Stress fractures of the femoral shaft in athletes: a new treatment algorithm

The Role of Footwear, Foot Orthosis, and Training-Related Strategies in the Prevention of Bone Stress Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of footwear, foot orthoses and training-related strategies to prevent lower extremity bone stress injury (BSI).

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

Four bibliographic databases (from inception until November 2021): Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL.

Eligibility criteria

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the risk of developing a BSI when using particular footwear, foot orthoses or training-related strategies such as muscle strengthening, stretching, and mechanical loading exercises.

Results

Eleven studies were included in this systematic review. When wearing foot orthoses, the risk ratio of developing a BSI on any lower extremity bone is 0.47 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.87; p = 0.02). When doing pre-exercise dynamic stretching, the risk ratio of suffering a tibial BSI is 1.06 (95% CI 0.67 to 1.68; p = 0.79). No meta-analyses could be performed for footwear or training-related strategies. The quality of evidence for all these results is low considering the high risk of bias in each study, the low number of studies and the low number of cases in each study.

Conclusion

This systematic review reveals the lack of high-quality studies in BSI prevention. Based on studies at high risk of bias, foot orthoses could potentially help prevent BSIs in the military setting. It is still unknown whether footwear and training-related strategies have any benefits. It is crucial to further investigate potential BSI prevention strategies in women and athletes. Research is also needed to assess the influence of running shoes and loading management on BSI incidence.

Return to sport following low-risk and high-risk bone stress injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Bone stress injuries (BSIs) are classified in clinical practice as being at low- or high-risk for complication based on the injury location. However, this dichotomous approach has not been sufficiently validated. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the prognostic role of injury location on return-to-sport (RTS) and treatment complications after BSI of the lower extremity and pelvis.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL and Google Scholar databases were searched from database inception to December 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Peer-reviewed studies that reported site-specific RTS of BSIs in athletes.

RESULTS

Seventy-six studies reporting on 2974 BSIs were included. Sixteen studies compared multiple injury sites, and most of these studies (n=11) described the anatomical site of injury as being prognostic for RTS or the rate of treatment complication. Pooled data revealed the longest time to RTS for BSIs of the tarsal navicular (127 days; 95% CI 102 to 151 days) and femoral neck (107 days; 95% CI 79 to 135 days) and shortest duration of time for BSIs of the posteromedial tibial shaft (44 days, 95% CI 27 to 61 days) and fibula (56 days; 95% CI 13 to 100 days). Overall, more than 90% of athletes successfully returned to sport. Treatment complication rate was highest in BSIs of the femoral neck, tarsal navicular, anterior tibial shaft and fifth metatarsal; and lowest in the fibula, pubic bone and posteromedial tibial shaft.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review supports that the anatomical site of BSIs influences RTS timelines and the risk of complication. BSIs of the femoral neck, anterior tibial shaft and tarsal navicular are associated with increased rates of complications and more challenging RTS.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021232351.

Surgical and Pharmacological Management of Periprosthetic Atypical Femoral Fractures: A Narrative Literature Review

Introduction

An increasing number of patients is annually undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), and a significant proportion of these patients are elderly and consequently at a higher risk of complications because of age, osteoporosis, and medical comorbidities. Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are one of the worst complications of THA associated with high rates of unfavorable prognosis. Besides, in the last decade, a new independent disease entity called “atypical femoral fracture” (AFF) has been identified and defined by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) task force. Some PFFs present clinical history and radiographic aspect consistent with an AFF, meeting the ASBMR criteria for the diagnosis of AFF except that PFFs by themselves are an exclusion criterion for AFF. However, there is an increasing number of published studies suggesting that periprosthetic atypical femoral fractures (PAFFs) exist and should not be excluded by definition.

Significance

Nowadays, although there is an increasing interest in PAFFs, there are still very few studies published on the topic and a lack of consensus regarding their treatment. This narrative literature review aims to introduce this new emerging topic to a wider readership describing the characteristics of PAFFs and the state-of-the-art in their management.

Conclusions

Many authors agree that PAFFs should be considered as a subgroup of PFFs that have atypical characteristics; they also show a significant correlation with prolonged bisphosphonate use. A correct diagnosis is paramount for proper treatment of the disease that requires both surgical and medical actions to be taken.

Intertrochanteric hip stress fracture in a male ultramarathon runner

Stress fractures are injuries frequently seen in high-performance athletes, especially runners. In the femur, the most commonly affected locations are the femoral neck, condylar area and proximal shaft. Intertrochanteric fractures are much more common in the elderly population, especially among those with osteoporosis, but they can also be a result of high-energy repetitive mechanisms. We present a case of an intertrochanteric stress fracture in a young male runner. The diagnosis was suspected after persistent pain following his first marathon, and it was confirmed with an MRI. Operative fixation of the fracture was performed 22 days after the pain started, which allowed the patient to return to his activities, including 50 km marathon 4 months following the surgery.

[Stress fractures of the lower limbs]

Stress reactions and fractures represent an important differential diagnostic entity, especially in patients active in sports. The lower extremities have predilection sites for stress fractures, which require special treatment in the context of the underlying risk factors. Clinically, patients usually complain of stress-dependent pain in the affected region and sport activities are mostly limited or even impossible. The detection of acute stress fractures is usually missed by conventional X‑ray within the first 4-6 weeks. The gold standard diagnostic tool is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Depending on the location, a distinction must be made between low-risk and high-risk stress fractures. Low-risk fractures show a high healing rate after conservative treatment including load and stress reduction as well as avoiding risk factors. High-risk fractures can take a complicated course under conservative treatment measures and in some cases, surgical intervention is required.

Detection and management of atypical femur fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article summarizes the risk factors for atypical femur fractures (AFF), discusses current and emerging imaging modalities for early identification of AFF, and offers recommendations for prevention and management of AFFs based on the current concepts.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antiresorptive therapies are widely recommended for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Despite their well established effectiveness to reduce fracture risk, emerging concerns related to potential adverse effects have led to a substantial decline in the use of bisphosphonates. Although, the pathogenesis of AFF has not yet been elucidated, the bulk of evidence supports that the well known therapeutic benefits of bisphosphonate far outweigh the relatively low risk of AFFs. Recommendations for early identification of patients at risk for AFF using radiographic imaging have been established. Consensus on the management of AFF and osteoporosis in patients with AFF needs to be formulated.

SUMMARY

AFF is a rare event associated with long-term bisphosphonate therapy, which represents an apparent paradox in the management of osteoporosis. Improved understanding of pathogenetic mechanisms will be helpful in further refining of screening guidelines and standardization of management and treatment strategies.

Atypical Femur Fractures: Review of Epidemiology, Relationship to Bisphosphonates, Prevention, and Clinical Management

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are highly effective in treating osteoporosis and reducing hip, vertebral, and other fractures by as much as 50% to 70%. However, since 2006, atypical femur fractures (AFFs) emerged as potential side effects of BPs and other treatments. These fractures have unusual radiologic features and occur with little trauma. Public concern has led to a >50% decrease in BP usage. AFFs are rare: for each AFF, >1200 fractures, including 135 hip fractures, are prevented. Case definition criteria were updated by the American Society of Bone and Mineral Research in 2014. Many epidemiologic studies have been reported, and although methodologically challenging, generally support a BP-AFF association. However, the magnitude of the association between BPs and AFFs is uncertain: estimates of relative risk for AFFs among BP users vs nonusers range from 1 to 65 with a meta-analysis estimate of 1.7. Although mechanistic studies have proposed several hypotheses explaining how BPs might decrease bone strength, AFF pathogenesis remains uncertain and cannot explain the paradox of efficacy of reduction of common fractures while increasing risk for rare fractures at one site. There are several consistent risk factors, including Asian race (in North America), femoral bowing, and glucocorticoid use, whereas others remain unclear. Consensus is emerging about strategies to prevent AFFs in BP users (including drug holidays after 5 years' use in some patients). In conclusion, AFFs can be devastating, but even under the most pessimistic assumptions, the benefit/risk ratio is highly positive for BPs, particularly during 3 to 5 years of use. As understanding of AFFs increases, it is becoming increasingly possible to maximize BP benefits while minimizing AFF risk.

Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in hypophosphatasia-not atypical at all

Risk for subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures is considered increased in patients with hypophosphatasia (HPP). Evaluating a large cohort of HPP patients, we could for the first time quantify the prevalcence and identify both morphometric features as well as predisposing factors for this complication of severe HPP.

INTRODUCTION

Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures have been associated with both, long-term antiresorptive treatment and metabolic bone disorders, specifically Hypophosphatasia (HPP). Building on a cross-sectional evaluation of real-world data, this study reports risk factors, prevalence, treatment outcome and morphometric particularities for such fractures in HPP as compared to Atypical Femoral Fractures (AFF) in long-term antiresorptive treatment.

METHODS

For 15 out of 150 HPP patients identified with having experienced at least one such fracture, medical records were reviewed in detail, extracting medical history, genotype, lab assessments, bone mineral density (DXA), radiographic data on femoral geometry and clinical aspects of fracture etiology and healing.

RESULTS

Bilateral fractures were documented in 10 of these 15 patients, yielding a total of 25 fractures for evaluation. Disease-inherent risk factors included autosomal-recessive, childhood onset HPP, apparently low alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 20 U/l and substantially elevated pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP) > 3 times upper limit of normal as well as high lumbar spine BMD. Fracture morphology met definition criteria for AFF in 88% of cases. Femoral geometry revealed additional risk factors previously described for AFF, including decreased femoral neck-shaft angle and increased femoral offset. Extrinsic risk factors include Hypovitaminosis D (80%) and pre-treatment with bisphosphonates (46,7%) and Proton-Pump Inhibitors (40%).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased risk for subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in HPP appears to result from both compromised bone metabolism as well as disease-associated bone deformities. In severe HPP, generous screening for such fractures seems advisable. Bisphosphonates and Hypovitaminosis D should be avoided. Healing is compromised and requires mindful consideration of both pharmacological and surgical options.

A Subtrochanteric Femoral Stress Fracture following Bisphosphonate Treatment in an Adolescent Girl

Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures (AFFs) have emerged as a potential complication of bisphosphonate treatment in adults. Despite increasing off-label use of bisphosphonates in children and adolescents for a variety of skeletal disorders, there have been no reports of AFFs in children or adolescents outside of the osteogenesis imperfecta population. We present the case of a 16-year-old girl who developed a subtrochanteric femoral stress fracture following pamidronate treatment for idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis.

Trochanteric Stress Fracture in a Female Window Cleaner

Stress fractures may occur at various sites in the femur including the head, neck, shaft, supracondylar and condylar regions. To the best of our knowledge, stress fracture occurring in the trochanteric region has not been previously reported. We report here a case of trochanteric stress fracture in a 53-year-old female window cleaner treated with hip nailing without adverse consequences. Careful consideration of this entity is needed when evaluating patients who have repetitive jumping up and down.

A low-energy femoral shaft fracture from performing a yoga posture

The femoral shaft is rarely the site of a low-energy fracture in a healthy individual. The vast majority of these fractures are due to major trauma such as motor vehicle accidents. Although low-energy femoral shaft fractures do occur, they are typically in patients with osteoporotic bone, or prosthesis related. In this case report, we present a man in his late 30s who was practising a specific yoga stance when he experienced a femoral shaft fracture.

Diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of stress fractures in the lower extremity in runners

Stress fractures account for between 1% and 20% of athletic injuries, with 80% of stress fractures in the lower extremity. Stress fractures of the lower extremity are common injuries among individuals who participate in endurance, high load-bearing activities such as running, military and aerobic exercise and therefore require practitioner expertise in diagnosis and management. Accurate diagnosis for stress fractures is dependent on the anatomical area. Anatomical regions such as the pelvis, sacrum, and metatarsals offer challenges due to difficulty differentiating pathologies with common symptoms. Special tests and treatment regimes, however, are similar among most stress fractures with resolution between 4 weeks to a year. The most difficult aspect of stress fracture treatment entails mitigating internal and external risk factors. Practitioners should address ongoing risk factors to minimize recurrence.

Intravenous bisphosphonates and vitamin D in the treatment of bone marrow oedema in professional athletes

INTRODUCTION

The goal of this retrospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ibandronate for bone marrow oedema (BMO) syndrome and stress fracture cases, and to demonstrate an additional field of therapeutic importance-the high-performance athlete.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included twenty-five high-performance athletes. Sixty per cent of the athletes were European soccer players and 40.0% other high-class international athletes (3 women and 22 men with an average age of 25.0±4.2), with BMO of the lower trunk or extremity diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The treatment regimen consisted of high-dose vitamin D supplementation and intravenous ibandronate therapy.

RESULTS

The time between the onset of pain and proper diagnosis of BMO was 106.3±104.1 days. Excellent pain reduction (pain at rest and under strain) and improved mobility was reported within the first two weeks after the first ibandronate administration by sixteen patients (64%). The time from first treatment until return to competition (RTC) was on average 102.6±65.2 days in total. If the time from onset of pain until diagnosis was within 40 days, the RTC was significantly reduced (p≤0.05) to almost 50% (63.8±48.1 days) when compared to the athletes with later diagnosis (124.4±63.2 days).

CONCLUSIONS

The here-applied therapy regimen of intravenous BPs application and vitamin D supplementation in BMO syndrome has a beneficial effect for high-performance athletes. An early diagnosis and rapid treatment start can reduce the RTC significantly. An optimal bone metabolism with sufficient daily calcium and vitamin D intake is crucial and should not only be strived for the professional but also for the recreational athlete.

Stress fracture of the lateral cuneiform bone: a case report

Stress fractures are common overuse injuries of the bone that are most often seen in athletes and military personnel. These types of injuries seem to be commonly missed or delayed in diagnosis. Physicians should consider the possibility of such an injury while determining the diagnosis of a long-lasting foot pain. The aim of this paper was to report an isolated stress fracture of the lateral cuneiform bone. A review of the literature failed to find a similar case.

Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab reduce the risk of spine and nonspine fractures. Atypical femur fractures (AFFs) located in the subtrochanteric region and diaphysis of the femur have been reported in patients taking BPs and in patients on denosumab, but they also occur in patients with no exposure to these drugs. In this report, we review studies on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and medical management of AFFs, published since 2010. This newer evidence suggests that AFFs are stress or insufficiency fractures. The original case definition was revised to highlight radiographic features that distinguish AFFs from ordinary osteoporotic femoral diaphyseal fractures and to provide guidance on the importance of their transverse orientation. The requirement that fractures be noncomminuted was relaxed to include minimal comminution. The periosteal stress reaction at the fracture site was changed from a minor to a major feature. The association with specific diseases and drug exposures was removed from the minor features, because it was considered that these associations should be sought rather than be included in the case definition. Studies with radiographic review consistently report significant associations between AFFs and BP use, although the strength of associations and magnitude of effect vary. Although the relative risk of patients with AFFs taking BPs is high, the absolute risk of AFFs in patients on BPs is low, ranging from 3.2 to 50 cases per 100,000 person-years. However, long-term use may be associated with higher risk (∼100 per 100,000 person-years). BPs localize in areas that are developing stress fractures; suppression of targeted intracortical remodeling at the site of an AFF could impair the processes by which stress fractures normally heal. When BPs are stopped, risk of an AFF may decline. Lower limb geometry and Asian ethnicity may contribute to the risk of AFFs. There is inconsistent evidence that teriparatide may advance healing of AFFs.

Atypical femoral fractures: a review of the literature

Bisphosphonates are the most commonly used drugs worldwide for treating osteoporosis. Atypical femoral fractures most commonly are associated with prolonged bisphosphonate use. They also may occur with denosumab use or in patients without a history of using these drugs. In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of the mechanism of action of bisphosphonate and the definition, incidence, epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and prevention of atypical femoral fractures.

Stress fractures

Stress fractures are common injuries in military recruits and athletes, particularly long-distance runners. A high index of suspicion coupled with a thorough history and correct imaging are vital in the diagnosis. A delay in their diagnosis or undertreatment can result in extended recovery times that are particularly damaging to sportspeople where these injuries can be career-ending. In most cases, treatment includes reducing the causative activity to a pain-free level. “High-risk” fractures which typically include the femoral neck, anterior tibia, proximal fifth metatarsal and tarsal navicular may however require surgical fixation. Stress fractures carry a high risk of recurrence and prevention involves reducing modifiable risk factors through training and diet adjustments. All members involved in an athlete or military recruit’s training should therefore be aware of the presence of eating disorders, the effects of overtraining and the importance of rest in order to reduce the incidence of these injuries.

Femoral neck stress fracture in a female athlete: a case report

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this case report is to describe chiropractic rehabilitation of a master's-level athlete with proximal femoral stress fracture and provide a brief discussion of stress fracture pathology.

CLINICAL FEATURES

A 41-year-old female master's-level endurance athlete presented with chronic groin pain later diagnosed and confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging as a stress fracture of the femoral neck. After diagnosis, the patient was referred to a doctor of chiropractic at week 1 of the non-weight-bearing physical rehabilitation process. At that time, the patient presented with sharp and constant groin pain rated 6/10 on a numeric rating scale.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME

This patient avoided weight-bearing activity for 8 weeks while cross-training and was able to return to her sport after this period. The patient was progressed through a series of non-weight-bearing strengthening exercises for the lower extremity. Myofascial release therapy was performed on the gluteal, hip flexor, and groin muscle groups to improve range of motion. Motion palpation testing the lumbar and sacroiliac joints was performed during each session, and manipulative therapy was performed when necessary. The patient was seen once a week for 8 weeks. Reevaluation was performed at week 8; at that time, the patient reported no groin pain (0/10). The patient was discharged from care and referred back to the supervising physician for clearance to return to sporting activities. One month after discharge, she reported that she was pain free and had fully returned to sport activities.

CONCLUSION

This case report demonstrates the importance of a through clinical history, physical examination, and magnetic resonance imaging in the accurate diagnosis of a patient with chronic groin pain and that chiropractic care can contribute to rehabilitation programs for these injuries.

Unusual presentation of a femoral stress fracture

Stress fractures are common injuries in sports medicine. Among these fractures, femoral neck stress fractures frequently have a benign course, especially when it happens in the medial aspect of the neck. This case report describes a stress fracture of the medial aspect of the femoral neck that developed a complete fracture and underwent surgical fixation.

Stress fractures in elderly patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate specific risk factors, common fracture locations and possible sex-specific differences in elderly patients with stress fractures.

METHODS

This analysis enrolled 105 patients (83 women, 22 men) with stress fractures. For the analysis of possible risk factors related to increasing age, data from 82 patients (67 women, 15 men) aged 40 years and older (mean age of 57.4 ± 11.0 years) were compared with that from a younger control group [23 patients (16 women, seven men), mean age 28.4 ± 6.7 years]. Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometry (DXA) and blood samples were taken.

RESULTS

A total of 211 stress fractures were found. Of these, 177 were found in the study group, of which 90.4 % were located in the lower limb. Lumbar and femoral BMD was significantly lower in elderly patients; however, the BMD of most patients was within the osteopenic or normal range. Within the study group, a total of 83.8 % had a vitamin D insufficiency (<30 μg/l); 75.5 % were not engaged in regular physical activity more than once a week. Overweight patients within the study group had significantly more stress fractures compared to normal weight patients (2.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.9 ± 1.1, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A similar contribution of risk factors has been found for stress fractures in elderly patients and younger controls of the general population. Stress fracture incidence seems to be rather multifactorial and not based on osteoporotic changes alone. A balanced calcium and vitamin D metabolism seems to be of paramount importance for stress fracture prevention in elderly patients.

Stress fractures in runners

Many runners in the United States are at risk for stress-related injuries, which are largely preventable. Severity and recovery vary, and can range from uneventful to surgical intervention. This article explores risks, pathophysiology, diagnostic considerations, and rehabilitation. Prevention strategies are also outlined.

Stress fractures in runners

Running has many beneficial effects, including cardiovascular and skeletal health. Poor training technique and a variety of risk factors may predispose runners to lower-limb overuse injuries affecting muscle, tendon, and bone. Injuries to the bone include stress reactions to full-fledged stress fractures. This article is designed to provide an understanding of the general concepts involving bone strain, risk factor assessment, and evaluation and treatment strategies for the runner with a stress fracture. The second half of the article presents more detail regarding each specific fracture seen in runners. The ultimate goal of this article is to provide the basics regarding stress fractures in runners from pathophysiology and general guidelines of evaluation and treatment and provide a quick reference regarding the details of each specific fracture encountered in clinical practice.

Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Reports linking long-term use of bisphosphonates (BPs) with atypical fractures of the femur led the leadership of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) to appoint a task force to address key questions related to this problem. A multidisciplinary expert group reviewed pertinent published reports concerning atypical femur fractures, as well as preclinical studies that could provide insight into their pathogenesis. A case definition was developed so that subsequent studies report on the same condition. The task force defined major and minor features of complete and incomplete atypical femoral fractures and recommends that all major features, including their location in the subtrochanteric region and femoral shaft, transverse or short oblique orientation, minimal or no associated trauma, a medial spike when the fracture is complete, and absence of comminution, be present to designate a femoral fracture as atypical. Minor features include their association with cortical thickening, a periosteal reaction of the lateral cortex, prodromal pain, bilaterality, delayed healing, comorbid conditions, and concomitant drug exposures, including BPs, other antiresorptive agents, glucocorticoids, and proton pump inhibitors. Preclinical data evaluating the effects of BPs on collagen cross-linking and maturation, accumulation of microdamage and advanced glycation end products, mineralization, remodeling, vascularity, and angiogenesis lend biologic plausibility to a potential association with long-term BP use. Based on published and unpublished data and the widespread use of BPs, the incidence of atypical femoral fractures associated with BP therapy for osteoporosis appears to be very low, particularly compared with the number of vertebral, hip, and other fractures that are prevented by BPs. Moreover, a causal association between BPs and atypical fractures has not been established. However, recent observations suggest that the risk rises with increasing duration of exposure, and there is concern that lack of awareness and underreporting may mask the true incidence of the problem. Given the relative rarity of atypical femoral fractures, the task force recommends that specific diagnostic and procedural codes be created and that an international registry be established to facilitate studies of the clinical and genetic risk factors and optimal surgical and medical management of these fractures. Physicians and patients should be made aware of the possibility of atypical femoral fractures and of the potential for bilaterality through a change in labeling of BPs. Research directions should include development of animal models, increased surveillance, and additional epidemiologic and clinical data to establish the true incidence of and risk factors for this condition and to inform orthopedic and medical management.

Internal femoral forces and moments during running: implications for stress fracture development

BACKGROUND

Femoral stress fractures tend to occur at the neck, medial proximal-shaft, and distal-shaft. The purpose of this study was to determine the internal femoral forces and moments during running. It was expected that larger loads would occur at these common sites of femoral stress fracture.

METHODS

Ten subjects ran at their preferred running speed over a force platform while motion capture data were collected. Static optimization in conjunction with a SIMM musculoskeletal model was used to determine individual muscle forces of the lower extremity. Joint contact forces were determined, and a quasi-static approach was used to calculate internal forces and moments along a centroid path through the femur.

FINDINGS

The largest mean peak loads were observed at the following regions: anterior-posterior shear, 7.47 bodyweights (BW) at the distal-shaft (posteriorly directed); axial force, 11.40BW at the distal-shaft (compression); medial-lateral shear, 3.75BW at the neck (medially directed); anterior-posterior moment, 0.42BWm at the proximal-shaft (medial surface compression); torsional moment, 0.20BWm at the distal-shaft (external rotation); medial-lateral moment, 0.44BWm at the distal-shaft (anterior surface compression).

INTERPRETATION

The mechanical loading environment of the femur during running appears to explain well the redundancy in femoral stress fracture location. We observed the largest internal loads at the three femoral sites prone to stress fracture.

Overuse injuries in female athletes

The last three decades have witnessed a tremendous increase in female sports participation at all levels. However, increased sports participation of female athletes has also increased the incidence of sport-related injuries, which can be either acute trauma or overuse injuries. Overuse injuries may be defined as an imbalance caused by overly intensive training and inadequate recovery, which subsequently leads to a breakdown in tissue reparative mechanisms. This article will review the most frequent overuse injuries in female athletes in the context of anatomical, physiological, and psychological differences between genders.

Stress fractures in athletes

A stress fracture is a partial or complete bone fracture that results from repeated application of stress lower than the stress required to fracture the bone in a single loading. Otherwise healthy athletes, especially runners, sustain stress injuries or fractures. Prevention or early intervention is the preferable treatment. However, it is difficult to predict injury because runners vary with regard to biomechanical predisposition, training methods, and other factors such as diet, muscle strength, and flexibility. Stress fractures account for 0.7% to 20% of all sports medicine clinic injuries. Track-and-field athletes have the highest incidence of stress fractures compared with other athletes. Stress fractures of the tibia, metatarsals, and fibula are the most frequently reported sites. The sites of stress fractures vary from sport to sport (eg, among track athletes, stress fractures of the navicular, tibia, and metatarsal are common; in distance runners, it is the tibia and fibula; in dancers, the metatarsals). In the military, the calcaneus and metatarsals were the most commonly cited injuries, especially in new recruits, owing to the sudden increase in running and marching without adequate preparation. However, newer studies from the military show the incidence and distribution of stress fractures to be similar to those found in sports clinics. Fractures of the upper extremities are relatively rare, although most studies have focused only on lower-extremity injuries. The ulna is the upper-extremity bone injured most frequently. Imaging plays a key role in the diagnosis and management of stress injuries. Plain radiography is useful when positive, but generally has low sensitivity. Radionuclide bone scanning is highly sensitive, but lacks specificity and the ability to directly visualize fracture lines. In this article, we focus on magnetic resonance imaging, which provides highly sensitive and specific evaluation for bone marrow edema, periosteal reaction as well as detection of subtle fracture lines.