1
|
Davis KJ, Campbell C, Costelloe R, Song T, Fylyk G, Yu P, Craig SJ. Causes of Unwarranted Variation and Disparity in Breast Cancer Management in Regional and Rural Area. Breast J 2024; 2024:9354395. [PMID: 39742374 PMCID: PMC11208097 DOI: 10.1155/2024/9354395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
Introduction Breast cancer management is complex, requiring personalised care from multidisciplinary teams. Research shows that there is unwarranted clinical variation in mastectomy rates between rural and metropolitan patients; that is, variation in treatment which cannot be explained by disease progression or medical necessity. This study aims to determine the clinical and nonclinical factors contributing to any unwarranted variation in breast cancer management in rural patients and to evaluate how these factors and variations relate to patient outcomes. Methods Comprehensive data from patients who had primary breast cancer surgery from 2010 to 2014 in either a rural or metropolitan location in a single local health district was analysed (n = 686). Records were subset into two rurality groupings based on the postcode in which the patient resided, and the Modified Monash Model (MMM), an Australian system for classifying rurality. Statistical analysis was used to compare rural and metropolitan cohorts on treatments, patient characteristics, timeliness, and outcomes (recurrence and survival). Results Rural patients had higher mastectomy rates than metropolitan patients (57% vs. 34%, p < 0.001), despite a lack of difference in clinical or demographic factors accounting for such variation. The length of time between treatment pathway stages was consistently longer amongst rural patients (p < 0.01). Rural women also had worse survival outcomes, especially amongst HER2-positive patients who had significantly lower survival (5-year 74% vs 82%; 10-year 49% vs 71%, p < 0.05) than metropolitan HER2-positive patients. Conclusion This study reveals clinical disparities among rural breast cancer patients, that cannot be explained by demographic and clinical factors alone. Rural patients face lower rates of breast-conserving surgery and treatment delays, attributable to systemic barriers such as limited access to specialist care, high travel costs, and suboptimal care coordination. These findings have important implications for improving equity and collaboration in delivering person-centred breast cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley J. Davis
- Research Operations, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Chantal Campbell
- Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebekah Costelloe
- Illawarra Shoalhaven Cancer and Haematology Network, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Ting Song
- Centre for Digital Transformation, School of Computing and Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Glaucia Fylyk
- Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Ping Yu
- Centre for Digital Transformation, School of Computing and Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Steven J. Craig
- Graduate School of Medicine, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Shoalhaven District Memorial Hospital, Nowra, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mui J, Cheng E, Salindera S. Enhanced recovery after surgery for oncological breast surgery reduces length of stay in a resource limited setting. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:1096-1101. [PMID: 38488251 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in breast surgery optimizes resources and reduces healthcare costs by facilitating early discharges. These protocols are well established in tertiary centres, but not commonly adopted in regional centres. ERAS implementation potentially impacts smaller hospitals significantly, where resources are limited and persistent bed shortages with mounting waitlist pressures exist. Our study evaluates the feasibility of early discharge with the application of our ERAS protocol to mastectomies in a resource-constrained and rural setting. METHODS Breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomies with or without reconstruction between January 2017 and July 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. From January 2022, we implemented a standardized ERAS protocol for patients undergoing mastectomy. This incorporated a combination of pre-, intra- and post-operative elements to enhance patient readiness for discharge. Our study compared these patients (post-ERAS group) with the outcomes of mastectomies performed prior to January 2022 (pre-ERAS group). RESULTS 104 patients were identified. In the post-ERAS group, 74.4% were discharged within 24 h compared to 23.1% in the pre-ERAS group. Length of stay was reduced from 2.26 to 1.42 days. There were no differences in unplanned clinician reviews or early representation to the emergency department between the two groups. CONCLUSION Reducing the length of stay without increased complications can be achieved in a resource-limited environment with our protocolized ERAS principals. Our protocol has been instrumental in allowing safe discharges within 24 h. Other regional centres may benefit in adopting strategies implemented by us for their own ERAS protocols in breast cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Mui
- Department of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ernest Cheng
- Department of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
- St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kogarah, Australia
| | - Shehnarz Salindera
- Department of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coles CE, Earl H, Anderson BO, Barrios CH, Bienz M, Bliss JM, Cameron DA, Cardoso F, Cui W, Francis PA, Jagsi R, Knaul FM, McIntosh SA, Phillips KA, Radbruch L, Thompson MK, André F, Abraham JE, Bhattacharya IS, Franzoi MA, Drewett L, Fulton A, Kazmi F, Inbah Rajah D, Mutebi M, Ng D, Ng S, Olopade OI, Rosa WE, Rubasingham J, Spence D, Stobart H, Vargas Enciso V, Vaz-Luis I, Villarreal-Garza C. The Lancet Breast Cancer Commission. Lancet 2024; 403:1895-1950. [PMID: 38636533 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00747-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helena Earl
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Benjamin O Anderson
- Global Breast Cancer Initiative, World Health Organisation and Departments of Surgery and Global Health Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Carlos H Barrios
- Oncology Research Center, Hospital São Lucas, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Maya Bienz
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, London, UK; Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - David A Cameron
- Institute of Genetics and Cancer and Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Wanda Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Prudence A Francis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Felicia Marie Knaul
- Institute for Advanced Study of the Americas, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA; Tómatelo a Pecho, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Stuart A McIntosh
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lukas Radbruch
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | | | - Jean E Abraham
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Lynsey Drewett
- Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Farasat Kazmi
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Dianna Ng
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Szeyi Ng
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - William E Rosa
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stuart GW, Chamberlain JA, te Marvelde L. The contribution of prognostic factors to socio-demographic inequalities in breast cancer survival in Victoria, Australia. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15371-15383. [PMID: 37458115 PMCID: PMC10417162 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer survival in Australia varies according to socio-economic status (SES) and between rural and urban places of residence. Part of this disparity may be due to differences in prognostic factors at the time of diagnosis. METHODS Women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 2008 until 2012 (n = 14,165) were identified from the Victorian Cancer Registry and followed up for 5 years, with death from breast cancer or other causes recorded. A prognostic score, based on stage at diagnosis, cancer grade, whether the cancer was detected via screening, reported comorbidities and age at diagnosis, was constructed for use in a mediation analysis. RESULTS Five-year breast cancer mortality for women with breast cancer who were in the lowest quintile of SES (10.3%) was almost double that of those in the highest quintile (5.7%). There was a small survival advantage (1.7% on average, within each socio-economic quintile) of living in inner-regional areas compared with major cities. About half of the socio-economic disparity was mediated by prognostic factors, particularly stage at diagnosis and the presence of comorbidities. The inner-regional survival advantage was not due to differences in prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS Part of the socio-economic disparity in breast cancer survival could be addressed by earlier detection in, and improved general health for, more disadvantaged women. Further research is required to identify additional causes of socio-economic disparities as well as the observed inner-regional survival advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey W. Stuart
- Cancer Epidemiology DivisionCancer Council VictoriaMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- School of Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health SciencesUniversity of MelbourneVictoriaMelbourneAustralia
| | | | - Luc te Marvelde
- Victorian Cancer RegistryCancer Council VictoriaMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Akbari ME, Akbari A, Khayamzadeh M, Salmanian R, Akbari M. Ten-Year Survival of Breast Cancer in Iran: A National Study (Retrospective Cohort Study). Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:12-21. [PMID: 36876173 PMCID: PMC9982336 DOI: 10.1159/000526746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to estimate the 5- and 10-year survival rates of breast cancer in Iran. Methods This retrospective cohort study was performed in 2019 on breast cancer patients registered in the national cancer registry system of Iran during 2007-2014. The patients were contacted to collect their information and status (alive or dead). Age and pathological type of tumor were categorized into five groups, and the place of residence was divided into 13 regions. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model were used for data analysis. Results A total of 87,902 patients were diagnosed with breast cancer during the study, 22,307 of whom were followed-up. The 5- and 10-year survival rates of the patients were 80% and 69%, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 50.68 ± 12.76 years (median age, 49 years). About 2.3% of the patients were male. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 69% and 50% in men, respectively. The highest survival rate was reported in the age group of 40-49 years, and the lowest rate was found in the age group of ≥70 years. Of all pathological types, 88% were found in the invasive ductal carcinoma group; the highest survival rate was reported in the noninvasive carcinoma group. The highest survival rate was reported in the Tehran region and the lowest in the Hamedan region. Based on the results, the Cox proportional hazards model, sex, age group, and pathological type were statistically significant differences. Conclusion This nationwide study performed on breast cancer patients indicated an improvement in the overall survival rate of these patients over the past years (the 5-year survival rate increased from 71% in 2011 to 80% in the present study), which might be attributed to advances in cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Atieh Akbari
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maryam Khayamzadeh
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Academy of Medical Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Reza Salmanian
- Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Akbari
- Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
James A, Chamberlain D, Azar D, Sewell L. Talking about health: Community ambassadors as a health promotion strategy to increase breast and bowel cancer screening in regional Australia. Health Promot J Austr 2023; 34:246-254. [PMID: 35776366 PMCID: PMC10084130 DOI: 10.1002/hpja.635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED In Australia, cancer is the leading contributor to disease burden, with breast and bowel cancer among the most commonly diagnosed cancers. Despite the presence of community-wide health promotion activities and screening programs, people living in regional and rural locations experience a number of factors that reduce breast and bowel cancer survival outcomes. This study investigates the ways that high-risk community members in a regional area of Australia interact with health messaging about breast and bowel cancer screening. METHODS A qualitative research method was used to conduct 31 in-depth one-on-one interviews with community members, leaders and essential service providers. A thematic approach was used to analyse data. RESULTS Findings provided insight to the ways that health is spoken about within the community, what prompts discussion of health, trustworthy sources of health information and the significance of peer-to-peer communication. CONCLUSIONS Existing community communication lines can be used to assist in delivering public health messages among high-risk and vulnerable population groups. Utilising community ambassadors is identified as a health promotion method for hard-to-reach populations. SO WHAT?: Conversations about health and screening amongst community members, and led by community members, play a key role in shaping engagement with cancer screening programs and represent an important site for health promotion activities. These findings have implications for future public health initiatives amongst high-risk groups in regional locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra James
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Daniel Chamberlain
- Centre for Social Impact, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Denise Azar
- Gippsland Primary Health Network, Traralgon, VIC, Australia
| | - Lauren Sewell
- Gippsland Primary Health Network, Traralgon, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dayaratna N, Nguyen CL, Spillane A, Mak C, Warrier SK, Dusseldorp JR. Trends and variations in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction rates in Australia over 10 years. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:242-250. [PMID: 36651629 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Offering breast reconstruction (BR) at the time of mastectomy is standard of care in Australia with proven quality-of-life benefits. Previously BR rates in Australia have been low compared to similar countries. Accurate up-to-date information is needed to promote equity in access to BR and inform future planning of services. This study analysed recent trends and variations of BR uptake in Australia. METHOD Data from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit (BQA) were used to identify patients who underwent mastectomy with or without reconstruction for invasive or in situ breast carcinoma from 2010 to 2019. The association between BR uptake and the variables of jurisdiction (state or territory), age, hospital type and remoteness, and remoteness of patients' home addresses were analysed. RESULTS A total 41 880 women underwent mastectomy between 2010 to 2019. The national BR rate steadily increased from 12.8% in 2010 to 29% in 2019, with a 10-year national average of 21.3%. Statistically significant differences in BR uptake (P < 0.001) were found between states with higher rates in New South Wales and Victoria, with BR more likely in private hospitals and in younger women (P < 0.001), and less likely in remote areas (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The Australian BR rate has increased over the 10-year period, but significant variation still exists between states. BR is lower in older women and those living in regional and remote areas. While the steady increase in BR uptake is encouraging, barriers that exist to equitable provision of reconstructive surgical services for all women living with breast cancer still need to be corrected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirmal Dayaratna
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chu Luan Nguyen
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Spillane
- Northern Clinical School, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The Poche Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Mater Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cindy Mak
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sanjay Kumar Warrier
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joseph R Dusseldorp
- Department of Breast Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Concord Repatriation Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Association of Physician Densities and Gynecologic Cancer Outcomes in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 140:751-757. [DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
9
|
Socioeconomic aspect of breast cancer incidence and mortality in women in Lower Silesia (Poland) in 2005–2014. POSTEP HIG MED DOSW 2022. [DOI: 10.2478/ahem-2022-0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Identifying breast cancer-specific (BC) correlations between socioeconomic factors and population health is important for the optimization of womens cancer screening programs.
Materials/Methods
The research was based on data of 14,158 BC cases and 4096 deaths from BC in women registered at the Lower Silesian Cancer Registry in 2005–2014 and data from Statistical Office.
Results
We found a negative impact of female unemployment on the incidence of BC, and a positive impact on women's deaths due to BC. The performed spatiotemporal disease clusters’ analysis of BC data discovered a statistically significant (p<0.05) 2 “hot” and 3 “cold spots” in incidence and only 1 “hot” disease cluster in mortality.
Conclusion
The state of health of a society is strictly associated with socio-economic conditions; one of the prognostic factors in the epidemiology of BC is the unemployment rate among women. Broadly understood urban-rural conditions affect the assessment of incidence and mortality from BC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lindsay D, Bates N, Diaz A, Watt K, Callander E. Quantifying the hospital and emergency department costs for women diagnosed with breast cancer in Queensland. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:2141-2150. [PMID: 34676449 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06570-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE With increasing rates of cancer survival due to advances in screening and treatment options, the costs of breast cancer diagnoses are attracting interest. However, limited research has explored the costs to the Australian healthcare system associated with breast cancer. We aimed to describe the cost to hospital funders for hospital episodes and emergency department (ED) presentations for Queensland women with breast cancer, and whether costs varied by demographic characteristics. METHODS We used a linked administrative dataset, CancerCostMod, limited to all breast cancer diagnoses aged 18 years or over in Queensland between July 2011 and June 2015 (n = 13,285). Each record was linked to Queensland Health Admitted Patient Data Collection and Emergency Department Information Systems records between July 2011 and June 2018. The cost of hospital episodes and ED presentations were determined, with mean costs per patient modelled using generalised linear models with a gamma distribution and log link function. RESULTS The total cost to the Queensland healthcare system from hospital episodes for female breast cancer was AUD$309 million and AUD$12.6 million for ED presentations during the first 3 years following diagnosis. High levels of costs and service use were identified in the first 6 months following diagnosis. Some significant differences in cost of hospital and ED episodes were identified based on demographic characteristics, with Indigenous women and those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds having higher costs. CONCLUSION Hospitalisation costs for breast cancer in Queensland exert a high burden on the healthcare system. Costs are higher for women during the first 6 months from diagnosis and for Indigenous women, as well as those with underlying comorbidities and lower socioeconomic position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lindsay
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Nicole Bates
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Abbey Diaz
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kerrianne Watt
- College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Emily Callander
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clohessy J, Hoffman G, Cope D. Geographic remoteness from a multidisciplinary team is associated with an increased clinical staging of head and neck cancer: a Newcastle (Australia) study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 51:862-868. [PMID: 34598849 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between a patient's residential distance from a tertiary referral regional multidisciplinary team (MDT) and the clinical staging of their head and neck cancer (HNC) at presentation. A retrospective cohort study was performed of all attendees with HNC who had undergone an MDT assessment. The period of study was January 2016 to January 2017. The primary predictor variable was the patient's residential distance from the MDT. Demographic and clinicopathological factors were recorded. The primary outcome variable was the clinical staging conferred by the MDT. Descriptive and ordinal logistical regression analyses were conducted to examine the data. There were 286 observations; 230 patients were male and 56 were female. The mean age of the cohort was 66.52 years. The average residential distance from the MDT was 68.16 km. Regression analysis, while not statistically significant, indicated that those living more than 100 km (range 102-592 km) from the MDT had a 1.49 times increased risk of being diagnosed with an advanced stage of cancer when compared to those living less than 100 km away. This study provides insights into the potential adverse effect geographic remoteness has on initial staging of HNC and the need for further strategies to serve this at-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Clohessy
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
| | - G Hoffman
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; Medical School, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - D Cope
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Population Based Survival Analysis of Females Diagnosed with Breast Cancer and Its Related Factors in Kerman Province from 2001 to 2015, Using Parametric Log-Logistic Models. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER MANAGEMENT 2021. [DOI: 10.5812/ijcm.100730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide and 14.2% of deaths in Iranian women were due to breast cancer. Objectives: The present study aimed at investigating the survival of females with breast cancer diagnosed over 14 years and its related factors in Kerman Province. Methods: This is a longitudinal study. Information about 2851 females diagnosed with breast cancer was inquired from the Cancer Registry of Kerman University of Medical Sciences from March 2001 to March 2015. Data analysis was performed by Stata 14 and SPSS 22. Results: Totally, 8511 women diagnosed with breast cancer were enrolled in this study. The median survival time among patients with grade 3 at diagnosis was 0.51 of patients with grade 1 (P = 0.016). The median survival time among patients with stage 4 at diagnosis was 0.11 of patients with stages 0 and 1 (P < 0.001). The median survival time among post-menopause patients at diagnosis was 0.65 of pre-menopause patients (P = 0.014). The median survival time among patients with secondary metastasis was 0.22 of patients without it (P < 0.001) and the median survival time among patients with hormonotherapy was 1.52 of patients without this treatment (P = 0.013). Conclusions: Early diagnosis can improve the survival of patients with breast cancer. Periodic checkups especially in menopause ages are recommended. Hormone therapy has been successful in increasing patients’ survival.
Collapse
|
13
|
Fitch MI, Lockwood G, Nicoll I. Physical, emotional, and practical concerns, help-seeking and unmet needs of rural and urban dwelling adult cancer survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2021; 53:101976. [PMID: 34111722 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study explores the influence of residency location on the experiences of cancer survivors. The influence of where individuals live during cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment has been described in various countries. However, understanding the context of residency on experiences during survivorship has received less attention. METHODS A survey was designed to assess experiences of cancer survivors transitioning to follow-up care. Descriptive statistics were used to contrast physical, emotional, and practical concerns, help-seeking, and unmet needs of rural and urban dwelling respondents. Difference in proportions of greater than 5% were considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS In total, 13,319 respondents completed the survey of which 4646 met the criteria for rural dwelling (e.g., living in villages or towns with 10,000 or less residents or on an acreage, ranch, or farm). Proportions of respondents in rural and urban groups were similar in terms of level of concerns. Differences were observed for help seeking regarding return to work and for difficulty in obtaining help regarding taking care of children and other family members, changes in relationships with family, friends and co-workers, and getting to and from appointments. Unmet needs existed across all domains and were similar in both groups. A larger proportion of rural dwelling respondents experienced unmet needs regarding return to work. CONCLUSIONS [implications]: High proportions of cancer survivors experienced concerns following cancer treatment. However, rural dwelling survivors were more challenged in obtaining help for selected concerns. Implications exist for development of community-based support services in rural settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret I Fitch
- Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 207 Chisholm Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M4C 4V9, Canada.
| | - Gina Lockwood
- Biostatistician Consultant (Independent), Toronto, Canada.
| | - Irene Nicoll
- Health Care Consultant (Independent), Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shingde R, Salindera S, Aherne NJ, Millard-Newton L, Houlton A, Sanderson E, Bowers P, Shakespeare TP, Ross W. Survival outcomes for breast cancer patients who decline recommended treatment: a propensity score-matched analysis. ANZ J Surg 2021; 91:1766-1771. [PMID: 33844428 DOI: 10.1111/ans.16859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For patients with breast cancer who decline recommended treatments, available data examining survival outcomes are sparse. We compared overall survival and relapse-free survival outcomes between patients with breast cancer who declined recommended primary treatments and those who received recommended primary treatments. METHODS Using data from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit database, a retrospective cohort study was performed for patients diagnosed with breast carcinoma (stage 0-IV) between 2001 and 2014 who were treated in our integrated cancer centre. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare overall survival and relapse-free survival between patients who either declined or received the standard recommended treatment. RESULTS A total of 56/912 (6.1%) patients declined one or more recommended therapies. Five-year overall survival for those who declined or received treatment as recommended was 81.8% versus 88.9% (P = 0.17), respectively. Ten-year survival was 61.3% versus 67.8% (P = 0.22), respectively. For patients who declined treatments, 5-year relapse-free survival was 72.4%, compared to 87.4% for those who received them (P = 0.005). Ten-year relapse-free survival was 61.0% versus 80.6% (P = 0.002), respectively. On adjusted Cox regression analysis, treatment refusal was associated with poorer relapse-free survival (adjusted hazard ratio 2.76 (95% confidence interval 1.52-5.00), P < 0.001). CONCLUSION In conclusion, patients who declined recommended treatment for breast cancer had poorer relapse-free survival compared to those who received them. These data may help clinicians assist patients with breast cancer in their decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashmi Shingde
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shehnarz Salindera
- Department of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Noel J Aherne
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lee Millard-Newton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adelene Houlton
- Department of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Erica Sanderson
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Phillipa Bowers
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thomas P Shakespeare
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - William Ross
- School of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Surgery, Coffs Harbour Health Campus, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cardiac assessment in Australian patients receiving (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer: a population-based study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 187:893-902. [PMID: 33616773 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06135-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cardiac function assessment is important for detecting and managing trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity. Our study estimates rates and predictors of cardiac assessment among patients receiving trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (HER2+EBC) in Australia. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of Australians initiating (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab for HER2+EBC between 1 January 2015 and 15 April 2019. We used administrative claims to determine the number of patients receiving guideline-recommended assessment, i.e. evidence of baseline cardiac assessment (between 120 days before and 30 days after trastuzumab initiation) and regular on-treatment cardiac assessments (at least every 120 days). We examined factors associated with baseline and regular on-treatment cardiac assessment. RESULTS Our study includes 5621 patients (median age 56 years), of whom 4984 (88.7%) had a baseline cardiac function test. Among 4280 patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, 2702 (63.1%) had guideline-recommended cardiac assessment. Rates of guideline-recommended assessment increased with later year of diagnosis (60.9% in 2015 vs 68.3% in 2018, OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.06-1.69). Patients with higher baseline comorbidities and greater socioeconomic disadvantage were less likely to have guideline-recommended cardiac assessment. Cardiac assessment practices varied by State/Territory. There was no association between baseline cardiac risk or anthracycline use and the likelihood of receiving guideline-recommended cardiac assessment. CONCLUSION The majority of patients receiving (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab had guideline-recommended baseline and on-treatment cardiac assessment. Variations in cardiac assessment predominantly related to system-level factors, such as year of diagnosis and geography, rather than individual patient factors.
Collapse
|
16
|
Dasgupta P, Henshaw C, Youlden DR, Aitken JF, Sullivan A, Irving H, Baade PD. Global trends in incidence rates of childhood liver cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2020; 34:609-617. [PMID: 32337759 DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood liver cancers are relatively rare, hence inferences on incidence trends over time are limited by lack of precision in most studies. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of published contemporary trends on childhood liver cancer incidence rates worldwide. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION English-language peer-reviewed articles published from 1 January 2008 to 1 December 2019 that presented quantitative estimates of incidence trends for childhood liver cancer and diagnostic subgroups. Review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently extracted data and critically assessed studies. SYNTHESIS Random effects meta-analysis models were used to estimate pooled incidence trends by diagnostic subgroups. Heterogeneity was measured using the Q and I2 statistics and publication bias evaluated using Egger's test. RESULTS Eighteen studies were included, all based on population-based cancer registries. Trends were reported on average for 18 years. Overall pooled estimates of the annual percentage change (APC) were 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5, 2.3) for childhood liver cancers, 2.8 (95% CI 1.8, 3.8) for hepatoblastoma and -3.0 (95% CI -11.0, 4.9) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Sub-group analysis by region indicated increasing trends for childhood liver cancers in North America/Europe/Australia (APC 1.7, 95% CI 0.7, 2.8) whereas corresponding trends were stable in Asia (APC 1.4, 95%CI -0.3, 2.7). Publication bias was not detected for any of these analyses. The I2 statistic indicated that the heterogeneity among included studies was low for combined liver cancers, moderate for hepatoblastoma and high for hepatocellular carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS Incidence is increasing for childhood liver cancers and the most commonly diagnosed subgroup hepatoblastoma. Lack of knowledge of the etiology of childhood liver cancers limited the ability to understand the reasons for observed incidence trends. This review highlighted the need for ongoing monitoring of incidence trends and etiological studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramita Dasgupta
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Chloe Henshaw
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Danny R Youlden
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD, Australia
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Ashleigh Sullivan
- Department of Oncology, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Helen Irving
- Department of Oncology, Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter D Baade
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Southport, QLD, Australia.,School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dasgupta P, Henshaw C, Youlden DR, Clark PJ, Aitken JF, Baade PD. Global Trends in Incidence Rates of Primary Adult Liver Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2020; 10:171. [PMID: 32185125 PMCID: PMC7058661 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Primary liver cancer is a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Global burden varies, reflecting geographical distribution of viral hepatitis. Our objective was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of published current trends in incidence of adult liver cancers and histological types worldwide. Methods: This study used systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases for English-language peer-reviewed articles published from 1 January 2008 to 01 September 2019. Inclusion criteria were population-based studies of adult liver cancer patients with quantitative estimates of temporal trends in incidence for liver cancers and/or histological types. For multiple studies from the same geographical area, only the publication that reported the most recent trends for the same cancer type and population subgroup was included. Review was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently extracted data and critically assessed studies. Proposed contributors to observed trends were extracted from included articles. Study-specific estimates of the annual percentage change (APC) in incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis models. Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistics and publication bias evaluated using funnel plots and Egger's tests. Results: Overall, 53 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 31 were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, pooled APC estimates were +0.8 (95% CI −0.3, +2.0) for liver cancers combined, +2.6 (95% CI +1.2, +4.0) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and +4.3 (95% CI +2.5, +6.1) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Subgroup analyses indicated increasing trends for liver cancers (APC +3.2, 95% CI +2.5, +3.9) and HCC (APC +3.6, 95% CI +2.9, +4.4) in the region of North America/Europe/Australia, whereas corresponding trends were decreasing (APC −1.7, 95% CI −2.2, −1.1) and stable (APC −0.7, 95% CI −1.9, +0.5) in Asia, respectively. Conclusions: Incidence is increasing for adult liver cancers and HCC in Western countries, whereas trends are decreasing in the Asian region, although still remaining high. Our findings highlight the importance of viral hepatitis control and lifestyle interventions to reduce global liver cancer burden. Ongoing surveillance is also vital to detect early shifts in incidence trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramita Dasgupta
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Chloe Henshaw
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Danny R Youlden
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Paul J Clark
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Mater Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Princess Alexandra Hospital & Mater Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter D Baade
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.,School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mahumud RA, Alam K, Dunn J, Gow J. Emerging cancer incidence, mortality, hospitalisation and associated burden among Australian cancer patients, 1982 - 2014: an incidence-based approach in terms of trends, determinants and inequality. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031874. [PMID: 31843834 PMCID: PMC6924826 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer is a leading killer worldwide, including Australia. Cancer diagnosis leads to a substantial burden on the individual, their family and society. The main aim of this study is to understand the trends, determinants and inequalities associated with cancer incidence, hospitalisation, mortality and its burden over the period 1982 to 2014 in Australia. SETTINGS The study was conducted in Australia. STUDY DESIGN An incidence-based study design was used. METHODS Data came from the publicly accessible Australian Institute of Health and Welfare database. This contained 2 784 148 registered cancer cases over the study period for all types of cancer. Erreygers' concentration index was used to examine the magnitude of socioeconomic inequality with regards to cancer outcomes. Furthermore, a generalised linear model was constructed to identify the influential factors on the overall burden of cancer. RESULTS The results showed that cancer incidence (annual average percentage change, AAPC=1.33%), hospitalisation (AAPC=1.27%), cancer-related mortality (AAPC=0.76%) and burden of cancer (AAPC=0.84%) all increased significantly over the period. The same-day (AAPC=1.35%) and overnight (AAPC=1.19%) hospitalisation rates also showed an increasing trend. Further, the ratio (least-most advantaged economic resources ratio, LMR of mortality (M) and LMR of incidence (I)) was especially high for cervix (M/I=1.802), prostate (M/I=1.514), melanoma (M/I=1.325), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (M/I=1.325) and breast (M/I=1.318), suggesting that survival inequality was most pronounced for these cancers. Socioeconomically disadvantaged people were more likely to bear an increasing cancer burden in terms of incidence, mortality and death. CONCLUSIONS Significant differences in the burden of cancer persist across socioeconomic strata in Australia. Policymakers should therefore introduce appropriate cancer policies to provide universal cancer care, which could reduce this burden by ensuring curable and preventive cancer care services are made available to all people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashidul Alam Mahumud
- Health Economics and Policy Research, Centre for Health, Informatics and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- Health Economics Research, Health Systems and Population Studies Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Health and Epidemiology Research, Department of Statistics, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi, Bangladesh
| | - Khorshed Alam
- Health Economics and Policy Research, Centre for Health, Informatics and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Health Economics and Policy Research, Centre for Health, Informatics and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeff Gow
- Health Economics and Policy Research, Centre for Health, Informatics and Economic Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Commerce, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
- School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Coyne E, Frommolt V, Salehi A. The experience and challenges of rural persons with cancer and their families. Collegian 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.colegn.2019.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
20
|
Ho-Huynh A, Tran A, Bray G, Abbot S, Elston T, Gunnarsson R, de Costa A. Factors influencing breast cancer outcomes in Australia: A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13038. [PMID: 30919536 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review evaluates factors influencing breast cancer outcomes for women treated in Australia, facilitating the exploration of disparities in breast cancer outcomes for certain groups of women in Australia. METHOD A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE and Scopus focusing on breast cancer in Australia with outcome measures being breast cancer survival and recurrence with no restrictions on date. Risk of bias was assessed using Cairns Assessment Scale for Observational studies of Risk factors (CASOR). RESULTS Fifteen quantitative studies were included: two were high quality, 11 were intermediate quality, and two were low quality. Traditional risk factors such as invasive tumour type, larger size, higher grade and stage, lymph node involvement and absence of hormone receptors were found to be associated with breast cancer mortality. Being younger (<40 years old) and older (>70 years old), having more comorbidities, being of lower socioeconomic status, identifying as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander, living in more rural areas or having a mastectomy were factors found to be associated with poorer breast cancer outcomes. CONCLUSION Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, this review identified significant risk factors for breast cancer mortality and recurrence. The use of this data would be most useful in developing evidence-based interventions and in optimising patient care through creation of a prediction model. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42017072857.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Ho-Huynh
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alex Tran
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gerard Bray
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Samuel Abbot
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Timothy Elston
- Department of Surgery, Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ronny Gunnarsson
- Primary Health Care, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Alan de Costa
- Cairns Clinical School, College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dasgupta P, Baade PD, Aitken JF, Ralph N, Chambers SK, Dunn J. Geographical Variations in Prostate Cancer Outcomes: A Systematic Review of International Evidence. Front Oncol 2019; 9:238. [PMID: 31024842 PMCID: PMC6463763 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Previous reviews of geographical disparities in the prostate cancer continuum from diagnosis to mortality have identified a consistent pattern of poorer outcomes with increasing residential disadvantage and for rural residents. However, there are no contemporary, systematic reviews summarizing the latest available evidence. Our objective was to systematically review the published international evidence for geographical variations in prostate cancer indicators by residential rurality and disadvantage. Methods: Systematic searches of peer-reviewed articles in English published from 1/1/1998 to 30/06/2018 using PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Informit databases. Inclusion criteria were: population was adult prostate cancer patients; outcome measure was PSA testing, prostate cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, access to and use of services, survival, and prostate cancer mortality with quantitative results by residential rurality and/or disadvantage. Studies were critically appraised using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Overall 169 studies met the inclusion criteria. Around 50% were assessed as high quality and 50% moderate. Men from disadvantaged areas had consistently lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and prostate cancer incidence, poorer survival, more advanced disease and a trend toward higher mortality. Although less consistent, predominant patterns by rurality were lower PSA testing, prostate cancer incidence and survival, but higher stage disease and mortality among rural men. Both geographical measures were associated with variations in access and use of prostate cancer-related services for low to high risk disease. Conclusions: This review found substantial evidence that prostate cancer indicators varied by residential location across diverse populations and geographies. While wide variations in study design limited comparisons across studies, our review indicated that internationally, men living in disadvantaged areas, and to a lesser extent more rural areas, face a greater prostate cancer burden. This review highlights the need for a better understanding of the complex social, environmental, and behavioral reasons for these variations, recognizing that, while important, geographical access is not the only issue. Implementing research strategies to help identify these processes and to better understand the central role of disadvantage to variations in health outcome are crucial to inform the development of evidence-based targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramita Dasgupta
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Peter D Baade
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.,School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Joanne F Aitken
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicholas Ralph
- Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.,St Vincent's Private Hospital, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.,School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| | - Suzanne Kathleen Chambers
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.,Health and Wellness Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.,Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jeff Dunn
- Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.,Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.,Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|