Concentric myocardial hypertrophy after one year of increased training volume in experienced distance runners

Echocardiographic Characteristic Of Left Ventricular Geometry Of 12-17 Years Athletes

Aim. To compare the type of left ventricular geometry associated with training among 12-17 years athletes currently competing in cycling, rowing and basketball playing and to determine the factors influencing left ventricular geometry. Methods. A total 167 male athletes 12-17 year-old, involved in basketball (n = 62), academic rowing (n =51) and cycling (n = 54) and 168 sedentary non-athletes, matched for age and sex were involved in this study. All participants underwent twodimensional, M-mode and Doppler echocardiography. To estimate left ventricular geometry relative wall thickness and left ventricular mass index were calculated. Left ventricular geometry was assessed as normal, eccentric ventricular hypertrophy, concentric left ventricular hypertrophy, concentric left ventricular remodeling. Results. Left ventricular hypertrophy was present in 48 % of all athletes, predominantly (34 %) eccentric hypertrophy. 16% of athletes had concentric hypertrophy. Only 7% of athletes manifested concentric remodeling. The prevalence of eccentric hypertrophy was more common in cyclists (54%), concentric hypertrophy was more frequent in rowers (38%), and normal left ventricular geometry was more common in basketball players (53%). Multivariate regression analysis showed that age was the important determinant of eccentric and concentric left ventricular hypertrophy. Eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy also was independently associated to training volume (hour per week) and cycling sporting discipline. Conclusion. Almost half of athletes (48%) had left ventricular hypertrophy, predominantly eccentric hypertrophy, and the age was the important determinant of left ventricular hypertrophy (eccentric and concentric). Training volume and cycling sporting discipline were significantly associated with eccentric left ventricular hypertrophy.

Echocardiographic parameters in athletes of different sports

Competitive athletics is often associated with moderate left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, and it has been hypothesized that training mode and type of exercise modulates long-term cardiac adaptation. The purpose of the study was to compare cardiac structure and function among athletes of various sports and sedentary controls. Standard transthoracic two-dimensional M-mode and Doppler echocardiography was performed at rest in Caucasian male canoe/kayak paddlers (n = 9), long distance runners (LDR, n = 18), middle distance runners (MDR, n = 17), basketball players (BP, n = 31), road cyclists (n = 8), swimmers (n = 10), strength/power athletes (n = 9) of similar age (range, 15 to 31 yrs), training experience (4 to 9 years), and age-matched healthy male sedentary controls (n = 15). Absolute interventricular septum (IVS) thickness and LV wall thickness, but not LV diameter, were greater in athletes than sedentary controls. Left ventricular mass of all athletes but relative wall thickness of only BP, swimmers, cyclists, and strength/power athletes were higher as compared with controls (p < 0.05). Among athletes, smaller IVS thickness was observed in MDR than BP, cyclists, swimmers or strength/power athletes, while LDR had higher body size-adjusted LV diameter as compared to BP, cyclists and strength/power athletes. In conclusion, relative LV diameter was increased in long distance runners as compared with basketball players, cyclists, and strength/power athletes. Basketball, road cycling, strength/power, and swimming training were associated with increased LV concentricity as compared with paddling or distance running. Key pointsThe type of cardiac hypertrophy seems to be only moderately exercise-specific.Long-distance runners develop larger left ventricular dilation as compared with basketball players, cyclists, and strength/power athletes.Myocardial wall thickening is triggered by different sporting activities that involve large muscle groups.

The role of echocardiography in the differential diagnosis between training induced myocardial hypertrophy versus cardiomyopathy

Increased myocardial mass due to regular high-volume intense exercise training (so-called athlete's heart) is not uncommon. Although directly correlated with the extent of training loads, myocardial hypertrophy is not present exclusively in well-trained or elite athletes. Athlete's heart is considered a physiological phenomenon with no known harmful consequences. However, extreme forms of myocardial hypertrophy due to endurance training resemble a structural heart disease such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a condition associated with substantially increased risk of cardiac event. Endurance sports such as rowing and road cycling, rather than strength/power training, are most commonly associated with left ventricular (LV) wall thickness compatible with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The differentiation between physiological and maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy in athletes is undoubtedly important, since untreated cardiac abnormality often possesses a real threat of premature death due to heart failure during intense physical exertion. Luckily, the distinction from pathological hypertrophy is usually straightforward using transthoracic echocardiography, as endurance athletes, in addition to moderately and proportionally thickened LV walls with normal acoustic density, tend to possess increased LV diameter. In more uncertain cases, a detailed evaluation of myocardial function using (tissue) Doppler and contrast echocardiography is effective. When a doubt still remains, knowledge of an athlete's working capacity may be useful in evaluating whether the insidious cardiac pathology is absent. In such cases cardiopulmonary exercise testing typically resolves the dilemma: indices of aerobic capacity are markedly higher in healthy endurance athletes compared to patients. Other characteristics such as a decrease of LV mass due to training cessation are also discussed in the article. Key pointsTransthoracic echocardiography is still the most common relevant differentiation technique applied to distinguish athlete's heart from the cardiomyopathy.Conventional echocardiographic criteria such as left ventricular chamber size and diastolic function parameters are to be regarded first when making differential diagnosis between substantially increased wall thickness in athlete's heart (i.e. physiological adaptation) versus a disease (usually hypertrophic cardiomyopathy).When conventional echocardiographic parameters fail to diagnose the nature of myocardial hypertrophy, other differentiation criteria such as aerobic fitness, cardiac performance in response to physical exertion, and changes in echocardiographic parameters due to detraining, must be taken into consideration.Tissue Doppler, contrast and three-dimensional imaging are state-of-the-art echocardiographic techniques which have recently appeared in the differential diagnostics.