ABC of atrial fibrillation. Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

External Cardioversion in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation A Reappraisal of the Effects of Electrode Pad Position and Transthoracic Impedance on Cardioversion Success

The optimal methods to perform external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) have yet to be conclusively determined. This study was performed to examine the relative efficacy of different pad positions on cardioversion success and the relationship between the transthoracic impedance (TTI) and energy requirement for AF cardioversion. Seventy patients with persistent AF undergoing elective cardioversion were randomly assigned to an electrode pad position situated either over the ventricular apex-right infraclavicular area (AL group, n = 31 ) or over the right lower sternal border-left infrascapular area close to the spine (AP group, n = 39). Energy was delivered at an initial 100 joules (J) and then increased to 150 J, 200 J, 300 J, and 360 J if needed. Energy and TTI readings were recorded. Mean TTI was significantly lower in the AP group than in the AL group. However, the cumulative success rates at each energy level were similar in the two groups (23% vs 19.4%, 41% vs 45.2%, 66.7% vs 74.2%, 79.5% vs 77.4%, and 84.6% vs 83.9% at 100 J, 150 J, 200 J, 300 J and 360 J, respectively). In the AP group, converters showed slightly lower TTI compared to nonconverters. In the AL group, converters showed significantly lower TTI compared to nonconverters. However, for all patients as a group, TTI was the only predictor for cardioversion success and showed a significant relationship to the energy required for cardioversion, which can be described by a quadratic equation. Rather than pad position. TTI is the single factor that significantly affects cardioversion and correlates with energy requirement. The relationship between energy requirement and TTI further allows estimation of energy requirements to achieve a successfil cardioversion.

Initial energy setting, outcome and efficiency in direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to design a more efficient protocol for the electrical cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for electrical cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias recommend starting with low energy shocks, which are often ineffective.

METHODS

We recorded the sequence of shocks in 1,838 attempts at cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) and 678 attempts at cardioversion for atrial flutter. These data were used to calculate the probability of success for each shock of a standard series and the probability of success with a single shock at each intensity. In 150 cases, a rhythm strip with the time of each shock allowed us to calculate the time expended on unsuccessful shocks.

RESULTS

We analyzed the effects of 5,152 shocks delivered to patients for AF and 1,238 shocks delivered to patients for atrial flutter. The probability of success on the first shock in AF of > 30 days duration was 5.5% at < 200 J, 35% at 200 J and 56% at 360 J. In atrial flutter, an initial 100 J shock worked in 68%. In AF of >30 days duration, shocks of < 200 J had a 6.1% probability of success; this fell to 2.2% with a duration >180 days. In those with AF for >180 days, the initial use of a 360 J shock was associated with the eventual use of less electrical energy than with an initial shock of < or =100 J (581 +/- 316 J vs. 758 +/- 433 J, p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test).

CONCLUSIONS

An initial energy setting of > or =360 J can achieve cardioversion of AF more efficiently in patients than traditional protocols, particularly with AF of longer duration.

Contemporary utilization of digoxin in patients with atrial fibrillation. Clinical Quality Improvement Network Investigators

OBJECTIVE

To define the contemporary practice patterns of digoxin utilization for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

A retrospective medical records audit of 2490 patients with documented AF, from 12 Canadian hospitals and six outpatient clinics, during fiscal year 1993-1994, was conducted.

RESULTS

There were 1158 women and 1332 men, with a mean age of 72 years; 956 patients were < 70 years of age and 1534 were > or = 70 years old. The majority of patients had nonvalvular AF (75% of those with a documented etiology). Paroxysmal AF (PAF) was documented in 800 patients, 936 had chronic AF, and 754 had new-onset AF. While the prescribing patterns were heterogeneous, the predominant strategy pursued in all subgroups appeared to be that of achieving rate control. Digoxin was the most commonly prescribed medication (79%) and was prescribed for the majority of patients in all subgroups, including patients with PAF (74%) and patients with a history of chronic AF who were currently in sinus rhythm (83%). Only 10% of the patients with PAF who were prescribed digoxin had congestive heart failure. Similarly, less than 25% of the patients with chronic AF who were prescribed digoxin after conversion to sinus rhythm had evidence of heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of clinical trial evidence supporting either a strategy of antiarrhythmic therapy or rate control with anticoagulation, the appropriateness of the observed prescribing practices cannot be judged. However, digoxin is not the best rate-controlling agent for all patients and may be overused in certain subgroups of patients, such as those with PAF and those successfully converted to sinus rhythm.