1
|
Engler ID, Koback FL, Curley AJ. Value-Based, Environmentally Sustainable Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery. Clin Sports Med 2024; 43:355-365. [PMID: 38811115 DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
Orthopedic surgeons are increasingly recognizing the broader societal impact of their clinical decisions, which includes value-based and environmentally sustainable care. Within anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, value-based care-or most cost-effective care-includes an outpatient surgical setting with regional anesthesia, use of autograft, meniscus repair when indicated, and use of traditional metal implants such as interference screws and staples. Environmentally sustainable care includes slimming down surgical packs and trays to avoid opening unnecessary equipment, avoiding desflurane as an inhaled anesthetic agent, and minimizing waste in the operating room-a priority that addresses both cost and environmental impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian D Engler
- Central Maine Healthcare Orthopedics, Central Maine Medical Center, 690 Minot Avenue #1, Auburn, ME 04210, USA; UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 South Water Street, Pittsbrugh, PA, USA.
| | - Frances L Koback
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College, 1 Rope Ferry Road, Hanover, NH 03755, USA
| | - Andrew J Curley
- UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, 3200 South Water Street, Pittsbrugh, PA, USA; TidalHealth Nanticoke, 801 Middleford Road, Seaford, DE 19973, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Özbek EA, Dursun Savran M, Baltacı Ç, Herman ZJ, Zsidai B, Wailing J, Samuelsson K, Musahl V. Return to Work After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Orthop J Sports Med 2024; 12:23259671241249086. [PMID: 38745916 PMCID: PMC11092533 DOI: 10.1177/23259671241249086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The timing of return to work (RTW) after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is a less studied milestone compared with return to sports. Purpose To systematically review the rate and postoperative timing of RTW after ACLR. Study Design Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods This study was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Ovid databases for clinical studies reporting RTW after ACLR, and 806 studies were identified in August 2022. A quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index of Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) grading system. The following data were extracted from studies: study characteristics, cohort demographics, ACLR technique, concomitant meniscal and/or cartilage procedures, preoperative patient-reported outcomes, rates of RTW, and days required for RTW after ACLR. Results A total of 13 studies met inclusion criteria, totaling 1791 patients (86.4% male). Wide variability was observed in the methodological quality of the assessed studies (MINORS score range, 8-17). Hamstring tendon (HT) autograft was used in 76.8% (n = 1377; mean age, 30.5 years old), allograft in 17.1% (n = 308; mean age, 33.1 years old), the ligament advanced reinforcement system in 2.5% (n = 46; mean age, 33.2 years old), bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft in 2% (n = 36; mean age, 28.5 years old), and quadriceps tendon autograft in 1.3% (n = 24; mean age, 24.1 years old). Among the included patients, 99.1% (n = 1781) reported successful RTW after surgery. The mean time to RTW was 84.2 days (range, 31.4-107.1 days) for HT and 69.5 days (range, 49-56.6 days) for allograft. Conclusion While data regarding work intensity before and after ACL injury were absent, our study results suggested that patients most often RTW within 90 days of surgery. Patients with allograft ACLR may RTW earlier than patients undergoing ACLR with HT autograft.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Anıl Özbek
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Merve Dursun Savran
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Çağatay Baltacı
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Zachary J. Herman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Bálint Zsidai
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jacon Wailing
- Department of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kristian Samuelsson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Volker Musahl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Urhausen AP, Grindem H, H. Ingelsrud L, Roos EM, Silbernagel KG, Snyder-Mackler L, Risberg MA. Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for IKDC-SKF and KOOS at the 10-Year Follow-up After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Study From the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort. Orthop J Sports Med 2024; 12:23259671241250025. [PMID: 38827138 PMCID: PMC11143835 DOI: 10.1177/23259671241250025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Clinicians need thresholds for the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Treatment Failure to interpret group-based patient-reported outcome measures after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Validated thresholds that are crucial for accurately discerning patient symptom state and facilitating effective interpretation have not been determined for long-term follow-up after ACL injury. Purpose To calculate and validate thresholds for PASS and Treatment Failure for the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales at the 10-year follow-up after ACL injury. Study Design Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods A total of 163 participants with unilateral ACL injury (treated with reconstruction or rehabilitation alone) from the Delaware-Oslo ACL Cohort were included. Thresholds for PASS were calculated for IKDC-SKF and KOOS subscales using anchor-based predictive modeling and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Too few participants had self-reported Treatment Failure to calculate thresholds for that outcome. Nonparametric bootstrapping was used to derive 95% CIs. The criterion validity of the predictive modeling and ROC-derived thresholds were assessed by comparing actual patient-reported PASS outcome with the calculated PASS outcome for each method of calculation and calculating their positive and negative predictive values with respect to the anchor questions. Results A total of 127 (78%) participants reported satisfactory symptom state. Predictive modeling PASS thresholds (95% CIs) were 76.2 points (72.1-79.4 points) for IKDC-SKF, 85.4 points (80.9-89.2 points) for KOOS Pain, 76.5 points (67.8-84.7 points) for KOOS Symptoms, 93.8 points (90.1-96.9 points) for KOOS activities of daily living, 71.6 points (63.4-77.7 points) for KOOS Sports, and 59.0 points (53.7-63.9 points) for KOOS quality of life (QoL). Predictive modeling thresholds classified 81% to 93% of the participants as having satisfactory symptom state, whereas ROC-derived thresholds classified >50% as unsatisfied. The thresholds for IKDC-SKF, KOOS Sports, and KOOS QoL resulted in the most accurate percentages of PASS among all identified thresholds and therefore demonstrate the highest validity. Conclusion Predictive modeling provided valid PASS thresholds for IKDC-SKF and KOOS at the 10-year follow-up after ACL injury. The thresholds for IKDC-SKF, KOOS Sports, and KOOS QoL should be used when determining satisfactory outcomes. ROC-derived thresholds result in substantial misclassification rates of the participants who reported satisfactory symptom state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk P. Urhausen
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hege Grindem
- Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lina H. Ingelsrud
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ewa M. Roos
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Lynn Snyder-Mackler
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - May Arna Risberg
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Simonsson R, Magnusson C, Piussi R, Kaarre J, Thomeé R, Ivarsson A, Samuelsson K, Hamrin Senorski E. To achieve the unachievable-Patients' experiences of opting for delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after trying rehabilitation alone as primary treatment: A qualitative study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2024; 34:e14569. [PMID: 38389139 DOI: 10.1111/sms.14569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION About 50% of patients who sustain an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are treated without ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). A significant proportion of these patients opt for late ACL-R. Patients' experience of changing treatment has not yet been investigated and presented in the scientific literature. AIM To explore patients' experiences before and after changing treatment from ACL rehabilitation alone to ACL-R. METHOD Fifteen patients were interviewed in semi-structured interviews, which were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with qualitative content analysis, based on the method described by Graneheim and Lundman. Patients were between 26 and 58 years old, and had tried rehabilitation for a minimum of 9 months prior to ACL-R. RESULTS Two themes, "Expecting what could not be achieved: the struggle to recover and not becoming stable", and "Internal completeness: expectations can be achieved", emerged from the analysis. Each theme was supported by three main categories and 5-6 subcategories. The first theme represents the journey before ACL-R, where patients experienced getting stronger, but perceived the knee as unstable. The second theme represents the journey after ACL-R, where patients expressed that they felt whole after their ACL-R, and where able to achieve their expections. Patients experienced a greater support from the healthcare system, and ultimately expressed a feeling of having achieved the unachievable after ACL-R. SUMMARY Patients who cross over from ACL rehabilitation to ACL-R experienced rehabilitation alone as insufficient to achieve the desired outcomes, which resulted in a need to opt for delayed ACL-R. Healthcare providers need to support patients, who primarily choose to undergo rehabilitation alone and later opt for ACL-R, throughout the whole rehabilitation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Simonsson
- Sportrehab, Sport Medicine Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Ramana Piussi
- Sportrehab, Sport Medicine Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Janina Kaarre
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roland Thomeé
- Sportrehab, Sport Medicine Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Andreas Ivarsson
- School of Health and Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
- Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
- Swedish Olympic Committee, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kristian Samuelsson
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Eric Hamrin Senorski
- Sportrehab, Sport Medicine Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Swedish Olympic Committee, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yu C, Feng S, Li Y, Chen J. Application of Nondegradable Synthetic Materials for Tendon and Ligament Injury. Macromol Biosci 2023; 23:e2300259. [PMID: 37440424 DOI: 10.1002/mabi.202300259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Tendon and ligament injuries, prevalent requiring surgical intervention, significantly impact joint stability and function. Owing to excellent mechanical properties and biochemical stability, Nondegradable synthetic materials, including polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), have demonstrated significant potential in the treatment of tendon and ligament injuries. These above materials offer substantial mechanical support, joint mobility, and tissue healing promotion of the shoulder, knee, and ankle joint. This review conclude the latest development and application of nondegradable materials such as artificial patches and ligaments in tendon and ligament injuries including rotator cuff tears (RCTs), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, and Achilles tendon ruptures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengxuan Yu
- Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University; Sports Medicine Institute of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Sijia Feng
- Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University; Sports Medicine Institute of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Yunxia Li
- Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University; Sports Medicine Institute of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| | - Jun Chen
- Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University; Sports Medicine Institute of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lohmander LS, Roemer FW, Frobell RB, Roos EM. Treatment for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear in Young Active Adults. NEJM EVIDENCE 2023; 2:EVIDoa2200287. [PMID: 38320141 DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2200287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury of the knee is common in young active adults and often has severe and sometimes lifelong consequences. The clinical management of this injury remains debated. A prior trial of early versus delayed optional ACL repair showed no differences in outcomes at 2 years. METHODS: We present the 11-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial involving 121 young active adults (mean age 26yo, 74% male) with an acute sports-related ACL tear. We compared patient-reported and radiographic outcomes between those randomized to receive early ACL reconstruction (ACLR) followed by exercise therapy (N=62) and those treated with early exercise therapy plus optional delayed ACLR (N=59). The primary end point at 11 years was change from baseline in the mean of four subscales of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) — pain, symptoms, function in sports and recreation, and knee-related quality of life (KOOS4; range of scores, 0 [worst] to 100 [best]; minimal important change=9). RESULTS: In all, 88% of the cohort followed up at 11 years (53/62 in the early vs. 54/59 in the optional late ACL repair groups), and 52% of those assigned to optional delayed ACLR underwent ACLR. Mean improvement in KOOS4 from baseline to 11 years was 46 points for those assigned to early ACLR plus exercise therapy and 45 points for those assigned to exercise therapy plus optional delayed ACLR (between-group difference, 1.6 points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −8.8 to 5.6; P=0.67 after adjustment for baseline score, full analysis set). About two thirds of the full cohort reported meeting the case definition for a “patient-acceptable symptom state” (KOOS4 patient-acceptable symptom state threshold value=79), whereas 44% had developed radiographic osteoarthritis of their injured knee. Mean summed incident radiographic osteoarthritis feature scores, scores range from 0 to 30 where higher scores indicate more severe joint damage, were 2.4 for the group assigned to early ACLR and 1.0 for the group assigned to exercise therapy plus optional delayed ACLR (mean difference, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.9). CONCLUSIONS: At 11-year follow-up, among young active adults with acute ACL tears assigned to early ACLR plus exercise versus initial exercise therapy with the option of delayed ACLR, there were no differences in patient-reported outcomes. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council; ISRCTN number, ISRCTN84752559.)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Stefan Lohmander
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Frank W Roemer
- Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston
| | - Richard B Frobell
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ewa M Roos
- Center for Muscle and Joint Health, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
MCID and PASS in Knee Surgeries. Theoretical Aspects and Clinical Relevance References. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2023; 31:2060-2067. [PMID: 36897384 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07359-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
The application and interpretation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM), following knee injuries, pathologies, and interventions, can be challenging. In recent years, the literature has been enriched with metrics to facilitate our understanding and interpretation of these outcome measures. Two commonly utilized tools include the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and the patient acceptable symptoms state (PASS). These measures have demonstrated clinical value, however, they have often been under- or mis-reported. It is paramount to use them to understand the clinical significance of any statistically significant results. Still, it remains important to know their caveats and limitations. In this focused report on MCID and PASS, their definitions, methods of calculations, clinical relevance, interpretations, and limitations are reviewed and presented in a simple approach.
Collapse
|
8
|
Piussi R, Simonson R, Kjellander M, Jacobsson A, Ivarsson A, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K, Hamrin Senorski E. When context creates uncertainty: experiences of patients who choose rehabilitation as a treatment after an ACL injury. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2023; 9:e001501. [PMID: 36987514 PMCID: PMC10040041 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Up to 50% of patients who suffer an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury receive or opt for rehabilitation alone as initial treatment in Scandinavia. Knowledge of whether patients treated with rehabilitation alone after ACL injury are satisfied is lacking. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients treated with rehabilitation alone after an ACL injury. Fourteen patients (35.9 (19-56) years old) who suffered an ACL injury treated with rehabilitation alone, a mean of 32 months before inclusion, were interviewed. The interview transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach. The experiences of patients treated with rehabilitation after an ACL injury were summarised in one theme: 'Is the grass greener on the other side? Context characterised by uncertainty', supported by three main categories and nine subcategories. Uncertainty permeated the context of all levels of knee-related life following ACL injury: (1) in the past, patients felt uncertainty regarding treatment choices, (2) in the present, patients felt uncertainty regarding their physical capacity and knee self-efficacy, and (3) for the future, patients felt uncertainty regarding what might happen. With few exceptions, patients' experiences after an ACL injury treated with rehabilitation alone are characterised by uncertainty regarding their physical function, psychological impairments and possible future limitation of knee function. Uncertainty is experienced by patients in the past, the present and the future. Patients experience the knee as a symptomatic obstacle and need to adapt the physical activity to the presence of symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramana Piussi
- Health and Rehabilitation, University of Gothenburg Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Goteborg, Sweden
- Sportrehab Sports Rehabilitation Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rebecca Simonson
- Health and Rehabilitation, University of Gothenburg Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Goteborg, Sweden
- Sportrehab Sports Rehabilitation Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Moa Kjellander
- Sportrehab Sports Rehabilitation Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Andreas Ivarsson
- Centre of Research on Welfare, Health and Sport, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden
- Swedish Olympic Committee, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Jon Karlsson
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Kristian Samuelsson
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eric Hamrin Senorski
- Health and Rehabilitation, University of Gothenburg Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Goteborg, Sweden
- Sportrehab Sports Rehabilitation Clinic, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Swedish Olympic Committee, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shimodaira H, Tensho K, Koyama S, Iwaasa T, Kumaki D, Yoshida K, Horiuchi H, Takahashi J. Effect of a new remnant-preserving technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on MRI-based graft maturity: a comparison cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022; 31:2394-2405. [PMID: 36181522 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07180-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the effects of a new remnant-preserving double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) technique, focused on avoiding remnant damage and preserving continuity of remnants, on graft maturity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS A total of 169 patients were divided into three groups: 41 in the preservation group, 70 in the resection group, and 58 in the absent group. In the preservation group, rather than passing the graft through the remnant tissue, the graft was reconstructed such that the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles sandwiched the remnant to avoid damage to the remnant and maintain its continuity. Based on 1-year postoperative MRI, the grafts were divided into three regions: distal, middle, and proximal. The signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of each region of interest was calculated to evaluate the signal intensity of the graft and was compared among the three groups. Additionally, to identify factors influencing graft maturity, a multiple regression analysis was performed with SNQ as the dependent variable and patient demographics, bone morphology, and surgical factors as independent variables. RESULTS In a three-group comparison of mean SNQs, the distal region was 3.3 ± 3.4, 8.9 ± 8.3, and 9.0 ± 8.6 (p < 0.001), the middle region was 5.3 ± 3.7, 10.9 ± 11.1, and 11.3 ± 10.2 (p < 0.001), and the proximal region was 6.8 ± 4.5, 11.1 ± 8.8, and 11.7 ± 10.8 (p = 0.017), in order of the preservation, resection, and absent groups, respectively. That indicated that the remnant-preserving ACLR was more hypointense than ACLR with remnant resection or absent in all three regions. Multiple regression analysis showed that remnant preservation remained the relevant factor affecting SNQ of the graft at the distal and middle levels. CONCLUSION The new remnant-preserving anatomic double-bundle ACLR had significantly better graft maturity, measured by SNQ on MRI, than the remnant resection and absent groups. The remnant procedure was the relevant factor affecting graft maturity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Shimodaira
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Keiji Tensho
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan.
| | - Suguru Koyama
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Tomoya Iwaasa
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Daiki Kumaki
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Kazushige Yoshida
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Horiuchi
- Department of Rehabilitation, Shinshu University Hospital, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
| | - Jun Takahashi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1, Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kaarre J, Zsidai B, Narup E, Horvath A, Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Grassi A, Musahl V, Samuelsson K. Scoping Review on ACL Surgery and Registry Data. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2022; 15:385-393. [PMID: 35829892 PMCID: PMC9463418 DOI: 10.1007/s12178-022-09775-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review To present an overview of registry-based anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) research, as well as provide insight into the future of ACL registries. Recent Findings During the past decades, the ACL registries have had an important role in increasing our understanding of patients with ACL injuries and their treatment. The registry data has deepened our understanding of factors that have been associated with an increased risk of sustaining an ACL injury and for evaluation of treatment factors and their impact on patient-related outcomes. Recently, registry-based ACL research using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) has shown potential to create clinical decision-making tools and analyzing outcomes. Thus, standardization of collected data between the registries is needed to facilitate the further collaboration between registries and to facilitate the interpretation of results and subsequently improve the possibilities for implementation of AI and ML in the registry-based research. Summary Several studies have been based on the current ACL registries providing an insight into the epidemiology of ACL injuries as well as outcomes following ACL reconstruction. However, the current ACL registries are facing future challenges, and thus, new methods and techniques are needed to ensure further good quality and clinical applicability of study findings based on ACL registry data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janina Kaarre
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. .,Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center (SSMC), Gothenburg, Sweden. .,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - Bálint Zsidai
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center (SSMC), Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Eric Narup
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center (SSMC), Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alexandra Horvath
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center (SSMC), Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eleonor Svantesson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center (SSMC), Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Eric Hamrin Senorski
- Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center (SSMC), Gothenburg, Sweden.,Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Alberto Grassi
- IIa Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Volker Musahl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kristian Samuelsson
- Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Sahlgrenska Sports Medicine Center (SSMC), Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|