS

Distance and near visual acuities were measured and eye health was assessed. The VS QOL questionnaire administered by interview was analyzed using Rasch analysis, univariate analysis, and linear regression to determine associations between VS QOL, demographic factors, and levels of visual impairment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The Timor-Leste VS QOL questionnaire results.

RESULTS

Rasch analysis confirmed that for participants both with and without visual impairment, the Timor-Leste VS QOL questionnaire provided a valid and reliable measure, was unidimensional, and had appropriate response categories. There was a consistent pattern of deterioration in VS QOL as vision worsened: for each category of distance- and near-vision impairment, there was an independent and significant change in Timor-Leste VS QOL scores between no visual impairment and either mild, moderate, or severe impairment (P < 0.05). Combined distance- and near-vision impairment was associated with a greater impact on VS QOL than categories separately, the impact of severe distance- and near-vision impairment being the greatest and clinically significant: -3.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], -3.60 to -2.49; P<0.05; and 95% CI, <-1.0). Distance vision (37.2%) contributed relatively more than near vision (4.7%) to the total variance in VS QOL (41.9%). Older people, those not married, not literate, and rural dwellers had significantly worse Timor-Leste VS QOL scores (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of independent dose-response relationships between distance- and near-vision impairment and poorer VS QOL. Distance-vision impairment had a relatively larger impact on VS QOL than near-vision impairment. Combined distance- and near-vision impairment was associated with a greater impact on VS QOL compared with the independent impact of distance- or near-vision impairment at similar levels.