1
|
Sharan A, Jahagirdar S, Stuurman AL, Elango V, Riera-Montes M, Kumar Kashyap N, Kumar Arora N, Mathai M, Mangtani P, Devlieger H, Anderson S, Whitaker B, Wong HL, Cutland CL, Guillard Maure C. Operational lessons learned in conducting an international study on pharmacovigilance in pregnancy in resource-constrained settings: The WHO Global Vaccine safety Multi-Country collaboration project. Vaccine X 2022; 11:100160. [PMID: 35434599 PMCID: PMC8993756 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2022.100160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The WHO Global Vaccine Safety Multi-Country Collaboration study on safety in pregnancy aims to estimate the minimum detectable risk for selected perinatal and neonatal outcomes and assess the applicability of standardized case definitions for study outcomes and maternal immunization in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This paper documents the operational lessons learned from the study. A prospective observational study was conducted across 21 hospitals in seven countries. All births occurring at sites were screened to identify select perinatal and neonatal outcomes from May 2019 to August 2020. Up to 100 cases per outcome were recruited to assess the applicability of standardized case definitions. A multi-pronged study quality assurance plan was implemented. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on site functioning and project implementation was also assessed. Multi-layered ethics and administrative approvals, limited clinical documentation, difficulty in identifying outcomes requiring in-hospital follow-up, and poor quality internet connectivity emerged as important barriers to study implementation. Use of electronic platforms, application of a rigorous quality assurance plan with frequent interaction between the central and site teams helped improve data quality. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted data collection for up to 6 weeks in some sites. Our study succeeded in establishing an international hospital-based surveillance network for evaluating perinatal and neonatal outcomes using common study protocol and procedures in geographically diverse sites with differing levels of infrastructure, clinical and health-utilization practices. The enhanced surveillance capacity of participating sites shall help support future pharmacovigilance efforts for pregnancy interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apoorva Sharan
- The INCLEN Trust International, New Delhi, India.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mathews Mathai
- Centre for Maternal and Newborn Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Punam Mangtani
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Steven Anderson
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Barbee Whitaker
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Hui-Lee Wong
- Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Clare L Cutland
- African Leadership in Vaccinology Expertise (Alive), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dodd C, Andrews N, Petousis-Harris H, Sturkenboom M, Omer SB, Black S. Methodological frontiers in vaccine safety: qualifying available evidence for rare events, use of distributed data networks to monitor vaccine safety issues, and monitoring the safety of pregnancy interventions. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2020-003540. [PMID: 34011501 PMCID: PMC8137251 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
While vaccines are rigorously tested for safety and efficacy in clinical trials, these trials do not include enough subjects to detect rare adverse events, and they generally exclude special populations such as pregnant women. It is therefore necessary to conduct postmarketing vaccine safety assessments using observational data sources. The study of rare events has been enabled in through large linked databases and distributed data networks, in combination with development of case-centred methods. Distributed data networks necessitate common protocols, definitions, data models and analytics and the processes of developing and employing these tools are rapidly evolving. Assessment of vaccine safety in pregnancy is complicated by physiological changes, the challenges of mother-child linkage and the need for long-term infant follow-up. Potential sources of bias including differential access to and utilisation of antenatal care, immortal time bias, seasonal timing of pregnancy and unmeasured determinants of pregnancy outcomes have yet to be fully explored. Available tools for assessment of evidence generated in postmarketing studies may downgrade evidence from observational data and prioritise evidence from randomised controlled trials. However, real-world evidence based on real-world data is increasingly being used for safety assessments, and new tools for evaluating real-world evidence have been developed. The future of vaccine safety surveillance, particularly for rare events and in special populations, comprises the use of big data in single countries as well as in collaborative networks. This move towards the use of real-world data requires continued development of methodologies to generate and assess real world evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Dodd
- Julius Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nick Andrews
- Statistics Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Helen Petousis-Harris
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Saad B Omer
- Institute for Global Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Steven Black
- Global Vaccine Data Network, Berkeley, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berrueta M, Ciapponi A, Bardach A, Cairoli FR, Castellano FJ, Xiong X, Stergachis A, Zaraa S, Meulen AST, Buekens P. Maternal and neonatal data collection systems in low- and middle-income countries for maternal vaccines active safety surveillance systems: A scoping review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:217. [PMID: 33731029 PMCID: PMC7968860 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03686-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most post-licensure vaccine pharmacovigilance in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are passive reporting systems. These have limited utility for maternal immunization pharmacovigilance in LMIC settings and need to be supplemented with active surveillance. Our study's main objective was to identify existing perinatal data collection systems in LMICs that collect individual information on maternal and neonatal health outcomes and could be developed to inform active safety surveillance of novel vaccines for use during pregnancy. METHODS A scoping review was performed following the Arksey and O'Malley six-stage approach. We included studies describing electronic or mixed paper-electronic data collection systems in LMICs, including research networks, electronic medical records, and custom software platforms for health information systems. Medline PubMed, EMBASE, Global Health, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Bibliography of Asian Studies (BAS), and CINAHL were searched through August 2019. We also searched grey literature including through Google and websites of existing relevant perinatal data collection systems, as well as contacted authors of key studies and experts in the field to validate the information and identify additional sources of relevant unpublished information. RESULTS A total of 11,817 records were identified. The full texts of 264 records describing 96 data collection systems were assessed for eligibility. Eight perinatal data collection systems met our inclusion criteria: Global Network's Maternal Newborn Health Registry, International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and their Health; Perinatal Informatic System; Pregnancy Exposure Registry & Birth Defects Surveillance; SmartCare; Open Medical Record System; Open Smart Register Platform and District Health Information Software 2. These selected systems were qualitatively characterized according to seven different domains: governance; system design; system management; data management; data sources, outcomes and data quality. CONCLUSION This review provides a list of active maternal and neonatal data collection systems in LMICs and their characteristics as well as their outreach, strengths, and limitations. Findings could potentially help further understand where to obtain population-based high-quality information on outcomes to inform the conduct of maternal immunization active vaccine safety surveillance activities and research in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mabel Berrueta
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Agustin Ciapponi
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ariel Bardach
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Federico Rodriguez Cairoli
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fabricio J Castellano
- Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS), Dr. Emilio Ravignani 2024 (C1014CPV), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Xu Xiong
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA
| | | | - Sabra Zaraa
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-7631, USA
| | | | - Pierre Buekens
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berrueta M, Bardach A, Ciaponni A, Xiong X, Stergachis A, Zaraa S, Buekens P. Maternal and neonatal data collection systems in low- and middle-income countries: scoping review protocol. Gates Open Res 2020; 4:18. [PMID: 32420540 PMCID: PMC7199220 DOI: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13106.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Pregnant women and neonates represent one of the most vulnerable groups, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A recent analysis reported that most vaccine pharmacovigilance systems in LMICs consist of spontaneous (passive) adverse event reporting. Thus, LMICs need effective active surveillance approaches, such as pregnancy registries. We intend to identify currently active maternal and neonatal data collection systems in LMICs, with the potential to inform active safety electronic surveillance for novel vaccines using standardized definitions. Methods: A scoping review will be conducted based on established methodology. Multiple databases of indexed and grey literature will be searched with a specific focus on existing electronic and paper-electronic systems in LMICs that collect continuous, prospective, and individual-level data from antenatal care, delivery, neonatal care (up to 28 days), and postpartum (up to 42 days) at the facility and community level, at the national and district level, and at large hospitals. Also, experts will be contacted to identify unpublished information on relevant data collection systems. General and specific descriptions of Health Information Systems (HIS) extracted from the different sources will be combined and duplicated HIS will be removed, producing a list of unique statements. We will present a final list of Maternal, Newborn, and Child Health systems considered flexible enough to be updated with necessary improvements to detect, assess and respond to safety concerns during the introduction of vaccines and other maternal health interventions. Selected experts will participate in an in-person consultation meeting to select up to three systems to be further explored in situ. Results and knowledge gaps will be synthesized after expert consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mabel Berrueta
- Department of Mother and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
| | - Ariel Bardach
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
| | - Agustin Ciaponni
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
| | - Xu Xiong
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, LA 70112, USA
| | | | - Sabra Zaraa
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7631, USA
| | - Pierre Buekens
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, LA 70112, USA
| | - Scoping Review Collaboration Group
- Department of Mother and Child Health Research, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, C1414CPV, Argentina
- Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, LA 70112, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7631, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The science of vaccine safety: Summary of meeting at Wellcome Trust. Vaccine 2020; 38:1869-1880. [PMID: 31987690 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Vaccines are everywhere hugely successful but are also under attack. The reason for the latter is the perception by some people that vaccines are unsafe. However that may be, vaccine safety, life any other scientific subject, must be constantly studied. It was from this point of view that a meeting was organized at the Wellcome Trust in London in May 2019 to assess some aspects of vaccine safety as subjects for scientific study. The objective of the meeting was to assess what is known beyond reasonable doubt and conversely what areas need additional studies. Although the meeting could not cover all aspects of vaccine safety science, many of the most important issues were addressed by a group of about 30 experts to determine what is already known and what additional studies are merited to assess the safety of the vaccines currently in use. The meeting began with reviews of the current situation in different parts of the world, followed by reviews of specific controversial areas, including the incidence of certain conditions after vaccination and the safety of certain vaccine components. Lastly, information about the human papillomavirus vaccine was considered because its safety has been particularly challenged by vaccine opponents. The following is a summary of the meeting findings. In addition to this summary, the meeting organizers will explore opportunities to perform studies that would enlarge knowledge of vaccine safety.
Collapse
|
6
|
Rezaallah B, Lewis DJ, Pierce C, Zeilhofer HF, Berg BI. Social Media Surveillance of Multiple Sclerosis Medications Used During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Content Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e13003. [PMID: 31392963 PMCID: PMC6702799 DOI: 10.2196/13003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 06/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease occurring mostly in women of childbearing age. Pregnant women with MS are usually excluded from clinical trials; as users of the internet, however, they are actively engaged in threads and forums on social media. Social media provides the potential to explore real-world patient experiences and concerns about the use of medicinal products during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Objective This study aimed to analyze the content of posts concerning pregnancy and use of medicines in online forums; thus, the study aimed to gain a thorough understanding of patients’ experiences with MS medication. Methods Using the names of medicinal products as search terms, we collected posts from 21 publicly available pregnancy forums, which were accessed between March 2015 and March 2018. After the identification of relevant posts, we analyzed the content of each post using a content analysis technique and categorized the main topics that users discussed most frequently. Results We identified 6 main topics in 70 social media posts. These topics were as follows: (1) expressing personal experiences with MS medication use during the reproductive period (55/70, 80%), (2) seeking and sharing advice about the use of medicines (52/70, 74%), (3) progression of MS during and after pregnancy (35/70, 50%), (4) discussing concerns about MS medications during the reproductive period (35/70, 50%), (5) querying the possibility of breastfeeding while taking MS medications (30/70, 42%), and (6) commenting on communications with physicians (26/70, 37%). Conclusions Overall, many pregnant women or women considering pregnancy shared profound uncertainties and specific concerns about taking medicines during the reproductive period. There is a significant need to provide advice and guidance to MS patients concerning the use of medicines in pregnancy and postpartum as well as during breastfeeding. Advice must be tailored to the circumstances of each patient and, of course, to the individual medicine. Information must be provided by a trusted source with relevant expertise and made publicly available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bita Rezaallah
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Patient Safety, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - David John Lewis
- Patient Safety, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.,School of Health and Human Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hans-Florian Zeilhofer
- Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Hightech Research Center of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Britt-Isabelle Berg
- Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Hightech Research Center of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|