(Cost-)effectiveness of lower extremity nerve decompression surgery in subjects with diabetes: the DeCompression (DECO) trial-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Does Lower Extremity Nerve Decompression Surgery Improve Quality of Life?

BACKGROUND

Entrapment neuropathies are more prevalent in patients with diabetes than in healthy patients. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of lower extremity nerve decompression surgery on quality of life and clarify predictors of this surgical outcome and the incidence of surgical site problems.

METHODS

Patients who underwent lower extremity nerve decompression surgery between September of 2017 and March of 2019 were followed prospectively at the outpatient clinic of University Medical Center Utrecht. The common, superficial, and deep peroneal nerve and tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel and soleal sling were decompressed if an entrapment was diagnosed. The primary study outcome was quality of life as measured by the Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy questionnaire. Secondary outcomes of interest were change in Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument score, predictors of the Norfolk score at follow-up, and the occurrence of complications.

RESULTS

Sixty patients underwent surgery (45 unilateral, 15 bilateral), with a median postoperative follow-up of 13.0 months (interquartile range, 7.3 to 18.0 months). Quality of life improved significantly in this period of observation [baseline median, 46.0 (34.0 to 62.0) versus follow-up median, 37.0 (20.0 to 60.0); p = 0.011], as did Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument scores [7.0 (5.0 to 9.0) versus 3.0 (0.0 to 6.5); p < 0.01]. Predictors of quality of life were a higher baseline quality of life score [β, 0.59 ( p = 0.001)], longer follow-up time [β, 2.34 ( p < 0.001)], and hypertension [β, 16.38 ( p = 0.03)]. A total of 26.7 percent of patients had surgical site problems, including wound infections (18.3 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower extremity nerve decompression surgery significantly improves quality of life by reducing neuropathy symptoms in patients with lower extremity nerve compressions. Attention should be given to lowering the risk of wound complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

The Efficacy of Rehabilitation Nursing Interventions on Patients with Open Lower Limb Fractures

Objective

The study aims to analyze the efficacy of rehabilitation nursing interventions on patients with open lower limb fractures.

Methods

From June 2020, patients who received RNI (observation group) were included and compared with patients who received routine nursing interventions (control group). The efficacy of different nursing modes was compared with several indicators.

Results

One hundred patients were included in this study, 50 in each group. The baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. Regarding the emotional scores, the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score (26.98 vs 43.47), and Distress Management Screening Measure (DMSM) score (8.01 vs 12.85) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, both P < 0.05. Regarding the postoperative related indexes, the postoperative pain score (10.13 vs 15.53), fracture healing time (6.32 vs 10.86 weeks), and postoperative complications rate (0 vs 12%) in the observation group were all significantly lower than those in the control group, all P < 0.05. Regarding the quality of life scores, the WHOQOL-100 score (94.12 vs 83.13) and PSQI score (6.43 vs 10.36) were both significantly better in the observation group, with both P < 0.05.

Conclusion

Patients with open lower limbs who received RNI can help patients reduce postoperative anxiety and stress, promote postoperative rehabilitation and improve their quality of life.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Diabetes—A Comprehensive Review

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression neuropathy in the general population and is frequently encountered among individuals with type 1 and 2 diabetes. The reason(s) why a peripheral nerve trunk in individuals with diabetes is more susceptible to nerve compression is still not completely clarified, but both biochemical and structural changes in the peripheral nerve are probably implicated. In particular, individuals with neuropathy, irrespective of aetiology, have a higher risk of peripheral nerve compression disorders, as reflected among individuals with diabetic neuropathy. Diagnosis of CTS in individuals with diabetes should be carefully evaluated; detailed case history, thorough clinical examination, and electrophysiological examination is recommended. Individuals with diabetes and CTS benefit from surgery to the same extent as otherwise healthy individuals with CTS. In the present review, we describe pathophysiological aspects of the nerve compression disorder CTS in relation to diabetes, current data contributing to the explanation of the increased risk for CTS in individuals with diabetes, as well as diagnostic methods, treatment options, and prognosis of CTS in diabetes.

Advances in Interventional Therapies for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is one of the major complications of diabetes mellitus. It is often debilitating and refractory to pharmaceutical therapies. Our goal was to systematically review and evaluate the strength of evidence of interventional management options for PDN and make evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Llibrary and systematically reviewed all types of clinical studies on interventional management modalities for PDN.

RESULTS

We identified and analyzed 10 relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 8 systematic reviews/meta-analyses, and 5 observational studies of interventional modalities for PDN using pain as primary outcome. We assessed the risk of bias in grading of evidence and found that there is moderate to strong evidence to support the use of dorsal column spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in treating PDN in the lower extremities (evidence level: 1B+), while studies investigating its efficacy in the upper extremities are lacking. Evidence exists that acupuncture and injection of botulinum toxin-A provide relief in pain or muscle cramps due to PDN with minimal side effects (2B+/1B+). Similar level of evidence supports surgical decompression of lower limb peripheral nerves in patients with intractable PDN and superimposed nerve compression (2B±/1B+). Evidence for sympathetic blocks or neurolysis and dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation is limited to case series (2C+).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate to strong evidence exists to support the use of SCS in managing lower extremity pain in patients who have failed conventional medical management for PDN. Acupuncture or injection of botulinum toxin-A can be considered as an adjunctive therapy for PDN. Surgical decompression of peripheral nerves may be considered in patients with PDN superimposed with nerve compression. High-quality studies are warranted to further evaluate the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of interventional therapies for PDN.

Cost-Effectiveness of Lower Extremity Nerve Decompression Surgery in the Prevention of Ulcers and Amputations: A Markov Analysis

BACKGROUND

The costs and health effects associated with lower extremity complications in diabetes mellitus are an increasing burden to society. In selected patients, lower extremity nerve decompression is able to reduce symptoms of neuropathy and the concomitant risks of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations. To estimate the health and economic effects of this type of surgery, the cost-effectiveness of this intervention compared to current nonsurgical care was studied.

METHODS

To estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of lower extremity nerve decompression over a 10-year period, a Markov model was developed to simulate the onset and progression of diabetic foot disease in patients with diabetes and neuropathy who underwent lower extremity nerve decompression surgery, compared to a group undergoing current nonsurgical care. Mean survival time, health-related quality of life, presence or risk of lower extremity complications, and in-hospital costs were the outcome measures assessed. Data from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study were used as current care, complemented with information from international studies on the epidemiology of diabetic foot disease, resource use, and costs, to feed the model.

RESULTS

Lower extremity nerve decompression surgery resulted in improved life expectancy (88,369.5 life-years versus 86,513.6 life-years), gain of quality-adjusted life-years (67,652.5 versus 64,082.3), and reduced incidence of foot complications compared to current care (490 versus 1087). The incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was -€59,279.6 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, which is below the Dutch critical threshold of less than €80,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

CONCLUSIONS

Decompression surgery of lower extremity nerves improves survival, reduces diabetic foot complications, and is cost saving and cost-effective compared with current care, suggesting considerable socioeconomic benefit for society.