Early ACL reconstruction is required to prevent additional knee injury: a misconception not supported by high-quality evidence

More knee reinjuries after ACL reconstruction compared to nonsurgical treatment of the ACL. A 2-year follow-up of the NACOX prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To describe knee reinjuries and surgeries within 2 years after an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, in patients treated with or without ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Two years follow-up of 275 patients (52% females, mean age 25.2 [SD 7.0] years) about knee reinjuries and surgeries were analysed from the prospective NACOX cohort study, aiming to describe recovery after an acute ACL injury treated according to clinical routine. Knee reinjury was defined as increase or new symptoms due to new trauma. At 2 years after injury, 169 (61%) had undergone an ACLR. Results are presented with descriptive statistics and risk ratios (RR).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients sustained reinjuries within 2 years; 6 in the non-ACLR group, and 26 in the ACLR group (7 before and 19 after ACLR). Twelve patients in the ACLR group sustained a graft rupture and three did an ACL revision. Patients with non-ACLR, aged 21-25 years, had a 5.9-fold higher risk for reinjury than those aged 15-20 years (RR 5.9 [1.3-26.9]; p = 0.012). Twenty-four patients had surgery in the non-ACLR group and 36 patients in the ACLR group (excluding primary ACLR), where six were before ACLR and 30 were after ACLR.

CONCLUSION

Twelve percent sustained a knee reinjury and 21% underwent knee surgery within 2 years after the index ACL injury. There was a higher reinjury incidence in the ACLR group, but no difference in incidence of surgeries. Thus, ACLR did not reduce the risk of traumatic reinjuries or surgeries, which is important for treatment decision considerations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Superior Outcome of Early ACL Reconstruction versus Initial Non-reconstructive Treatment With Late Crossover to Surgery: A Study From the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry

BACKGROUND

Although comparable clinical and functional outcomes have been reported after nonsurgical and surgical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) treatment, few studies have investigated the effects of early versus late ACL reconstruction with initial rehabilitation.

PURPOSE

To determine patient-reported knee function in patients who initially undergo nonreconstructive treatment after an ACL injury but who later choose to undergo ACL reconstruction as compared with (1) patients undergoing ACL reconstruction close to the index injury and (2) patients treated nonreconstructively at 1 to 10 years of follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Results from the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were extracted from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Registry for patients treated with nonreconstruction, early ACL reconstruction, and initial nonreconstruction but subsequent ACL reconstruction (crossover group). The KOOS₄ (a mean of 4 KOOS subscales) was analyzed cross-sectionally at baseline and at the 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year follow-ups. Additionally, the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) was applied to all KOOS subscales from baseline to the 10-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 1,074 crossover, 484 nonreconstruction, and 20,352 early ACL reconstruction cases were included. The crossover group reported lower KOOS₄ values than the group undergoing early ACL reconstruction at baseline and at all follow-ups (mean difference [95% CI]): baseline, -6.5 (-8.0 to -5.0); 1 year, -9.3 (-10.9 to -7.7); 2 years, -4.8 (-6.3 to -3.2); 5 years, -6.1 (-8.8 to -3.4); and 10 years, -10.9 (-16.3 to -5.2). Additionally, a smaller proportion of the crossover cohort achieved a PASS on KOOS subscales at baseline and through the 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-year follow-ups as compared with the early ACL reconstruction cohort. No differences were observed between crossover and nonreconstruction cases on either the KOOS₄ or the PASS at any follow-up.

CONCLUSION

A greater proportion of patients treated with early ACL reconstruction reported acceptable knee function and superior overall knee function as compared with patients who decided to cross over from nonreconstructive treatment to ACL reconstruction.

Evidence-based recommendations for the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture occurs most commonly in young and active individuals and can have negative long-term physical and psychological impacts. The diagnosis is made with a combination of patient's history, clinical examination, and, if appropriate, magnetic resonance imaging. The objectives of management are to restore knee function, address psychological barriers to activity participation, prevent further injury and osteoarthritis, and optimize long-term quality of life. The three main treatment options for ACL rupture are (1) rehabilitation as first-line treatment (followed by ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in patients, who develop functional instability), (2) ACLR and post-operative rehabilitation as the first-line treatment, and (3) pre-operative rehabilitation followed by ACLR and post-operative rehabilitation. We provide practical recommendations for informing and discussing management options with patients, and describe patient-related factors associated with a worse ACL-rupture outcome. Finally, we define evidence-based rehabilitation and present phase-specific rehabilitation recommendations and criteria to inform return to sport decisions.