Impact of hepatitis C virus infection on long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide population-based, propensity-matched cohort study in Taiwan

The association between hepatitis C virus infection status and blood pressure in adults in the United States: NHANES 1999-2012

Background

The Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is strongly associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors, but the relationship with blood pressure (BP) remains unclear.

Objectives

To assess the association between HCV infection status and BP in US adults.

Methods

Data for the study were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1999 and 2012. The association of HCV infection status (including HCV infection, current HCV infection, and past HCV infection) with hypertension, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were explored using logistic or linear regression analyses respectively.

Results

A total of 25,850 participants (age≥18 years) were enrolled in the current study, including 14,162 participants with hypertension. After adjusting for all covariates, HCV infection/current HCV infection was not associated with hypertension and SBP compared to participants with non-HCV infection (OR: 1.34,95% CI 0.96-1.87/1.31 95% CI 0.91,1.91, β: -0.92, 95% CI -2.7-0.86/-0.35 95% CI -2.51,1.81, respectively). HCV infection/current HCV infection was only associated with elevated DBP (β: 4.1,95% CI 2.57-5.63/4.24,95% CI 2.27-6.21). However, there was no correlation with past HCV infection in participants with hypertension, SBP, and DBP compared to those with non-HCV infection (OR: 1.23,95% CI 0.59-2.54; β: -3.79, 95% CI -7.67-0.08 and 2.28 95% CI -0.36-4.92, respectively).

Conclusion

In a representative sample of US adults, it was found that both HCV infection and current HCV infection were independently linked to higher DBP. However, there was no association between past HCV infection and DBP.

Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of acute myocardial infarction

With the discovery of new biomarkers for the early detection of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), advancements in valid medication, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the overall prognosis of AMI has improved remarkably. Nevertheless, challenges remain which require more difficult work to overcome. Novel diagnostic and therapeutic techniques include new AMI biomarkers, hypothermia therapy, supersaturated oxygen (SSO 2 ) therapy, targeted anti-inflammatory therapy, targeted angiogenesis therapy, and stem cell therapy. With these novel methods, we believe that the infarction size after AMI will decrease, and myocardial injury-associated ventricular remodeling may be avoided. This review focuses on novel advances in the diagnosis and management of AMI.

The risk of stroke after acute myocardial infarction in patients with and without atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are risk factors for stroke. The risk of stroke after AMI may differ between patients with and without AF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of AF on stroke in patients after the first AMI.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, nationwide cohort study. Patients with a primary diagnosis of a first AMI between 2000 and 2012 were included. All patients were followed up until ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), or December 31, 2012, whichever occurred first. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves were constructed to compare ischemic stroke or TIA between AMI patients with and without AF.

RESULTS

A total of 170 472 patients were enrolled in this study. Among them, 8530 patients with AF were identified. The propensity score matching technique was used to match 8530 patients without AF of similar ages and sexes. Overall, the 12-year stroke rate was significantly higher in patients with AF than in those without AF (log-rank p < 0.001), including different sexes, ages, and interventional therapy subgroups. Patients with pre-existing AF had higher stroke rates than those with newly diagnosed AF in male sex, age below 65 years, and those receiving interventional therapy subgroups. In Cox proportional-hazard regression analysis, AF was an independent risk factor for stroke after the first AMI (hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% CI: 1.5-1.87).

CONCLUSION

AF significantly increases stroke risk after the first AMI. In patients with AF, those with pre-existing AF have higher stroke risks in male sex, age below 65 years, and those with interventional therapy than those with newly diagnosed AF.

Comparison of effects of triple antithrombotic therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy on long-term outcomes of acute myocardial infarction

Warfarin is an alternate choice for patients who are not eligible for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to compare the long-term outcome of triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) with that of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after AMI. This was a nationwide, propensity score-matched, case-control study of 186,112 first AMI patients, of whom 2,825 received TAT comprising aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin. Propensity score matching in a ratio of 1:4 by age, sex, comorbidities, and treatment was adopted, Finally, 2,813 AMI patients and 11,252 matched controls that were administered TAT and DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel), respectively, were included in our analysis. The 12-year overall survival rate did not differ between both strategies (P = .3167). TAT was beneficial in old age (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92), female sex (HR = 0.86), atrial fibrillation (AF) (HR = 0.80), hypertension (HR = 0.92), cerebrovascular accident (HR = 0.90), and in the absence of percutaneous coronary intervention (HR = 0.79). TAT reduced the rate of recurrent myocardial infarction (P = .0108) but did not affect the rate of stroke (P = .4867), gastrointestinal bleeding (P = .3889), or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (P = .3449). TAT reduces the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction and does not increase the risk of major bleeding, while compared to DAPT.

Comparison of long-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction associated with or without sepsis

OBJECTIVES

Although the association between systemic infection and cardiovascular events has been identified, uncertainty remains regarding the incidence and prognosis of sepsis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of sepsis on survival after first AMI.

METHODS

This was a nationwide cohort study involving the analysis of data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2000-2012, for patients with a primary diagnosis of first AMI. Among the 186112 prospective patients, sepsis was diagnosed in 13065 (7.0%). The propensity score matching technique was used to match 13065 controls to the patients with sepsis and AMI with similar baseline characteristics. Cox proportional hazards regression models, including sepsis, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and comorbidities, were performed to further evaluate the different influences on the mortality risk in patients hospitalized for first AMI.

RESULTS

Overall, the 12-year survival rate was lower in AMI patients with sepsis than in those without sepsis (log rank p-value <0.001); this was also shown in the different age and sex groups. The AMI patients with sepsis had a longer length of hospital stay than those without sepsis (32.5days vs. 11.74 days, p<0.001). In the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, sepsis was an independent risk factor for mortality in patients after AMI (hazard ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval 1.72-1.83). Interventional management with PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting improved survival in both the sepsis and non-sepsis patients after first AMI.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, sepsis significantly increased the mortality risk of patients after first AMI. PCI may improve the long-term survival of patients in comparison to those managed conservatively.

The Dipyridamole Added to Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Cerebral Infarction After First Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide, Case-Control Study

Background and Purpose: No previous study has compared the impact of dipyridamole-based triple antiplatelet therapy on secondary stroke prevention and long-term outcomes to that of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and previous stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of dipyridamole added to DAPT on stroke prevention and long-term outcomes in patients with cerebral infarction after first AMI.

Methods: This nationwide, case-control study included 75,789 patients with cerebral infarction after first AMI. A 1:4 propensity score matching ratio was adopted based on multiple variables. Finally, the data of 4,468 patients included in the DAPT group and 1,117 patients included in the Dipyridamole-DAPT group were analyzed. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were cumulative event rate of recurrent MI or stroke, and cumulative intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and gastrointestinal bleeding rate.

Results: Long-term survival rate was comparable between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.1117), regardless of sex analyses. However, after first year, DAPT subgroup revealed better survival over DAPT-dipyridamole subgroup (log-rank P = 0.0188). In age subgroup analysis, a lower survival rate was detected in younger patients from the Dipyridamole-DAPT group after first year (log-rank P = 0.0151), but no survival difference for older patients. No benefit of Dipyridamole-DAPT was detected for patients after AMI, regardless of the myocardial infarction type. DAPT was superior to Dipyridamole-DAPT in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (log-rank P = 0.0153) and ST elevation myocardial infarction after first year (log-rank P = 0.0019). Dipyridamole-DAPT did not reduce cumulative event rate of recurrent MI or stroke in patients after AMI. Moreover, Dipyridamole-DAPT increased the cumulative ICH rate (log-rank P = 0.0026), but did not affect the cumulative event rate of gastrointestinal bleeding. In Cox analysis, dipyridamole did not improve long-term survival.

Conclusions: This nationwide study showed that Dipyridamole-DAPT, compared with DAPT, did not improve long-term survival in patients with stroke after AMI, and was related to poor outcomes after 1 year. Dipyridamole-DAPT did not reduce recurrent rate of MI or stroke, but increased the ICH rate without impacting the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding.