Assessment of the use of Unna boot in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in adults: systematic review protocol

Fluorescence-Based Evaluation of Bacterial Load in Perilesional Skin: A Comparison Between Short Stretch Bandage and Zinc Oxide Bandage

Bacterial proliferation plays a well-known role in delayed tissue healing. To date, the presence of microorganisms on the wound bed can be detected by skin swabs or skin biopsies. A novel noninvasive fluorescence imaging device has recently allowed real-time detection of bacteria in different types of wounds through endogenous autofluorescence. The fluorescence signals detected by the device provide health workers with a visual indication of the presence, load, and distribution of bacteria. The aim of our study was to evaluate the level of bacterial colonization in perilesional skin of patients affected by venous leg ulcers treated with 2 different types of bandages: short stretch bandage and zinc oxide bandage. We conducted a monocentric prospective study, enrolling 30 patients with venous leg ulcers, divided into 2 groups: group A was treated with short stretch bandage and group B with zinc oxide bandage. A complete patient's assessment was performed once a week for 3 weeks. Levels of potentially harmful bacteria in perilesional skin were detected using a fluorescent device by 2 experienced operators on the frames taken at individual injuries, while pain was evaluated with the Numerical Rating Scale. After 3 weeks, we observed a reduction in the bacterial colonization levels of the perilesional skin by 68.67% for group A and 85.54% for group B. All the patients had a statistically significant reduction in bacterial load (P < .001), and a statistically significant difference was identified between the 2 groups (P = .043). No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of pain relief (P = .114). Our study demonstrated that the application of zinc oxide bandage provides a higher reduction in bacterial load perilesional skin. On the other hand, we found no difference between the 2 bandages in terms of pain symptom reduction.

Compression Therapy in Dermatology

Purpose of Review

The compression therapy provides valuable support during management of vascular and inflammatory lower leg skin disorders. The review outlines the mechanism of action and the treatment options available with indications for use in wound management and general dermatology.

Recent Findings

Atypical wounds such as pyoderma gangrenosum, cutaneous vasculitis and other inflammatory skin diseases may benefit from the use of compression therapy. Adherence to treatment is always a challenging aspects for patients and caregiver, but modern technologies and specific materials have improved the compliance during treatment.

Summary

Compression therapy is a main option in vascular ulcer management. The technology provided by different devices together with new methods of bandaging application have increased the outcomes and acceptability from patients. Physicians should be aware of the advantages provided by compression therapy in skin diseases.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of Unna boot in the treatment of venous leg ulcers

This systematic review determined the effectiveness of the Unna boot in the treatment of venous leg ulcers (VLUs) by assessing the quality of the available evidence. A systematic search of studies published between August 2019 and February 2020 was conducted using the PubMed, PubMed/PMC, BVS/BIREME, CINAHL, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, ProQuest, BDTD, CAPES Thesis and Dissertation, OPEN THESIS, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and SciELO databases. Studies were eligible if they reported primary studies, controlled clinical trials, quasi-experimental studies or observational studies (cross-sectional studies or cohort studies). We identified 302 articles. After screening and critical appraisal, eight articles were included in this review, while six articles were included in the meta-analysis. Four studies were included in the outcome of complete ulcer healing rate with a weighted estimate of the odds ratio of 0.43 (95% CI = 0.188-1.01). No evidence of the presence of considerable heterogeneity was observed (p = 0.35, I² = 32%). Two studies were assigned to the outcome time to complete ulcer healing (days) with a weighted estimated mean difference of 41.3 days (95% CI = 21.62-61.04). Evidence of the presence of considerable heterogeneity was observed (p = 0.01, I² = 85%). The results showed a moderate degree of evidence that there is no difference in the healing rates of VLUs with the use of the Unna boot. For the time to complete ulcer healing, the low number of studies and low classification impaired the reporting at any level of evidence.