Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method

Evaluation of paediatric palliative care ambulance plans: A retrospective study

Paediatric Palliative Care Ambulance Plans ('Plans') are used by New South Wales Ambulance (Australia) to support the care needs of children with life-limiting conditions. We aimed to describe the population of children with Plans and provide details regarding Plan completion, paramedic responses during ambulance callouts, and correspondence between Plan recommendations and paramedic responses. Plans lodged in January 2017-December 2019 were retrospectively coded for demographic information, completeness and care preferences. Associated paramedic callout notes (January 2018-December 2019) were coded for paramedic responses. Of 141 Plans retrieved, 38 (41.3% of those providing suggested medications) suggested medication use outside general paramedic scope of practice. Of 199 associated ambulance callouts, reasons for callout included symptom management, planned transfer, death notification and end-of-life care. Over two-thirds of callouts (n = 135, 67.8%) occurred after-hours. Most paramedic callouts (n = 124, 62.3%), excluding planned transfers, resulted in children being transported. Paramedic interventions corresponded with interventions suggested in Plans. However, only 24 (25.3%) of paramedic callout notes documented Plans being sighted. This study provided detailed information about children with palliative care needs for whom Plans were being used, the nature of these Plans and associated paramedic callouts. However, it is not known how paramedics were influenced by Plans.

Limitation of Non-Beneficial Interventions and their Impact on the Intensive Care Unit Costs

Introduction

Using a plan to limit non-beneficial life support interventions has significantly reduced harm and loss of dignity for patients at the end of life. The association of these limitations with patients' clinical characteristics and health care costs in the intensive care unit (ICU) needs further scientific evidence.

Aim of the study

To explore decisions to limit non-beneficial life support interventions, their correlation with patients' clinical data, and their effect on the cost of care in the ICU.

Material and Methods

We included all patients admitted to the general ICU of a hospital in Greece in a two-year (2019-2021) prospective study. Data collection included patient demographic and clinical variables, data related to decisions to limit (withholding, withdrawing) non-beneficial interventions (NBIs), and economic data. Comparisons were made between patients with and without limitation decisions.

Results

NBIs were limited in 164 of 454 patients (36.12%). Patients with limitation decisions were associated with older age (70y vs. 62y; p<0,001), greater disease severity score (APACHE IV, 71 vs. 50; p<0,001), longer length of stay (7d vs. 4.5d; p<0,001), and worse prognosis of death (APACHE IV PDR, 48.9 vs. 17.35; p<0,001). All cost categories and total cost per patient were also higher than the patient without limitation of NBIs (9247,79€ vs. 8029,46€, p<0,004). The mean daily cost has not differed between the groups (831,24€ vs. 832,59€; p<0,716). However, in the group of patients with limitations, all cost categories, including the average daily cost (767.31€ vs. 649.12€) after the limitation of NBIs, were reduced to a statistically significant degree (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Limiting NBIs in the ICU reduces healthcare costs and may lead to better management of ICU resource use.

Collaboration between nurses and doctors in the decision-making process when considering ending the life-prolonging treatment of intensive care patients

AIMS

The aim of the study was to explore intensive care nurses' collaboration with doctors' when considering ending the life-prolonging treatment of patients in the intensive care unit.

DESIGN

A qualitative method with an explorative descriptive design was employed.

METHODS

Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with four intensive care nurses and four doctors working in three intensive care units at two university hospitals and one local hospital. The data were analysed using systematic text condensation. This study was reported according to the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research checklist.

RESULTS

Two categories were identified in the data analysis: listening to each other during the decision-making process and continuity and having time to facilitate regular discussions of prognosis and treatment plans.

Responding to the deteriorating patient: The rationale for treatment escalation plans

A Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP) is a communication tool designed to improve quality of care in hospital, particularly if patients deteriorate. The aims are to reduce variation caused by discontinuity of care; avoid harms caused by inappropriate treatment and promote patients’ priorities and preferences. The TEP is based on the goals of treatment – ‘What are we trying to achieve?’ The goals take account of the context of acute illness, the consequences of interventions and discussion with the patient. They should reflect a shift away from ‘fix-it’ medicine to what is realistic and pragmatic. A TEP has three escalation categories: full escalation, selected appropriate treatments and palliative/supportive care. Other appropriate/inappropriate treatments are also recorded. Treatment Escalation Plans are associated with significant reductions in intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, non-beneficial interventions, harms and complaints. Treatment Escalation Plans contribute to staff well-being by reducing uncertainty. Successful implementation requires training and education in medical decision-making and communication skills.

Goals of care discussions in acute hospital admissions - Qualitative description of perspectives from patients, family and their doctors

OBJECTIVE

Goals of care discussions guide care for hospital inpatients at risk of deterioration. We aimed to explore patient and family experience of goals of care during the first 72 h of admission along with their doctor's perspective.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study. Patients, family and doctors who participated in a goals of care discussion during an acute hospital admission at an Australian tertiary teaching hospital were interviewed in 2019.

RESULTS

Many participants found goals of care discussions appropriate and reported understanding. However, communication was commonly procedure-focused, with questioning about preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intubation. Some considered the discussion as inapplicable to their state of health, and occasionally surprising. Participants commonly related goals of care with death, and without context, this led to fear of abandonment. Previous experience with end of life care influenced decision-making. Preference for family presence was clear.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies deficiencies in goals of care communication in the acute hospital setting. Discussions are life-saving-procedure focused, leading to poor understanding and potentially distress, and jeopardising patient-centred care.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Assessment of patient values and clear communication on the aims of goals of care discussions is essential to optimise patient and institutional outcomes. Clinicians should consider environment and invite family participation.

Covid-19 Mortality in an Acute Care Hospital: Association of Patient Factors With Decision to Forego the Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Public awareness of the large mortality toll of COVID-19 particularly among elderly and frail persons is high. This public awareness represents an enhanced opportunity for early and urgent goals-of-care discussions to reduce medically ineffective care.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the end-of-life experiences of hospitalized patients dying of COVID-19 with respect to identifying the clinical factors associated with utilization or non-utilization of the ICU.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of hospital outcomes using electronic medical records and individual chart review from March 15, 2020 to October 15, 2020 of every patient with a COVID-19 diagnosis who died or was admitted to hospice while hospitalized. Logistic regression multivariate analysis was used to identify the clinical and demographic factors associated with non-utilization of the ICU.

RESULTS

133/749 (18%) of hospitalized COVID-19 patients died or were admitted to hospice as a result of COVID-19. Of the 133, 66 (49.6%) had no ICU utilization. In multivariate analysis, the significant patient factors associated with non-ICU utilization were increasing age, normal body mass index, and the presence of an advanced directive calling for limited life sustaining therapies. Race and residence at time of admission (home vs. facility) were significant only in the unadjusted analyses but not in adjusted. Gender was not significant in either form of analyses.

CONCLUSION

Goals of care discussions performed by an augmented palliative care team and other bedside clinicians had renewed urgency during COVID-19. Large percentages of patients and surrogates, perhaps motivated by public awareness of poor outcomes, opted not to utilize the ICU.

An evaluation of advance care planning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective review of patient involvement in decision making using routinely collected data from digital ReSPECT records

OBJECTIVE

To review advance care planning (ACP) practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluating the number of plans created, patient participation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommendations and variation between different population groups.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis and comparison of routinely collected data from electronic recommended summary plan for emergency care and treatment (ReSPECT) records documented in April 2020 and January to December 2019.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Electronic ReSPECT documents completed for adult patients at a large, acute hospital trust in the UK.

RESULTS

The number of plans created per 1,000 admissions in April 2020 was 333.0% higher than in 2019. A greater proportion of plans created during April 2020 were discussed with the patient and the proportion containing a 'for cardiopulmonary resuscitation' recommendation was higher across all population groups. A greater proportion of plans were created for younger adults and Black and minority ethnic groups during the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Increased ACP during a crisis can be achieved alongside increased patient participation in decision making. A tool such as ReSPECT that supports recommendations for, as well as limitations on, treatment may have enabled the expansion of ACP observed.

Education needed to improve antimicrobial use during end-of-life care of older adults with advanced cancer: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial use during end-of-life care of older adults with advanced cancer is prevalent. Factors influencing the decision to prescribe antimicrobials during end-of-life care are not well defined.

AIM

To evaluate factors influencing medicine subspecialists to prescribe intravenous and oral antimicrobials during end-of-life care of older adults with advanced cancer to guide an educational intervention.

DESIGN

18-item single-center cross-sectional survey.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Inpatient medicine subspecialists in 2018.

RESULTS

Of 186 subspecialists surveyed, 67 (36%) responded. Most considered withholding antimicrobials at the time of clinical deterioration during hospitalization (n = 54/67, 81%), viewed the initiation of additional intravenous antimicrobials as escalation of care (n = 44/67, 66%), and believed decision-making should involve patients or surrogates and providers (n = 64/67, 96%). Fifty-one percent (n = 30/59) of respondents who conducted advance care planning did not discuss antimicrobials. Barriers to discussing end-of-life antimicrobials included the potential to overwhelm patients or families, challenges of withdrawing antimicrobials, and insufficient training.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the initiation of additional intravenous antimicrobials was viewed as escalation of care, antimicrobials were not routinely discussed during advance care planning. Educational interventions that promote recognition of antimicrobial-associated adverse events, incorporate antimicrobial use into advance care plans, and offer communication simulation training around the role of antimicrobials during end-of-life care are warranted.

Cost impact of introducing a treatment escalation/limitation plan during patients' last hospital admission before death

OBJECTIVE

A recent study found that the use of a treatment escalation/limitation plan (TELP) was associated with a significant reduction in non-beneficial interventions (NBIs) and harms in patients admitted acutely who subsequently died. We quantify the economic benefit of the use of a TELP.

DESIGN

NBIs were micro-costed. Mean costs for patients with a TELP were compared to patients without a TELP using generalized linear model regression, and results were extrapolated to the Scottish population.

SETTING

Medical, surgical and intensive care units of district general hospital in Scotland, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred and eighty-seven consecutive patients who died over 3 months in 2017. Of these, death was 'expected' in 245 (85.4%) using Gold Standards Framework criteria.

INTERVENTION

Treatment escalation/limitation plan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Between-group difference in estimated mean cost of NBIs.

RESULTS

The group with a TELP (n = 152) had a mean reduction in hospital costs due to NBIs of GB £220.29 (US $;281.97) compared to those without a TELP (n = 132) (95% confidence intervals GB £323.31 (US $413.84) to GB £117.27 (US $150.11), P = <0.001). Assuming that a TELP could be put in place for all expected deaths in Scottish hospitals, the potential annual saving would be GB £2.4 million (US $3.1 million) from having a TELP in place for all 'expected' deaths in hospital.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a TELP in an acute hospital setting may result in a reduction in costs attributable to NBIs.

Antimicrobial use and misuse at the end of life: a retrospective analysis of a treatment escalation/limitation plan

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial treatment is common at end of life. A treatment escalation/limitation plan (TELP) offers the opportunity to avoid non-beneficial treatment in critically ill patients. Our aim was to evaluate antimicrobial prescribing in terminally ill patients, and assess whether it was modified using a TELP.

METHODS

Appropriateness of antimicrobial treatment was audited using a priori criteria in 94 consecutive hospital deaths. Prescribing in patients whose death was expected/unexpected, and who had a TELP with/without a 'ceiling' for antimicrobials, were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty three of 94 patients (24.5%) were receiving antimicrobials at time of death. This was not influenced by evidence of infection or whether death was expected. The use of a TELP (n = 81) with an antimicrobial 'ceiling' (28 with, 53 without) was associated with a significant reduction in antimicrobials administered (28.6% vs 81.1%; p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Many complex factors contribute to antimicrobial misuse at end of life. An appropriately constructed TELP reduces inappropriate prescribing.

A case-controlled study of relatives’ complaints concerning patients who died in hospital: The role of treatment escalation/limitation planning

Objectives

To independently assess quality of care among patients who died in hospital and whose next-of-kin submitted a letter of complaint and make comparisons with matched controls. To identify whether use of a treatment escalation limitation plan (TELP) during the terminal illness was a relevant background factor.

Design

The study was an investigator-blinded retrospective case-note review of 42 complaints cases and 72 controls matched for age, sex, ward location and time of death.

Setting

The acute medical and surgical wards of three District General Hospitals administered by NHS Lanarkshire, Scotland.

Participants

None.

Intervention

None.

Outcome measures

Quality of care: clinical ‘problems’, non-beneficial interventions (NBIs) and harms were evaluated using the Structured Judgment Review Method. Complaints were categorized using the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool.

Results

The event frequencies and rate ratios for clinical ‘problems’, NBIs and harms were consistently higher in complaint cases compared to controls. The difference was only significant for NBIs (P = 0.05). TELPs were used less frequently in complaint cases compared to controls (23.8 versus 47.2%, P = 0.013). The relationship between TELP use and the three key clinical outcomes was nonsignificant.

Conclusions

Care delivered to patients at end-of-life whose next-of-kin submitted a complaint was poorer overall than among control patients when assessed independently by blinded reviewers. Regular use of a TELP in acute clinical settings has the potential to influence complaints relating to end-of-life care, but this requires further prospective study.