Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study II: a randomised trial to determine whether HLA class II matching reduces the risk of allograft rejection in penetrating keratoplasty

Corneal Transplantation for Infectious Keratitis: A Prospective Dutch Registry Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze real-world practice patterns and graft survival after corneal transplantation for infectious keratitis in the Netherlands.

METHODS

All consecutive keratoplasties for infectious keratitis registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry were included. Graft survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves with Cox regression to compare the 3 most common pathogens with subgroup analysis for type and reason of transplantation, sex, and graft size. Multivariable analysis was performed using the same explanatory factors.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2017, 1111 keratoplasties for infectious keratitis were registered in the Netherlands Organ Transplant Registry. The most common pathogens were viruses (n = 437), bacteria (n = 271), and Acanthamoeba (n = 121). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching did not provide a significant survival benefit, whereas emergency procedures showed worse graft survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.40, P = 0.120; HR = 2.73, P < 0.001, respectively]. Graft size >8.5 mm was significantly worse than graft size 8.5 mm (HR = 2.062, P = 0.010). In therapeutic keratoplasty, graft survival was significantly worse for Acanthamoeba than viral keratitis (HR = 2.36, P = 0.008). In the multivariable model, adjusting for graft size, type, and reason for transplantation, viral and bacterial keratitis did not differ significantly in graft survival, and Acanthamoeba showed a significantly worse prognosis (vs. viral keratitis, HR = 2.30, P < 0.001; bacterial keratitis, HR = 2.65, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Viral keratitis was the most common indication for transplantation, followed by bacterial and Acanthamoeba keratitis. HLA matching did not offer protection over elective non-HLA-matched procedures, whereas emergency procedures and grafts sized >8.5 mm showed poor survival. In optical keratoplasty, survival is high for all pathogens, whereas in therapeutic keratoplasty Acanthamoeba shows poor outcome.

Keratoplasty Registries: Lessons Learned

ABSTRACT

Clinical registries have been developed for decades in the field of ophthalmology, and they are especially well-suited to the study of keratoplasty practices. A comprehensive donor/recipient registry system can provide insight into donor, recipient, and surgical factors associated with immediate and long-term outcomes and adverse reactions. Furthermore, linkage with demographic databases can elucidate relationships with social determinants of health and potentially shape public policy. The vast sample size and multicenter nature of registries enable researchers to conduct sophisticated multivariate or multilayered analyses. In this review, we aim to emphasize the importance of registry data for keratoplasty practice and 1) summarize the structure of current keratoplasty registries; 2) examine the features and scientific contributions of the registries from Australia, the United Kingdom, Singapore, the Netherlands, Sweden, Eye Bank Association of America, and European Cornea and Cell Transplant registries; 3) compare registry-based studies with large single-site clinical studies; 4) compare registry-based studies with randomized control studies; and 5) make recommendations for future development of keratoplasty registries. Keratoplasty registries have increased our knowledge of corneal transplant practices and their outcomes. Future keratoplasty registry-based studies may be further strengthened by record linkage, data sharing, and international collaboration.

Peripheral blood immune cell profiling of acute corneal transplant rejection

Acute rejection (AR) of corneal transplants (CT) has a profound effect on subsequent graft survival but detailed immunological studies in human CT recipients are lacking. In this multi-site, cross-sectional study, clinical details and blood samples were collected from adults with clinically diagnosed AR of full-thickness (FT)-CT (n = 35) and posterior lamellar (PL)-CT (n = 21) along with Stable CT recipients (n = 177) and adults with non-transplanted corneal disease (n = 40). For those with AR, additional samples were collected 3 months later. Immune cell analysis was performed by whole-genome microarrays (whole blood) and high-dimensional multi-color flow cytometry (peripheral blood mononuclear cells). For both, no activation signature was identified within the B cell and T cell repertoire at the time of AR diagnosis. Nonetheless, in FT- but not PL-CT recipients, AR was associated with differences in B cell maturity and regulatory CD4⁺ T cell frequency compared to stable allografts. These data suggest that circulating B cell and T cell subpopulations may provide insights into the regulation of anti-donor immune response in human CT recipients with differing AR risk. Our results suggest that, in contrast to solid organ transplants, genetic or cellular assays of peripheral blood are unlikely to be clinically exploitable for prediction or diagnosis of AR.

Impact of vaccination on keratoplasty

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Corneal graft rejection has been reported after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the literature regarding corneal graft rejection after vaccination, including rejection rates and risk factors. We aim to create a framework to identify patients who are at higher risk for graft rejection and may warrant consideration of prophylactic interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Graft rejection has been reported following administration of mRNA, viral vector, and inactivated whole-virion COVID-19 vaccines. Most cases had additional risk factors associated with rejection. Vaccination increases circulation of proinflammatory cytokines, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses, and antispike neutralizing antibody, all of which may contribute to graft rejection. Two prospective studies have found no relationship between recent vaccination and rejection but 20% of cornea specialists report to have seen a vaccine-associated rejection and 22% recommend delaying vaccination in certain circumstances. Many specialists recommend prophylactic topical corticosteroids before and after vaccination to mitigate rejection risk but there is no evidence to support this practice on a wider scale.

SUMMARY

Our framework identified 96.8% of penetrating keratoplasty patients with vaccine-associated rejection as higher risk. Further research is needed in order to develop evidence-based guidelines.

Corneal Allografts: Factors for and against Acceptance

Cornea is one of the most commonly transplanted tissues worldwide. However, it is usually omitted in the field of transplantology. Transplantation of the cornea is performed to treat many ocular diseases. It restores eyesight significantly improving the quality of life. Advancements in banking of explanted corneas and progressive surgical techniques increased availability and outcomes of transplantation. Despite the vast growth in the field of transplantation laboratory testing, standards for corneal transplantation still do not include HLA typing or alloantibody detection. This standard practice is based on immune privilege dogma that accounts for high success rates of corneal transplantation. However, the increasing need for retransplantation in high-risk patients with markedly higher risk of rejection causes ophthalmology transplantation centers to reevaluate their standard algorithms. In this review we discuss immune privilege mechanisms influencing the allograft acceptance and factors disrupting the natural immunosuppressive environment of the eye. Current developments in testing and immunosuppressive treatments (including cell therapies), when applied in corneal transplantation, may give very good results, decrease the possibility of rejection, and reduce the need for retransplantation, which is fairly frequent nowadays.

[Telemedical applications in ophthalmology in times of COVID-19]

BACKGROUND

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic access to and utilization of ophthalmologic healthcare providers was partially restricted.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides an overview of already available tele-ophthalmologic applications for better care during the pandemic as well as those still under development.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included an analysis of current scientific publications, analysis of unrestricted screening applications in smart device app stores as well as telemetric medical products specifically designed for home monitoring and discussion of the requirements of an integrated ophthalmologic video consultation.

RESULTS

There is significant interest in tele-ophthalmologic applications and devices as evidenced by a rise in the number of relevant publications. Freely available screening tests for smart phones and tablets are as a rule currently not validated and show significant discrepancies from established standard tests. Telemetric medical devices show great potential for home monitoring in chronic ophthalmologic diseases but must first become established in the clinical routine.

CONCLUSION

There is an unmet need for systematic analysis, development and validation of telemedical applications and medical products for ophthalmology in order to advantageously utilize the potential of telemedicine and to incorporate this into an ophthalmologic video consultation.

Advances in corneal graft rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune rejection after corneal transplantation is a major risk for graft failure. We aim to summarize recent advances in the understanding and management of graft rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Immune rejection remains the leading cause of graft failure in penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). While ABO blood type and sex match between donor and recipient may reduce rejection, human leucocyte antigens class II matching in a randomized study did not reduce the risk of rejection in high-risk PKP. Compared with PKP, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, and descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty have lower immune rejection rates of 1.7-13%, 5-11.4%, and 1.7-2.8%, respectively, based on long-term (5 years and more) studies. Whether immune rejection is a major risk factor for graft failure in these lamellar keratoplasties is unclear. While there have not been major advances in the systemic management of graft rejection, topical nonsteroid agents such as tacrolimus and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor have shown promise in high-risk cases.

SUMMARY

Immune rejection remains the leading cause of graft failure in PKP. Lamellar keratoplasties have significantly lower rejection rates compared with PKP. The significance of rejection in the failure of lamellar grafts warrants further investigation.