1
|
AlKhaldi M, Meghari H, Jillson IA, Alkaiyat A, Tanner M. State of Research Quality and Knowledge Transfer and Translation and Capacity Strengthening Strategies for Sound Health Policy Decision-Making in Palestine. Int J Public Health 2021; 66:620425. [PMID: 34408619 PMCID: PMC8366493 DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2021.620425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Over the last 2 decades, the World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed a global strategy and initiatives to establish a Health Research System (HRS) focusing on Health Research Quality and Standardization (HRQS), Health Research Knowledge Transfer and Dissemination (HRKTD), and Health Research Translation and Utilization into Health Care Decisions and Policies (HRTUDP). Despite the increase in health research productivity over the past several decades, HRS Capacity (HRSC) in Palestine and in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region has rarely been objectively evaluated. This study aims at eliciting the perceptions of HRS performers in Palestine in order to understand the status of HRSC, identify gaps, and generate policies and solutions capable of strengthening HRSC in Palestine. Methods: Key informants from three sectors, namely government, academia, and local and international organizations, were selected purposively based on different sampling methods: criterion, critical case, snowball, and homogeneous sampling. Fifty-two in-depth interviews with key informants and a total of fifty-two individuals, participating in six focus groups, were conducted by the principal investigator in Palestine. Data were analyzed by using MAXQDA 12. Results: The overall pattern of the Palestinian HRSC is relatively weak. The key findings revealed that while HR productivity in Palestine is improving, HRQS is at an average level and quality guidelines are not followed due to paucity of understanding, policies, and resources. HRKTD is a central challenge with both a dearth of conceptualization of translational science and inadequate implementation. The factors related to inadequate HRKTD include lack of awareness on the part of the researchers, inadequate regulatory frameworks and mechanisms for both communication and collaboration between and among researchers and policy-makers and clinicians, and lack of availability of, and credibility in, systematized and reliable HR data. Despite the limited knowledge translation, in general, HRTUDP is not considered an essential decision-making methodology mainly due to the lack of interface between knowledge producers (researchers) and users (policymakers), understanding level, HR credibility and availability of applied research, and governance, resources, and political fluctuations. Recommendations to strengthen HRS in Palestine include: a consolidated research regulatory framework and an effective capacity strengthening strategy overseen by Palestinian authorities; the promotion of HRQS and concepts and practices of translational science; and, most importantly, the use of findings for evidence-based policies and practice. Conclusion: Strengthening HRSC is both an imperative step and an opportunity to improve the Palestinian health system and ensure it is based on research evidence and knowledge. Building a successful HRS characterized by capacities of high-quality research and well-disseminated and translated knowledge is a prerequisite to effective health systems and services. This can be achieved by political commitment to support such strengthening, a consolidated leadership and governance structure, and a strong operational capacity strengthening strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed AlKhaldi
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Council on Health Research for Development, Geneve, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Hamza Meghari
- University College London (UCL), London, United Kingdom
| | - Irene Anne Jillson
- School of Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Abdulsalam Alkaiyat
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.,Council on Health Research for Development, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Marcel Tanner
- University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shalash A, Alsalman HM, Hamed A, Abu Helo M, Ghandour R, Albarqouni L, Abu Rmeileh NME. The range and nature of reproductive health research in the occupied Palestinian territory: a scoping review. Reprod Health 2019; 16:41. [PMID: 30944010 PMCID: PMC6448219 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0699-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In order to set research priorities for reproductive health in the occupied Palestinian territory, it is vital to know what current research has been done in the field of reproductive health. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine the range and nature of reproductive health research in the occupied Palestinian territory and to identify research gaps in the existing literature. METHODS We searched four databases: EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Popline. We included studies that: (i) are published (with an abstract); (ii) relevant to reproductive health; (iii) Palestinians living in Palestine; (iv) participants over the age of 15 years; and (v) restricted to human research. Three independent reviewers screened title and abstracts, and extracted data from included articles. We conducted quantitative and qualitative analyses. RESULTS Of 1025 titles and abstracts screened, 145 articles were included. 52 (36%) articles were conducted in community setting and 34 (24%) were conducted in hospitals. There were 5 (3%) experimental studies. 15 articles had more than one main theme; 160 subthemes overall were identified. The most frequently studied theme was labor and delivery (n = 19; 12%). One article discussed adolescent reproductive health and menopause while no articles discussed men's reproductive health. CONCLUSIONS 91% of the research conducted is observational. The focus of reproductive health research was to understand the topic, community and providers' perceptions and knowledge. Articles related to the quality of services were limited. It is also important to research the reproductive health of women outside of reproductive age, men, and adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisha Shalash
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, oPt, P.O.Box. 14, Birzeit, Palestine
| | - Hasan M Alsalman
- Obestrics and Gynecology specialist, Khalil Suliman hospital, oPt, Jenin, Palestine
| | - Alaa Hamed
- Obestrics and Gynecology resident, PMC hospital, oPt, Ramallah, Palestine
| | - Mai Abu Helo
- Obestrics and Gynecology specialist, Al-Hiba IVF center and The Arab Care hospital, oPt, Ramallah, Palestine
| | - Rula Ghandour
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, oPt, P.O.Box. 14, Birzeit, Palestine
| | - Loai Albarqouni
- Center for Research for Evidence Based Practice (CREBP), Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Australia
| | - Niveen ME Abu Rmeileh
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, oPt, P.O.Box. 14, Birzeit, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Assessing policy-makers', academics' and experts' satisfaction with the performance of the Palestinian health research system: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:66. [PMID: 30045746 PMCID: PMC6060523 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0341-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a growing demand within international health agencies to ensure health research systems (HRSs) are strengthened and well-functioning to support healthcare systems (HCSs). Understanding HRS performance through system actors is an indispensable move in analysing this system. This study aims to examine policy-makers’, academics’ and experts’ satisfaction with overall HRS performance, while also investigating their perceptions about political will and attention towards health research. Ultimately, we want to identify gaps related to performance and generate insights on how to move forward for HRS performance strengthening. Methods This study was carried out in Palestine, targeting three sectors, namely government institutions, public health universities, and major local and international health non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Semi-structured, in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with participants. The institutions from the three sectors were selected based on stated criteria and peer reviews. Data were translated from Arabic into English, transcribed, content checked by the principal investigator, imported to a software programme (MAXQDA 12), and then coded. Thematic content analysis was used. Results A total of 104 experts participated in 52 IDIs and 52 experts participated in 6 FGDs. Findings revealed three principal domains. First, the HRS in Palestine is remarkably underperforming, and the majority of experts were unsatisfied. Participants perceived the system as ineffective and inefficient, poorly managed and lacking systematic assessment. Second, the factors behind system underperformance were (1) an unstructured system and the lack of a research culture as well as of a governing body or policies; (2) health research was seen as individualistic, non-development driven and unutilised in policy decisions; and (3) considerably deficient coordination and essential resources. The third finding showed inadequate political support and engagement, which then also related to system underperformance. Conclusions The Palestinian HRS is perceived as underperforming by health experts at different levels, where research is not on the leadership agendas. Potential actions should be taken to actively engage the state health decision-makers and inform them of the importance, uses and impacts of performance assessment. Findings urge policy-makers and legislators to build an inclusive and national body of governance with agreed strategies including fundamentally hybrid and aligned performance assessment mechanisms, such as a research observatory platform. In addition, it is recommended to establish a strategic plan to expand professionals’ research awareness and abilities, as well as empower the institution’s research monitoring and evaluation capacities. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0341-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
4
|
AlKhaldi M, Abed Y, Pfeiffer C, Haj-Yahia S, Alkaiyat A, Tanner M. Understanding the concept and importance of the health research system in Palestine: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:49. [PMID: 29914533 PMCID: PMC6007061 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0315-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The importance of a health research system (HRS), namely an instrument for developing and enabling health systems, is increasing, particularly in developing countries. Assessing the perceptions of system performers is a necessary part of system analysis, which seeks to recognize a system’s strengths and limitations aiming towards improvement. This study assesses the perceptions of policy-makers, academicians and experts regarding the HRS concept and its importance to generate insights for system strengthening. In Palestine, HRS is just emerging, helping to address the many public health-related challenges faced by the country. Methods The study was implemented from January until July 2016, targeting three sectors, namely relevant government institutions, schools of public health, and major local and international health agencies. Data was collected through 52 in-depth interviews and six focus group discussions (FGDs) with policy-makers, academics, directors and experts. Participants and institutions were selected based on stated criteria and peer review. Data were translated, transcribed, checked and then imported to a software program (MAXQDA 12) for thematic and content analysis. Results A total of 104 experts participated, wherein 52 were interviewed and 52 participated in the six FGDs. The HRS concept, as defined by WHO, was conceptualized differently among participants with unclear delineations between various components. Inconsistencies appeared when participants attempted to conceptualize HRS in broader contexts, though HRS goals and functions were sufficiently delineated. The majority of participants agreed that HRS correlates with notions of ‘improvement’ and recognized HRS ‘as a significant gain’. Neglect of HRS was perceived as a big loss. Conclusions The study revealed that the level of understanding of HRS among health experts in Palestine is inadequate and not sufficiently conceptualized for its application. Findings also underlined the need to establish a central governance coordination body that promotes HRS understanding, awareness and culture as an enabler for HRS strengthening. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0315-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed AlKhaldi
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland. .,Najah National University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nablus, Palestine.
| | - Yehia Abed
- Al-Quds University, Faculty of Public Health, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Constanze Pfeiffer
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Saleem Haj-Yahia
- University Teaching Hospital, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.,Najah National University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nablus, Palestine.,Bristol University, School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Abdulsalam Alkaiyat
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland.,Najah National University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Marcel Tanner
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Albarqouni L, Elessi K, Abu-Rmeileh NME. A comparison between health research output and burden of disease in Arab countries: evidence from Palestine. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:25. [PMID: 29544498 PMCID: PMC5856204 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0302-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research conducted on conditions responsible for the greatest disease burden should be given the highest priority, particularly in resource-limited settings. The present study aimed to assess the research output in relation to disease burden in Palestine and to identify the conditions which are under- or over-investigated, if any. METHODS We searched PubMed and Scopus for reports of original research relevant to human health or healthcare authored by researchers affiliated with Palestinian institutions and published between January 2000 and December 2015. We categorised the condition studied in included articles using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) taxonomy. Data regarding burden of disease (percentage of deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)) was obtained from the Palestine profile in the GBD study. We examined the degree of discordance between the observed number of published articles for each disease/condition with the expected number based on the proportion of disease burden of that disease/condition. RESULTS Our search identified 2469 potentially relevant records, from which 1650 were excluded following the screening of titles and abstracts. Of the remaining 819 full-text articles, we included 511 in our review. Communicable (infectious) diseases (n = 103; 20%) was the condition with the highest number of published studies. However, cancer (n = 15; 3%) and chronic respiratory diseases (n = 15; 3%) were the conditions with the lowest number of published studies. Research output was poorly associated with disease burden, irrespective of whether it was measured in terms of DALYs (rho = -0.116, P = 0.7) or death (rho = 0.217, P = 0.5). Cardiovascular disease, cancer, and maternal and neonatal deaths accounted for more than two-thirds of the total deaths in Palestine (67%), but were infrequently addressed (23%) in published articles. CONCLUSIONS There is evidence of research waste measured by a mismatch between the health burden of certain diseases/conditions and the number of published research reports on those diseases/conditions in Palestine. A national research priority-setting agenda should be developed to meet the local community's need for quality evidence to implement independent and informed health policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loai Albarqouni
- Centre for Research in Evidence Based Practice (CREBP), Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia.
| | - Khamis Elessi
- Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Islamic University, Gaza, Palestine
| | - Niveen M E Abu-Rmeileh
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, Ramallah, West Bank, Palestine
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abu-Rmeileh NME, Ghandour R, Tucktuck M, Obiedallah M. Research priority-setting: reproductive health in the occupied Palestinian territory. Reprod Health 2018; 15:27. [PMID: 29433508 PMCID: PMC5810115 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0472-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) is an authority with limited resources. Therefore, research conducted in such a setting should be prioritized and coordinated to follow a national research agenda. This study aims to produce a research agenda for reproductive health in the oPt that can be utilized by reproductive health stakeholders and contribute to the development of policy-based evidence to guide health practice. METHODS In the current study, we followed research prioritization methods developed by the World Health Organization-Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative. Research questions were obtained from reproductive health experts in the oPt. The questions were then grouped into thematic areas which were prioritized by the reproductive health experts. Scores were calculated and sorted to define the top priority research areas. RESULTS A total of 232 research questions were prioritized by 30 reproductive health experts. Health system issues were the most addressed in the top 50 research questions. They included questions on the quality of services and health professionals' knowledge and continuous professional training. Adolescents' sexual and reproductive health and gender-based violence were rarely mentioned in the top 50 questions. The number of questions related to safe motherhood was around 50% followed by questions related to health system. Questions related to elderly women and menopause as well as reproductive system cancers were also within the top 50 ranked questions. CONCLUSIONS Priority research areas in reproductive health were identified for the oPt, which should be utilized by researchers with a focus on the high priority areas. Policy makers and funders should coordinate their efforts to ensure the production of research with value to the Palestinian context, in the most efficient way possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niveen M. E. Abu-Rmeileh
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, P.O.Box 14, Birzeit, West Bank, oPt Palestine
| | - Rula Ghandour
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, P.O.Box 14, Birzeit, West Bank, oPt Palestine
| | - Marina Tucktuck
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, P.O.Box 14, Birzeit, West Bank, oPt Palestine
| | - Mohammad Obiedallah
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, P.O.Box 14, Birzeit, West Bank, oPt Palestine
| |
Collapse
|