1
|
Medina-Córdoba M, Cadavid S, Espinosa-Aranzales AF, Aguía-Rojas K, Bermúdez-Hernández PA, Quiroga-Torres DA, Rodríguez-Dueñas WR. The effect of interprofessional education on the work environment of health professionals: a scoping review. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION : THEORY AND PRACTICE 2023:10.1007/s10459-023-10300-4. [PMID: 38038831 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-023-10300-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
To explore the existing literature on the effect of Interprofessional Education (IPE) on the work environment of health professionals. The research question was systematized according to the PCC (Population, Concept, and Context) format. A scoping review was performed. A search of multiple bibliographic databases identified 407 papers, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. The populations of the 21 studies reviewed were composed of professionals in the fields of medicine, nursing, psychology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and social work, among others. The study contexts were both academic and nonacademic hospitals, mental health institutions, and community settings, and the topics examined were organizational climate, organizational culture, organizational attachment and job satisfaction. The findings from the reviewed studies showed positive effects of IPE interventions on organizational climate and culture, but the results on job satisfaction and organizational attachment were mixed (i.e., positive and no effects following IPE interventions). Research on IPE is worth more attention as IPE could be an effective alternative for the fulfillment of the Quadruple Aim and achieving the third of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, aimed at improving health and well-being. It seems critical for IPE to be positioned as a trend in global health, aiming at boosting human health resources as one of its building blocks and calling the attention of health decision-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Cadavid
- Program of Psychology, People, Family and Society Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia.
| | | | - Karen Aguía-Rojas
- Program of Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Science Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Pablo Andrés Bermúdez-Hernández
- Program of Medicine, Medical and Health Sciences Education Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Daniel-Alejandro Quiroga-Torres
- Program of Biomedical Engineering, Gibiome Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia
| | - William R Rodríguez-Dueñas
- Program of Biomedical Engineering, Gibiome Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota, Colombia
- Electronics Engineering Department, Bioengineering Signal Analysis and Image Processing Research Group, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Paquette S, Kilcullen M, Hoffman O, Hernandez J, Mehta A, Salas E, Greilich PE. Handoffs and the challenges to implementing teamwork training in the perioperative environment. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1187262. [PMID: 37397334 PMCID: PMC10310998 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Perioperative handoffs are high-risk events for miscommunications and poor care coordination, which cause patient harm. Extensive research and several interventions have sought to overcome the challenges to perioperative handoff quality and safety, but few efforts have focused on teamwork training. Evidence shows that team training decreases surgical morbidity and mortality, and there remains a significant opportunity to implement teamwork training in the perioperative environment. Current perioperative handoff interventions face significant difficulty with adherence which raises concerns about the sustainability of their impact. In this perspective article, we explain why teamwork is critical to safe and reliable perioperative handoffs and discuss implementation challenges to the five core components of teamwork training programs in the perioperative environment. We outline evidence-based best practices imperative for training success and acknowledge the obstacles to implementing those best practices. Explicitly identifying and discussing these obstacles is critical to designing and implementing teamwork training programs fit for the perioperative environment. Teamwork training will equip providers with the foundational teamwork competencies needed to effectively participate in handoffs and utilize handoff interventions. This will improve team effectiveness, adherence to current perioperative handoff interventions, and ultimately, patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon Paquette
- Office of Undergraduate Medical Education, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Molly Kilcullen
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Olivia Hoffman
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Jessica Hernandez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Ankeeta Mehta
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Eduardo Salas
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Philip E. Greilich
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Health System Chief Quality Office, Office of Undergraduate Medical Education, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Owolabi OO, Jordan PJ, Williams M, Ten Ham-Baloyi W. Strategies for the implementation of best practice guidelines in operating theatres: An integrative literature review. Health SA 2021; 26:1488. [PMID: 34230856 PMCID: PMC8252143 DOI: 10.4102/hsag.v26i0.1488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Best practice guidelines (BPGs) exist for operating theatre (OT), but strategies to implement them are lacking. To address the gap, an integrative review was undertaken to identify strategies which can be used to implement BPGs in OT. This article aimed to summarise the best existing literature in order to identify and describe strategies for the implementation of BPGs in OT. An extensive search was undertaken to include relevant literature from February 2005 to March 2020 using the following databases: CINAHL, Medline, Biomed Central, Academic Search Complete and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition (EBSCOhost) and the Cochrane library. This integrative literature review followed the methodology proposed by Whittemore and Knafl, namely: (1) identification of the research problem, (2) search of the literature, (3) evaluation of the data, (4) analysis of the data and (5) presentation of the results. On completion of the critical appraisal, 15 (n = 15) articles met the inclusion criteria and relevant data were synthesised. The review identified six strategies facilitating implementation of BPGs in OT, namely, communication, education materials and mass media, academic detailing, opinion leaders, audit and feedback, and teamwork and collaboration. The review validated strategies for the implementation of BPGs in OT. Implementation of BPGs is essential to both provide and improve patient care and to benefit health outcomes. This review is expected to contribute to the provision of strategies to implement BPGs in OT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olukemi O Owolabi
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
| | - Portia J Jordan
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Margaret Williams
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Wilma Ten Ham-Baloyi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Nelson Mandela University, Port Elizabeth, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Long J, Jowsey T, Garden A, Henderson K, Weller J. The flip side of speaking up: a new model to facilitate positive responses to speaking up in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125:1099-1106. [PMID: 32943191 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Speaking up is important for patient safety, but only if the concern raised is acknowledged and responded to appropriately. While the power to change the course of events rests with those in charge, research has focussed on supporting those in subordinate positions to speak up. We propose responsibility also rests with senior clinical staff to respond appropriately. We explored the perceptions of senior staff on being spoken up to in the operating theatre (OT), and factors moderating their response. METHODS We undertook interviews and focus groups of fully qualified surgeons, anaesthetists, nurses, and anaesthetic technicians working in OTs across New Zealand. We used grounded theory to analyse and interpret the data. RESULTS With data from 79 participants, we conceptualise three phases in the speaking up interaction: 1) the content of the speaker's message and the tone of delivery; 2) the message interpreted through the receiver's filters, including beliefs on personal fallibility and leadership, respect for the speaker, understanding the challenges of speaking up, and personal cultural and professional norms around communication; and 3) the receiver's subsequent response and its effects on the speaker, the observing OT staff, and patient care. CONCLUSIONS The speaking up interaction can be high stakes for the whole OT team. The receiver response can strengthen team cohesion and function, or cause distress and tension. Our grounded theory uncovers multiple influences on this interaction, with potential for re-framing and optimising the speaker/receiver interaction to improve team function and patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Long
- Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Tanisha Jowsey
- Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Alexander Garden
- Department of Anaesthesia, Capital and Coast Health, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Kaylene Henderson
- Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jennifer Weller
- Centre for Medical and Health Sciences Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Effective teamwork, both in and out of the operating room, is an essential component of safe and efficient surgical performance. There are multiple available assessment tools for evaluating teamwork and important contributors to teamwork such as safety culture and nontechnical skills. Multiple types of interventions exist to improve and train providers on teamwork, and many have been demonstrated to improve not only teamwork but also patient outcomes. Teamwork strategies can be adapted to different contexts, based on provider needs and resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akemi L Kawaguchi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 5.246, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Lillian S Kao
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.264, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|