Musculoskeletal care pathways for adults with hip and knee pain referred for specialist opinion: a systematic review

Osteoarthritis care and risk of total knee arthroplasty among medicare beneficiaries

OBJECTIVE

To examine health care utilization among patients with knee osteoarthritis and test if utilization differed among residents of regions with high and low rates of total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries in 2005 - 2010 with knee osteoarthritis. Health care utilization for knee complaints, including rates of physician visits, physical therapy, knee injections and arthroscopy were abstracted from claims files until TKA or the end of study in 2015. Utilization was compared among beneficiaries who lived in regions with high or low rates of TKA.

RESULTS

Among 988,570 beneficiaries with knee osteoarthritis, 327,499 beneficiaries (33.1%) had TKA during follow-up (median 5.6 years). Higher rates of visits for knee complaints were associated with increased risks of arthroplasty, while use of physical therapy, specialist care, and intra-articular treatments were associated with lower risks. Frequency of TKA varied from 26.4% in the lowest quintile region to 42.1% in the highest quintile. Rates of physician visits, physical therapy, specialist care, and use of intra-articular injections varied inversely with arthroplasty quintile. For example, physical therapy was used by 32.5% of beneficiaries in the lowest quintile region and 23.6% in the highest quintile region. Physical therapy was associated with lower TKA rates across all quintiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Dedicated non-surgical osteoarthritis care was infrequently used by elderly Americans with knee osteoarthritis. Non-surgical care was more common in regions with low rates of TKA, suggesting reciprocal emphasis on medical versus surgical treatment across regions.

National Referral Prioritization tool for first specialist assessment: results of a pilot study in orthopaedic surgery

BACKGROUND

Most public hospitals are receiving more referrals for first specialist assessment than they have capacity to see. Traditional priority categories are too broad for effective discrimination. In New Zealand (NZ) explicit prioritization is required by legislation and supported by the Medical Council of NZ. A new generic National Referral Prioritization tool (NRPT) has been developed which includes a patient impact on life score. This study reports its trial implementation in orthopaedic surgery in a single centre.

METHODS

Four months of referrals to the orthopaedic department were prioritized using the new NRPT and traditional clinical priority categories. Scores and acceptances were compared across conditions, surgeons and against the traditional categories.

RESULTS

The mean NRPT was 60.1 (range 23-99). The correlation with impact on life was 0.59. There was good consistency of scores between surgeons. The NRPT score was significantly different across clinical priority categories (urgent, semi-urgent, routine). A total of 305 referrals (49%) were accepted using the NRPT compared with 493 (79%) if the traditional tool had been used. Patients with foot and ankle, carpal tunnel syndrome and upper limb conditions had the lowest scores and were more likely to be declined.

CONCLUSIONS

The NRPT is the first tool designed to prioritize referral letters. It is more discriminating than the clinical priority categories used previously. It allows fine-tuning of a threshold score to balance acceptances and capacity.

Using routine referral data for patients with knee and hip pain to improve access to specialist care

Background

Referral letters from primary care contain a large amount of information that could be used to improve the appropriateness of the referral pathway for individuals seeking specialist opinion for knee or hip pain. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the content of the referral letters to identify information that can independently predict an optimal care pathway.

Methods

Using a prospective longitudinal design, a convenience sample of patients with hip or knee pain were recruited from orthopaedic, specialist general practice and advanced physiotherapy practitioner clinics. Individuals completed a Knee or hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score at initial consultation and after 6 months. Participant demographics, body mass index, medication and co-morbidity data were extracted from the referral letters. Free text of the referral letters was mapped automatically onto the Unified Medical Language System to identify relevant clinical variables. Treatment outcomes were extracted from the consultation letters. Each outcome was classified as being an optimal or sub-optimal pathway, where an optimal pathway was defined as the one that results in the right treatment at the right time. Logistic regression was used to identify variables that were independently associated with an optimal pathway.

Results

A total of 643 participants were recruited, 419 (66.7%) were classified as having an optimal pathway. Variables independently associated with having an optimal care pathway were lower body mass index (OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.0 p = 0.004), named disease or syndromes (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.8, p = 0.02) and taking pharmacologic substances (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0 to 3.3, p = 0.02). Having a single diagnostic procedure was associated with a suboptimal pathway (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.9 p < 0.001). Neither Knee nor Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome scores were associated with an optimal pathway. Body mass index was found to be a good predictor of patient rated function (coefficient − 0.8, 95% CI -1.1, − 0.4 p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Over 30% of patients followed sub-optimal care pathway, which represents potential inefficiency and wasted healthcare resource. A core data set including body mass index should be considered as this was a predictor of optimal care and patient rated pain and function.