Shake test on amniotic fluid and the respiratory distress syndrome

Current perspectives in assessment of fetal pulmonary surfactant status with amniotic fluid

In recent years, improvements in analytical methodology and clinical management of maternal-fetal diseases have altered the understanding of data from amniotic fluid analysis. Delays in phospholipid production or lung function are not currently reported in maternal diabetes. Fetal lung function following glucocorticoid therapy or premature membrane rupture is uncoupled from amniotic fluid phospholipid concentrations, which do not have the usual significance in these circumstances. Phosphatidylglycerol (PG) is present prior to the usual time it is detected by thin layer chromatography (TLC) methods, which vary in sensitivity for PG. Consequently, the significance of its "absence" is highly varied. These observations are discussed in light of the earlier methods and data, along with new perceptions of the functions of the individual phospholipids and apoproteins, the regulatory mechanism of surfactant production, and the relationship of amniotic fluid components to neonatal lung function.

Methods of evaluating fetal lung maturity

Respiratory distress syndrome occurs in infants born with immature lungs. The immature fetal lung lacks an adequate supply of surfactant, a phospholipid-rich substance which is produced in the type II cells of the alveolar epithelium. In the fetus, surfactant is secreted into the potential air spaces of the lung and passes into the amniotic fluid as gestation proceeds. It is now clear that most methods currently in use for assessing fetal lung maturity depend on the detection of a sudden release of surfactant into the amniotic fluid as the lung reaches a critical stage of maturity. These methods, which include the lecithin/sphingomyelin ratio, the lung profile, total phospholipid or lecithin concentration, fluorescence depolarization, lamellar body phospholipid concentration, and the "shake" test, are reviewed in the light of recent understanding of the nature of surfactant. In assessing each method, we have examined possible sources of error in performing the test in the laboratory, factors which could theoretically limit its ability to reflect the state of fetal lung maturity and current information regarding its reliability, in terms of clinical performance. Guidelines for future research in this area are also suggested.