Observational non-randomised controlled evaluation of the effectiveness of cancer counselling centres: a study protocol

Effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives: a quasi-experimental evaluation of cancer counselling centres

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of brief psychosocial support for patients with cancer and their relatives regarding their mental health.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental controlled trial with measurements at three time points (baseline, after 2 weeks and after 12 weeks).

SETTING

The intervention group (IG) was recruited at two cancer counselling centres in Germany. The control group (CG) included patients with cancer or relatives who did not seek support.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, n=885 participants were recruited and n=459 were eligible for the analysis (IG, n=264; CG, n=195).

INTERVENTION

One to two psychosocial support sessions (approximately hour) provided by a psycho-oncologist or social worker.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was distress. The secondary outcomes were anxiety and depressive symptoms, well-being, cancer-specific and generic quality of life (QoL), self-efficacy and fatigue.

RESULTS

The linear mixed model analysis showed significant differences between IG and CG at follow-up for distress (d=0.36), p=0.001), depressive (d=0.22), p=0.005) and anxiety symptoms (d=0.22), p=0.003), well-being (d=0.26, p=0.002), QoL (QoL mental; d=0.26, p=0.003), self-efficacy (d=0.21, p=0.011) and QoL (global; d=0.27, p=0.009). The changes were not significant for QoL (physical; d=0.04, p=0.618), cancer-specific QoL (symptoms; d=0.13, p=0.093), cancer-specific QoL (functional; d=0.08, p=0.274) and fatigue (d=0.04, p=0.643).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that brief psychosocial support is associated with the improvement of mental health of patients with cancer and their relatives after 3 months.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00015516.

Associations between self-efficacy, distress and anxiety in cancer patient-relative dyads visiting psychosocial cancer support services: Using actor-partner interdependence modelling

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer and their relatives often suffer from psychosocial burdens following a cancer diagnosis. Psychosocial cancer support services offer support for cancer patients and their relatives. Only a few studies have focused on associations of psychological factors within patient-relative dyads. This study aims to assess associations between the patients' or relatives' self-efficacy and their levels of distress and anxiety who seek help together at psychosocial cancer support centres.

METHODS

Participants were recruited at two psychosocial cancer support centres in a major city in Germany. Patients with cancer and their relatives seeking support together received the questionnaire before their first support session. Self-efficacy was assessed with the Pearlin sense of mastery scale, distress with the distress thermometer and anxiety with the General Anxiety Disorder questionnaire (GAD-7). For the analysis, the actor-partner interdependence model was applied.

RESULTS

The data analysis was based on 41 patient-relative dyads (patients: 39% women, mean age 53.5; relatives: 66% women, mean age 52.16). A significant actor effect from self-efficacy to distress was found for patients (r = -0.47) but not for relatives (r = -0.15). Partner effects from self-efficacy to distress were not significant (r = -0.03, r = -0.001). The actor effect from self-efficacy to anxiety for patients (r = -0.61) as well as relatives was significant (r = -0.62), whereas the partner effect was significant for patients (r = 0.16) but not for relatives (r = -0.46).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that patients' and relatives' self-efficacy is associated with their distress and anxiety. Partner effects were visible for patients' self-efficacy and relatives' anxiety. These findings suggest that self-efficacy is an important factor for the psychological well-being of patients and relatives and that it may additionally be associated with the partners' well-being. Longitudinal research with larger samples is needed to support the findings.

Correlates of Psychological Distress in Patients With Cancer at a Psycho-oncology Clinic

BACKGROUND

Patients with cancer experience significant psychological distress. Most studies investigated individual risk factors for distress in their respective treatment setting, which limit generalizability of results or comparison of relative importance.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relation between psychological distress in patients referred to a psycho-oncology clinic and its correlates in a comprehensive manner.

METHOD

Medical charts of patients who visited the psycho-oncology clinic at a tertiary hospital from May 2019 to May 2020 were reviewed. Demographic, cancer-related, and psychiatric factors; health-related quality of life; and somatic pain were investigated. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, item 9 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, Present Pain Intensity, and Distress Thermometer were measured at the index visit. Simple and multiple linear regression analyses were performed with the Distress Thermometer score as a dependent variable.

RESULTS

A total of 454 patients were included. The univariate analyses showed age and physical, emotional, and functional well-being scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General were negatively associated with the Distress Thermometer scores, while female genital cancer, advanced disease, recent radiotherapy, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score, and the Present Pain Intensity score showed a positive relation. After adjusting for all other variables, female genital cancer (P = 0.027), anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (P < 0.001), the Present Pain Intensity (P = 0.002), and physical (P < 0.001) and functional (P = 0.019) well-being subscales of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General remained significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cancer who visited a psycho-oncology clinic experienced more distress if they had female genital cancer, low health-related quality of life score, severe anxiety, or somatic pain.