Inequalities in access to cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome: the EPiHeart cohort

Socio-geographical factors associated with cardiac rehabilitation participation after percutaneous coronary intervention: A registry-based cohort study from France

AIMS

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute (ACS) or chronic (CCS) coronary syndrome is underutilised worldwide. The determinants of underuse are not fully understood. Using real-world data, this study explored the effect of socio-geographical factors on CR participation.

METHODS

Patients from the Aquitaine region (France) who underwent PCI between 2017 and 2019 were selected from a regional PCI register. Their 1-year CR participation was tracked using the French hospital database. Associations between CR participation and socio-geographical factors, (social deprivation, general practitioner accessibility, and distance to the nearest CR centre) were assessed through logistic regression mixed models at 1 and 3 months in ACS, and at 3 and 6 months in CCS.

RESULTS

Among the 19,002 patients, 5,073 (26.7%) participated in CR (ACS: 4,071, 33.0%; CCS: 1,002, 15.0%). A CR centre distance >25 km reduced participation at 3 months in ACS patients (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.99, p = 0,023), but not at 1 month after PCI. CCS patients from most advantaged areas were more likely to participate in CR at 3 (OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.88, p = 0.002) and 6 months (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.42-0.82, p < 0.001). General practitioner accessibility did not affect participation.

CONCLUSION

Post-PCI CR participation was low. Proximity to CR centres promoted participation for ACS patients, while CR usage correlated with higher socio-economic status for CCS patients. These findings highlight socio-geographical inequalities in CR access, providing a basis for targeted interventions, such as telerehabilitation or expanded coverage.

Rehabilitation Patterns After Hospitalization: Results from a Danish Registry

OBJECTIVE

Conditions that could benefit from rehabilitation contribute to 310 million years of life lived with disability. Internationally rehabilitation could be part of the solution to the growing global disease burden. This register based study wanted to explore differences in patterns of rehabilitation among patients discharged from the hospital with a rehabilitation plan, explore rehabilitation initiation, and assess the activation of rehabilitation plans within legal requirements.

SETTING

The study was conducted at Odense University Hospital in the Region of Southern Denmark.

PARTICIPANTS

The study investigated acute contacts by utilising rehabilitation referrals, demographic and municipal data from Odense Municipality residents from 2015 to 2020.

MAIN MEASURES

Descriptive statistics, logistic regressions, cox regression and cumulative incidence rate were used to explore rehabilitation the activation of rehabilitation plans.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 225,653 hospital contacts. Overall, 10,327 (5%) received a rehabilitation plan. Contacts were more often female or had increased co-morbidity. Prescription increased with age and for ethnical Danes. Initiation of prescribed plans increased within the first weeks, levelling from 30 to 60 days. Delayed initiation of the rehabilitation plan beyond 30 days raised the likelihood of non-initiating altogether.

CONCLUSIONS

Although evidence acknowledges the benefits of rehabilitation, this study showed that more than 25% of all referred municipality rehabilitation plans were never initiated. If the initiation of a rehabilitation plan was delayed beyond 30 days, it significantly reduced the likelihood of initiation. Therefore, the international community need to keep focus on early rehabilitation and increase the use of rehabilitation in the future.

Race or ethnicity and education in cardiac rehabilitation enrollment

BACKGROUND

Although cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has established benefits for cardiovascular health, it remains significantly underutilized, with substantial differences in participation related to factors such as educational attainment (EA), race, and ethnicity. We studied a geographically and racially diverse cohort of insured individuals in a health claims database to (1) evaluate differences in CR participation by EA and race or ethnicity and (2) assess how EA modifies associations between race or ethnicity and CR participation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of individuals identified in Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® database between 1/1/2016 and 12/31/2019. Eligible individuals included those aged ≥18 years with a hospitalization for an incident CR-qualifying diagnosis. We calculated incidence rates of CR enrollment by EA and race or ethnicity, as well as associations of EA and race or ethnicity with CR enrollment, and evaluated interaction between EA and race or ethnicity with respect to CR participation.

RESULTS

We identified 171,297 individuals eligible for CR with a mean ± SD age of 70.4 ± 11.6 years; 37.4 % were female, and 68.3 % had >high school education. We observed a dose-response association between EA and rate of participation in CR. After adjustment, compared to White individuals, the odds of attending CR was 24 % lower for Asian individuals [95 % confidence interval (CI): 17 %, 30 %], 13 % lower for Black individuals (95 % CI: 9 %, 17 %), and 32 % lower for Hispanic individuals (95 % CI: 28 %, 35 %), all p < 0.0001. However, Black individuals with ≥bachelor's degree had a similar odds of CR enrollment as White individuals with ≥bachelor's degree (odds ratio 1.01, 95 % CI: 0.85, 1.20, p = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

EA was positively associated with CR enrollment across racial and ethnic groups. Higher EA might partially attenuate racial and ethnic differences in CR participation, but significant disparities persist. Our findings support increased attention to individuals with limited education to improve CR enrollment.

The role of mesolevel characteristics of the health care system and socioeconomic factors on health care use - results of a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Besides macrolevel characteristics of a health care system, mesolevel access characteristics can exert influence on socioeconomic inequalities in healthcare use. These reflect access to healthcare, which is shaped on a smaller scale than the national level, by the institutions and establishments of a health system that individuals interact with on a regular basis. This scoping review maps the existing evidence about the influence of mesolevel access characteristics and socioeconomic position on healthcare use. Furthermore, it summarizes the evidence on the interaction between mesolevel access characteristics and socioeconomic inequalities in healthcare use.

METHODS

We used the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO and followed the 'Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR)' recommendations. The included quantitative studies used a measure of socioeconomic position, a mesolevel access characteristic, and a measure of individual healthcare utilisation. Studies published between 2000 and 2020 in high income countries were considered.

RESULTS

Of the 9501 potentially eligible manuscripts, 158 studies were included after a two-stage screening process. The included studies contained a wide spectrum of outcomes and were thus summarised to the overarching categories: use of preventive services, use of curative services, and potentially avoidable service use. Exemplary outcomes were screening uptake, physician visits and avoidable hospitalisations. Access variables included healthcare system characteristics such as physician density or distance to physician. The effects of socioeconomic position on healthcare use as well as of mesolevel access characteristics were investigated by most studies. The results show that socioeconomic and access factors play a crucial role in healthcare use. However, the interaction between socioeconomic position and mesolevel access characteristics is addressed in only few studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic position and mesolevel access characteristics are important when examining variation in healthcare use. Additionally, studies provide initial evidence that moderation effects exist between the two factors, although research on this topic is sparse. Further research is needed to investigate whether adapting access characteristics at the mesolevel can reduce socioeconomic inequity in health care use.

Barriers to Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease After Reperfusion Therapy: A Scoping Review

Patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) experience many barriers to participate in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs. Several studies identify barriers that can affect participation in CR among patients with CHD after reperfusion therapy. However, there has yet to be a review specifically in this population. This review aims to identify the literature systematically that analyzes the barriers that affect the participation of CHD patients after reperfusion therapy in implementing the CR program. This study used the Preferred Reporting Item for PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) with databases PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCO-hosted Academic Search Complete, Scopus, Taylor & Francis, and Sage Journals. The keywords used in English were "coronary artery disease OR myocardial infarction OR cardiovascular disease OR heart disease" AND "Barrier OR obstacle", AND "percutaneous coronary intervention OR PCI OR angioplasty OR coronary artery bypass graft surgery OR CABG" AND "cardiac rehabilitation OR rehabilitation OR recovery". The inclusion criteria in this review were full-text articles in English, articles with a descriptive, cross-sectional, and cohort design with a minimum of 100 participants that discussed barriers to participation in patients with CHD after undergoing reperfusion therapy, and the CR phases such as I, II, III, and IV have also been identified. Based on the initial search, there are 23 relevant studies out of 7400. The results of this study reported that most of the participants from the studies analyzed had a low level of participation in CR (≤50%). We classify the factors that affect the level of CR participation into five categories: individual factors, health history, environmental, logistical, and health system. The most reported barriers in each category were age, comorbidities, lack of support from friends, family and health workers, distance or travel time, and cost and economic status. Professional health workers, especially nurses, can identify various barriers that patients feel so that they can increase their participation in attending CR.

Current state of cardiac rehabilitation in Portugal: Results of the 2019 national survey

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs have a central role in cardiovascular medicine, encompassing a comprehensive framework able to holistically address various facets of cardiovascular disease. However, several obstacles to their optimal application have been reported. Over the years, the Portuguese Society of Cardiology has periodically conducted a national survey on the state of CR in Portugal.

OBJECTIVES

This study reports the results of the 2019 survey on CR.

METHODS

In December 2019 a voluntary questionnaire was sent to centers offering CR programs, consisting of several items concerning this intervention.

RESULTS

In 2019, 25 centers provided structured CR programs. A total of 2182 patients underwent phase II programs, representing an increase of 13% from the previous survey. Of these, 67.2% were referred due to ischemic heart disease, and 14.5% due to heart failure. Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) comprised 49.3% of referrals, leading to an estimated 9.3% CR coverage. A total of 606 patients participated in phase III programs (a decrease of 37%). Drop-out rates ranged from 0-68%; 91% of centers presented drop-out rates <25%.

CONCLUSION

The present survey shows an increase in the number of centers and patients undergoing phase II CR, and an increase in the estimated CR coverage after ACS. Despite this, the level of increase means that overall patient representation remained below the optimal range, while the data also showed a decrease in the number of patients in phase III programs. These findings reinforce the importance of optimization of CR entry and maintenance, in order to improve the uptake of this pivotal intervention.

Supporting government policies to embed and expand rehabilitation in health systems in Europe: A framework for action

Investment in action is vital to confront the challenges associated with chronic diseases and disability facing European health systems. Although relevant policy responses are being increasingly developed, most of them fail to recognize the role of rehabilitation services in achieving public health and social goals. Comprehensive guidance is thus urgently needed to support rehabilitation policy development and expand access to rehabilitation care to meet population needs effectively. This paper describes a framework to guide policy action for rehabilitation in Europe. The framework was developed in collaboration with the European Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine based on a focused literature review and expert consultations. A review in PubMed and grey literature sources identified 458 references and resulted in 135 relevant documents published between 2006 and 2019. Thematic analysis of extracted information helped summarize the findings and develop the draft policy action framework. This was circulated to a wider group of experts and discussed in three workshops in 2018-2019. The framework was revised according to their feedback. The proposed framework contains 48 options for policy action organized in six domains and twelve subdomains that address several areas of health programming. The proposed framework provides a structure to understand the policy terrain related to rehabilitation in Europe and the measures required for translating aspirational political pronouncements into targeted programmatic action and tangible health and social outcomes.