Antithrombotic treatment and atrial fibrillation

A survey of atrial fibrillation in general practice: the West Birmingham Atrial Fibrillation Project

BACKGROUND

The management of atrial fibrillation (AF) has changed substantially in recent years, especially with a greater appreciation of the prophylactic role of antithrombotic therapy against stroke. There is therefore a need for further information on the prevalence of AF in Britain, the prevalence of (and contraindications to) anticoagulant treatment, and the factors that influence doctors' decisions in treating AF, including the investigation of patients with this arrhythmia.

AIM

To investigate the prevalence, clinical features and management of patients with AF in a general practice setting.

METHOD

Cross-sectional survey of patients using treatment prescriptions and clinical records in two general practices from the west of Birmingham (serving a patient population of 16,519) where 4522 subjects (27.4%) were aged > or = 50 years.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven (2.4%) patients who were aged > or = 50 years were found to be in AF (42 males; mean age 76.6, SD 9.1); 77.5% were Caucasian, 2.7% Afro-Caribbean, 0.9% Asian, and 0.9% mixed race; in 20 cases there was no information on ethnicity. Of the AF patients, 5.4% were aged 50-60 years, 16.2% aged 61-70 years, 20.7% aged 71-75 years, 20.7% aged 76-80 years, 24.3% aged 81-85 years, and 12.6% aged > 85 years old, with female patients being significantly older than males. Eighty-one patients (73%) had chronic AF, while 30 patients (27%) had paroxysmal AF. The most common associated factors were hypertension (36.9%) and ischaemic heart disease (28.8%), with no obvious cause for AF in six patients. Cardiac failure was associated with AF in 34 patients (30.6%), and stroke had occurred in 29 patients (18%). Only 20 patients (18%) had had an echocardiogram, 26 (23.4%) a chest X-ray, and 58 (52.3%) thyroid function test. Only 30.6% had ever presented to hospital practice. Warfarin was prescribed to 40 patients (36%), with anticoagulation intensity monitoring by the general practitioner (GP) in three cases (7.5%), by a hospital clinic in 30 (75%), and by both GP and hospital in seven cases (17.5%). Of those not anticoagulated (n = 71), only 12 patients (16.9%) had contraindications to warfarin therapy. Patients treated with warfarin were younger than those who were not prescribed warfarin (71.3 versus 79.6 years, P < 0.001). Aspirin was being prescribed for 21 patients (18.9%), primarily for previous myocardial infarction. Only five patients (4.5%) had ever had attempted cardioversion.

CONCLUSION

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in general practice, and is commonly associated with hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and heart failure. There is a suboptimal application of standard investigations and use of antithrombotic therapy or attempted cardioversion; and few patients have presented to hospital practice. Guidelines on the management of this common arrhythmia in general practice are required.

Service provision and use of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation

Several large trials have shown that the risk of stroke in patients with non-valvar atrial fibrillation is reduced by treatment with warfarin. Implementing this research evidence requires not only an understanding of the trials' results and of the changes that they imply for clinicians' treatment decisions but also an appreciation of the organisation, quantity, and quality of services required to support these changes. Understanding of these implications is crucial for developing services that allow changes in practice to produce reductions in stroke incidence while minimising the risks of treatment. This article considers the developments in service provision that will probably be required to support the changes in clinical practice suggested by the trials' results. These services will be provided largely by doctors, and their development has implications for doctors in both primary and secondary care.

Non-anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important risk factor for stroke and anticoagulation is now indicated in many patients at increased risk. Studies however have shown that many patients at risk are not anticoagulated for reasons that are not well explored. We identified prospectively the reasons for non-anticoagulation in patients with AF in 94 consecutive hospital patients with cardiac or cerebrovascular disease who had AF. Patients with intermittent or lone AF and < 60 years were excluded n = 16. The remaining group had a mean age of 76 +/- 7 years with a mental test score of 7.4 +/- 2 (normal 10), 31 lived alone and they lived an average of 14 +/- 11 miles from the hospital laboratory. The reasons for non-anticoagulation overlapped and were: medical in 29: cognitive impairment/compliance in 32: and monitoring problems in 50. Anticoagulation for AF in the elderly is a complex enterprise which must take into account social and cognitive as well as medical issues.

Antithrombotic therapy prescribed for patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation

Patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation have a fivefold increased risk of stroke. Warfarin reduces this risk by approximately two thirds, but evidence for benefit from aspirin is less compelling. We assessed whether our current practice reflects the message of the trials. In a retrospective case record study we reviewed notes of 131 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), mean age 79 (range 53-95) years, admitted to a medical unit (72) or geriatric assessment unit (59). Thirty-two patients had paroxysmal AF. Of 115 patients with nonrheumatic AF, 36 (31%) had one or more recorded contraindication to anti-coagulation. Although 79 patients (69%) had no recorded contraindication to warfarin, only 2 took warfarin and 15 aspirin prior to admission. Ten patients commenced warfarin and 8 aspirin before discharge. Thirty-nine patients (53%) without contraindication, were discharged without antithrombotic therapy. Despite evidence to support anticoagulating patients with non-rheumatic AF, this rarely occurs.