Variability in preventive care practices among US adults with diabetes mellitus

Trends and prospects in nursing care for diabetic foot: A bibliometric analysis from 2003 to 2023

BACKGROUNDS

Diabetic foot (DF) is a globally significant concern, with complications like diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) posing major challenges despite medical advancements. Effective nursing strategies are crucial to preventing DF progression and reducing disability risk. However, nursing research in DF care is fragmented, necessitating a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to identify key trends, influential contributors, and critical research areas.

PURPOSE

This study explored current trends in nursing methods for DF care and their impact on patient outcomes, utilizing CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix to identify key contributors, influential countries, and noteworthy topics, aiming to provide valuable insights for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field.

METHODS

Relevant publications from the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection Science Citation Index Expanded were retrieved for the period between 2003 and 2023. We included peer-reviewed original articles or reviews related to diabetic foot (DF) and nursing. The following criteria were used for exclusion: ① conference abstracts or corrigendum documents, ② unpublished articles, ③ repeated publications, ④ unrelated articles, ⑤ case reports, and ⑥ qualitative studies. CiteSpace was employed to identify top authors, institutions, countries, keywords, co-cited authors, journals, references, and research trends. VOSviewer was used to generate a network of authors, journals, and references. Bibliometrix was utilized to create maps of cooperating countries and keyword frequency charts, as well as a Sankey diagram illustrating the relationship between authors, keywords, and countries.

RESULTS

A total of 305 relevant articles were included in this study. The research pertaining to nursing aspects of diabetic foot care exhibited a noticeable upward trend. The analysis in this study revealed that "amputation" held the highest centrality, indicating a critical area of focus in nursing interventions to prevent severe outcomes. "Diabetic foot ulcer" ranked first in terms of citation rate, emphasizing the ongoing challenges in managing DFUs through nursing care. In recent years, there was a shift in focus towards keywords such as "pressure ulcers", "burden", and "chronic wound" highlighting the evolving priorities in nursing research to address complex wound care, patient burden, and long-term management strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The current primary research focuses in nursing care for diabetic foot (DF) include wound management, offloading techniques, sensory protection, anti-infective treatment, education and self-management, and multidisciplinary teamwork. Future research should prioritize developing innovative nursing interventions tailored to individual patient needs, integrating advanced technologies like telemedicine and wearable devices for continuous monitoring, and exploring the psychological aspects of DFU management to improve patient adherence and outcomes. Additionally, more longitudinal studies are needed to assess the long-term effectiveness of various nursing strategies on patient quality of life.

Disparities in preventative diabetic foot examination

The objective of this study was to assess the overall differences in the standard of preventive foot care for patients at risk of diabetic foot ulceration and to identify specific demographic factors affecting these health care practices, including race and ethnicity. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data for 2011 to 2018 were analyzed. Participants (20 years and older) with diabetes were categorized as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and others (including multiracial participants) based on self-reported race and ethnicity. The primary outcome was foot examination over the past year administered by a medical professional. Logistic regression was performed to examine the effects of race and ethnicity on the annual diabetic foot examination, controlling for age (65 years and older), gender, and health insurance status. Among the 2,836 participants included in the study (weighted percentage: 61.1% were White, 13.9% were Black, 15.1% were Hispanic, 5.4% were Asian, and 4.5% were other), 2,018 (weighted percentage: 71.6%) received annual diabetic foot examination over the past year. Hispanic participants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.685; 95% CI, 0.52-0.90) were significantly less likely than White participants to receive an annual foot examination (Black participants: aOR = 1.11; 95% CI, 0.83-1.49; Asian participants: aOR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.60-1.07; other participants: aOR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.40-1.10). Factors associated with receipt of foot examination were age 65 years or older (aOR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.92) and having health insurance (aOR = 3.02; 95% CI, 2.27-4.03). Our findings suggest that Hispanic adults with diabetes are receiving disproportionately lower rates of preventive foot care compared with their White counterparts. This significant variation in the standard of care for individuals with diabetes reflects the need to further identify factors driving the disparities in preventive foot care services among racial and ethnic minority groups.

US adults with diabetes mellitus: Variability in oral healthcare utilization

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients are advised to have at least one dental examination per year. It is unclear to what extent different subgroups of US diabetic adults closely follow this recommendation. Thus, we assessed dental care utilization and related factors in a representative sample of US diabetic adults from rural and urban counties.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data were from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). Survey logistic regression was used to account for the complex sampling design.

RESULTS

Among 40,585 eligible participants, 24,887 (60% of the population) had at least one dental visit for any reason within the past year. The lowest compliance was observed among edentulous participants (27%, adjusted OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.22-0.31 vs. fully dentate). Dental compliance was also negatively associated with having a lower income or education, ever being a smoker, or having barriers to access to care. Rural residents had lower dental compliance compared to urban residents, particularly those without healthcare coverage.

CONCLUSIONS

Dental compliance among US adult diabetic individuals was low, particularly among rural residents, and as compared to other recommended diabetic care practices. Future public health interventions may target rural individuals without healthcare coverage, smokers and edentulous individuals. There is a need to integrate dental and medical care to facilitate cross-talks among different health professionals, so that educational preventive messages are reinforced at every healthcare visit.