Access to heart surgery for smokers. Smokers waste valuable resources

"If there were a war tomorrow, we'd find the money": contrasting perspectives on the rationing of health care

In spite of the substantial academic effort being devoted to the subject of health care rationing, there is little clarity about the views of those working in health care who have to implement rationing nor about the views of citizens who are (potentially) affected by the rationing of care. This paper reports the findings of a study conducted using focus groups and semi-structured interviews to explore and compare beliefs about rationing among citizens and those with a role in the health service (service informants) within the context of health care provision in the UK. Citizen and service informants both identified external pressures on the resources available for health care including technological improvement, the ageing population and increasing public expectations. Citizens, however, also identified such factors as the political choice to provide insufficient funds to the health service and the wasteful use of resources that are available. The predominant view was that these latter factors were amenable to change and thus that there are alternatives to the rationing of care. Some citizens accepted that some health care rationing might be necessary. Service informants, on the other hand, were cynical about prospects of increased funding and viewed further reductions in management as untenable. For them, rationing was an inevitability to be managed. A number of these informants felt that rationing should become more explicit, suggesting that openness made rationing both more democratic and more practical. Others, however, believed that explicit rationing would have a number of uncomfortable implications. The paper concludes by suggesting that if rationing is to become more explicit, its inevitability, as perceived by those working within health care, will have to be communicated to citizens.

Smoking is not a predictor of mortality and morbidity following coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine the significant differences in preoperative and operative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes in patients having coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) who are smokers and in those who are not smokers.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively in all (2916) patients having their first CABG. The patients were cared for in a regional medical center by private physicians. No operations were denied because of smoking status. Smokers differed from nonsmokers in several characteristics.

RESULTS

Analysis of morbidity and mortality showed no instance in which smokers fared worse than nonsmokers. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that smoking was not predictive of mortality. Smoking was not predictive of morbidity except that it was predictive of less probability of need for intra-aortic balloon pump (7.5% in nonsmokers and 4.7% in smokers). We then created groups of smokers and nonsmokers that were individually matched for age and sex. Analysis of the matched groups of smokers and nonsmokers showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence or magnitude of preoperative and operative factors except that recent myocardial infarction was more common in smokers. Nonsmokers had greater weight, body mass index (obesity), and ejection fraction. There was no difference in smokers and nonsmokers in mortality or morbidity at the 99% confidence level.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that there is no need to delay CABG for the patients who are smokers.

Expanding access to coronary artery bypass surgery: who stands to gain?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the perceptions of general practitioners (GPs) about the benefits of coronary artery bypass surgery, in terms of gains in life expectancy, for different groups of patients.

DESIGN

A questionnaire survey of all GPs in Northern Ireland.

SETTING

A survey conducted collaboratively by the departments of public health medicine in each of the four health boards in the province, serving a total population of 1.5 million.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The median and mean gain in life expectancy perceived by groups of doctors for smoking and non-smoking male and female 55 year old patients. The percentage of 50 year old and 70 year old non-smoking patients considered likely to have their lives extended with bypass surgery. Differences were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test for unpaired samples and the Wilcoxon signed rank tests for paired.

RESULTS

541 GPs replied (response rate 56%). The median (and mean) perceived gain in life expectancy after cardiac surgery for non-smoking 55 year old subjects was 120 (104) months for men and 120 (112) months for women (z = 6.42; P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon signed rank test). For male and female smokers of the same age, the perceived gains were 48 (47) and 60 (52) months respectively (z = 6.72; P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon signed ranks test), both figures being significantly different than for non-smokers. The median (and mean) percentage of patients that the doctors considered would have their lives extended by bypass surgery was 70 (64) of every 100 "young" patients and 40 (42) of every 100 "old" patients, (z = 16.2; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results point to a significant overestimation of the benefits of coronary artery bypass surgery by GPs in Northern Ireland and to a need to develop guidelines for referral.