1
|
Forster RB, Engeland A, Kvåle R, Hjellvik V, Bjørge T. Association between medical androgen deprivation therapy and long-term cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in non-metastatic prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:1109-1119. [PMID: 35489025 PMCID: PMC9544783 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Studies have suggested that prostate cancer (PCa) patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are at increased risk of developing or exacerbating cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to explore the association between ADT for PCa and subsequent CVD and all‐cause mortality in this nationwide, longitudinal study. We also evaluated the role of cardiovascular risk and ADT duration to determine effect modification. Norwegian registry data were used to identify patients with PCa from 2008‐18 and who received primary ADT in the first year after diagnosis. The associations between ADT and composite cardiovascular events, and the individual components of myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure, in addition to atrial fibrillation and all‐cause mortality, were explored using time‐varying Cox regression models. We included 30 923 PCa patients, of whom 8449 (27%) received primary ADT. Mean follow‐up was 2.9 and 3.8 years for CVD events and mortality, respectively. We found an association between ADT and composite CVD (adjusted HR 1.13: 95% CI 1.05‐1.21), myocardial infarction (1.18: 1.05‐1.32), stroke (1.21: 1.06‐1.38), heart failure (1.23: 1.13‐1.35) and all‐cause mortality (1.49: 1.39‐1.61). These associations persisted in those with low and moderate CVD risk and ADT longer than 7 months. A relationship between ADT and composite CVD and all‐cause mortality was observed, especially in those with moderate CVD risk and longer treatment duration. Future studies with more detailed cancer data are needed to verify the clinical relevance of these results, especially when considering all‐cause mortality within the context of treatment guidelines and benefits of ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R B Forster
- Department of Health Registry Research and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway
| | - A Engeland
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - R Kvåle
- Department of Health Registry Research and Development, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - V Hjellvik
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - T Bjørge
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.,Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin E, Garmo H, Van Hemelrijck M, Adolfsson J, Stattin P, Zethelius B, Crawley D. Exploring the association between use of gonadotropin releasing hormones agonists and prostate cancer diagnosis per se and diabetes control in men with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nationwide, population-based cohort study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1259. [PMID: 34809595 PMCID: PMC8607667 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08941-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gonadotropin Releasing Hormones agonists (GnRH), which are first line treatment for metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), increase risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aims to quantify the association of use of GnRH with diabetes control in PCa men with T2DM. METHODS Nationwide population-based cohort study in the Swedish National Diabetes Register and Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden 4.1, on the association between GnRH and diabetes control in T2DM men with PCa by comparing T2DM men with PCa vs. without PCa, as well as comparing T2DM men with PCa on or not on GnRH. The primary exposure was use of GnRH. Worsening diabetes control was the primary outcome, defined as: 1) HbA1c rose to 58 mmol/mol or higher; 2) HbA1c increase by 10 mmol/mol or more; 3) Start of antidiabetic drugs or switch to insulin. We also combined all above definitions. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the association. RESULTS There were 5714 T2DM men with PCa of whom 692 were on GnRH and 28,445 PCa-free men with T2DM with similar baseline characteristics. Diabetes control was worse in men with GnRH vs. PCa-free men (HR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.13-1.34) as well as compared with PCa men without GnRH (HR:1.58, 95% CI: 1.39-1.80), when we defined the worsening control of diabetes by combining all definitions above. CONCLUSION Use of GnRH in T2DM men with PCa was associated with worse glycemic control. The findings highlight the need to closely monitor diabetes control in men with T2DM and PCa starting GnRH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Lin
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, 3rd Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - Hans Garmo
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, 3rd Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, 3rd Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Jan Adolfsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pär Stattin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Björn Zethelius
- Department of Public Health/Geriatrics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Danielle Crawley
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, 3rd Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Observation of Efficacy of Internet-Based Chronic Disease Management Model Combined with Modified Therapy of Bushenyiliu Decoction in Treating Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Prostate Cancer and Its Effect on Disease Control Rate. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2021; 2021:7767186. [PMID: 34539806 PMCID: PMC8448592 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7767186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective To explore the efficacy of Internet-based chronic disease management model combined with the modified therapy of Bushenyiliu decoction in treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and prostate cancer and its effect on disease control rate (DCR). Methods 120 patients with T2DM and prostate cancer admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou First People's Hospital, from February 2019 to February 2020, were retrospectively analyzed and equally divided into the experimental group and the control group according to their admission order. Conventional treatment combined with the modified therapy of Bushenyiliu decoction was performed on all patients for 3 months, and the Internet-based chronic disease management model was adopted for patients in the experimental group additionally, so as to compare their short-term effect, survival time, disease progression, blood glucose indicators, immune function indicators, and type 2 Diabetes Self-Care Scale (2-DSCS) scores. Results Compared with the control group, the experimental group obtained significantly higher DCR and objective remission rate (ORR) (P < 0.05), higher survival time and disease progression (P < 0.001), better blood glucose indicators and immune function indicators (P < 0.001), and higher 2-DSCS scores (P < 0.001) after treatment. Conclusion Combining the Internet-based chronic disease management model with the modified therapy of Bushenyiliu decoction can effectively enhance the self-care ability of patients with T2DM and prostate cancer, improve their blood glucose level, promote their body immunity, and comprehensively optimize the cancer control effect, which should be promoted in practice.
Collapse
|
4
|
Parker J, Crawley D, Garmo H, Lindahl B, Styrke J, Adolfsson J, Lambe M, Stattin P, Van Hemelrijck M, Beckmann K. Use of Warfarin or Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Risk of Prostate Cancer in PCBaSe: A Nationwide Case-Control Study. Front Oncol 2020; 10:571838. [PMID: 33134172 PMCID: PMC7578339 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.571838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 08/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Existing literature examining warfarin's association with prostate cancer (PCa) risk provides conflicting results, while the association with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has not yet been studied. We investigated the association of warfarin and DOAC use on PCa risk among men within the population-based Prostate Cancer database Sweden (PCBaSe), using a case-control design. The study population included PCa cases diagnosed 2014–2016 and five age-matched PCa-free controls. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for PCa associated with warfarin and DOAC use, adjusted for marital status, education level, other drug use, and comorbidities. Among 31,591 cases and 156,802 controls, there were 18,522 (9.8%) warfarin and 4,455 (2.4%) DOAC users. Warfarin ever-use was associated with reduced risk of PCa overall (OR 0.92 95% CI 0.88–0.96) as were both past and current use. DOAC use was not associated with PCa risk. For some warfarin exposures, decreased risk was observed for unfavorable PCa (high risk/locally advanced/distant metastatic) but not with favorable PCa (low/intermediate risk). Increased risk of favorable PCa was observed for men whose initial warfarin exposure occurred in the 12 month period before diagnosis (OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.13–1.70). Our findings are consistent with previous publications reporting decreased PCa risk with warfarin exposure. Increased risk of favorable PCa suggests detection bias due to increased prostate specific antigen testing when starting on warfarin. Decreased overall PCa risk could reflect bias due to reduced biopsy rates among long-term warfarin users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Parker
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Danielle Crawley
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hans Garmo
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,Regional Cancer Centre Uppsala Orebro, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Bertil Lindahl
- Clinical Research Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Johan Styrke
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Jan Adolfsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Lambe
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pär Stattin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kerri Beckmann
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.,Cancer Research Institute, School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vassilev ZP, Gabarró MS, Kaye JA, Saltus CW, Riedel O, Scholle O, Mehtälä J, Korhonen P, Garbe E, Zong J. Incidence of second primary malignancies in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from observational studies in three countries. Future Oncol 2020; 16:1889-1901. [DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: This reports some of the first incidence rate (IR) estimates of second primary malignancies (SPMs) in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in three countries. Patients & methods: Claims data from the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database; registry data from the Prostate Cancer Data Base Sweden; and combined registry-claims data from the US Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database were analyzed to obtain overall survival and incidence of SPMs in men with mCRPC. Results: SPMs occurred in 308 German (n = 2360), 273 Swedish (n = 2849) and 172 US (n = 2234) men with mCRPC. IRs of SPMs were 79.0 (95% CI: 70.4–88.4), 101.7 (95% CI: 90.3–114.5) and 59 (95% CI: 50–68) per 1000 person-years in German, Swedish and US cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: These studies report some of the first IR estimates of SPMs in men with mCRPC, providing a historical risk estimate of SPM in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Oliver Riedel
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research & Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Oliver Scholle
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research & Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | | | | | - Edeltraut Garbe
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research & Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lin E, Garmo H, Van Hemelrijck M, Adolfsson J, Stattin P, Zethelius B, Crawley D. Association of type 2 diabetes mellitus and antidiabetic medication with risk of prostate cancer: a population-based case-control study. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:551. [PMID: 32539807 PMCID: PMC7294669 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07036-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are prevalent conditions that often occur concomitantly. However, many aspects of the impact of T2DM, particularly the duration of T2DM and antidiabetic medications, on PCa risk are poorly understood. METHODS To assess the association of duration of T2DM and antidiabetic medication with PCa risk, we designed a matched case-control study, including 31,415 men with PCa and 154,812 PCa-free men in Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe) 4.1. RESULTS Overall, a decreased risk of PCa was observed for men with T2DM (odds ratio (OR): 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-0.84), as compared to men without T2DM. The decreased risk of PCa was consistently showed across duration of T2DM. With respect to use of antidiabetic drugs, this inverse association with duration was also found for all medications types, as compared to men without T2DM, including insulin, metformin and sulphonylurea (SU) (e.g. 3- < 5 yr insulin OR:0.69, 95%CI:0.60-0.80; 3- < 5 yr metformin OR: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.74-0.91; 3- < 5 yr SU OR: 0.72, 95%CI: 0.62-0.83). When stratifying by PCa risk categories, this decreased risk was most evident for diagnosis of low and intermediate-risk PCa (low-risk OR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.66-0.70, intermediate-risk OR: 0.80, 95%CI: 0.75-0.85). CONCLUSIONS The study showed an inverse association between pre-existing T2DM and PCa across different durations of T2DM and all types of T2DM medication received. This inverse association was most evident for low- and intermediate-risk PCa, suggesting that whilst T2DM and its medication may protect some men from developing PCa, the relationship warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Lin
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Hans Garmo
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jan Adolfsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Pär Stattin
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Björn Zethelius
- Department of Public Health/Geriatrics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Danielle Crawley
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Determining the Impact of a Cancer Diagnosis on Diabetes Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Am J Clin Oncol 2020; 42:870-883. [PMID: 31592804 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cancer patients with comorbid diabetes have a 50% increased risk of all-cause mortality compared with cancer patients without diabetes. Less attention to diabetes management (glucose control, medication adherence, and diabetes self-management behaviors) during active cancer treatment is hypothesized as an explanation for worse outcomes among diabetic cancer patients. The objective of this systematic review is to determine and quantify how a cancer diagnosis impacts diabetes management. METHODS Quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating diabetes management among patients were identified by searching 4 databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers extracted data and summarized results from eligible studies. Study quality was formally assessed. RESULTS Thirty-six studies met all inclusion criteria. We observed heterogeneity across studies in terms of study design, sample size, cancer site, type of diabetes management evaluated, and quality. Numerous articles discussed that overall, glucose control, medication adherence, and diabetes self-management behaviors declined following a cancer diagnosis. However, findings were inconsistent across studies. CONCLUSIONS Although the effects of a cancer diagnosis on diabetes management are mixed, when results across studies were synthesized together, diabetes management appeared to generally decline after a cancer diagnosis. Declines in diabetes management seem to be primarily due to shifts in the priority of care from diabetes management to cancer. A next critical step in this line of work is to identify patient and provider level predictors of better or worse diabetes management to design and test interventions aimed at improving effective diabetes management for cancer patients.
Collapse
|