The third generation oral contraceptive controversy. The evidence shows they are less safe than second generation pills

Oral contraceptives and the periodontium

Oral contraceptives are a safe and effective means of contraception for millions of women worldwide. The first formulations of these drugs contained much higher doses of estrogens and progestins than those available today, and these were associated with an unacceptably high rate of unwanted effects including serious cardiovascular events. In addition, a number of case reports and clinical studies suggested that use of the first generation oral contraceptives was also associated with an increased risk for gingival and/or periodontal disease. Unfortunately, many of these early studies suffered from significant methodological flaws which throw their findings into question. Nonetheless, these studies provided the basis for a perception among the dental profession that oral contraceptives increase the risk for gingivitis and/or periodontitis. Realisation that the adverse events profile of oral contraceptives was dose dependant led to the development of the modern low dose formulations that are in use today. There have been far fewer studies to investigate whether modern oral contraceptives have any impact on the periodontium compared to studies of the early contraceptive formulations, but the quality of the more recent research is undoubtedly better. Following extensive review of the relevant literature and consideration of the historical perspective, the best available evidence strongly supports that oral contraceptives no longer place users at any increased risk for gingivitis or periodontitis. Oral contraceptives should not be viewed as a risk factor for gingival or periodontal disease.

Symmetrical analysis of risk-benefit

To quantify the value of a medical therapy the benefits are weighed against the risks. Effectiveness is defined by objective evidence from predefined endpoints. This benefit is offset against the disadvantage of adverse events. The safety assessment is usually a subjective summary of concerns that can often be neither confirmed nor dismissed. But sometimes a clinical database is so large that a parameter common to both efficacy and safety can be quantified with reasonable certainty: myocardial infarction (MI) is used here as an example. Recently the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed set limits for the incidence of MI as a safety threshold for diabetes treatment. Setting a threshold before something is considered as a safety concern opens the possibility of setting a threshold for clinically important efficacy. When a parameter is common to both safety and efficacy, then logically a unit change in either direction should be of equal weight in the risk and benefit analysis. For example, a doubling in the incidence of myocardial infarction as a safety signal should be given equal weight to the halving of the incidence of myocardial infarction as an efficacy signal. Similarly, if FDA guidance suggests that a less than a 30% increase in the incidence of MI as a safety parameter is considered acceptable, for example for diabetes treatment, when there is no other major toxicity, this opens a debate about a possible inverse threshold for clinical benefit for drugs that reduce a risk factor, such as antihypertensives.

Effect of low-dose combined oral contraceptive on aerobic capacity and anaerobic threshold level in active and sedentary young women

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of long-term use of oral contraceptives (OC) containing 0.20 mg of ethinylestradiol (EE) combined with 0.15 mg of gestodene (GEST) on the peak aerobic capacity and at the anaerobic threshold (AT) level in active and sedentary young women.

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-eight women (23+/-2.1 years old) were divided into four groups - active-OC (G1), active-NOC (G2), sedentary-OC (G3) and sedentary-NOC (G4) - and were submitted to a continuous ergospirometric incremental test on a cycloergometer with 20 to 25 W min(-1) increments. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Level of significance was set at 5%.

RESULTS

The OC use effect for the variables relative and absolute oxygen uptake VO(2) mL kg-(1) min(-1); VO(2), L min(-1), respectively), carbon dioxide output (VCO(2), L min(-1)), ventilation (VE, L min(-1)), heart rate (HR, bpm), respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and power output (W) data, as well as the interaction between OC use and exercise effect on the peak of test and at the AT level did not differ significantly between the active groups (G1 and G2) and the sedentary groups (G3 and G4). As to the exercise effect, for all variables studied, it was noted that the active groups presented higher values for the variables VO(2), VCO(2), VE and power output (p<.05) than the sedentary groups. The RER and HR were similar (p>.05) at the peak and at the AT level between G1 vs. G3 and G2 vs. G4.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term use of OC containing EE 0.20 mg plus GEST 0.15 mg does not affect aerobic capacity at the peak and at the AT level of exercise tests.

Thrombophilias and gynaecology

In gynaecology, women are exposed to sex steroids when using oral contraceptives, hormone replacement therapy or when undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment and ovulation induction. Oral contraceptives and the use of hormone replacement therapy increase the risk of venous thrombosis. The risk is highest in the first year of use and higher among women with clotting defects. Women taking third-generation oral contraceptives have an almost twofold increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with those taking second-generation oral contraceptives. Inherited clotting defects, which are themselves risk factors of venous thrombosis, (e.g. factor V Leiden mutation, deficiency of protein C, protein S or antithrombin, high plasma levels of factor VIII, and prothrombin mutation) appear synergistically increase the risk of venous thrombosis caused by oral contraceptives. Recent studies also point to an interaction between hormone replacement therapy and coagulation defects in causing venous thrombosis. Emerging studies show that in vitro fertilization treatment and ovulation induction are also risk factors for venous thrombosis; the role of coagulation defects in this association is not yet clear.

Changes in prescription patterns of oral contraceptives in a northern Italian province: relation with venous thromboembolism

Oral contraceptives (OC) are a definite risk for venous thrombosis. It is commonly accepted that they cause a fourfold increased risk of thrombosis compared to non-users. The prescription patterns were evaluated from 1990 to 2000 in a northern Italian province (province of Padua). This province is typical of other northern Italian provinces. As a consequence, it can be safely assumed that the observations gathered may apply to the entire north of Italy. During these years, a sharp increase in the use of OC was noted. Furthermore, around 1995 to 1996, a marked switch toward the use of preparations containing third-generation progestins was noted. During the past few years of the observation period, approximately 80% of women use preparations containing third-generation progestins. During the same period, an increased incidence of episodes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was noted. The increase in the prevalence of VTE episodes appeared to be proportional to the increased use of OC, regardless of the type of progestin contained in the oral contraceptive preparations.

Proposal of a flow chart for thrombosis-free oral contraceptive therapy

Oral contraceptive therapy (OCT) is associated with a fourfold increase in the risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Women with congenital defects have a much higher risk. Because it is impossible to screen all women undergoing OCT, it is advisable to adopt some guidelines in an attempt to define the group of women who may be particularly exposed to the risk of VTE. On the basis of experience and that in the literature, two flow charts are used that are simple and reliable. The two flow charts are based on an accurate family and personal history so that an extensive investigation can be carried out only for women who show a positive family or personal history for idiopathic thrombosis. The definition of idiopathic thrombosis may be difficult, particularly in the case of family members. In case of doubt the thrombotic event should be considered as idiopathic. The two flow charts are not intended to eliminate the OCT-related VTE but represent only an attempt to decrease the prevalence of this complication.

Termination of pregnancy following panic-stopping of oral contraceptives

This study assessed characteristics of women presenting for termination of pregnancy subsequent to stopping combined oral contraceptive use in response to publicity-mediated fears regarding venous thromboembolism. Records of 400 women attending for pregnancy termination assessment were reviewed retrospectively. Panic-stopping of oral contraceptives was implicated in 9.5%. Nearly 50% of combined pill users claimed their pregnancy resulted from panic-stopping because of media-promoted fear of health risks, especially 'clots.' Panic-stoppers had significantly lower identified risk factors for venous thromboembolism than pill users who had not panic-stopped. The relative safety of third-generation pills is under debate. The risk-benefit ratio of contraceptive pills is overwhelmingly positive but practitioners must be vigilant in screening for risk factors and contraindications. Panic-stopping results in unwanted pregnancies with concomitant psychological distress and potential physical morbidity. In future situations where research findings may precipitate drug scares, we recommend recall of patients by their health provider, funded by the relevant health authority or pharmaceutical companies, to allow discussion of risks before the media is enabled to have access to the information.

Thrombophilia: what's a practitioner to do?

Management of thrombophilia is an ever-changing field as new disorders are described and additional clinical experience accrues. This paper addresses three common management issues in the care of patients with thrombophilia. The first two topics are updates for common but perplexing hypercoagulable states and the last topic introduces a new option for optimal management of oral anticoagulant therapy. Dr. Jacob Rand updates and organizes the approach to patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. This syndrome is a common acquired thrombophilic state, but the diagnosis and treatment of patients remains a challenge. Dr. Rand outlines his diagnostic and treatment strategies based on the current understanding of this complicated syndrome. Dr. Barbara Konkle addresses the special concerns of managing women with thrombophilia. Hematologists are often asked to advise on the risks of hormonal therapy or pregnancy in a woman with a personal or family history of thrombosis or with an abnormal laboratory finding. Dr. Konkle reviews the available data on the risks of hormonal therapy and pregnancy in women with and without known underlying thrombophilic risk factors. In Section III, Dr. Gail Macik will discuss a new approach to warfarin management. Several instruments are now available for home prothrombin time (PT) monitoring. Self-testing and self management of warfarin are slowly emerging as reliable alternatives to traditional provider-based care and Dr. Macik reviews the instruments available and the results of studies that support this new management option.

Tentative guidelines and practical suggestions to avoid venous thromboembolism during oral contraceptive therapy

Oral contraceptive therapy (OCT) is widely used in the world. It is usually safe and effective but side effects are occasionally seen. Venous thromboembolism is one of the most feared side effects. To avoid this complication adequate guidelines are needed. These have to take into account family history, personal history, and suitable laboratory investigations. The presence of an idiopathic venous thrombosis in the family or in the personal history is of paramount importance. However it is often difficult to ascertain whether a venous thrombosis is idiopathic or not. Even when there is doubt, a coagulation study should be carried out. An adequate coagulation study in this case should include at least an evaluation of antithrombin, protein C, and protein S. A search for homozygosity of factor V Leiden appears advisable. These defects represent absolute contraindications to the use of OCT. Relative contraindications may be represented by other minor coagulation disorders such as heterozygous factor V Leiden, fibrinolysis defects, and a G-to-A 20210 prothrombin abnormality. Other noncoagulation-related conditions such as hypertension, liver damage, and obesity may represent absolute or relative contraindications to the use of OCT.

Thrombophilia: What's a Practitioner to Do?

Management of thrombophilia is an ever-changing field as new disorders are described and additional clinical experience accrues. This paper addresses three common management issues in the care of patients with thrombophilia. The first two topics are updates for common but perplexing hypercoagulable states and the last topic introduces a new option for optimal management of oral anticoagulant therapy. Dr. Jacob Rand updates and organizes the approach to patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. This syndrome is a common acquired thrombophilic state, but the diagnosis and treatment of patients remains a challenge. Dr. Rand outlines his diagnostic and treatment strategies based on the current understanding of this complicated syndrome. Dr. Barbara Konkle addresses the special concerns of managing women with thrombophilia. Hematologists are often asked to advise on the risks of hormonal therapy or pregnancy in a woman with a personal or family history of thrombosis or with an abnormal laboratory finding. Dr. Konkle reviews the available data on the risks of hormonal therapy and pregnancy in women with and without known underlying thrombophilic risk factors. In Section III, Dr. Gail Macik will discuss a new approach to warfarin management. Several instruments are now available for home prothrombin time (PT) monitoring. Self-testing and self management of warfarin are slowly emerging as reliable alternatives to traditional provider-based care and Dr. Macik reviews the instruments available and the results of studies that support this new management option.

Oral contraceptives and thrombosis

Oral contraceptives (OCs) are used by many millions of healthy young women. Their ease of use and efficacy against unwanted pregnancy has made them an indispensable part of modern society. Despite various changes in formulation, they are clearly associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Case-control and prospective studies have developed a range of relative risks of VTE, but the important issue is the impact of VTE relative to perceived benefits of the OC. This involves societal as well as medical judgment. The development of third-generation OCs has led to considerable concerns that these newer preparations may be associated with additional thrombotic risks over and above those of the traditional second-generation preparations. The paradoxical effect, that a change in progestogen in the combined OC could lead to increased VTE, could be explained by the induction of activated protein C resistance. In a society that is less prepared to accept unwanted side effects from medications, it is recommended that increased attention be given to patient selection, and possibly the incorporation into this process of some of the more recently discovered hypercoagulability markers.