Does Poliomyelitis affect Intellectual Incapacity?

Interventions for treating scabies

BACKGROUND

Scabies is an intensely itchy parasitic infection of the skin caused by the Sarcoptes scabiei mite. It is a common public health problem with an estimated global prevalence of 300 million cases. Serious adverse effects have been reported for some drugs used to treat scabies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate topical and systemic drugs for treating scabies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In February 2007, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 1), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and INDMED. In March 2007, we also searched the grey literature and sources for registered trials. We also checked the reference lists of retrieved studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of drug treatments for scabies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Results were presented as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals and data combined where appropriate.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty small trials involving 2392 people were included. One trial was placebo controlled, 16 compared two or more drug treatments, two compared treatment regimens, and one compared different drug vehicles.Fewer treatment failures occurred by day seven with oral ivermectin in one small trial (55 participants). Topical permethrin appeared more effective than oral ivermectin (85 participants, 1 trial), topical crotamiton (194 participants, 2 trials), and topical lindane (753 participants, 5 trials). Permethrin also appeared more effective in reducing itch persistence than either crotamiton (94 participants, 1 trial) or lindane (490 participants, 2 trials). One small trial did not detect a difference between permethrin (a synthetic pyrethroid) and a natural pyrethrin-based topical treatment (40 participants). No significant difference was detected in the number of treatment failures between crotamiton and lindane (100 participants, 1 trial), lindane and sulfur (68 participants, 1 trial), benzyl benzoate and sulfur (158 participants, 1 trial), and benzyl benzoate and natural synergized pyrethrins (240 participants, 1 trial); all were topical treatments. No trials of malathion were identified. No serious adverse events were reported. A number of trials reported skin reactions in participants randomized to topical treatments. There were occasional reports of headache, abdominal pain, diarrhoea, vomiting, and hypotension.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Topical permethrin appears to be the most effective treatment for scabies. Ivermectin appears to be an effective oral treatment. More research is needed on the effectiveness of malathion, particularly when compared to permethrin, and on the management of scabies in an institutional setting and at a community level.

Interventions for treating scabies

BACKGROUND

Scabies is a common public health problem with an estimated prevalence of 300 million. Infestation can cause considerable discomfort and intense itching. Severe adverse effects have been reported for some drugs used to treat scabies.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess the effects and toxicity of topical and systemic drug treatment for scabies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase, military records, traditional medicine databases. We also contacted international specialist centres and drug manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of any drug treatment for scabies. Tolerability and toxicity were sought in any study of humans taking any drug treatments for scabies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials were included (7 compared drug treatments, 2 compared treatment regimes, 1 compared the drug vehicle and 1 was a community intervention). Compared with placebo in one small trial, ivermectin was associated with a significant higher clinical cure rate at seven days. Permethrin appeared to be more effective than crotamiton for clinical and parasitic cure rates. Permethrin appeared to be better than gamma benzene hexachloride for clinical cure rates in two small trials but had no advantage in the largest trial (test for heterogeneity p< 0.001). Permethrin also appeared more effective in reducing itch persistance than gamma benzene hexachloride. There appeared to be no difference in clinical cure rates between crotamiton and gamma benzene hexachloride. Single trials assessed: the effectiveness of oral versus topical treatment (ivermectin versus benzyl benzoate); treatment vehicle (pork fat versus cold cream); and mass community treatment (ivermectin) but were too small to demonstrate an effect. No randomised trials of malathion were identified. Serious adverse drug reactions (including death and convulsions) have been reported in other studies of scabies drugs, most notably gamma benzene hexachoride and ivermectin.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The evidence that permethrin is more effective than gamma benzene hexachloride is inconsistent. Permethrin appears to have less potential serious drugs reactions than gamma benzene hexachloride although this is not derived from trial data. More research is needed of the safety and effectiveness of ivermectin and malathion compared to permethrin, on community management, and on different regimes and vehicles for topical treatment.