Hospital outbreak of cross-infection due to Staphylococcus pyogenes phage type 80

Evolutionary blueprint for host- and niche-adaptation in Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex CC30

Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex CC30 has caused infectious epidemics for more than 60 years, and, therefore, provides a model system to evaluate how evolution has influenced the disease potential of closely related strains. In previous multiple genome comparisons, phylogenetic analyses established three major branches that evolved from a common ancestor. Clade 1, comprised of historic pandemic phage type 80/81 methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), and Clade 2 comprised of contemporary community acquired methicillin resistant S. aureus (CA-MRSA) were hyper-virulent in murine infection models. Conversely, Clade 3 strains comprised of contemporary hospital associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) and clinical MSSA exhibited attenuated virulence, due to common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP's) that abrogate production of α-hemolysin Hla, and interfere with signaling of the accessory gene regulator agr. We have now completed additional in silico genome comparisons of 15 additional CC30 genomes in the public domain, to assess the hypothesis that Clade 3 has evolved to favor niche adaptation. In addition to SNP's that influence agr and hla, other common traits of Clade 3 include tryptophan auxotrophy due to a di-nucleotide deletion within trpD, a premature stop codon within isdH encoding an immunogenic cell surface protein involved in iron acquisition, loss of a genomic toxin–antitoxin (TA) addiction module, acquisition of S. aureus pathogenicity islands SaPI4, and SaPI2 encoding toxic shock syndrome toxin tst, and increased copy number of insertion sequence ISSau2, which appears to target transcription terminators. Compared to other Clade 3 MSSA, S. aureus MN8, which is associated with Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome, exhibited a unique ISSau2 insertion, and enhanced production of toxic shock syndrome toxin encoded by SaPI2. Cumulatively, our data support the notion that Clade 3 strains are following an evolutionary blueprint toward niche-adaptation.

Negotiating hospital infections: the debate between ecological balance and eradication strategies in British hospitals, 1947-1969

This paper reviews and contrasts two strategies of infection control that emerged in response to the growing use of antibiotics within British hospitals, c. 1946-1969. At this time, we argue, the hospital became an arena within which representatives of the medical sciences and clinical practices contested not so much the content of knowledge but the way that knowledge translated into practice. Key to our story are the conceptual assumptions about antibiotics put forward by clinicians, on the one hand, and microbiologists on the other. The former embraced antibiotics as the latest weapon in their fight to eradicate disease. For clinicians, the use of antibiotics were utilised within a conceptual frame that prioritised the value of the individual patient before them. Microbiologists, in contrast, understood antibiotics quite differently. They adopted a complex understanding of the way antibiotics functioned within the hospital environment that emphasised the relational and ecological aspects of their use. Despite their broader environmental focus, microbiologists focus on the ways in which bacteria travelled led to ever greater emphasis to be placed on the "healthy" body which, having been exposed to antibiotics, became a dangerous carrier of resistant staphylococcal strains. The surrounding debate regarding the appropriate use of antibiotics reveals the complex relationship between hospital, the medical sciences and clinical practice. We conclude that the history of hospital infections invites a more fundamental reflection on global hospital cultures, antibiotic prescription practices, and the fostering of an interdisciplinary spirit among the professional groups living and working in the hospital.

A study of post-operative wound infection in a provincial general hospital

1. A survey of post-operative wound infection was done in 1959–60 on 559 surgical patients admitted to a provincial general hospital.

2. Clinical evidence of post-operative wound sepsis was observed in 71(12·7 %), suppuration in 51(9·1 %) and staphyloccocal wound sepsis in 48 (8·6 %).

3. Seventeen of the patients died in hospital. Although 5 of these had septic wounds, the sepsis did not appear to have been the cause of death.

4. Contrary to some reported findings, the post-operative wound sepsis rate was considerably lower in patients who were staphylococcal nasal carriers on admission to hospital than in non-carriers. Nine out of 153 carriers (5·9 %) developed wound sepsis and 36 out of 385 non-carriers (9·4 %). When allowance is made for 3 highly probable self-infections, the incidence of wound cross-infection was 3 % in carriers and 9 % in non-carriers.

5. The excess of sepsis in non-carriers could not be explained in terms of different age or sex distribution in carrier and non-carrier groups, nor by differences in the types of operation undergone or in degree of exposure to staphylococcal contamination.

6. The excess of sepsis in non-carriers was accounted for by the patients whose wounds had drains rather than by clean-stitched wounds.

7. Those carriers who harboured a staphylococcus of the 80/81 group in the nose on admission to hospital had a higher incidence of wound sepsis than carriers of other phage types or staphylococcus.

8. Three probable instances of wound self-infection occurred, and in the early stages of the survey at least 5 wound infections were probably directly caused by two members of the theatre staff carrying staphylococci of the 80/81 group in the nose and with existing skin sepsis or a recent history.

9. The survey findings and a study of the literature suggested: (a) that the acquisition of a nasal staphylococcus in hospital was probably, as a rule, evidence of exposure to staphylococeal contamination and not a determinant of wound sepsis, unless the patient also became a skin carrier; (b) that a small proportion of patients are self-infected, some are directly infected by theatre personnel, and the wounds of other patients are directly or indirectly contaminated by staphylococci from the ward environment; (c) that wool or cotton fluff contaminated with staphyloccoci may cause wound sepsis by falling into open wounds and as foreign bodies induce a significant reduction in the minimum pus-forming dose of staphylococci; (d) that before ascribing high or low sepsis rates to factors such as the nasal carrier state, the relevant groups should be shown not to differ materially in respect of other factors known to influence the incidence of wound sepsis.

We gratefully acknowledge the help and encouragement of our surgical colleagues Mr H. P. Guerrier, Mr P. J. W. Monks, Mr J. Macpherson and Mr C. C. Jeffery; and of Dr C. P. Warren, consultant pathologist to the Torbay Hospital, Mrs M. Stamp, Matron, Sister E. M. Cottrell, first Infection Control Sister at the Torbay Hospital, and her successor Mr H. Street.

Acknowledgement is also due to the South Western Regional Hospital Board for its encouragement and for a research grant for technical aid, without which the surveys described would not have been possible.

Guidelines for the prophylaxis and treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the UK

These evidence-based guidelines have been produced after a literature review of the treatment and prophylaxis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. The guidelines were further informed by antibiotic susceptibility data on MRSA from the UK. Recommendations are given for the treatment of common infections caused by MRSA, elimination of MRSA from carriage sites and prophylaxis of surgical site infection. There are several antibiotics currently available that are suitable for use in the management of this problem and potentially useful new agents are continuing to emerge.

Primary postoperative wound infection due to Staphylococcus pyogenes

Using S. pyogenes as a tracer organism, an examination of the importance of air-borne infection of clean wounds in the modern, plenum-ventilated operating room has been made. It appears that, for most surgical procedures, additional ultra-clean air installations are not necessary. It has been shown that even if the air is sterile, the skin remains a possible source of infection. This is especially so as far as the patient's skin is concerned. It will remain so, since the skin cannot be sterilized. Indeed, until the ecology of the skin is better understood, rigorous efforts directed toward its disinfection may compromise its inherent defense mechanisms and its protective bacterial flora. It will be argued by some that operating rooms with ultraclean air should be afforded for certain specialized procedures in sugery; for example, those in which prosthetic materials are being implanted or in which the patient's immune mechanisms are depressed. Although not disagreeing with this, I wish to note that the only controlled trial on this aspect of surgery that exists to date shows no advantage for patients randomly apportioned to have hip arthroplasty, either in an isolator or in the same modern operating room but without the isolator. From this experience, I believe that any further trial of this nature, if it is to be controlled to a similar high level, will require very large numbers of patients to show even a marginal advantage for ultraclean air or isolator installations over the modern, plenum-ventilated and meticulously managed operating suite. The verdict on the need to install ultraclean air plant for operating rooms must, therefore, be couched in the third alternative that exists under Scots Law-- "not proved." I suggest the money could be better spent on devising methods to keep skin pathogens out of surgical wounds. Perhaps more urgently, there is a need to discover how to increase the defense mechanisms of the wound milieu to implanted harmful bacteria. There is also a pressing need to improve the ward environment with the aim of diminishing secondary infections of surgical wounds.