Mortality in elderly patients admitted for respite care

Optimising residential respite care in nursing homes: Current problems and solutions for a better future

AIM

To examine whether residential respite care increases the risk of harm to older people and suggest directions for future research and policy.

BACKGROUND

Respite care is a vital part of the aged care system that supports dependent older people and their caregivers to continue residing in the community. There is little research determining whether an older person experiences harm from residential respite.

METHODS

This commentary considered conceptual research and existing empirical evidence to determine whether the risk of death was greater during residential respite care for older people.

RESULTS

Evidence on the mortality in contemporary respite care is extremely limited with the majority of studies published almost 20 years ago and focussing on planned respite admissions. The evidence available has limitations in design and lacks comparison groups and key variables relevant to outcome and risk stratification. Nonetheless, it provides a theoretical basis supporting that the potential for harm and mortality may be increased during a residential respite care admission.

CONCLUSIONS

The question of whether residential respite care presents significant risks to older people remains unanswered. Substantial changes in practice since the last century make the existing empirical evidence redundant. However, there is much to learn by reflecting on omissions of important details from these studies.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

A full and objective understanding of the harm associated with residential respite care for older people requires reopening and re-examining this area with robust research. Informed professional nursing practice and policy requires an empirical evidence basis to residential respite care.

'Time and space': carers' views about respite care

The needs of carers have become more visible since the Carers Recognition & Service Act (1995). Although the demand for respite care is apparent it has proven much harder to establish its precise benefits using quantitative analysis. Some studies have shown no benefit at all to carers and the only clear benefit to emerge from more elaborate randomized controlled trials is a modest reduction in caregiver distress. Quantitative instruments may miss some of the benefits. We embarked on a qualitative study to determine what carers themselves said about the benefits or otherwise of respite care. Twenty-three carers were interviewed about their experiences of respite care and qualitative themes were derived from the transcripts of these semi-structured interviews. Caring was conceptualized in terms of costs (physical exhaustion, feelings of despair, lack of recognition and financial losses) and benefits (a sense of closeness to the dependant and enhanced self-esteem). Respite care emerged as a service that offered 'normality' and 'freedom' to the carer. Conversely, it was also perceived in critical terms if there was any shortfall between the quality of professional care compared to their own informal care. However high the quality of respite care, there was the uncomfortable realization by many that this care might be viewed as a signal to the patient, the family and the local community that they were no longer able to cope. Respite care was perceived as a service which, on balance, facilitated informal care and enabled care to continue at home for longer than would otherwise have been possible. The particular component of this service that was most valued was the option of a home-sitting service.

Do 'social relief' admissions have any effect on patients or their care-givers?

Dependent patients and their care-givers were studied before and 1 week after a social relief admission in order to assess the effects on physical and psychological problems. Data about care-givers stress and mental health were gathered, as well as patient data. Patients' self-care abilities improved slightly but care requirements remained constant. Care-giver stress levels did not change, but there was a highly significant improvement in their mental health. The results suggest that social relief admissions enabled care-givers to continue to look after very dependent people in the community.

Should hospices offer respite admissions to patients with motor neurone disease?

The provision of inpatient respite care for patients with motor neurone disease (MND) in hospices is variable. Some institutions are concerned about accepting patients who may need long-term care. Some see 'respite' care as simply a short residential stay with little nursing or medical input being necessary. Others, however, feel that respite offers the potential for palliative care and should be provided within the spectrum of a hospice service. This retrospective study examines that group of MND patients requesting respite care in terms of demographic details, problems identified and medical and nursing interventions made during respite admissions. The results indicate a great need for symptom management in these patients as well as co-ordination of future community care. Most patients were discharged home after respite admissions and the median stay in the hospice (15 days) was identical to that of cancer patients. We conclude that respite admissions to the hospice were valuable both for MND patients and their carers. Units not currently involved in this work may wish to reconsider their position.