1
|
Dukhanin V, Gamper MJ, Gleason KT, McDonald KM. Patient-reported outcome and experience domains for diagnostic excellence: a scoping review to inform future measure development. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-024-03709-w. [PMID: 38850395 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03709-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE "Diagnostic excellence," as a relatively new construct centered on the diagnostic process and its health-related outcomes, can be refined by patient reporting and its measurement. We aimed to explore the scope of patient-reported outcome (PRO) and patient-reported experience (PRE) domains that are diagnostically relevant, regardless of the future diagnosed condition, and to review the state of measurement of these patient-reported domains. METHODS We conducted an exploratory analysis to identify these domains by employing a scoping review supplemented with internal expert consultations, 24-member international expert convening, additional environmental scans, and the validation of the domains' diagnostic relevance via mapping these onto patient diagnostic journeys. We created a narrative bibliography of the domains illustrating them with existing measurement examples. RESULTS We identified 41 diagnostically relevant PRO and PRE domains. We classified 10 domains as PRO, 28 as PRE, and three as mixed PRO/PRE. Among these domains, 19 were captured in existing instruments, and 20 were captured only in qualitative studies. Two domains were conceptualized during this exploratory analysis with no examples identified of capturing these domains. For 27 domains, patients and care partners report on a specific encounter; for 14 domains, reporting relates to an entire diagnostic journey over time, which presents particular measurement opportunities and challenges. CONCLUSION The multitude of PRO and PRE domains, if measured rigorously, would allow the diagnostic excellence construct to evolve further and in a manner that is patient-centered, prospectively focused, and concentrates on effectiveness and efficiency of diagnostic care on patients' well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim Dukhanin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Suite 643, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | - Mary Jo Gamper
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kelly T Gleason
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kathryn M McDonald
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dukhanin V, McDonald KM, Gonzalez N, Gleason KT. Patient Reasoning: Patients' and Care Partners' Perceptions of Diagnostic Accuracy in Emergency Care. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:102-111. [PMID: 37965762 PMCID: PMC10712203 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231207829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the context of validating a measure of patient report specific to diagnostic accuracy in emergency department or urgent care, this study investigates patients' and care partners' perceptions of diagnoses as accurate and explores variations in how they reason while they assess accuracy. METHODS In February 2022, we surveyed a national panel of adults who had an emergency department or urgent care visit in the past month to test a patient-reported measure. As part of the survey validation, we asked for free-text responses about why the respondents indicated their (dis)agreement with 2 statements comprising patient-reported diagnostic accuracy: 1) the explanation they received of the health problem was true and 2) the explanation described what to expect of the health problem. Those paired free-text responses were qualitatively analyzed according to themes created inductively. RESULTS A total of 1,116 patients and care partners provided 982 responses coded into 10 themes, which were further grouped into 3 reasoning types. Almost one-third (32%) of respondents used only corroborative reasoning in assessing the accuracy of the health problem explanation (alignment of the explanation with either test results, patients' subsequent health trajectory, their medical knowledge, symptoms, or another doctor's opinion), 26% used only perception-based reasoning (perceptions of diagnostic process, uncertainty around the explanation received, or clinical team's attitudes), and 27% used both types of reasoning. The remaining 15% used general beliefs or nonexplicated logic (used only about accurate diagnoses) and combinations of general reasoning with perception-based and corroborative. CONCLUSIONS Patients and care partners used multifaceted reasoning in their assessment of diagnostic accuracy. IMPLICATIONS As health care shifts toward meaningful diagnostic co-production and shared decision making, in-depth understanding of variations in patient reasoning and mental models informs use in clinical practice. HIGHLIGHTS An analysis of 982 responses examined how patients and care partners reason about the accuracy of diagnoses they received in emergency or urgent care.In reasoning, people used their perception of the process and whether the diagnosis matched other factual information they have.We introduce "patient reasoning" in the diagnostic measurement context as an area of further research to inform diagnostic shared decision making and co-production of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vadim Dukhanin
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kathryn M. McDonald
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kenny K, Williams Veazey L, Broom A, Peterie M, Page A, Prainsack B, Wakefield CE, Itchins M, Khasraw M, Lwin Z. Hope in the era of precision oncology: a qualitative study of informal caregivers' experiences. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065753. [PMID: 37130677 PMCID: PMC10163471 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore informal caregivers' perspectives on precision medicine in cancer care. DESIGN Semi-structured interviews with the informal caregivers of people living with cancer and receiving targeted/immunotherapies. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically using a framework approach. SETTING Recruitment was facilitated by two hospitals and five Australian cancer community groups. PARTICIPANTS Informal caregivers (n=28; 16 men, 12 women; aged 18-80) of people living with cancer and receiving targeted/immunotherapies. RESULTS Thematic analysis identified three findings, centred largely on the pervasive theme of hope in relation to precision therapies including: (1) precision as a key component of caregivers' hope; (2) hope as a collective practice between patients, caregivers, clinicians and others, which entailed work and obligation for caregivers; and (3) hope as linked to expectations of further scientific progress, even if there may be no personal, immediate benefit. CONCLUSIONS Innovation and change in precision oncology are rapidly reconfiguring the parameters of hope for patients and caregivers, creating new and difficult relational moments and experiences in everyday life and in clinical encounters. In the context of a shifting therapeutic landscape, caregivers' experiences illustrate the need to understand hope as collectively produced, as emotional and moral labour, and as entangled in broader cultural expectations of medical advances. Such understandings may help clinicians as they guide patients and caregivers through the complexities of diagnosis, treatment, emerging evidence and possible futures in the precision era. Developing a better understanding of informal caregivers' experiences of caring for patients receiving precision therapies is important for improving support to patients and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Kenny
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies; School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Leah Williams Veazey
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies; School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alex Broom
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies; School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Peterie
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies; School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander Page
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies; School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Barbara Prainsack
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Claire E Wakefield
- Behavioural Sciences Unit, Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital Randwick, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Medicine and Health, Randwick Clinical Campus, Discipline of Paediatrics, UNSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Malinda Itchins
- Northern Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Zarnie Lwin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Velden NCA, Smets EMA, Hagedoorn M, Applebaum AJ, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, van Laarhoven HWM, Henselmans I. Patient-Caregiver Dyads' Prognostic Information Preferences and Perceptions in Advanced Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 65:442-455.e2. [PMID: 36731806 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prognostic information is considered important for advanced cancer patients and primary informal caregivers to prepare for the end of life. Little is known about discordance in patients' and caregivers' prognostic information preferences and prognostic perceptions, while such discordance complicates adaptive dyadic coping, clinical interactions and care plans. OBJECTIVES To investigate the extent of patient-caregiver discordance in prognostic information preferences and perceptions, and the factors associated with discordant prognostic perceptions. METHODS We conducted secondary analyses of a cross-sectional study (PROSPECT, 2019-2021). Advanced cancer patients (median overall survival ≤12 months) from seven Dutch hospitals and caregivers completed structured surveys (n = 412 dyads). RESULTS Seven percent of patient-caregiver dyads had discordant information preferences regarding the likelihood of cure; 24%-25% had discordant information preferences regarding mortality risk (5/2/1 year). Seventeen percent of dyads had discordant perceptions of the likelihood of cure; 12%-25% had discordant perceptions of mortality risk (5/2/1 year). Dyads with discordant prognostic information preferences (P < 0.05) and dyads in which patients reported better physical functioning (P < 0.01) were significantly more likely to perceive the one-year mortality risk discordantly. CONCLUSION Physicians should be sensitive to discordant prognostic information preferences and prognostic perceptions among patient-caregiver dyads in advanced cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi C A van der Velden
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (N.C.A.V., E.M.A.S, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health (N.C.A.V, E.M.A.S, B.D.O-P, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam (N.C.A.V., E.M.A.S, H.W.M.L, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (N.C.A.V., E.M.A.S, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health (N.C.A.V, E.M.A.S, B.D.O-P, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam (N.C.A.V., E.M.A.S, H.W.M.L, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mariët Hagedoorn
- Department of Health Psychology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen (M.H), The Netherlands
| | - Allison J Applebaum
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (A.J.A), New York, New York, USA
| | - Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
- Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health (N.C.A.V, E.M.A.S, B.D.O-P, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (B.D.O-P, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam (N.C.A.V., E.M.A.S, H.W.M.L, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam (H.W.M.L), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (N.C.A.V., E.M.A.S, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health (N.C.A.V, E.M.A.S, B.D.O-P, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam (N.C.A.V., E.M.A.S, H.W.M.L, I.H.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kirby E, Kenny K, Broom A, Lwin Z. Chronicity in/and cancer: a qualitative interview study of health professionals, patients, and family carers. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2022.2035319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Kirby
- Centre for Social Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Katherine Kenny
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alex Broom
- Sydney Centre for Healthy Societies, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Zarnie Lwin
- Cancer Care Services, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bell L, Anderson K, Girgis A, Aoun S, Cunningham J, Wakefield CE, Shahid S, Smith AB, Diaz A, Lindsay D, Masa A, Garvey G. "We Have to Be Strong Ourselves": Exploring the Support Needs of Informal Carers of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People with Cancer. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18147281. [PMID: 34299731 PMCID: PMC8303635 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Informal carers provide an important role in supporting people with cancer. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience higher cancer mortality than other Australians. To date, very little is known about the support needs of carers of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with cancer. This article explored these needs through a qualitative study. Twenty-two semi-structured qualitative interviews and one focus group were conducted with carers of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults with cancer (n = 12) and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer survivors (n = 15) from Queensland, Australia. Half of the carers interviewed were Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander Australians. Interviews were transcribed, coded and thematically analysed following an interpretive phenomenological approach. Thematic analysis of carer and survivor interviews revealed four key themes relating to carers’ needs: managing multiple responsibilities; maintaining the carer’s own health and wellbeing; accessing practical support and information; and engaging with the health system. Within these overarching themes, multiple needs were identified including specific needs relevant for carers of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, such as advocating for the patient; accessing Indigenous support services and health workers; and ensuring that the cultural needs of the person are recognised and respected. Identifying the needs of informal carers of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cancer patients will enable greater understanding of the support that carers require and inform the development of strategies to meet these areas of need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine Bell
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia; (K.A.); (J.C.); (A.D.); (D.L.); (A.M.); (G.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-7-3169-4206
| | - Kate Anderson
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia; (K.A.); (J.C.); (A.D.); (D.L.); (A.M.); (G.G.)
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia; (A.G.); (A.B.S.)
| | - Samar Aoun
- Public Health Palliative Care Unit, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia;
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Joan Cunningham
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia; (K.A.); (J.C.); (A.D.); (D.L.); (A.M.); (G.G.)
| | - Claire E. Wakefield
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia;
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Shaouli Shahid
- Centre for Aboriginal Studies, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia;
| | - Allan Ben Smith
- Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT), Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia; (A.G.); (A.B.S.)
| | - Abbey Diaz
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia; (K.A.); (J.C.); (A.D.); (D.L.); (A.M.); (G.G.)
| | - Daniel Lindsay
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia; (K.A.); (J.C.); (A.D.); (D.L.); (A.M.); (G.G.)
| | - Adam Masa
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia; (K.A.); (J.C.); (A.D.); (D.L.); (A.M.); (G.G.)
| | - Gail Garvey
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT 0810, Australia; (K.A.); (J.C.); (A.D.); (D.L.); (A.M.); (G.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The social meanings of choice in living-with advanced breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 2021; 280:114047. [PMID: 34090104 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Individual choice is valorised as a core social value; yet the necessity and desirability of making choices takes on new significance for people living with incurable cancer who are required to make often difficult decisions about treatment, care and family life, amidst considerable vulnerability and precariousness. There has been comparatively little exploration of how choice is negotiated and made meaningful under the spectre of incurability and a contracted future. In this paper, drawing on multiple qualitative interviews with 38 women with metastatic breast cancer, we explore how they experience and give meaning to choice in relation to their health (and beyond) in their daily lives. Our analysis highlights that while exercising choice was sometimes a concealed or silent pursuit, choice was always a socially negotiated and temporally unfolding process, nested within relational and interpersonal dynamics. Choices were also often constrained, even foreclosed, due to situational and relational dynamics. Yet even in the absence of choice, the idea of choice-as-control was discursively embraced by women. We argue that greater attention is needed to the affective, temporal and economic dimensions of choice, and how treatment decisions are asymmetrically structured when considered within the normative context of cancer.
Collapse
|