Intravitreal dexamethasone implant in radiation-induced macular oedema

INTRAVITREAL FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE IMPLANT FOR RADIATION RETINOPATHY: Report of Preliminary Findings

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of a 0.18 mg intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FA) implant (Yutiq, EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, MA) as a treatment option for patients with radiation retinopathy-related cystoid macular edema.

METHODS

A retrospective review of seven patients treated for uveal melanoma who developed radiation retinopathy-related cystoid macular edema. They were initially treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and/or steroid injections and then transitioned to intravitreal FA implant. Primary outcomes include best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield thickness, and number of additional injections.

RESULTS

After FA implant insertion, best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness remained stable in all patients. The variance in best-corrected visual acuity decreased from 75.5 ETDRS letters (range 0-199 letters) to 29.8 (range 1.2-134) after FA implant insertion. Mean central subfield thickness was 384 µ m (range 165-641) and 354 µ m (range 282-493) before and after FA implant insertion, resulting in a 30- µ m mean reduction. The number of intravitreal injections (average 4.9, range 2-10) decreased after intravitreal FA implant insertion with only two patients requiring one additional FA implant (average 0.29, range 0-1) over a mean of 12.1 months (range 0.9-18.5) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal FA implant is an effective treatment for cystoid macular edema radiation retinopathy. The slow release of steroid allows for sustained control of macular edema, which correlated with stable visual acuity and decreased injection burden for patients.

Ocular Complications of Radiotherapy in Uveal Melanoma

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary malignant intraocular tumor in adults. Radiation therapy has replaced enucleation and is now the preferred treatment in most cases. Nonetheless, around 70% of patients develop radiation-related complications, some of which are vision-threatening. The objective of this review is to present the most important complications associated with radiotherapy in the treatment of uveal melanoma and their pathogenesis, incidence, risk factors, and available preventive and therapeutic measures. The most common complications are cataracts, with a reported incidence ranging from 4% to 69%, and radiation retinopathy, reported in 5-68% of cases. Radiation-related complications are responsible for approximately half of secondary enucleations, the leading cause being neovascular glaucoma. A poor visual outcome is mainly associated with the presence of radiation retinopathy and radiation optic neuropathy. Therapeutic options are available for the majority of complications with the notable exception of optic neuropathy. However, many studies report a final visual acuity of less than 20/200 in more than 60% of treated eyes. Reducing complication rates can be achieved by lowering the dose of radiation, with the use of eccentric, customized plaques and careful planning of the irradiation delivery in order to protect structures vital to vision and by associating radiation therapy with other methods with the aim of reducing tumor volume.

RADIATION MACULOPATHY IS ANTICIPATED BY OCT HYPERREFLECTIVE RETINAL FOCI: A Large, Prospective, Confirmation Study

PURPOSE

To investigate, by means of spectral domain optical coherence tomography, retinal reflectivity changes as an early biomarker anticipating radiation-induced macular edema (ME) in patients treated by iodine-125 (I-125) brachytherapy.

METHODS

Thirty patients planned for I-125 brachytherapy because of uveal melanoma were prospectively included and followed every 4 months for five years. Reflectivity alterations, namely hyperreflective retinal foci, were characterized and counted by two independent masked examiners by means of spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging. Hyperreflective retinal foci were defined as discrete intraretinal reflectivity changes ≤30 µm, with reflectivity similar to nerve fiber layer and without back shadowing.

RESULTS

Macular edema occurred in 17 patients (24.2 ±15.1 months) (group 1) after irradiation. Thirteen patients showed no signs of ME at the 5-year follow-up (group 2). The number of hyperreflective retinal foci was statistically higher in sequential visits until the evidence of ME in group 1 vs group 2 (P < 0.0001). In group 1, hyperreflective retinal foci at the follow-up before the evidence of ME were significantly related to the OCT central subfield thickness at ME appearance (P = 0.0002, r2=0.6129). The intergrader agreement was almost perfect (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.80).

CONCLUSION

Hyperreflective retinal foci may be considered as an early in vivo imaging biomarker of retinal inflammatory response to ocular irradiation, anticipating the development of radiation maculopathy.

Non-Cancer Effects following Ionizing Irradiation Involving the Eye and Orbit

Simple Summary

The irradiation of tumors involving the eye or orbit represents a complex therapeutic challenge due to the proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation. The challenges include tumor control, as it is often a surrogate for survival; organ (usually the eyeball) preservation; and the minimization of damage of sensitive tissues surrounding the tumor in order to preserve vision. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. The aim of the present review is to report the non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality. The pros and cons of conventional and advanced forms of radiation techniques and their clinical implementation are provided with a clinical perspective.

Abstract

The eye is an exemplarily challenging organ to treat when considering ocular tumors. It is at the crossroads of several major aims in oncology: tumor control, organ preservation, and functional outcomes including vision and quality of life. The proximity between the tumor and organs that are susceptible to radiation damage explain these challenges. Given a high enough dose of radiation, virtually any cancer will be destroyed with radiotherapy. Yet, the doses inevitably absorbed by normal tissues may lead to complications, the likelihood of which increases with the radiation dose and volume of normal tissues irradiated. Precision radiotherapy allows personalized decision-making algorithms based on patient and tumor characteristics by exploiting the full knowledge of the physics, radiobiology, and the modifications made to the radiotherapy equipment to adapt to the various ocular tumors. Anticipation of the spectrum and severity of radiation-induced complications is crucial to the decision of which technique to use for a given tumor. Radiation can damage the lacrimal gland, eyelashes/eyelids, cornea, lens, macula/retina, optic nerves and chiasma, each having specific dose–response characteristics. The present review is a report of non-cancer effects that may occur following ionizing irradiation involving the eye and orbit and their specific patterns of toxicity for a given radiotherapy modality.

Radiation retinopathy intricacies and advances in management

Background: Radiation retinopathy is a chronic, progressive, vision-threatening complication from exposure to various radiation sources. While several treatment modalities are available, proper management for this disease is a continuing challenge with no consensus on the most efficacious.Objective: The aim of this article is to provide an updated review of the published literature on the course of the disease, available treatments and their efficacies, frequency of regimen, core issues in patient management, and additional newer treatment modalities, including possible prophylactic approaches.Value: We also highlighted the challenges encountered with managing chronically treated patients through an analysis of a clinical case report on a patient who was treated for several years with different modalities after a diagnosis of radiation retinopathy.

Recent advancements in the management of retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma

Retinoblastoma in children and uveal melanoma in adults can pose a serious threat to both vision and life. For many decades, enucleation was often the only option to treat these intraocular malignancies. For retinoblastoma, intra-arterial chemotherapy is often utilized as the primary treatment at advanced academic centers and has dramatically improved local tumor control and eye salvage rates. For uveal melanoma, both plaque brachytherapy and proton beam irradiation have served as widely utilized therapies with a local failure rate of approximately 1–10%, depending on the series. Major recent advancements have allowed for a better understanding of the genomics of uveal melanoma and the impact of certain mutations on metastatic susceptibility. Gene expression profile stratifies uveal melanomas into two classes: low-risk (class 1) and high-risk (class 2). A loss-of-function mutation of BAP1 is associated with a class 2 gene expression profile and therefore confers worse prognosis due to elevated risk of metastasis. On the other hand, gain-of-function mutations of EIF1AX and SF3B1 correspond to a gene expression profile of class 1A and class 1B and confer a better prognosis. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is an antigen that increases metastatic susceptibility when expressed in uveal melanoma cells. In addition to plaque brachytherapy and proton beam irradiation, both of which have demonstrated superb clinical outcomes, scientists are actively investigating newer therapeutic modalities as either primary therapy or adjuvant treatment, including a novel nanoparticle therapy and immunotherapy.

Chorioretinal Side Effects of Therapeutic Ocular Irradiation: A Multimodal Imaging Approach

Radiation chorioretinopathy, radiation maculopathy, and radiation optic neuropathy are the major complications of ophthalmic radiotherapy. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) are revolutionary imaging methods, allowing the visualization of the retinal cellular architecture and the retinal vascular system, respectively. In recent years this multimodal imaging approach has been applied to several retinal disease, but its role in the clinical characterization of retinal complications secondary to ophthalmic radiotherapy has not yet been defined. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the role of OCT and OCTA in the clinical assessment of radiation-induced chorioretinopathy, maculopathy, and optic neuropathy.

Treatment of radiation maculopathy and radiation-induced macular edema: A systematic review

Radiation maculopathy and radiation-induced macular edema are common, sight-threatening complications after radiotherapy, especially that used for uveal melanoma. While many treatment and preventive strategies have been proposed, management of these conditions is still challenging. Initially, treatments were based on the use of retinal laser, but the outcomes were poor. Subsequently, management has shifted toward injection of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor or corticosteroids. We reviewed current clinical evidence, which mostly relies on small sample-sized and retrospective studies, for the management of radiation maculopathy and, in particular, radiation-induced macular edema. At present, the first-line approach is usually intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor. Intravitreal dexamethasone implantation may be an option for those with suboptimal response or contraindications to antivascular endothelial growth factor agents. Possible preventive treatments that require future study are intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab, peripheral laser photocoagulation, and subtenon triamcinolone acetonide.

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant as a Sustained Release Drug Delivery Device for the Treatment of Ocular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Drug delivery into the vitreous chamber remains a great challenge in the pharmaceutical industry due to the complex anatomy and physiology of the eye. Intravitreal injection is the mainstream route of drug administration to the posterior segment of the eye. The purpose of this review is to assess the current literature about the widening use of the intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (Dex) implant, and to provide a comprehensive collection of all the ocular disorders that benefit from Dex administration. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth-factors (VEGFs) have been largely indicated as a first-choice level, the Dex implant represents an important treatment option, especially in selected cases, such as vitrectomized eyes or patients in whom anti-VEGF failed or are contraindicated. In this article, the safety profile as well as the list of the possible complications related to intravitreal Dex injection are also discussed.

IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF MACULAR MORPHOLOGIC BIOMARKERS RELATED TO VISUAL ACUITY IN RADIATION MACULOPATHY: A Multimodal Imaging Study

PURPOSE

To identify and classify, by a multimodal imaging approach, the most relevant macular morphologic biomarkers related to visual acuity in patients affected by radiation maculopathy secondary to brachytherapy.

METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients previously treated with Iodine-125 brachytherapy because of uveal melanoma were enrolled. Each patient underwent full ophthalmologic examination including best-corrected visual acuity and multimodal macular imaging analysis. Macular morphological parameters were processed by a stepwise selection analysis.

RESULTS

Three macular parameters were identified as the most relevant macular morphologic biomarkers of poor visual acuity: the vertical thickness of the thickest macular cyst (P = 0.0001), the presence of foveal inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) layer disruption (P = 0.0054), and the presence of foveal retinal pigment epithelium atrophy (0.0884). The intergrader agreement for these morphologic biomarkers was 0.98, 0.92, and 0.92, respectively (interclass correlation coefficient).

CONCLUSION

The vertical thickness of the thickest macular cyst, the presence of foveal retinal pigment epithelium atrophy, and IS/OS layer disruption can be used to clinically characterize radiation maculopathy. These parameters allow for separation of the edematous component of radiation maculopathy, which is potentially treatable in early disease stages, from late onset atrophic components, which are theoretically irreversible.

Peripapillary vascular changes in radiation optic neuropathy: an optical coherence tomography angiography grading

AIMS

To investigate peripapillary vascular changes secondary to radiation optic neuropathy (RON) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) and to propose a clinical grading of RON based on OCT-A findings.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients affected by RON were consecutively included. Each patient underwent best corrected visual acuity measurement (ETDRS score) and OCT-A (Nidek RS-3000 Advance device, Nidek, Gamagori, Japan). The radial peripapillary capillary plexus (RPCP) and the entire peripapillary capillary bed (EPCB) were analysed. Quantitative analysis of the OCT-A images was performed using open-source available ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA). Qualitative analysis based on the proposed clinical grading (Grades 0-4) was also performed by two masked graders.

RESULTS

RON clinical (qualitative) classification based on RPCP correlated with the quantitative RPCP perfusion analysis (P=0.0001). RON clinical classification based on RPCP statistically correlated with ETDRS score (P=0.001). RON clinical classification based on EPCB also correlated with the quantitative EPCB perfusion analysis and ETDRS score (P=0.02 and P=0.01, respectively). Compared with the clinical classification based on EPCB, the qualitative classification based on RPCP reached a higher intergrader agreement (0.96 and 0.86, respectively).

CONCLUSION

OCT-A can be used to detect RPCP abnormalities and to clinically classify RON with a high interexaminer agreement. The proposed clinical classification is supported by the quantitative analysis based on the use of specific images elaboration techniques and correlates with visual acuity of the examined eyes.