Rectal impalement with perforation of the bladder

Transrectal impalement of an incense stick in a child presenting as foreign body in the urinary bladder

The diversity of objects that can be found in the urinary bladder often surpasses the urologist's imagination and mostly they are introduced per urethrally. Impalement injuries of the rectum with bladder perforation have been rarely reported. A high index of clinical suspicion is required to make the diagnosis of bladder perforation while assessing patients presenting with rectal impalement. In this interesting case, a young male child presented with haematuria and dysuria. He had a history of accidentally sitting on an agarbatti (Indian incense stick) stand while playing, followed by perianal pain which subsided spontaneously. Next day he presented with haematuria and dysuria. Clinical examination was inconclusive. On thorough investigation, a linear echogenic foreign body was found in the urinary bladder. The child was operated and the foreign body (incense stick) was removed. This is the first reported case of rectal impalement injury with incense stick, migrated to the urinary bladder in a 2-year-old child.

Penetrating injury of the vagina, bladder and omentum in a woman with 5 months gestation: case report and review of the literature

Intra-peritoneal bladder and visceral injuries from impalement of the perineum in women are exceedingly rare. This kind of injury has not been previously reported in a pregnant woman. The evaluation and surgical management of a pregnant woman is a challenging surgical problem. Preoperative evaluation of the uterus and fetus is balanced with minimal use of radiographic studies. Multiple organs can be damaged with this type of injury, necessitating careful evaluation and operative planning. We report a rare case of transvaginal impalement injury with through-and-through bladder rupture and intra-peritoneal injury in a 5 months pregnant woman. We discuss diagnostic and management strategies and review the literature.

Rectal impalement with bladder perforation: A review from a single institution

Context:

Impalement injuries of the rectum with bladder perforation have been rarely reported. Such lesions have been associated with increased postoperative morbidity. A well-conducted preoperative evaluation of the lesions tends to prevent such complications.

Aims:

To increase awareness about patients with rectal impalement that involve bladder injuries and to examine the significance of thorough clinical examination and complementary investigation for these patients’ management.

Materials and Methods:

Retrospectively, we identified three patients with rectal impalement and bladder perforation treated in University Hospital Hassan II, Fez, Morocco. We recorded the symptoms, subsequent management, and further follow-up for each patient. All available variables of published cases were reviewed and analyzed.

Results:

Evident urologic symptoms were present in only one patient. Bladder perforation was suspected in two other patients on the basis of anterior rectal perforation in digital exam. Retrograde uroscanner could definitely confirm the diagnosis of bladder perforation. Fecal and urine diversion was the basis of the treatment. No postoperative complications were noted. We have reviewed 14 previous reports. They are presented mainly with urine drainage through the rectum. Radiologic investigation (retrograde cystography and retrograde uroscanner) confirmed bladder perforation in 10 patients (71.4%). Unnecessary laparotomy was performed in six patients (42.8%). Fecal diversion and urinary bladder decompression using urethral catheter were the most performed procedures in bladder perforation [6/14 patients (42.8%)]. No specific postoperative complications were reported.

Conclusions:

A high index of clinical suspicion is required to make the diagnosis of bladder perforation while assessing patients presenting with rectal impalement. Meticulous preoperative assessment is the clue of successful management.

Extraperitoneal bladder rupture secondary to rectal impalement

Impalement injury to both the urinary bladder and the rectum is a rare occurrence. A 45-year-old man was referred to our hospital because he had been stabbed through the internal femoral skin by a steel bar. Retrograde cystography and computed tomography failed to demonstrate bladder rupture. We carried out cystoscopy (CS) because of the existence of gross hematuria and found a penetrating wound in the posterior wall. Colon fiberscopy revealed two wounds in the rectum, one of which communicated with the bladder. A diagnostic laparoscopy revealed no associated injuries in the peritoneal cavity. Vesicorectal injury was diagnosed and treatment included transanal closure of fistulas and indwelling ureteral and urethral catheters. Postoperative CS revealed complete closure of the injury.

Intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal bladder rupture secondary to rectal impalement

A 9-year-old boy presented with rectal impalement injury associated with through-and-through bladder rupture and intraperitoneal communication. We believe this to be the first reported case of rectal impalement causing an intraperitoneal bladder rupture.

Penetrating anorectal injury. An unrecognized hazard for surgeons

Accidental anorectal injuries are becoming less common. This case, where impalement of the anorectal region by the shaft of a stool occurred to a junior surgeon at work, illustrates a previously unrecognized menace.