Characteristics and vitreoretinal management of retinal detachment in eyes with Boston keratoprosthesis

Retinal Detachment in Eyes with Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Surgical Techniques and Mid-Term Outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) performed for retinal detachment (RD) repair after Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of KPro implanted at the Stein Eye Institute presenting with RD and treated by PPV. Functional success was defined as a postoperative visual acuity (VA) maintained within 2 Snellen lines of the CDVA measured before the development of the RD (baseline) and anatomical success as an attached retina after the PPV. Kaplan-Meyer survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Among the 224 KPro performed, 28 (15.2%) RD were identified, of which 21 (9.4%) were included. The mean follow-up was 42.5 ± 27.3 months. Vitreoretinal proliferation was present in 18/21 (85.7%) eyes. Surgical techniques were adapted to the complex anterior segment anatomy of KPro eyes. Anatomical success was achieved in 18/21 (85.7%) eyes. Functional success occurred in 17/21 (81.0%) eyes, and 5/21 (23.8%) eyes reached 20/400 or better VA at final follow-up. The KPro was retained in 11/21 (52.4%) eyes. The retention rate decreased from 94.7% at 1 year to 53.5% at 5 years. The most frequent complications were retroprosthetic membrane (47.6%) and corneal melt (23.8%).

CONCLUSION

Modified PPV techniques resulted in relatively good mid-term anatomic, functional, and retention rate outcomes, given the severity of RD at presentation, and the numerous preoperative comorbidities of KPro eyes.

Vitreoretinal Complications in Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence of vitreoretinal complications, treatment modalities, and the visual outcomes in a large cohort of eyes that underwent Boston Keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

132 eyes of 114 patients who underwent KPro implantation at the Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal from 2008 to 2017 were included with at least 1 year follow-up. Charts were reviewed and data was collected, including demographics, initial corneal indication for surgery, posterior segment complications, preoperative and postoperative visual acuity.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 68.2 months and 61.4% of eyes developed postoperative vitreoretinal complications (VRC). The most common VRC was RPM formation (38.6%, n=51) followed by RD (15.2%, n=20), CME (12.1%, n=16), ERM (9.8%, n=13), endophthalmitis (9.1%, n=12), sterile vitritis (7.6%, n=10), vitreous hemorrhage (6.8%, n=9), choroidal detachment (3.0%, n=4) and central retinal vein occlusion (0.7%, n=1). BCVA improved in the no VRC group from 1.74 ± 0.33 logMAR to 1.33±0.83 logMAR and in the VRC group from 1.74±0.36 logMAR to 1.52±0.83 logMAR, without any statistically significant intergroup differences (p=0.231). RD was the only significant complication associated with poorer visual outcomes (p=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Potentially blinding secondary complications occur in the majority of patients and frequent monitoring is necessary, specifically in the early and intermediate postoperative periods. This study evidenced significant improvements in visual outcomes of KPro eyes, including those that developed postoperative vitreoretinal complications.

Wide-field vitreoretinal surgery in eyes with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

Vitreoretinal surgery in eyes with Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro) is challenging due to narrow optic of the KPro. This study analyzed the results of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a wide-field imaging accessory, Resight®700 Fundus Viewing System (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Germany), for better intraoperative peripheral retinal imaging.

METHODS

In this retrospective case series, KPro patients who underwent simultaneous or sequential PPV at Dokuz Eylul University Hospital between June 2010 and January 2020 were evaluated in terms of anatomic and visual prognoses, as well as KPro- and PPV-associated complications.

RESULTS

Among 9 KPro eyes that necessitated vitreoretinal surgery, 3 (33.3%) underwent simultaneous KPro and PPV due to proliferative vitreoretinopaties; 6 (66.7%) underwent PPV for retinal detachment or suprachoroidal hemorrhage that appeared after KPro surgery. Retina could be attached in 7 eyes (77.8%), and vision improved in 3 eyes (33.3%). In 1 eye, injected silicone oil moved to subconjunctival area through glaucoma drainage device.

CONCLUSION

In eyes with a Boston KPro, wide-angle viewing systems helped handling peripheral retinal problems successfully during PPV, with no observed inadequacy of imaging. Despite anatomical success in most cases, visual prognosis depends on vitality of the macula and the optic disc.

COMPARISON OF VISUAL AND ANATOMICAL OUTCOMES OF EYES UNDERGOING TYPE I BOSTON KERATOPROSTHESIS WITH COMBINATION PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY WITH EYES WITHOUT COMBINATION VITRECTOMY

PURPOSE

To determine whether 1-year visual and anatomical results after surgery combining pars plana vitrectomy, Boston keratoprosthesis, and a glaucoma drainage device as needed are similar, better, or worse than Boston keratoprosthesis initial implantation alone.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of adult patients undergoing Boston keratoprosthesis at our institution. Visual acuity outcomes, anatomical results, and complication rates of patients undergoing combination surgery (including pars plana vitrectomy and a posterior glaucoma drainage device) were compared with those undergoing keratoprosthesis placement alone.

RESULTS

There were 70 eyes in the keratoprosthesis alone group and 55 eyes in the keratoprosthesis with pars plana vitrectomy group. Mean follow-up durations were 54.67 months in the keratoprosthesis alone group and 48.41 months in the combination group. Baseline mean Snellen equivalent visual acuities were worse for the combination group compared with the keratoprosthesis alone group (P = 0.027). Visual acuities improved postoperatively by 1 month after keratoprosthesis implantation for both groups and improved three or more lines of Snellen acuity in the majority of eyes for both groups (≥72% by 12 months). Eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy had lower rates of de novo (P = 0.015) and significantly lower rates of secondary procedures (P = 0.002) at 1 year. One year complications rates for retroprosthetic membrane formation, retinal detachment, hypotony, cystoid macular edema, epiretinal membrane formation, endophthalmitis, and corneal melting were similar for both groups.

CONCLUSION

Compared with keratoprosthesis alone, combining keratoprosthesis with pars plana vitrectomy and a glaucoma drainage device as needed, resulted in lower rates of de novo glaucoma, lower rates of additional surgical procedures, similar visual acuity outcomes at 1 year, and did not result in higher complication rates.

Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: outcomes of the first 38 cases performed at Moorfields Eye Hospital

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (K-Pro) surgery in a cohort of high-risk patients at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Our patients were referred to us at the end-point of their ocular disease.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all K-Pro surgery performed between March 2011 and July 2015 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months.

RESULTS

39 eyes of 38 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 28.4 months (range: 12-56). The main indication for surgery was bullous keratopathy from multiple failed grafts (56%). 26 cases (72.2%) had known posterior segment disease pre-operatively. Mean BCVA for the entire cohort (n = 39) initially improved from HM vision to 1/60 before returning to CF vision by 6 months and was maintained for the duration of follow-up. By final follow-up (n = 39), 46% had improved vision (1 line improvement in 10%; 2 lines or more in 36%) and 31% maintained pre-operative visual acuity. Anterior segment pathology was not an independent variable in visual outcome. However, absence of posterior segment disease was significant and performed best, improving from HM to 6/15 and maintaining that vision in the longer term. There were 13 (33%) cases of progressive glaucomatous optic neuropathy, 10 (26%) retinal detachments, 8 (21%) retroprosthetic membranes, 3 (8%) infective keratitis and 2 (5%) vitritis of which 1 progressed to endophthalmitis. In all, 3 (8%) had NPL vision and 4 (10%) required removal of the K-Pro.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of the Boston K-Pro can lead to improved vision, with the main limiting factor being posterior segment pathology.

RESULTS OF RETINAL DETACHMENT SURGERY IN EYES WITH OSTEO-KERATOPROSTHESIS

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anatomical and functional results of pars plana vitrectomy in eyes with osteo-keratoprosthesis, who have suffered retinal detachment.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective study of 18 eyes which underwent pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment after an implantation of an osteo-keratoprosthesis, with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. A descriptive study and a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for anatomical and functional success were performed. Anatomical success was defined as an attached retina at the end of vitreoretinal surgery with no redetachment during the follow-up. Functional success was defined as a postoperative visual acuity of more than or equal to 20/400.

RESULTS

The overall rate of anatomical success was 56%, and the anatomical survival rates were 67% and 53% at 6 months and 12 months, respectively, maintaining this last value at 24 months after pars plana vitrectomy. The overall rate of functional success was 17%, and the functional survival rates were 83%, 39%, and 14% at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after pars plana vitrectomy, respectively. The most frequent complication after retinal surgery was retroprosthetic membrane (33%).

CONCLUSION

Despite the reserved prognosis and the severe complications, vitrectomy represents a valid method for treating retinal detachment in patients with osteo-keratoprosthesis, with good anatomical results but poor visual acuity.